The Loudoun County Facility Standards Manual Public Review Committee (FSM PRC) met on October 27, 2025, to review floodplain amendments and a draft private road reserve fund letter. Note: the supplied meeting date is October 27, 2025, while the agenda and transcript reference October 16, 2025. The meeting included scheduled 3:15 p.m. floodplain discussions and a 4:30 p.m. reserve fund update.
It was real. I'd like to call it order the October 16th, 2025 facility standards manual public review committee meeting. Pursuant to Code of Virginia Section 2.2-3708.3. And in accordance with the Board of Supervisors' policies and procedures on advisory forms of commissions and committees dated October 6, 2022, and the May 16, 2023 PRC bylaws. Dave Bryant is participating in a meeting from a remote location in Reston, Virginia. And Matt Leslie is participating from a remote location in Roundfield, Virginia. It is not open to the public. Okay, so we did receive some edits from members. One edit I just made was to call us the FSM PRC. This is an official acronym change from County Administration. So we are no longer just the PRC or the FSM PRC, and it might take me years. I think that I'm officially putting in the minutes, so hopefully it'll fit. So that was one of the changes. Another change was here under the DOEAM update. It got a little confusing because we have a chair, the commission has a chair, and the recommendation was to say that the commission asked the FSMPRC chair about the deliberations on the DOEAM, and he reported that there was a healthy discussion. So that's just a clarifying change to figure out which chair was talking. Again, you see, I slipped in at the same PRC minutes. And then as I go down here, this edit was just to state that the floodway guidance was actually in presence distributed to the committee prior to the meeting to clarify that. And then if I keep going, this this bullet here, there were a couple statements made, and the we put in numbers to say that there were two distinct things. This is a kind of a big change. And FEMA indicated that all flood complaint must be treated as a floodway. And so I put the staff liaison on board at the FSMPRC on March 27th, 2015 FEMA letter provided as attachment to the July 18th, 2023 Board of Supervisor Staff report following the meeting. Just to clarify that that's where we found that. So that was just a clarification. And then I think so. The last one. Those are the changes to the minutes. Unless anybody else has any changes. Thank you to everybody instead of command. That's fine, but if anybody has any want to discuss you. Approved as edited. Second. Take a list of moving in, Derek. Second. Okay. Any further discussion? All in favor, please say aye. So you saw on our agenda. I guess there's two main items we're going to try to tackle today. And probably a very short presentation on the 10-year preserve fund. Oh, four than that. Okay. All right. Maybe it's working. All right. Maybe the thought on the floodway was uh staff was gonna reflect back on the floodway, flood fringe, floodplain, uh narrative. Um allow maybe some interaction. I don't really want that to go the interaction part of it to take too much of our time because we do at some point need to get back into the text. Doesn't mean that if we have questions while we're going through the text that we can't go back and discuss some of those things, but let's let's try not to make this a 45-minute debate back and forth. Um maybe 15-20 minutes or so, and then let's go to the text and like I said, if we have to go back and forth, I think we're happy to do that, but we'll try that on for size and see if so we did send out a couple staff reports after the meeting, had quite a few attachments, including the one I just referenced in the minutes to try to clarify how the county's floodplain is designated.