The Mesquite City Council held a Technical Review Meeting on Tuesday, October 7, 2025, at 2:30 PM. The meeting included public comments, additions to the agenda, and staff updates on capital improvement projects.
Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to the Tuesday, October 7th, 2025 technical review meeting for the city of Musquite. It is 2 30 p.m. We're gonna get started. And we're gonna start with our opening public comment. You have three minutes, please come forward. Oh, why are you here? Rick McIntyre, uh resident of Musquite. Mayor, members of council, thank you very much. I have a uh technical question really. Uh earlier there was an agenda item that was to me a competing interest in that parcel property at the late in the agenda here. Has that been removed? The first I don't see it on the agenda is why I'm asking. Seems like it was there previously, but so six six point nine isn't and six ten. Yes, 6.9 and 610. And are they still two competing interests in that parcel? Yes. And that's what I'm looking at here. Yes. Thank you. Thanks, Rick. Hello, Mayor Whipple and City Council for the record, my name is Railine Schiffano. Um, I'm here today to request that the city council open a formal review into the September 2nd uh 2025 verification letter issued by Mr. Simon Kim. Um this letter is issued privately and without public notice. It declares that the 2011 conditional use permit CUP 11001 for the MV Night Club remains valid and unrestricted. Yet this correspondence was not the result of a public hearing inspection or council action. It was simply a response. You guys can see it. Um a response uh to a personal request by Mr. Seitz. What makes this particular concerning is that as of July 31st, 2025, Mr. Sites no longer holds voting rights within the Red Hills Association. The association board determined that the his parcel was not on not on the final map, which Travis and I had that discussion. The final map does not show 4C2 or 3D two. So the association voted them out of the association with no voting rights because their two properties were not on this final map. He is no longer an owner in Red Hills on the map. He doesn't have any easement rights, he doesn't have any membership rights, and yet the city, Mr. Kim is giving him a special letter to say that he has parking rights, which the parking rights are to be debated not by the city council or the city, but by the CC and Rs. If Mr. Sites thinks that he has the right to have reciprocal parking, his place is in civil court. The only duty the city has is to enforce the parking code, which there's no parking variances, no waivers. The 2005 site plan was never re never approved. There's no parking studies. The Red Hills is supposed to have 898 parking spots. We have 524. Even if they went by the 2005 site plan, it's a hundred parking spots short. Mr. Seitz is trying to sell his property now. So he's gonna sell it to the next victim, the next person that's gonna have to deal with the same issues. And the city is colluding with him to help him do that.