And um special call me to go to the city council and a review session place. First item is right there basically manage a day where the board gates and I should go to the fiber blank value right here. Short time with the prayer and also standpoint to three setting things. I think uh here it's yeah, don't have to be reading something they read something with uh uh I think there's a problem which needs it. Okay, I don't know. We can go either way. Okay. I'll do whatever. Then you don't want to have trouble. Um to a bad extra head. I think Mr. Mary says no new information to share. Um I did want to uh react to a question that Councilman Richardson asked at the Monday meeting. Um essentially what the question was was would this uh splitting of the parcels match what our infull overlay ordinance is and looking at that ordinance that ordinance actually required or allows much smaller parcels than what you're doing. Yeah, for example, these two both being over eleven thousand square feet, and that ordinance allows to be five thousand square feet. So there's some principal alignment, but not individually. That's correct, and this uh request is not asking for side set back in facts. It's just the long width and the one size. Yeah, and also this is not saying anything about the street and I don't strip over fairness, it's just the streets on it. That would be a different entire that'd be a particular process time. Yes, sir, it's clear. Fourth item is not all consumed. Well, I shouldn't. So we do it. You want to talk about the agreement and don't talk about the contract. You want to come down? Speak to her and she didn't accept the position. Maybe I can put the open shit which is already final language. Right now it says uh driven boards fix the compensation in contract. It's part of our back on the same orders. Back from the committees of the stack contract and you have the solution to the chief prosecutor officer in the name was the second one. I don't have a contract section. The country has some kind of material issues and then some non-material. Like things where it says it is where it should say. So it's got some of that, but it also specifically took language from the chief prosecutor. And just added assistant. The problem that that creates is only the chief prosecutors I'm reading right now is governed by the prosecuting attorney's council of the state of Georgia. Not any assistant. So we've got some language where she's allowed to grant leave to lower assistant prosecutors just the language in there that is should just be preserved for not extended. So can we do this without the contract at this moment? If you desire, you can say to file approval Mr. Bruton is registered on with the language modified to make consistently joined the law. First thing you prosecute. Because that would be those were the two things I'd identify. So those needs language structures. Whatever my exact body however we want to do the language again. Just understanding that as I'm reading the CJ 15181. It is limited to the chief prosecutor. So there's some things that we're just going to need to monitor. And if I'm currently labels in the Cistrian Prosecutor's attorney and counsel Georgia, which doesn't operate the function change the fact that the front of it will need to break it.