Mesquite-Nevada Technical Review Meeting - May 5, 2026
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Mesquite-Nevada Technical Review Meeting - May 5, 2026
The meeting opened at 4:32 PM on Tuesday, May 5, 2026, with public comments and a work session. Key topics included water supply concerns, a perennial yield study, and school zone safety.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Nick expressed concern about water levels in Lake Mead and Lake Powell, warning that the Department of Interior's decision in June/July could lead to a dead pool. He argued that hydraulics connect Lake Mead to local wells and urged the city to prepare for firefighting tanker funding.
- A speaker with 30 years in water experience countered that local water percolates from the north into an aquifer and moves toward Lake Mead, not the reverse, and that the Colorado River does not affect Mesquite's wells.
- Another commenter noted that development in St. George and Washington County has created a dry reservoir, and they may seek water from the area.
- Mayor Adam clarified he serves on the water district board and referenced a recent perennial yield study by Gloriet of Geosciences, which showed strong aquifer health. He encouraged the public to review the study with Aaron Bunker or Ben Martinson at the water district.
- Council member requested that the water district present to the City Council; Mayor Adam agreed to arrange it.
- Mike raised concerns about speeding in school zones (15 mph limit) and lack of enforcement, citing cars passing at 30 mph. He urged ticketing and noted that highway patrol was present but not city police. He also called for ticketing parents of children riding bikes without helmets and riding the wrong way.
Discussion Items
- The water discussion dominated the work session. Council members and the public debated the source of local water, the implications of the perennial yield study, and the need for public education. The council agreed to schedule a formal presentation from the water district on the study.
- No other formal agenda items were discussed beyond public comments and the work session.
Key Outcomes
- The council agreed to invite Aaron Bunker or Ben Martinson to present the perennial yield study at a future City Council meeting.
- The meeting adjourned without any formal votes or motions.
Meeting Transcript
All right, everyone, welcome to the Tuesday, May 5th, 2026 technical review meeting for the city of Musquite. It's 4 32. We're gonna get started. Um, any opening public comment, mayor, council, thank you. Great breakfast. I want the recipe for the pancakes for the batter. I cooked them, but I didn't batter them. Now the truth comes out. All right. Okay. If they were good, they were probably somebody else's if they're questionable. Yeah, they might have been mine. Excellent. Excellent. Great time. Great turnout. Uh on a serious note. Uh I've been watching some of the things going on with water and water issues regarding to Nevada, Arizona, and what's going on. Uh I don't know how up to date y'all are on it. I spoke about this a couple years ago, brought it up, nothing happened. Uh the county of Maricopa, Arizona, uh, tried to get a law into effect, which they're not done yet, but it did get turned down. And what it is is this their water is going to be shutting off pretty soon. Uh they won't be able to draw water off of Lake Mead. And since that happens, they are stepping up the pace to have builders or developers in their contracts now, right up to where they want the count the state, the county does to have a 100-year guarantee of water before they hand out the permits to build, and it's something to consider. Well, it turns out June and July is gonna be the date that the Department of Interior is gonna decide what they're gonna do with Lake Powell for water now. Lake Powell's been draining a lot of water from a lot of reservoirs, and a lot of the tribes and other people that use them won't have any water. Okay, in the process, they estimate right now they're gonna be dropping over a hundred feet, uh, which puts them in a dead pool. Well, if uh Lake Mead doesn't get it, it's gonna be the same thing. Now, again, we've been through the thing about the wells and all the stuff, and everything's okay, but the problem is is hydraulics. Hydraulics mean the water in Lake Mead affects the water in the wells. Well, my question is we better start looking at money for tankers to put out fires. And what is the city gonna do for water if we don't have it in those wells? And I think it's just something to look at, consider because again, by June and July, this is gonna hit us right at the hot season. And uh again, putting out fires might need tankers, fire truck tankers, and where are they gonna get the water from? Thank you for your time. Thanks, Nick. Yeah, during public moment. Okay. Well, we won't have council comments, so if you want to make a public comment. I would like to say something about that. I worked in water for over 30 years. You're wrong about hydraulics, it's not Lake Mead pushing water up to us. The water that's here matriculates to Lake Mead. All of our water comes from the north. None of it comes from Lake Mead. Well, not for detective. It it does not. You won't convince me, you won't convince anyone with Virgin Valley water. Our wells have nothing to do with the Colorado River. Our wells have nothing to do with the Virgin River.
openpublica.com