STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The work session covered business briefings on a rezoning proposal and board appointments, followed by updates on the winter warming shelter, child protective services, kinship care, and downtown infrastructure and safety. Council members also discussed community concerns including deer overpopulation, open burning regulations, and street lighting.
The wind of binder. Thank you. Mayor, Vice Mayor, members of the city council. Today's work session. We have a couple of business item briefings wherein will the staff will uh do their best to uh get you informed about an impending vote that will not happen today will happen subsequent. Um work session agenda items. Uh we have a warming and shelter update uh that will be kind of spearheaded by Kent, and you know, we're heading in let's let's you know hope for a much more mild uh winter, but we'll see. Uh and then there's been some uh questions that have been posed during public comment that uh city council has asked city staff to follow up on and so we'll be prepared to kind of engage you on those. So with that, Mayor, it's back to you. First item. Business item brief number one, one oh one. I mean one thousand one thousand three Ardmore dry rezoning, Ms. Fresh Housen. Thank you, Mayor, Vice Mayor, members of council. Uh AZ Avenue Partners is petitioning to rezone 1001 and 1003 Ardmore to allow this site to be developed for commercial purposes, such as a drive-thru restaurant or for retail. Our future land use map. Whoop. Uh future land use map recommends neighborhood commercial and medium density residential uses for these properties. Uh neighborhood commercial areas consist primarily of office, retail, personal service, and restaurant uses that are scaled and designed to be compatible with and serve immediate neighborhoods. People can walk, bike, or take a short drive to reach them. Medium density residential areas are characterized by smaller lots, single family detached housing, duplexes, and townhomes where neighborhoods exist, infills should be at a compatible density and type. These properties were annexed into the city in 1976. The existing R2 and R3 zoning has been in place since the late 1970s. The property consists of two tracks and totals about 582 thousandths of an acre. Um thousand one Ardmore is currently unimproved based on aerial photography dating back to 1941. Um it looks like this property has never been developed. 1003 Ardmore contains a one-story single household detached structure, which uh is about 1,800 square feet in size, constructed in 1962. The property is bound to the north and east by commercial uses, uh, to the west by a single household detached structure, and to the south by multifamily residential apartment development. If approved, the rezoning uh would allow the existing structure at one of 1,003 Ardmore to be demolished, uh and the properties would be developed for commercial purposes such as a drive-thru restaurant or for retail. Two concept plans are attached to the report and are shown here, and they show potential layouts for the site. These plans are not proffered, so uh the conceptual layouts are intended to be examples. Uh another commercial use aside from a proffered out use could be established. The planning commission was generally in agreement that a rezoning to uh you know allow a commercial use is appropriate at this location, being a signalized intersection on Old Forest Road, which is mainly a commercial area. These properties are some of the last remaining low density and medium density residential uh properties on Old Forest Road. The submitted proffer that was considered by planning commission limits the possible uses on the site, and it excludes a lot of the uses that may be less compatible with neighboring homes, like uh cash for gold, short short-term loans, those those types of uses. Um, would align with the neighborhood commercial use recommended for 1001 Ardmore by our future land use map. However, the planning commission noted that since the final use of the site has not yet been determined, there is a degree of uncertainty on how the site would ultimately be developed. Some of the uses that would still be permitted by right, uh such as tire stores, construction related businesses, et cetera, may not be appropriate given the adjoining single household residence. Light auto repair, such as an oil change could have been permitted uh if a conditional use permit was pursued at a later date. Uh the planning commission at their public hearing on October 14th uh had a motion to recommend denial, which failed in a tie. After the planning commission, the petitioner chose to submit revised proffers. The proffers now prohibit light auto repair, so uh the oil change is off the table. And also uh include the installation of a privacy fence along the property line adjoining 1005 Ardmore, which is a single household home.