Manitowoc Board of Public Works Meeting Summary for July 8, 2026
Manitowoc Board of Public Works Meeting Summary for July 8, 2026
The Board of Public Works met on July 8, 2026, at 4:00 PM in the Common Council Chambers. The meeting lasted 16 minutes and was conducted in person and via Zoom. All six present members (Reed, Alfred, Nycz, Norell, Beeman, Minikel) voted unanimously on all items; two members (Nickels, Reckelberg) were absent.
Public Comments & Testimony
-
2200 Rankin St. Weed Appeal: The property owner appeared and explained her situation. She stated she had paid $100 to have wood removed and $50 for lawn mowing, but was still assessed $470 for noxious weed remediation. She expressed confusion over receiving conflicting instructions from two city departments (building inspection vs. public works) regarding wood removal and weed trimming. She noted that the weeds were missed because the mower did not get close enough to her deck. The city attorney, Eric Nich, acknowledged the ordinance is unpopular but stated the city must enforce it as the city incurred costs due to non-compliance. The board voted 6-0 to uphold the assessment. The property owner was advised to contact her alderperson before the next Common Council meeting on July 20.
-
714 S. 27th St. Weed Appeal: No property owner appeared. The board noted this was a second violation for the same address and owner. The board voted 6-0 to uphold the assessment.
Discussion Items
-
Bids for 10th Street (Chicago-Washington) Streetscape, Project #WS-26-20: One e-bid was received. The minutes list Vinton Construction Company at $119,767.00; however, the raw transcript refers to "Benton Construction Company" for the same bid. The board voted to refer the bid to the Department of Public Works for tabulation (6-0).
-
Bids for Manitowoc Public Library Renovation of Meeting & Study Room Spaces – REBID, Project #WB-26-18R: One e-bid was received. The minutes list Hamann Construction at $310,583.00; the transcript says "Hammond Construction." The board voted to refer the bid to the Library Board for tabulation (6-0). The project is funded by the library foundation.
-
Change Orders: Two change orders were approved unanimously (6-0):
- Vinton Construction Company (transcript says "Benton Construction") – Change Order #2 for 2026 Red Arrow Beach Access Improvements, WS-26-14, increasing the contract by $25,832.77. The change was to proceed with the foundation for the stage.
- Fearing's Madison AV (transcript: "Fearings, Madison A. V") – Change Order #3 for Council Chambers Audio/Video Upgrade, WO-26-12, increasing by $131.16.
-
Pay Estimates: Six pay estimates were approved unanimously (6-0):
- Vinton Construction Company, 2026 Concrete Paving I, WS-26-1, Est. 1: $739,207.10
- Seiler Bros Construction, Inc., 2026 Remove & Replace Sidewalks, WS-26-3, Est. 1: $21,776.17
- Bay Lake Regional Planning Commission, Maritime Metro TDP Update, Project #25009-05, Est. 4: $15,538.32
- RA Smith, Franklin Street Reconstruction, Est. 4: $2,184.50
- Strand Associates, Design of Rubick Field Dry Detention, Est. 20: $8,500.00
- Vinton Construction Company, Red Arrow Beach Access Improvements, WS-26-14, Est. 3: $563,872.23
-
Contractor's Payroll Affidavits: None were submitted.
Key Outcomes
- All votes were unanimous (6-0) with two members absent.
- The board referred the 10th Street streetscape bid to the Department of Public Works for tabulation.
- The board referred the library renovation bid to the Library Board for tabulation.
- The board upheld both noxious weed assessments (2200 Rankin St. and 714 S. 27th St.). The decision will be forwarded to the Common Council for final approval, with payment due by November 1, 2026, after which the balance would be added to the property tax.
- Two change orders and six pay estimates were approved as presented.
- The meeting adjourned at 4:16 PM.
Note: There are discrepancies between the official minutes and the raw transcript regarding contractor names. The minutes use "Vinton Construction Company" for the 10th Street bid and Red Arrow Beach change order, while the transcript uses "Benton Construction Company." For the library renovation bid, the minutes use "Hamann Construction" and the transcript uses "Hammond Construction." The official minutes are considered authoritative.
Meeting Transcript
All right, it is four o'clock, and we are we are we on are we on? Okay. All right, we'll yeah, you could we'll call the board to public works order. Um first item on the agenda is bid for 10th Street Chicago to Washington Streetscape project at WS2620. That's great. All right, one bid received from Benton Construction Company in the amount of 119,767 dollars. Motion to refer the bid to the Department of Public Works for tabulation. Second, all right, it's been moving the second and to send it to public works for tabulation. Um any further discussion? All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion carries unanimously. Next item is bids for Manitowak Public Library renovation of meeting and study room spaces, rebid project WB 2618R. Uh one bid received from Hammond Construction in the amount of three hundred and ten thousand five hundred and eighty-three dollars. So uh Mr. Mr. Chairman, as this uh this project is is stated to be funded by the library foundation. Uh I move that we refer this bid to the library board for tabulation. All right, second. All right, moved and seconded to refer to library board for tabulation. Any further discussion? All in favor say aye. Aye. Any opposed? Motion carries unanimously. Next item on here is Noxious Weed Assessment Appeals 260583 property owner appeal for Noxious Weed Assessment at 2200 Rankin Street. I have it. You have it. Well, thank you. Okay. Yes, ma'am. Um do want to have her come up to the table right here. If you here, let's grab a yeah, here we go. She can come right up to the table, ma'am. Okay. We do have a copy of the uh letter that you wrote as well as the the form that was the complaint and the the picture. So if you'd like to uh address the committee, the floor is yours. Yes, I took some pictures today too to show that the wood was gone. I paid a hundred dollars to a friend because they pay paid a hundred dollars to somebody to rent a uh a truck to come and get it, so I had to pay them the hundred. And I've also got pictures of the yard where it was mowed both front and back. And it's been mowed a couple times. The problem was is I had a friend that told me he was gonna come and mow the yard, and he kept having every excuse in the world why he couldn't. And I didn't have a mower at the time, and my son finally got me a mower, so I've been out there doing part of it, and then I have a neighbor girl that does the other half that I I can't do because getting old. And I just don't have the energy to do all of it myself. So she does part of it, and very nice girl. But it was, as I say, it was very tall at the time because my friend just never got over there, and then he finally directed me to somebody else, which I had to pay him $50 to uh do the lawn. And then there was a guy, his name was Steve that I had been talking to here at the city, and he told me that he he drove by my yard and saw that the wood was gone and saw that the yard was mowed, and he says, I'm not even getting out of my car. Well, then somebody who they said it's he told he said that he he was contracted by the city to come out and look at it, and he found the weeds that I had gotten to because my weed whacker ran out of string, and I didn't remember how to restring it. And he so he said, Well, I have to I have to cut it down, or the city will get mad at me.
openpublica.com