OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Miami Dade County, Florida/BCC Committee Meetings
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Miami-Dade Aviation and Seaport Committee Meeting - October 13, 2026

BCC Committee Meetings — Tuesday, October 13, 2026
BodyMiami Dade County, Florida
SessionBCC Committee Meetings
DateTuesday, October 13, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 52:00

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

2:03

Commissioner Milian Orbis.

2:05

Vice Chairman Gonzalez.

2:09

Chairwoman Coinhagans.

2:12

Well, members present, we have a quorum.

Speaker 2

2:15

Good morning.

2:16

Please bow your heads for prayer, led by Commissioner Gilbert, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Commissioner Miliana Orbis.

Speaker 3

2:23

Bowing your heads, Heavenly Father, Lord and Savior today.

2:25

On this day we never seen before, we never see again.

2:28

We come first, just saying thank you.

2:31

Just pausing a second and saying thank you.

2:33

Thank you for the opportunity to be public servants.

2:36

Thank you for the people in this community.

2:38

Thank you for the opportunity to serve.

2:39

Father, give us wisdom, give us grace, help us be the best leaders in this moment for your people.

2:45

Amen.

Unassigned speaker

3:06

Oh,

Speaker 3

3:07

there he is.

Unassigned speaker

3:08

Okay.

Speaker 3

3:09

Good morning.

3:09

How are you?

Speaker 2

3:11

Morning, and welcome to our aviation and seaport committee.

3:16

To the attorneys, are there any edits or changes to this morning's agenda?

Speaker 4

3:20

Good morning, Madam Chair.

3:21

Just two additions to your agenda this morning, items three B and three C.

Speaker 2

3:28

At this time, we'll open the reasonable opportunity for the public to be heard.

3:31

Now is your opportunity to address this body.

Speaker 5

5:00

So, Commissioner, um this is uh embedded software which proprietary software that is being used by by airport department, and since it's sole source proprietary and the the way our code is written, it's the and we're extending the current contract for uh because we're not gonna rip apart the software in a place with the new one.

5:22

We continue to do business with the with this company and use the software.

5:26

So it is a designated purchase per R code.

Unassigned speaker

5:30

So let

Speaker 3

5:30

me ask you just and this is on this, but other things.

5:33

Do you all think that maybe we should stop being in the business of going with software that can only be operated or things that require a C a single vendor?

5:44

And and like I I'm only asking because ultimately we've become beholden to their prices because we can never really change anyway.

5:58

So because we've heard this argument, like for ATT, and we've heard we like we keep hearing the argument.

6:04

And so even so, even if it's not the best product, or it's not the best quality, for us, it'll always be the best because the problem with extricating it from our system becomes too onerous and a lot more expensive.

6:20

So maybe just as a function of how you all do business and

Speaker 6

6:25

go ahead.

Speaker 3

6:26

And how you procure that would be a bad habit to maintain

Speaker 6

6:34

yeah, uh Commissioner, just uh to kind of a sway your concern.

6:37

We are always exploring always, you know, uh alternate uh software's alternate methodology.

6:43

So we do that as a matter of course in this particular case.

6:46

We did an analysis which yielded that it I mean, we're ex uh extending the contract and adding another 420,000 in order to replace everything, it will be a 3.2 million dollar expense and an 18-month implementation cycle, which will create an operational disruption.

7:00

So completely understand your concern, and we're constantly uh exploring different ways of of doing things so we aren't tied to proprietary software, but in this particular case, it made sense to go how to move forward.

7:11

Well, yes,

Speaker 3

7:12

and that that's actually this is an example that actually makes my point.

7:15

Because you you because we have to factor in the replacement cost effort, we can never change.

7:23

So don't buy something else that we can never change out.

7:27

Like just stop buying things that we can't change out.

7:31

Because it and if you if you know you're gonna do that, then on the front end, you need to get such a massive discount, it needs to be like a lifelong discount, because you can never leave them.

7:42

So whenever we factor to procurement, and I'm gonna vote for the side, I'm gonna move it.

7:45

But whenever we factor in a procurement, we have to factor in whoever else would bid if we actually put this out to bid, we have to factor in how much it's gonna cost, how the other people will cost.

7:55

They can never win.

7:56

And and so we're gonna be beholden to this technology, whether they end up being the best or not.

8:03

Either way, I I'll I'll move this item with the rest of the agenda, but I just think maybe going forward, you all on airport, but in the commission as a broader, when you start seeing us bid out stuff that can that there's no way out, they're the only ones treat it like it's a lifetime contract.

8:24

Like it's a lifetime contract.

Speaker 5

8:25

Commissioner, to your point, you're asked uh uh um I know this was purchased some time back, but moving forward, we're bringing to the board every time we're doing an RFP for let's say to buy a a software application, we want to look at okay, is it gonna be here for 10 years, 15 years?

8:41

So we want to come to the board so we could show you the whole life of this is what's it's gonna cost.

8:46

We're gonna be embedded in here, and and so when we go back out again, we're going back out again for full-blown.

8:53

So we're trying to do that, yes.

Speaker 3

8:55

Yeah, but we never we can never end up going out because as we know now, the budget crunch, this budget never really gets easier.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Technology and Innovation█████████████████████████████████████37%
Aviation And Seaport██████████████████████████26%
Procurement████████████████████20%
Procedural███████████11%
Labor Relations██████6%
Summary of Proceedings

Miami-Dade Aviation and Seaport Committee Meeting - October 13, 2026

The Miami-Dade Aviation and Seaport Committee convened on October 13, 2026, with Chairwoman Danielle Cohen Higgins presiding and Vice Chairman Roberto J. Gonzalez, Commissioners Oliver G. Gilbert III, Keon Hardeman, and Natalie Milian Orbis present. Two add-on items, 3B and 3C, were announced at the outset. The committee discussed the county's reliance on proprietary software, considered the future of the Miami Heat/Airball Sports concession at Miami International Airport (MIA), and approved the balance of the agenda by voice vote.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved the remainder of the agenda, including:
    • Resolution 261599: first amendment to the professional services agreement with GPI Geospatial, Inc., increasing the agreement by $5,954,850 to a new not-to-exceed amount of $14,253,043.75 for photogrammetric mapping, topographic, planimetric, and light detection and ranging (LiDAR) services.
    • Resolution 261771: additional expenditure authority of $6,665,500 for Contract RFP-01258, Baggage Handling System Operation and Maintenance, modifying the contract amount to $100,904,735.
    • Approval of the Clerk's summary of minutes for the September 8, 2026, Aviation and Seaport Committee meeting; the October 2026 Aviation Capital Program Report; and the FIRST CARE-MIA Advisory Board report for July and August 2026.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No public comments are reflected in the transcript during the public comment opportunity.

Discussion Items

Item 3C - PropWorks System Software

  • Commissioner Gilbert questioned the county's pattern of purchasing proprietary software that locks the county into a single vendor, arguing these should be treated as lifetime contracts and should require steep upfront discounts or the use of agnostic/plug-and-play systems. He said he would support the item but wanted procurement decisions to build in the future cost of switching.
  • Commissioner Orbis asked when the county would receive information on full contract life costs and requested a countywide report on sole-source/proprietary contracts, including contract length, vendor performance, and replacement plans. Staff agreed to bring the data to the November committee cycle.
  • Commissioner Gonzalez said the county is “enslaved” to proprietary software, citing a district splash pad that was closed for four years because only a Canadian company could service it. He called for innovation and warned against a “Blockbuster mentality.”
  • Chairwoman Cohen Higgins asked whether legacy renewal items could include written due diligence showing alternatives were considered and why the existing vendor was recommended. Staff said that research was normally done and could be “beefed up” in future memos.
  • Commissioner Hardeman criticized the timing, saying the board was being forced to make a last-minute decision with only one vendor option. Staff said replacing PropWorks would cost an estimated $3.2 million and require an 18-month implementation cycle, making the requested extension with $420,091 in additional expenditure authority more fiscally responsible, for a total modified contract amount of $1,070,158.
  • The committee deferred item 3C to the November Aviation and Seaport Committee meeting, with a written report on the due diligence performed and evidence of competition. The motion passed by voice vote with no recorded opposition.

Item 2A - Airball Sports II LLC / Miami Heat at MIA

  • Chairwoman Cohen Higgins sponsored Resolution 261773, which would have directed the county to stop negotiating a concession extension with Airball Sports II LLC and instead solicit open competitive proposals for the location at MIA.
  • Commissioner Gonzalez asked why the matter took two years and why the prime space was not addressed sooner through a competitive process.
  • George Lopez, representing Airball Sports/Miami Heat basketball properties, said the lease extension had previously been before the committee, that the required labor peace agreement took longer than expected, and that the agreement was now in place. Wendy Walsh, general vice president of Unite Here International Union, said the labor peace agreement with Airball Sports was executed the day before the meeting. The transcript contains a discrepancy: Lopez also suggested the companion affidavit had been executed for months.
  • Commissioner Hardeman strongly opposed ejecting the Miami Heat from MIA, saying the airport should have a prime retail space for hometown teams. Commissioner Gilbert agreed the Heat should remain, while stressing that labor peace is important and that business should move “at the speed of business.”
  • Chairwoman Cohen Higgins explained that the Airball/Miami Heat agreement expired on November 28, 2024, and that MIA sent multiple notices to stop negotiations for lack of response, leaving the vendor as a two-year holdover tenant. She said she learned of the execution only that morning. The newly executed agreements cleared the way for a lease renewal; MIA staff stated the new lease would be a 10-year agreement generating millions of dollars in revenue.
  • The committee voted to defer item 2A to no date certain so the completed lease extension/renewal could be brought back. Commissioner Orbis was the only recorded no vote.

Key Outcomes

  • Item 3C deferred to the November committee cycle, contingent on a written due-diligence and competition report; no recorded opposition.
  • Item 2A deferred to no date certain; Commissioner Orbis recorded no. The pending resolution to solicit competitive proposals for the Airball Sports location was not adopted.
  • The administration agreed to provide a countywide report on sole-source/proprietary software contracts at the November committee cycle.
  • The remaining agenda items and reports were approved by voice vote.

Meeting Transcript

Commissioner Milian Orbis. Vice Chairman Gonzalez. Chairwoman Coinhagans. Well, members present, we have a quorum. Good morning. Please bow your heads for prayer, led by Commissioner Gilbert, followed by the Pledge of Allegiance led by Commissioner Miliana Orbis. Bowing your heads, Heavenly Father, Lord and Savior today. On this day we never seen before, we never see again. We come first, just saying thank you. Just pausing a second and saying thank you. Thank you for the opportunity to be public servants. Thank you for the people in this community. Thank you for the opportunity to serve. Father, give us wisdom, give us grace, help us be the best leaders in this moment for your people. Amen. Oh, there he is. Okay. Good morning. How are you? Morning, and welcome to our aviation and seaport committee. To the attorneys, are there any edits or changes to this morning's agenda? Good morning, Madam Chair. Just two additions to your agenda this morning, items three B and three C. At this time, we'll open the reasonable opportunity for the public to be heard. Now is your opportunity to address this body. So, Commissioner, um this is uh embedded software which proprietary software that is being used by by airport department, and since it's sole source proprietary and the the way our code is written, it's the and we're extending the current contract for uh because we're not gonna rip apart the software in a place with the new one. We continue to do business with the with this company and use the software. So it is a designated purchase per R code. So let me ask you just and this is on this, but other things. Do you all think that maybe we should stop being in the business of going with software that can only be operated or things that require a C a single vendor? And and like I I'm only asking because ultimately we've become beholden to their prices because we can never really change anyway. So because we've heard this argument, like for ATT, and we've heard we like we keep hearing the argument. And so even so, even if it's not the best product, or it's not the best quality, for us, it'll always be the best because the problem with extricating it from our system becomes too onerous and a lot more expensive. So maybe just as a function of how you all do business and go ahead. And how you procure that would be a bad habit to maintain yeah, uh Commissioner, just uh to kind of a sway your concern. We are always exploring always, you know, uh alternate uh software's alternate methodology. So we do that as a matter of course in this particular case. We did an analysis which yielded that it I mean, we're ex uh extending the contract and adding another 420,000 in order to replace everything, it will be a 3.2 million dollar expense and an 18-month implementation cycle, which will create an operational disruption. So completely understand your concern, and we're constantly uh exploring different ways of of doing things so we aren't tied to proprietary software, but in this particular case, it made sense to go how to move forward. Well, yes, and that that's actually this is an example that actually makes my point. Because you you because we have to factor in the replacement cost effort, we can never change. So don't buy something else that we can never change out. Like just stop buying things that we can't change out. Because it and if you if you know you're gonna do that, then on the front end, you need to get such a massive discount, it needs to be like a lifelong discount, because you can never leave them. So whenever we factor to procurement, and I'm gonna vote for the side, I'm gonna move it.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com