The City of Mesquite held a Technical Review Meeting on Tuesday, September 2, 2025, at 2:30 P.M. in City Hall. This work session was held to discuss and establish the business to be heard at the upcoming Regular City Council Meeting on September 9, 2025. The council heard public comments and voted to add several items to the next council agenda.
Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to the Tuesday September 2nd, 2025 technical review meeting for the City of Musquete. We are going to open with open public comments. You have three minutes, please come forward. Hello, Mayor Whipple and Council members. For the record, my name is Raylane Shavana with Nordic Beach Holdings. First of all, I'd like to say that I did receive the email from the attorney, the city attorney. Um I acknowledge receipt of the email in which you indicated that you would respond directly to Mr. Chatterjee based on his prior resin representation of me in matters related to the Mesquite Vistas Association. At this time, I wish to clarify there's no civil litigation pending between myself and the city of Musquite. My communications regarding annexation subdivision and governance issues are being made in my capacity as a citizen and a business owner within the city of Musquite. Homeowners have the right to vote on annexations and have the have the knowledge that the city will follow the laws that govern annexation procedures. I'm here as a property owner with questions about why annexations and parking issues are occurring without the required vote of the memberships and the laws. Under 2.4 of the master declaration and the NRS codes 116. To be clear, I have nothing against annexations in principle. My concern is selective enforcement being carried out by the association in the city. Some owners are allowed in without proper procedure, while others are denied rights enforced into costly costly litigation. This unequal treat treatment undermines both the rule of law and public trust. And to participate in public proceedings without being compelled to do so through private counsel. Accordingly, I respect the request and request the city acknowledge and rep respond to the communications I submit in my individual capacity, whether by email, public comment, or written submission to the city clerk. Of course, should litigation arise against the city. Thank you for your attention to this matter, and I look forward to addressing the city uh and your questions. Um I do want to just show the city for shared parking because I think we're confused. Um Mr. Kim is enforcing private CCNRs, not the public code. That's all we're asking. Is that he do the public code, not our CCNRs. If our board president, Mr. Sites of NV Night Club, wants to talk about reciprocal parking, he can file a private litigation matter against Nordic Beach or Red Hills, and we will deal with it at that time. The city has a code. We're just asking for that code to be honored. Thank you. Thank you, Rayline. I'll make sure Santa gets you on your watch, okay. As you know, I have been banned from reading my poem for 9-11 for my friend. Outrageous. Came to every one of you and told you what was going on. And now I've been banned. I sent an email to your clerk asking at the next city council. I can present my side of 9-11. I am really distraught over this. As you know, the lady in Henderson has filed a lawsuit for motional distress. I can tell you, I have shed many tears over this. This deeply hurts me. I'm not telling you where it's gonna go because none of you up there had anything to do with it. I believe that. You didn't even know about it, did you, ma'am? Be honest. Not until after the decision was made. There you go. Thank you.