City of Mesquite Technical Review Meeting - July 7, 2026
City of Mesquite Technical Review Meeting - July 7, 2026
The meeting opened with public comments and work session items. The mayor pulled Item 7.8 (City Manager salary increase) from consideration after public sentiment. No formal votes were taken; the meeting focused on resident concerns about proposed code changes and city transparency.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Wes (Mesquite resident): Addressed Item 6.1 (bicycle and electric micro-mobility device regulations). Suggested the city include a redlined comparison showing differences between the proposed municipal code and existing Clark County regulations, which have been in effect for seven months, so residents can understand jurisdictional changes (e.g., legality of scooter operations between Bunkerville and Mesquite).
- Doug Honschel: Raised concerns about city expenditure transparency. Mentioned a May 19 finance communication and a subsequent public records request (submitted 37 days prior) that had not been answered. Questioned discrepancies in reported figures: City Council combined salaries listed as $120,000 (which he calculated differently from the mayor’s explanation of $14,000 per member plus $18,000 for mayor), benefits of $155,000, and the existence of a non-department with a million dollars in expenses but no wages. Also cited salary listings for three “animal control receptionists” (actual role: animal control officers) each over $50,000, and a sanitation billing clerk at $45,000. Expressed frustration over lack of response from city officials.
- Ron Shackleford: Commented on Item 7.8, asking to see the City Manager’s contract. Noted the city charter committee meeting scheduled for that Friday. The mayor subsequently pulled the item.
Discussion Items
- Item 7.8 (Pulled): Mayor announced removal of the proposal for a 5% salary increase for City Manager Becca Schrupp for FY 2026/2027, stating public sentiment was against the timing and acknowledging it was “not appropriate.” He indicated the contract would be reconsidered before December, per the contract’s annual review requirement.
- Item 6.1 (Mentioned in Public Comment): Proposed ordinance amending Title 6 for bicycle and electric micro-mobility device regulations. No council discussion occurred beyond Wes’s public comment.
Key Outcomes
- Item 7.8 was pulled from the agenda; no vote taken.
- No other items were voted on or discussed formally.
- The meeting concluded after public comments, with the next regular city council meeting scheduled for the following Tuesday (July 14, 2026).
Meeting Transcript
Everyone and welcome to the Tuesday, July 7th, 2026 for the City of Musquite. We're gonna start off with opening public comment mesquite resident. Uh, the way you guys have the tech review formatted now, or is this the time to talk about things on the agenda? Because it sounds like um, I think the way that either or I I would just go for it because you know the mayor can allow it and yeah, it's yeah, because there's gonna be motions later to move and change things. If yeah, well, maybe there will be, I don't know. Okay, well, my question or suggestion on item 6.1 about the uh driving on sidewalks, looks like is it if this has to do with the e-scooters and e-bikes, that whatever differences between what the proposed municipal code is and the county regulations that have been in place for seven months, whatever those differences are should be um put on the agenda also, at least as an attachment. Um, so people can see what the differences are. I mean, if your kid drives on a scooter from Bunkerville to Mesquite, they should know are mine illegal here in Mesquite for doing something that I'm all right to do anywhere else in Clark County and vice versa. So I highly suggest putting that on the agenda as well, the redlining it or whatever. Thanks. Thanks, Wes Doug Honschel. I'm gonna go over some stuff I brought up the last city council meeting about expenses. On May 19th, you received a communication from finance about expenditures and salaries. And at that point, I asked, I sent each of you an email. A couple of you actually responded that you received it, but none of them addressed the question within the email. Um as you can tell. Turn it on. On the 23rd, I submitted a request for information. Mr. Mayor, you emailed me three sentences saying you were gonna have Julie? Julie. And I I apologize. I have reached out to her a couple of times. Is Julie on vacation or she is, and that's uh public info request is still being processed. Okay, yeah. I'm I'm sorry, I was trying to get a hold of her before I responded to you, but I haven't been able to get a hold of her, so I wasn't aware that she was my comment would be this city has to have a decent computer system, I'm guessing. You know what you're paying your employees, you know what benefits they're getting. That's all I asked. You know, I I don't understand how the city council can be paid salaries of 120,000, but you have in benefits of 155,000. Is anybody up there want to try and tell me why your benefits are $30,000 more than your salaries? Um, I could probably explain that a little bit. So that's the total salaries of the city council. So the city council members each make 14,000 a year. I make eighteen thousand dollars a year, and then we also get health insurance. So the health insurance actually can't cost more than what we get paid. But it says your salaries are 120. But that's combined with everybody. Okay, so it still doesn't reach 120,000. So different departments are taken on to the city council. Yeah, so 14 times five plus eighteen. 70 plus 88,000. So yeah. So why is it his report show 120,000? I don't know if that includes our vehicle allowance. That probably includes some other things. Your benefits, I don't know. Yeah, but no one in over a month, 37 days. I've been trying to secretary, part of the secretary probably gets paid for that. Okay, that's why I asked to break it out to let the public know who's getting paid what and the benefits. I mean, we have three according to last report, uh 2024, it's the last one available on computer.
openpublica.com