OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Loudoun County, Virginia/Commissions & Advisory Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Western Loudoun Rural Uses and Standards ZOAM Committee Meeting - September 16, 2026

Commissions & Advisory Boards — Wednesday, September 16, 2026
BodyLoudoun County, Virginia
SessionCommissions & Advisory Boards
DateWednesday, September 16, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 4:45:24

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:03

Are we all present?

0:05

Everybody ready?

0:15

Okay, guys, you're gonna call us to order at 5 06.

0:19

So we're too late getting started tonight.

0:23

Um tonight's meeting will occur in the following order.

0:27

Uh the committee will adopt the um meeting summary from the August 24th meeting, which I hope everybody had a chance to review.

0:35

Um committee members can provide disclosures.

0:38

Um I will propose the rehearing of a motion.

0:42

We'll talk about that.

0:43

Staff will provide their introductory presentation beginning with comments from the county attorney's office.

0:48

Then the committee members will have two minutes each to ask staff questions.

0:53

Um following questions, we'll go through the six topics we have for tonight.

0:57

Um staff is detailed in the item.

0:59

Um staff's gonna introduce the topic and we'll hold a 20-minute committee of the whole with two-minute timer for each committee member at the end of the 20 minutes.

1:07

I'll call for a motion.

1:09

Um, the committee will debate the motion, then vote on the motion before moving on to the next topic.

1:14

And we'll proceed in the same manner.

1:16

Uh ready to get started.

1:21

All right.

1:22

Um do I have a motion on the meeting summary from August 24th from anyone?

1:28

I have um uh changes before do I have a motion first?

1:32

Then we can talk about it.

1:34

I don't want to adopt it because I want changes to make changes.

1:42

Okay, I'll make a motion so we can amend it.

1:52

Oh, okay.

1:52

I said I'll make it a question.

1:55

Okay, there we go.

2:01

Did you have amendments?

2:02

Yes.

2:03

So on page two.

2:06

Um the question that I had asked was a question in regarding of the um regulations that the county can regulate when it comes to um the right to farm act, and you're using a raw private farms and the right they have, and Betsy came forward and addressed that when it's a private farm with agriculture use, those buildings are exempt from the code.

2:31

That wasn't reflected at all in the minutes, and in fact, what was a turned around to say that it was a discussion about legal format, and that we did um so I would like to have that added in the to the minutes.

2:45

Um that's actually on page three.

2:47

I'm sorry I skipped ahead.

2:49

It wasn't a question about legality, and that was outside of our scope.

2:54

It was a question about the regulations and are we allowed to regulate it.

2:58

Um on page two.

3:01

Um Judy had brought forward that we that the staff couldn't do um what I had suggested about doing the separation of the packets.

3:09

So we basically just that kind of laid on the table.

3:13

Um and so I wanted to make sure that was just simply clear because there wasn't really a debate about anything of it.

3:21

We just agreed that the staff couldn't do it because of constraints, and that was fine on page four, and this is where I think it's very important.

3:32

Obviously, um we need to make sure that the chair is recognizing and acknowledging out loud who the who the person that made the motion is and who the person is seconded, because obviously who's ever recording is not picking up the seconds.

3:45

Um, and so it's important to make sure that we're doing that because on page four under motion number three saw mills.

3:52

Um it says that the second identified, you know, wasn't they couldn't identify it here so on the recording.

3:58

So we need to make sure for the records that we're doing that.

4:02

Um then you want me to do the next one or you want to do you can do it.

4:08

Then on page five again.

4:11

Um I don't think that um Mr.

4:16

Malone was arguing.

4:18

Um I think he was discussing or debating.

4:22

I think when we use the word argue, it makes it seems like we're combative, and I don't think any of us in this way.

4:27

I mean, we all have the right to discuss debate, whatever.

4:31

Um, but I think that's a little misleading when we start using strong language like um argued, and then on page, I just lost it.

4:45

Um, I haven't gotten it yet on page nine.

4:53

Um we have where um Stacy Metcalf simply was informing us uh um the um position of the equine and everything and having discussion about that.

5:06

And it says Ms.

5:06

Miskav argued 0.0 departs from board directions.

5:12

I mean she discussed it, she she mentioned it, whatever, but she didn't argue again.

5:16

That's a commentary.

5:17

Um, and I think it's important that we not get into the point that we're using commentaries in when it's a reporting minutes.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning Regulations█████████████████████████████████████████████45%
Agricultural Operations█████████████████████████25%
Procedural█████████9%
Zoning Ordinance██████6%
Miscellaneous██████6%
Right To Farm Act██2%
Parking Regulations██2%
Lodging Regulations█1%
Noise Pollution█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Western Loudoun Rural Uses and Standards ZOAM Committee Meeting - September 16, 2026

The Planning Commission/Zoning Ordinance Committee's Western Loudoun Ad Hoc Committee met on September 16, 2026, to discuss and vote on a series of zoning ordinance amendments related to Western Loudoun rural uses and standards, including lodging uses (bed and breakfasts, country inns), guest farm or ranch, farm worker housing (seasonal labor dormitories, tenant dwellings, movable tenant dwellings), and seasonal agricultural worker camps. The committee reviewed staff-proposed language, debated whether it reflected board direction, and passed numerous motions with recommendations for the Planning Commission.

Consent Calendar

  • Adoption of Meeting Summary (August 24, 2026): Approved unanimously after amendments to correct language (e.g., replacing "argued" with "discussed") and ensure proper identification of motion makers and seconds.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No public testimony was presented; committee disclosures included meetings with wineries associations, farm bureau, and private citizens.

Discussion Items

  • Bed and Breakfast Homestays, Inn, Country Inns, and Private Parties: The committee found the draft language generally consistent with board direction (motions 19, 21, 23-26, 56) by a 5-4 vote. Separate votes approved: (1) expanding proof-of-operation options for lodging uses (unanimous); (2) confirming field parking on land owned/operated by the lodging operator (unanimous); (3) aligning outdoor music cutoff with permitted hours and referencing the noise ordinance (unanimous); (4) allowing amendment of annual private party zoning permits without new fee (unanimous); (5) recommending that the board reconsider motion 24 (comprehensive standards table) (unanimous). A motion to increase field parking setbacks to 60 feet for B&B uses was tabled for further study.
  • Guest Farm or Ranch: The committee unanimously agreed the staff language reflects board direction (motion 39) and added a recommendation that minimum parcel size be 20 acres for up to 10 guest rooms and 40 acres for up to 20 rooms (unanimous). An additional motion provided that the use is subordinate to and ceases upon discontinuance of the agricultural operation (unanimous). A friendly amendment to add a reconciliation clause was not accepted but noted for future discussion.
  • Seasonal Labor Dormitories: Unanimously approved that staff language reflects board direction (motion 36, reducing square footage from 200 to 100 sq ft and allowing income from any county ag operation). A subsequent motion added that residents must derive a majority of their hours from agricultural labor during occupancy (unanimous after amendment).
  • Tenant Dwellings: Approved that draft text reflects board directions (motions 46 and 47) by a 7-1 vote (one opposed). The committee then passed: (1) a five-year self-certification renewal without fee (7-2) instead of the proposed three-year zoning permit renewal; (2) confirmation that compacted gravel satisfies the dust-free parking surface requirement (unanimous). Scrivener's errors (e.g., explicit prohibition on short-term rentals) were noted for correction.
  • Movable Tenant Dwellings: After debate, the committee voted 6-2 to include self-powered units (RVs and tiny houses on wheels) in the definition, directing staff to incorporate this change. An additional motion (unanimous) removed the Virginia-only license restriction, allowing any U.S. state registration. Minor corrections (e.g., "should" to "shall", placeholder zoning districts) were added as friendly amendments.
  • Seasonal Agricultural Worker Camp: Unanimously agreed that staff language meets board direction (motion 49). The committee then voted 6-2 (with one member absent) to keep this use separate from seasonal labor dormitories, noting differences in health department permitting and family occupancy.

Key Outcomes

  • Adopted: Meeting summary of August 24, 2026 (unanimous).
  • Approved (with recommendations to Planning Commission): All lodging, guest farm, and farm worker housing provisions as amended, with specific votes as noted.
  • Deferred: Proposal to increase field parking setbacks for B&B uses (to be revisited at wrap-up meeting).
  • Noted: Scrivener's errors to be corrected; committee will revisit certain items on November 9, 2026, to harmonize with agritourism discussions.

Meeting Transcript

Are we all present? Everybody ready? Okay, guys, you're gonna call us to order at 5 06. So we're too late getting started tonight. Um tonight's meeting will occur in the following order. Uh the committee will adopt the um meeting summary from the August 24th meeting, which I hope everybody had a chance to review. Um committee members can provide disclosures. Um I will propose the rehearing of a motion. We'll talk about that. Staff will provide their introductory presentation beginning with comments from the county attorney's office. Then the committee members will have two minutes each to ask staff questions. Um following questions, we'll go through the six topics we have for tonight. Um staff is detailed in the item. Um staff's gonna introduce the topic and we'll hold a 20-minute committee of the whole with two-minute timer for each committee member at the end of the 20 minutes. I'll call for a motion. Um, the committee will debate the motion, then vote on the motion before moving on to the next topic. And we'll proceed in the same manner. Uh ready to get started. All right. Um do I have a motion on the meeting summary from August 24th from anyone? I have um uh changes before do I have a motion first? Then we can talk about it. I don't want to adopt it because I want changes to make changes. Okay, I'll make a motion so we can amend it. Oh, okay. I said I'll make it a question. Okay, there we go. Did you have amendments? Yes. So on page two. Um the question that I had asked was a question in regarding of the um regulations that the county can regulate when it comes to um the right to farm act, and you're using a raw private farms and the right they have, and Betsy came forward and addressed that when it's a private farm with agriculture use, those buildings are exempt from the code. That wasn't reflected at all in the minutes, and in fact, what was a turned around to say that it was a discussion about legal format, and that we did um so I would like to have that added in the to the minutes. Um that's actually on page three. I'm sorry I skipped ahead. It wasn't a question about legality, and that was outside of our scope. It was a question about the regulations and are we allowed to regulate it. Um on page two. Um Judy had brought forward that we that the staff couldn't do um what I had suggested about doing the separation of the packets. So we basically just that kind of laid on the table. Um and so I wanted to make sure that was just simply clear because there wasn't really a debate about anything of it. We just agreed that the staff couldn't do it because of constraints, and that was fine on page four, and this is where I think it's very important. Obviously, um we need to make sure that the chair is recognizing and acknowledging out loud who the who the person that made the motion is and who the person is seconded, because obviously who's ever recording is not picking up the seconds. Um, and so it's important to make sure that we're doing that because on page four under motion number three saw mills. Um it says that the second identified, you know, wasn't they couldn't identify it here so on the recording. So we need to make sure for the records that we're doing that. Um then you want me to do the next one or you want to do you can do it. Then on page five again. Um I don't think that um Mr. Malone was arguing. Um I think he was discussing or debating.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com