OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Loudoun County, Virginia/Commissions & Advisory Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Loudoun County FSM Public Review Committee Meeting – September 25, 2026

Commissions & Advisory Boards — Friday, September 25, 2026
BodyLoudoun County, Virginia
SessionCommissions & Advisory Boards
DateFriday, September 25, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:49:32

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:13

Thanks everyone for joining us today.

0:15

I'd like to call to order the September 10th, 2026 Facility Standards Manual Public Review Committee meeting.

0:22

No members are participating remotely and committee members disclosed that they are members of one or more affected groups and their respective declarations of interest

Unassigned speaker

0:31

are

Speaker 1

0:31

kept on file in the minutes of the facility standards manual public review committee.

0:37

Um before we jump into administrative things, we have a new committee member,

Unassigned speaker

0:44

Mr.

Speaker 1

0:44

Veltree.

0:45

Thank you for joining us today.

Unassigned speaker

0:47

I don't

Speaker 1

0:48

know if you want to give a brief introduction to who you are, so everybody knows.

0:51

Oh, sure.

0:52

Uh hi everyone, I'm Patrick Valdry.

0:54

Um I'm

Speaker 2

0:55

currently working uh at Bowman Consulting, but I'm within the industry and actually in Lounge County for 25 years now, I would say.

Unassigned speaker

1:04

Yeah, but yeah,

Speaker 2

1:05

glad

Speaker 1

1:06

to be here and hope to get up to speed on everything.

1:09

You'll have a lot of fun, I'm

Unassigned speaker

1:11

sure.

Unassigned speaker

1:13

All

Speaker 3

1:14

right.

1:14

Um

Unassigned speaker

1:16

just

Speaker 1

1:16

the next thing is uh our minutes from the July 16th meeting.

1:23

Everybody remembers that, right?

Speaker 4

1:25

Oh, yeah.

Speaker 1

1:26

Very reasonable.

Unassigned speaker

1:29

That

Speaker 4

1:29

was an all-virtual meeting.

1:30

Do you want me to do a walk in?

1:32

Yeah,

Speaker 5

1:32

please.

1:32

Just a brief you have to okay.

Speaker 4

1:34

I'll just do a quick walkthrough.

1:35

So that was an all-virtual meeting for us.

1:37

Uh we talked about the affordable dwelling unit written agreement.

1:41

Adrian Buena Vista from the County Attorney's Office came and spoke about that.

1:45

Uh, I do have an update on that.

1:49

She made some revisions to that agreement based on the discussion at committee.

1:54

Um, one of which uh being the ability to release the applicant from the agreement and the terms for release, because that was one of the things the committee asked

Unassigned speaker

2:04

for.

Speaker 4

2:04

So she's made some edits.

2:06

Um, it is now in Teresa Miller's hands, the zoning administrator, because she's going to do a zoning advisory opinion to release that template.

2:16

So that's kind of where we are.

2:17

But this was the discussion about

Unassigned speaker

2:20

the

Speaker 4

2:20

input that you all provided on that ADU written agreement.

2:24

And then we talked about gated communities.

2:27

So we were coming out of work group at that time.

2:31

We had a pretty detailed discussion on how the gate work group came up with the gated community edits and committee provided input on those.

2:43

And then we talked about the fact that Zeb was leaving

Unassigned speaker

2:46

us.

Speaker 4

2:49

Um and then we adjourned the meeting a little bit early.

Speaker 1

2:53

Very

Unassigned speaker

2:54

good.

Speaker 1

2:54

Any uh suggested amendments or edits to the minutes, and if there's not any, I'd appreciate a motion to approve.

3:04

So moved.

Unassigned speaker

3:05

Thank

Speaker 1

3:05

you, Elizabeth.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Archaeological Survey█████████████████████████████████████37%
Wetland Management███████████11%
Procedural██████████10%
Stormwater Management██████████10%
Fire Apparatus Access███████7%
Easement Regulations█████5%
Gabion Basket Maintenance█████5%
Zoning Regulations███3%
Gated Communities██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Loudoun County Facility Standards Manual Public Review Committee Meeting – September 25, 2026

Note: The agenda and raw transcript refer to this meeting as occurring on September 10, 2026. The date provided for this summary is September 25, 2026, per user instruction. The discrepancy is noted for accuracy.

The meeting was called to order with a new member, Patrick Valdry (Bowman Consulting), introduced. Administrative items included approval of the July 16, 2026 minutes and a brief update on Plan Clearance Tech Memo (no progress, awaiting County Attorney input). The committee then discussed three major amendment packages (FAAR Shoulders, Gated Communities, and Cultural Resources) and received a presentation on the Gabion Basket Study.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of July 16, 2026 Minutes: Moved by Elizabeth, seconded, all in favor (ayes). Drew abstained; Patrick Valdry also abstained as he did not attend that meeting.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • None were offered during the meeting.

Discussion Items

  • Plan Clearance Tech Memo Update: Staff reported no new information; the update remains pending additional input from the County Attorney’s Office. One committee member mentioned a plan clearance had been requested for a project.
  • FAAR Shoulders (Fire Access Road Amendments): Fire Marshal Dan Irley presented cleanup edits to footnotes in roadway tables (Category A and C) regarding shoulder width. The revision clarifies that shoulders may count toward the 20-foot minimum unobstructed width for fire apparatus access only if the surface material (gravel or pavement) is extended into the shoulder, consistent with Section 4810B. Committee expressed concern about potential misinterpretation but accepted the edits. Next step: October Planning Commission public hearing; effective date anticipated January 1, 2027.
  • Gated Communities: Staff introduced a minor change to allow the director or designee to approve alternate methods for queuing analysis, with the criterion that the method be equivalent to the specified manual. Committee had no objections. Next step: agency referral for comment, then return to committee.
  • Cultural Resources Amendments (Chapters 7 & 8): Staff walked through numerous cleanup edits (highlighted in yellow, blue, and red). Notable changes included:
    • Replacing “subsurface disturbance” with “land disturbance” for consistency.
    • Broadening “building” to “structure” (more inclusive).
    • Inserting “human” before cemeteries, burial grounds, and graves to align with zoning ordinance.
    • Clarifying that reconnaissance surveys are always required for areas not subject to a Phase I survey (cannot be waived).
    • Updating language on previously developed parcels to allow desktop review vs. requiring grading permits. Committee debated specific terms (e.g., “testing area” vs. “shovel test pits”, “residential lots” vs. “lots with residential uses”) and agreed to keep most edits. No formal vote; staff will incorporate feedback and send to agency referral.
  • Gabion Basket Study: Chris Stone (Journal Services) presented findings from 16 sampled sites. None had PVC-coated wire; galvanized baskets failed due to site-specific conditions (standing water, high chlorides from de-icing salts). Recommendations: avoid gabions in wet environments, consider alternatives (earth and berm, sheet pile, cast-in-place concrete, stacked riprap). Committee discussed feasibility of stacked stone, potential volume credits, and maintenance ease. No decisions made; Chris will return at the October 1 meeting with draft FSM language.

Key Outcomes

  • July 16 minutes approved.
  • FAAR Shoulders amendments to proceed to October Planning Commission public hearing.
  • Gated Communities amendments to proceed to agency referral.
  • Cultural Resources amendments to be revised and sent for agency referral.
  • Gabion Basket Study: Draft FSM language expected at October 1, 2026 meeting.
  • Next meetings: October 1 (Dulles Room) and October 15 (Dulles Room), 2026.

Meeting Transcript

Thanks everyone for joining us today. I'd like to call to order the September 10th, 2026 Facility Standards Manual Public Review Committee meeting. No members are participating remotely and committee members disclosed that they are members of one or more affected groups and their respective declarations of interest are kept on file in the minutes of the facility standards manual public review committee. Um before we jump into administrative things, we have a new committee member, Mr. Veltree. Thank you for joining us today. I don't know if you want to give a brief introduction to who you are, so everybody knows. Oh, sure. Uh hi everyone, I'm Patrick Valdry. Um I'm currently working uh at Bowman Consulting, but I'm within the industry and actually in Lounge County for 25 years now, I would say. Yeah, but yeah, glad to be here and hope to get up to speed on everything. You'll have a lot of fun, I'm sure. All right. Um just the next thing is uh our minutes from the July 16th meeting. Everybody remembers that, right? Oh, yeah. Very reasonable. That was an all-virtual meeting. Do you want me to do a walk in? Yeah, please. Just a brief you have to okay. I'll just do a quick walkthrough. So that was an all-virtual meeting for us. Uh we talked about the affordable dwelling unit written agreement. Adrian Buena Vista from the County Attorney's Office came and spoke about that. Uh, I do have an update on that. She made some revisions to that agreement based on the discussion at committee. Um, one of which uh being the ability to release the applicant from the agreement and the terms for release, because that was one of the things the committee asked for. So she's made some edits. Um, it is now in Teresa Miller's hands, the zoning administrator, because she's going to do a zoning advisory opinion to release that template. So that's kind of where we are. But this was the discussion about the input that you all provided on that ADU written agreement. And then we talked about gated communities. So we were coming out of work group at that time.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com