OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Milford, Delaware/Board of Adjustment
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Milford Board of Adjustment Meeting – March 12, 2026

Board of Adjustment — Thursday, March 12, 2026
BodyMilford, Delaware
SessionBoard of Adjustment
DateThursday, March 12, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:29:43

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

Please rise and we'll pledge allegiance.

0:23

We have the open public comment period first.

0:26

Has anyone signed up?

0:29

Did we check that?

Speaker 2

0:30

I didn't like to do that.

Speaker 1

0:35

The open public comment is just for anything that's not on the agenda per state law.

Speaker 3

0:42

Just check to see if we'll anyone.

Speaker 4

0:44

Anyone online wish to make a general statement before the meeting?

0:48

Please raise your

Unassigned speaker

0:49

hand.

Speaker 4

0:52

Nobody's coming forward.

Speaker 1

0:54

All right.

0:55

We'll close the open public comment period, move into our regular meeting.

0:59

We do have a full quorum today.

1:04

And

Unassigned speaker

1:06

I

Speaker 1

1:06

think all the applicants are here.

Unassigned speaker

1:11

Do

Speaker 1

1:11

we have the uh the minutes?

1:14

No minutes today.

1:17

Okay.

1:18

All right, we'll move into the public the public hearings.

1:22

The first application is lands of David Carr 205 Fisher Avenue.

1:28

Mr.

1:28

Pierce, we explain the applicant's request.

Speaker 4

1:31

Thank you.

1:31

Good morning.

1:32

The this application begins on page seven of your packet.

1:35

Uh this is application BOA 252-2026, lands of David Carr.

1:40

This is a variance application for a property that's zoned R2 residential district.

1:46

The property single property currently contains two single-family detached dwellings.

1:51

Um located at 205 Fisher Avenue and 213 Fisher Avenue.

1:57

The applicant's proposing to subdivide the property that currently contains two single family detached dwellings on one property into two lots, each containing one of the single family detached dwellings.

2:08

In order to subdivide the property as requested, the applicant has to obtain approval of three variances.

2:15

Variance number one is from chapter 230-D, paragraph or chapter 230-10, paragraph D1A, which states the minimum interior lot area shall be 8,000 square feet, and minimum corner lot area shall be 13,000 square feet.

Unassigned speaker

2:31

The

Speaker 4

2:31

applicant seeking a variance to reduce the minimum lot area for proposed lot one from 8,000 square feet to 5,746 square feet,

Unassigned speaker

2:39

uh

Speaker 4

2:40

resulting in a lot area 2,254 square feet less than what is required by city code.

Unassigned speaker

2:46

The

Speaker 4

2:47

second variance is from chapter 230-10, paragraph D1C, which states the minimum lot width shall be 80 feet.

2:54

The applicant seeking a variance to reduce the lot width for proposed lot one from 80 feet to 58.68 feet, resulting in a lot width 21.32 feet less than what is required by the city code.

3:34

Section two of the staff report provides staff's analysis of the four criteria used to evaluate an area variance for each of the three requests.

3:57

Uh showing the proposed lot one, which contains the smaller area of lot size and an existing uh home at 213 Fisher Avenue, and the residual land, which contains the older home on the corner of 2nd Street in Fisher.

4:16

We also have a response from the applicant for the uh application and a narrative from the property owners.

4:25

Um we have a copy of the zoning code highlighting the sections are seeking a variance from, and at the end of the packet material for this agenda item is a copy of the public notice.

4:35

The public notice was advertised in the daily state news on February 13th, 2026, and all properties within 200 feet of the parcel was were mailed a copy of the public notice for this morning's meeting, and the property is posted with a public notice sign uh to meet our advertising requirements.

4:54

Uh so with that uh I can answer your questions and the applicant's here to go over the request in more detail.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

So

Speaker 1

5:00

any questions from Mr.

5:02

Pierce.

5:05

Someone here on behalf of the applicant, please come forward to the podium and state your name and address, and Mr.

5:12

Morris will swear you

Unassigned speaker

5:13

in.

Speaker 3

5:27

Yes, just give us your full name and address, ma'am.

Speaker 5

5:30

Brenda Carr 205 Fisher Avenue.

Speaker 3

5:33

Ma'am, do you swear our firm to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?

Speaker 5

5:37

I swear.

Speaker 3

5:38

You may proceed.

Speaker 5

5:40

Um we're requesting the subdivision on Eglinton Hall, which is nationally historic home, and a Milford Historic Home.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Miscellaneous███████████████████████████████████35%
Planning and Zoning█████████████████████████████████33%
Land Use Regulation███████████████████19%
Procedural█████5%
Historic Preservation████4%
Community Engagement████4%
Summary of Proceedings

Milford Board of Adjustment Meeting – March 12, 2026

The Milford Board of Adjustment held a public hearing on March 12, 2026, to consider three variance applications. The board approved most requests, with one item tabled for additional information. The meeting included public testimony, staff presentations, and individual votes on each variance.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • On the David Carr application (205 Fisher Avenue): Julie Morris expressed surprise that the city supported this homeowner’s variance while not similarly supporting a developer’s project on Walnut Street. A letter from Martha Pileggi (607 SE 2nd St) opposing the variances was read into the record, citing self-created conditions, disregard for zoning laws, and neighborhood disturbances.
  • On the Ashley Furniture application: Greg Socora (334 Shore Lane, Lighthouse Estates) strongly opposed the 40-foot sign height (Variance #3), citing potential light trespass, sleep disruption, glare, and environmental impacts. He spoke as HOA president. Rachel Melton (113 Starlight Lane) asked about construction traffic impacts on the single entrance/exit to Lighthouse Estates. Julie Morris (21142 Cedar B. True) supported the project overall but opposed the sign height, noting inconsistency with past sign decisions, and suggested that approvals be conditioned on the site remaining a showroom.
  • On the Milford Historical Society application: Julie Morris supported all variances, noting satisfaction that fire truck access concerns were addressed.

Discussion Items

  • Lands of David Carr – 205 Fisher Avenue: The applicant requested three variances to subdivide a property containing two single-family homes: reduce minimum interior lot area from 8,000 sq ft to 5,746 sq ft, reduce minimum lot width from 80 ft to 58.68 ft, and reduce side yard setback from 8 ft to 7.6 ft. The applicant (Brenda Carr) stated the larger lot for the historic Eglington Hall honors the home and is consistent with smaller adjacent lots. Staff confirmed proper public notice was given.
  • Ashley Furniture – 23529 Sussex Highway: The applicant sought three variances for a new 30,380 sq ft retail store: reduce required parking from 153 spaces to 65, reduce loading berths from three to one, and increase freestanding sign height from 28 ft to 40 ft. The engineer (Edwin Tenefoss) and representative (Justin Barnes) explained that a similar store in Millsboro with 50 parking spaces operates adequately, that the store is a showroom (no warehouse), and the taller sign is needed to be visible southbound over the Route 1 overpass. They noted the sign would be internally lit, not a digital sign, and would comply with city illumination standards. Staff confirmed that sign lighting is regulated at permit issuance.
  • Milford Historical Society – Parson Thorne Mansion: The applicant requested five variances to construct a 2,000 sq ft museum building: reduce rear yard setback from 25 ft to 20 ft, permit gravel parking (except handicap spaces), reduce drive aisle width from 14 ft to 8 ft, reduce parking from 7 spaces to 5, and eliminate required screening. The engineer (John Roach) stated the property is historically constrained, the gravel and narrow aisle match existing character, and the building’s low usage justifies fewer parking spaces. Fire marshal approval will be required during site plan review.

Key Outcomes

  • David Carr variances: All three variances were approved unanimously (5-0).
    • Variance #1 (lot area): Motion by Rizzo, seconded by Wiley; approved.
    • Variance #2 (lot width): Motion by Wiley, seconded by Rizzo; approved.
    • Variance #3 (side yard setback): Motion by Wiley, seconded by White; approved.
  • Ashley Furniture variances: Variances #1 (parking) and #2 (loading berths) were approved unanimously (5-0). Variance #3 (sign height) was tabled unanimously (5-0) to allow the applicant to provide more details on sign design and illumination, and to potentially align with a future application for building height.
  • Milford Historical Society variances: All five variances were approved unanimously (5-0).
    • Variance #1 (rear yard setback): Motion by Wiley, seconded by White; approved.
    • Variance #2 (paving): Motion by Rizzo, seconded by Muscola; approved.
    • Variance #3 (drive aisle width): Motion by Wiley, seconded by Rizzo; approved.
    • Variance #4 (parking spaces): Motion by Wiley, seconded by Muscola; approved.
    • Variance #5 (screening): Motion by Rizzo, seconded by Wiley; approved.
  • Other: The board deferred approval of the finding of facts for previous agenda items to the next meeting, citing late preparation.

Meeting Transcript

Please rise and we'll pledge allegiance. We have the open public comment period first. Has anyone signed up? Did we check that? I didn't like to do that. The open public comment is just for anything that's not on the agenda per state law. Just check to see if we'll anyone. Anyone online wish to make a general statement before the meeting? Please raise your hand. Nobody's coming forward. All right. We'll close the open public comment period, move into our regular meeting. We do have a full quorum today. And I think all the applicants are here. Do we have the uh the minutes? No minutes today. Okay. All right, we'll move into the public the public hearings. The first application is lands of David Carr 205 Fisher Avenue. Mr. Pierce, we explain the applicant's request. Thank you. Good morning. The this application begins on page seven of your packet. Uh this is application BOA 252-2026, lands of David Carr. This is a variance application for a property that's zoned R2 residential district. The property single property currently contains two single-family detached dwellings. Um located at 205 Fisher Avenue and 213 Fisher Avenue. The applicant's proposing to subdivide the property that currently contains two single family detached dwellings on one property into two lots, each containing one of the single family detached dwellings. In order to subdivide the property as requested, the applicant has to obtain approval of three variances. Variance number one is from chapter 230-D, paragraph or chapter 230-10, paragraph D1A, which states the minimum interior lot area shall be 8,000 square feet, and minimum corner lot area shall be 13,000 square feet. The applicant seeking a variance to reduce the minimum lot area for proposed lot one from 8,000 square feet to 5,746 square feet, uh resulting in a lot area 2,254 square feet less than what is required by city code. The second variance is from chapter 230-10, paragraph D1C, which states the minimum lot width shall be 80 feet. The applicant seeking a variance to reduce the lot width for proposed lot one from 80 feet to 58.68 feet, resulting in a lot width 21.32 feet less than what is required by the city code. Section two of the staff report provides staff's analysis of the four criteria used to evaluate an area variance for each of the three requests. Uh showing the proposed lot one, which contains the smaller area of lot size and an existing uh home at 213 Fisher Avenue, and the residual land, which contains the older home on the corner of 2nd Street in Fisher. We also have a response from the applicant for the uh application and a narrative from the property owners. Um we have a copy of the zoning code highlighting the sections are seeking a variance from, and at the end of the packet material for this agenda item is a copy of the public notice. The public notice was advertised in the daily state news on February 13th, 2026, and all properties within 200 feet of the parcel was were mailed a copy of the public notice for this morning's meeting, and the property is posted with a public notice sign uh to meet our advertising requirements. Uh so with that uh I can answer your questions and the applicant's here to go over the request in more detail. So any questions from Mr.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com