OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Manitowoc Public Library Board of Trustees Meeting - August 25, 2026

Common Council & CommitteesTuesday, August 25, 2026
BodyManitowoc, Wisconsin
SessionCommon Council & Committees
DateTuesday, August 25, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 22:24

Transcript — Verbatim
0:03

All right, we're gonna call the meeting to order.

0:06

So are there any requests to amend tonight's agenda?

0:12

All right.

0:13

I don't see any requests, so we'll go on to public comment.

0:17

Members of the public are invited to speak at Manchester Public Library Board of Trustees meeting each month on any matter related to the oversight of Massach Public Library.

0:26

The comments from each speaker shall be limited to five minutes remain unless extended by action of the NASA Public Library Board of Trustees.

0:34

Do I have anyone here who would like to speak for public comment?

0:40

All right, let me go ahead and stand in the can I begin?

0:50

Sure.

0:52

I had agreed with the library's organization, and I even told the library director and my supervisor that I supported it.

1:03

That was before I realized the reorganization money saving plan to hire a new position, included targeting and harassing employees.

1:14

One employee that quit on his firm own prior to my termination, experienced some of the same treatment as me.

1:25

Employees at management use their tactics on to harass me, experienced extreme fear.

1:33

These tactics used to target these employees and myself consist of creating a fearful hostile environment, retaliation termination, unethical, unprofessional statements, and behaviors.

1:48

Management even pulled a non-library employee into the mix of this harassment.

1:58

How unethical and unprofessional.

2:02

The resistance of the board to handle these poor management and harassment tactics lean towards the board's approval of employment employee harassment employees towards the board as a compliant puppet.

2:17

I would hope this isn't the case.

2:21

A board member said they do not get involved with personnel problems, but this involves serious management problems.

2:32

When two management members target certain employees by asking what their conversation with the Pacific co-worker was, it creates a fearful, hostile working environment.

2:45

A toll co-worker told me that two managers together approached him her for questioning.

2:55

This is an intimidation tactic, creating a hostile workplace.

3:00

Sneaking around to ask what employees are talking about breaks psychological safety.

3:06

It demonstrates a lack of leadership skills, maturity, and emotional control.

3:13

A management member that stands outside an office to listen in on a conversation is considered a form of micromanagement and shows excessive monitoring of employee tasks and interaction.

3:31

It causes a toxic environment by creating a culture of fear, suspicion, and anxiety.

3:38

It is a form of surveillance management by treating employees with distrust, by constantly auditing their movements and private discussions.

3:50

Micromanagement destroys trust, kills morale, and lowers productivity.

3:56

Unemployment contacted me, and I quote, employer failed to provide information during a fact-finding investigation.

4:06

Discharge, no misconduct.

4:09

End of quote.

4:11

No specific incident or incidents was given for my termination, which points to reorganization and retaliation termination.

4:24

Termination paper said I was not committed to organizational goals.

4:29

But yet I had an organization donate money to the Great Decisions Program and the friends of the library.

4:38

Management told me all my responsibilities would be divided among other employees.

4:50

Obviously, my termination was in the library's or reorganization plan to save money.

5:00

Management can fire whomever, whenever they want, but the harassing on ethical and unprofessional tactics used to reach their goal, causing a fearful hostile working environment for employees they target and a difficult environment for work collaboration should be stopped.

5:21

I strongly believe Manitowk City residents should be aware of these harassing unethical, unprofessional management tactics being used.

5:32

I was told that my personal jump dive would be returned to me.

5:38

Therefore, I want my jump drive returned to me immediately in good condition with my documentation in care.

5:47

So I think my time is up.

5:49

I think all right, yes, maybe for your comments.

5:53

All right.

6:00

I need a motion.

6:01

Motion is approved.

6:03

Margaret?

6:04

I'll second that.

6:05

Perfect.

6:05

Megan's gonna second that.

6:10

Are there any questions?

6:11

Sorry.

6:13

Mr.

6:13

Abel.

6:14

Are we approving all three sets of minutes or one?

6:18

Yes.

6:19

Okay.

6:21

Approval minutes.

6:22

Approval and then all the minutes.

6:24

There's no comments or any concerns?

6:26

We're good.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Personnel Matters███████████████████████████████31%
Procedural█████████████████████████████29%
Engineering And Infrastructure███████████████████████████27%
Budget Equity Analysis███████7%
Parks and Recreation██████6%
Summary of Proceedings

Manitowoc Public Library Board of Trustees Meeting - August 25, 2026

The board met on August 25, 2026, to conduct routine business, hear public comment, and act on administrative and financial items. No agenda or minutes were available; this summary is based on the meeting transcript.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved three sets of meeting minutes by voice vote.
  • Accepted the financial reports as presented, including budget status for Fund 2810 and Fund 2013 and the MPL check register.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • A former employee said they initially supported the library reorganization and told the library director and their supervisor, but later concluded the reorganization plan included targeting and harassing employees. They described a hostile work environment, retaliation, termination, and unethical/unprofessional statements and behaviors by management.
  • The speaker alleged that managers questioned employees about conversations, listened outside an office, and pulled a non-library employee into the harassment, which they said created fear and broke psychological safety. They also referenced a board member saying the board does not get involved in personnel problems, but argued this involved serious management problems.
  • The speaker stated that unemployment contacted them with a finding that the employer "failed to provide information during a fact-finding investigation. Discharge, no misconduct." They said no specific incident was given for their termination and viewed it as reorganization and retaliation.
  • The speaker said termination paperwork stated they were not committed to organizational goals, despite their involvement in securing a donation to the Great Decisions Program and the Friends of the Library. They also said management told them their responsibilities would be divided among other employees, supporting their view that the termination was part of a money-saving reorganization.
  • The speaker asked for their personal jump drive to be returned immediately, in good condition and with their documentation, and said Manitowoc residents should be aware of the management tactics. They also expressed concern that board inaction could look like approval of the alleged harassment.

Committee and Administrative Reports

  • A piece of correspondence received by the board was acknowledged; a trustee said it was very nice and appreciated the specific details about library services and helpful staff.
  • The library director/administrator explained that the online form allows the public to correspond with trustees; correspondence will not be placed on the agenda unless a trustee requests a discussion. She thanked Charlotte and Aaron for their work at the library and wished them well.
  • Personnel Committee: The committee reviewed upcoming changes taking effect in January, and the board approved the new organizational structure.
  • Finance Committee: The committee reviewed the proposed 2027 budget, prepared under both the new and current organizational structures, and unanimously recommended approval. The board approved the 2027 library budget, with the understanding that some city-provided figures, such as health care, are not yet known and the budget may need to be amended later. No changes were made to operating expenses compared to the current year.

Discussion Items

  • Bathroom project: The board received three bids for the new bathroom project. City policy requires accepting the lowest bid. One trustee expressed concern about the large gap between the lowest bid of about $120,000 and another bid of almost $197,000, saying they did not know enough about the companies. The director explained that bids vary by company and that the city engineering department had already reviewed the bids and could answer questions.
  • Personnel policy revisions: The board approved personnel policy revisions drafted by the city HR department with city attorney feedback, so that the library would match city policies and remain in line with other departments.
  • Personnel committee chair: After discussion, Margaret agreed to serve as personnel committee chair. The finance committee chair was described as the treasurer by default.

Old Business / Facilities Updates

  • Facilities work reported included upgrading the remaining roof/HVAC/exhaust fan infrastructure, converting old work-lamp lights to LED, and removing old Wi-Fi signs from poles to make room for new signage.
  • Upcoming work included planting juniper bushes, changing over fall flowers, an all-staff event in September, and a volunteer day with a local business involving sidewalk cleaning, bench cleaning, solar-charger cleaning, windows, and landscaping.

Key Outcomes

  • Approved the minutes and accepted the financial reports unanimously.
  • Approved the new organizational structure.
  • Approved the 2027 library budget, subject to possible amendment when final city figures are received.
  • Approved the lowest bid for the bathroom project; one trustee abstained because she did not believe she had enough information about the bids.
  • Approved personnel policy revisions to align with city policies.
  • Appointed Margaret as personnel committee chair.
  • Adjourned.

Meeting Transcript

All right, we're gonna call the meeting to order. So are there any requests to amend tonight's agenda? All right. I don't see any requests, so we'll go on to public comment. Members of the public are invited to speak at Manchester Public Library Board of Trustees meeting each month on any matter related to the oversight of Massach Public Library. The comments from each speaker shall be limited to five minutes remain unless extended by action of the NASA Public Library Board of Trustees. Do I have anyone here who would like to speak for public comment? All right, let me go ahead and stand in the can I begin? Sure. I had agreed with the library's organization, and I even told the library director and my supervisor that I supported it. That was before I realized the reorganization money saving plan to hire a new position, included targeting and harassing employees. One employee that quit on his firm own prior to my termination, experienced some of the same treatment as me. Employees at management use their tactics on to harass me, experienced extreme fear. These tactics used to target these employees and myself consist of creating a fearful hostile environment, retaliation termination, unethical, unprofessional statements, and behaviors. Management even pulled a non-library employee into the mix of this harassment. How unethical and unprofessional. The resistance of the board to handle these poor management and harassment tactics lean towards the board's approval of employment employee harassment employees towards the board as a compliant puppet. I would hope this isn't the case. A board member said they do not get involved with personnel problems, but this involves serious management problems. When two management members target certain employees by asking what their conversation with the Pacific co-worker was, it creates a fearful, hostile working environment. A toll co-worker told me that two managers together approached him her for questioning. This is an intimidation tactic, creating a hostile workplace. Sneaking around to ask what employees are talking about breaks psychological safety. It demonstrates a lack of leadership skills, maturity, and emotional control. A management member that stands outside an office to listen in on a conversation is considered a form of micromanagement and shows excessive monitoring of employee tasks and interaction. It causes a toxic environment by creating a culture of fear, suspicion, and anxiety. It is a form of surveillance management by treating employees with distrust, by constantly auditing their movements and private discussions. Micromanagement destroys trust, kills morale, and lowers productivity. Unemployment contacted me, and I quote, employer failed to provide information during a fact-finding investigation. Discharge, no misconduct. End of quote. No specific incident or incidents was given for my termination, which points to reorganization and retaliation termination. Termination paper said I was not committed to organizational goals. But yet I had an organization donate money to the Great Decisions Program and the friends of the library. Management told me all my responsibilities would be divided among other employees. Obviously, my termination was in the library's or reorganization plan to save money. Management can fire whomever, whenever they want, but the harassing on ethical and unprofessional tactics used to reach their goal, causing a fearful hostile working environment for employees they target and a difficult environment for work collaboration should be stopped. I strongly believe Manitowk City residents should be aware of these harassing unethical, unprofessional management tactics being used. I was told that my personal jump dive would be returned to me. Therefore, I want my jump drive returned to me immediately in good condition with my documentation in care. So I think my time is up. I think all right, yes, maybe for your comments. All right. I need a motion. Motion is approved. Margaret? I'll second that. Perfect. Megan's gonna second that. Are there any questions?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com