OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Loudoun County, Virginia/Commissions & Advisory Boards
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Loudoun County Heritage Commission Land Use Subcommittee Meeting - October 7, 2026

Commissions & Advisory Boards — Wednesday, October 7, 2026
BodyLoudoun County, Virginia
SessionCommissions & Advisory Boards
DateWednesday, October 7, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 50:11

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:02

George Lambert standing as a visitor, but also member of the commission.

Unassigned speaker

0:06

Thank

Speaker 2

0:06

you.

0:07

And Emily Johnson.

0:08

And we will be giving me.

0:12

Stephen Thompson is here as well, not to be overlooked.

0:17

He's a member of the staff.

0:18

Right.

0:22

We've been discussing briefly the weather and the white paper of the for data centers, which will be presented by the land use committee only as a vehicle to presentation.

0:42

It is not a land use object.

0:45

It is simply a vehicle of vehicle to present it.

1:05

Appreciate it.

1:08

And we um we already have a couple of amendments that we are thinking of for the white paper.

1:18

Those are a little more discussion of employment.

1:32

And can we include another paragraph on Lady's chair centers can help preserve open spellets and help to reverse the tide on the loss of open spaces?

1:46

And can we include a graph on studying a way to leverage the goodwill of the data center community?

1:55

And do I have that too much straight?

Speaker 3

1:58

For historic preservation.

2:00

Okay.

2:01

And you may have some thoughts on that because I know the yeah, in terms of some of the things that the PEC has done on looking at it, is there wills that grants or things that the data centers can put out that can all put land and conservation easement.

2:17

I I didn't know the right language to put there.

Speaker 4

2:19

That's a good question.

2:20

Like how do we incentivize the ones that we have here?

2:23

And

Unassigned speaker

2:24

I

Speaker 4

2:24

don't know the answer to that.

2:26

Um I

Speaker 3

2:27

don't know if any ad incentivize the ones that are here, the ones that are in the pipeline.

2:32

That's what I'm saying about the pipeline.

Speaker 4

2:34

Because I think it's worth raising, you know, how do we work more with the ones that are here as well.

2:40

And I don't know if you want to include

Unassigned speaker

2:43

that

Speaker 4

2:43

in the white paper, but I know it's something that they'll be talking about with the data center standards process.

2:48

Yes, because a lot of those regulations are starting to be coming late, given how many data centers we have.

2:56

And so it will

Speaker 3

2:58

be a conversation about the ones that

Speaker 4

3:00

are here.

Speaker 3

3:00

You know, what does

Speaker 4

3:02

continuing partner look like and then can we do or even for ones that are on the ground?

3:08

And if that conversation's happening, it'd be worth raising this as part of that.

3:12

I hope it is.

3:13

And the the open

Speaker 3

3:15

houses for schedule, the 28th and the 30th.

3:17

Did you go to

Speaker 4

3:18

those?

3:18

I did go.

3:19

I did go.

3:19

It was um a lot about presenting concepts to the community.

3:24

Uh making sure that people have the language down to understand what is a microgrid, what is a substation, um, you know, a transmission line versus a distribution line, and making sure that people have the terminology to engage in the discussions.

3:41

It was not a presentation directly of the changes they are proposing.

3:47

Um in some cases the changes that they are not proposing.

3:51

Currently, they haven't changed setback requirements on some things.

3:55

So I

Unassigned speaker

3:56

think

Speaker 4

3:57

the community's gonna need to continue to be engaged in actually what regulations are changing, but the way those were formatted was to give them the language.

Unassigned speaker

4:07

I

Speaker 2

4:08

mean, we what I'm hoping that these documents get to is the fact that there has to be

Unassigned speaker

4:16

a

Speaker 2

4:16

uh a higher level of communication with the community about what's going on and what's needed for the future and what bring in a higher level of information um to to even to the board of supervisors from outside sources and uh and it I don't think that we should, I don't believe that the bullets that are there of the paragraphs are there should be the be all and end all.

4:51

I think there should be you know I think I don't think we have to be comprehensive.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Historic Preservation█████████████████████████████████████████41%
Data Center Development█████████████████████████████29%
Public Engagement█████████9%
Land Use Planning████████8%
Transportation Land Use Committee██████6%
Public Records Management████4%
Procedural███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Loudoun County Heritage Commission Land Use Subcommittee Meeting - October 7, 2026

The Land Use Subcommittee of the Loudoun County Heritage Commission met to review pending applications and craft the commission's position on data center development. Key discussions centered on the Lucketts Bypass compromise, the Data Center White Paper strategy, and updates on several other land use cases.

Note on Meeting Date:

The agenda for this meeting listed the date as October 5, 2026, while the official timestamp for the record is October 7, 2026.

Discussion Items

Heritage Commission Data Center Position

  • Commissioners reviewed proposed amendments to the Data Center White Paper, including adding language on leveraging the goodwill of the data center industry for historic preservation and incentivizing existing data centers.
  • A significant point of debate was the exact number of data centers in Loudoun. The white paper used "more than 260", County Chair Randall cited 257 with 17 in the pipeline, a county fact sheet listed 233, and the data center dashboard showed 210. The subcommittee agreed to attribute the figure to the chair or use a conservative estimate.
  • Members expressed frustration that recent public information meetings on data center standards did not address heritage concerns. The subcommittee devised a two-track strategy: have Commissioner Gene present the commission's letter to the Board of Supervisors, and have individual commissioners ask their respective supervisors to raise specific questions during the December Board information item.
  • Specific policy concerns included the lack of setback requirements for data centers from historic resources, the cumulative pollution impacts, and the destruction of historic sites like the Tippett's Hill cemetery setting and the old Ox Road roadbed.
  • The subcommittee decided to first follow up with Bill Joffrey, the project manager for the data center standards, on questions left unanswered from an August presentation before formally escalating issues to the Board of Supervisors.

Lucketts Bypass (Route 15)

  • Commissioners received a detailed update on the county's plan for Route 15. The plan has shifted from a $300 million, 70-property-capturing large bypass to a two-lane "mini-bypass" around the village of Lucketts.
  • While a win for historic preservation by maintaining the rural character and avoiding extensive takings, the mini-bypass would take 10 acres from the JK Black Wildlife Sanctuary, a globally rare wetland. A member noted Tom of the Wildlife Conservancy's characterization of it as "a compromise, but it is still a devastating compromise."
  • The subcommittee agreed to contact the Wildlife Conservancy to determine if a joint letter of support from the Heritage Commission would be helpful, emphasizing alignment with other conservation groups.

Micki Gordon Park Plans

  • Commissioners considered the park plans resolved. The ballpark has been preserved, and the previously controversial lighting issue has been addressed. The item was removed from the active agenda.

Paris Mountain Application

  • The site plan remains stalled as the applicant contests the county's determination that a special exception is required. Commissioners criticized the archaeological survey for failing to align the study area with the limits of disturbance and for omitting metal detection on a known battlefield.

Spoonbill Facilities

  • Spoonbill Storage Facility: Archaeology is progressing, but the applicant is contesting a county determination that a zoning map amendment is needed.
  • Spoonbill Energy Storage: The subcommittee was directed by Supervisor Laura Teer's office to not send any letter regarding this application. The matter has been referred to the County Manager, leaving the commission in a holding pattern.

National Conference Center

  • The application for housing and demolition is inactive at the request of the developer. A Phase II significance evaluation of the historic building is ongoing.

Spring Valley Tech Park

  • The proposal, recommended for denial by the Planning Commission, has been deferred from its scheduled October 14 Board of Supervisors hearing. Commissioners noted the threat a data center would pose to the transition character and setting of the adjacent LZ Cemetery.

Key Outcomes

  • Data Center White Paper: Subcommittee will introduce amendments, follow up with Bill Joffrey, and time a formal letter to the Board of Supervisors for its December information item.
  • Lucketts Bypass: Staff will contact the Wildlife Conservancy to explore a joint letter.
  • Micki Gordon Park: Removed from the active agenda.
  • Spoonbill Energy Storage: Letter placed on indefinite hold per Supervisor Teer's office.
  • Paris Mountain: Commission will provide formal comments during the special exception process.
  • The meeting was adjourned following the conclusion of agenda items.

Meeting Transcript

George Lambert standing as a visitor, but also member of the commission. Thank you. And Emily Johnson. And we will be giving me. Stephen Thompson is here as well, not to be overlooked. He's a member of the staff. Right. We've been discussing briefly the weather and the white paper of the for data centers, which will be presented by the land use committee only as a vehicle to presentation. It is not a land use object. It is simply a vehicle of vehicle to present it. Appreciate it. And we um we already have a couple of amendments that we are thinking of for the white paper. Those are a little more discussion of employment. And can we include another paragraph on Lady's chair centers can help preserve open spellets and help to reverse the tide on the loss of open spaces? And can we include a graph on studying a way to leverage the goodwill of the data center community? And do I have that too much straight? For historic preservation. Okay. And you may have some thoughts on that because I know the yeah, in terms of some of the things that the PEC has done on looking at it, is there wills that grants or things that the data centers can put out that can all put land and conservation easement. I I didn't know the right language to put there. That's a good question. Like how do we incentivize the ones that we have here? And I don't know the answer to that. Um I don't know if any ad incentivize the ones that are here, the ones that are in the pipeline. That's what I'm saying about the pipeline. Because I think it's worth raising, you know, how do we work more with the ones that are here as well. And I don't know if you want to include that in the white paper, but I know it's something that they'll be talking about with the data center standards process. Yes, because a lot of those regulations are starting to be coming late, given how many data centers we have. And so it will be a conversation about the ones that are here. You know, what does continuing partner look like and then can we do or even for ones that are on the ground? And if that conversation's happening, it'd be worth raising this as part of that. I hope it is. And the the open houses for schedule, the 28th and the 30th. Did you go to those? I did go. I did go. It was um a lot about presenting concepts to the community. Uh making sure that people have the language down to understand what is a microgrid, what is a substation, um, you know, a transmission line versus a distribution line, and making sure that people have the terminology to engage in the discussions. It was not a presentation directly of the changes they are proposing.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com