OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Milford, Delaware/Board of Adjustment
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Milford Board of Adjustments Meeting - July 9, 2026

Board of Adjustment — Thursday, July 9, 2026
BodyMilford, Delaware
SessionBoard of Adjustment
DateThursday, July 9, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 41:32

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:01

We'll

Speaker 2

0:01

call

Speaker 1

0:02

the July 9th, 2026 Board of Adjustments meeting to order.

0:05

The first item is if anyone signed up on an open public comment period, which is not to do with directly something on the application.

0:14

Has anyone signed up?

Speaker 3

0:16

Mr.

0:16

Chairman, it appears that two people have signed up, but I think their items are on the agenda.

0:20

At least I'm correct.

0:22

And if so, um they they can of course talk.

0:25

But originally was Brian Scheip, which I believe has an application, and then Matt Phillips, which is also

Unassigned speaker

0:32

uh

Speaker 3

0:33

regarding the issue an issue which is going to be before the board.

0:37

I don't see anyone else that has signed up, and I don't know if there's anyone else

Speaker 4

0:40

online.

0:42

Is there anyone online who wishes to make a public comment?

0:45

Please uh come forward.

Unassigned speaker

0:51

Uh

Speaker 4

0:51

nobody's raising their hand.

Speaker 1

0:52

Okay.

0:53

We'll close the open public comment period.

0:56

Go into the regular meeting.

0:57

Please rise and we'll pledge allegiance.

Speaker 3

1:21

We

Speaker 1

1:21

do have all the members here and all the staff, so we're good on that end.

1:30

See, did we have the minutes?

1:33

No minutes.

1:34

So there's no minutes, so we'll move right into the public hearings.

1:48

First application is Southern States.

1:51

Um I won't list their address in Richmond.

1:56

It's on the Milford Harrington Highway.

1:58

Mr.

1:58

Pierce will explain the applicant's request.

Speaker 4

2:01

Yes, this application begins on page five of your packet.

2:04

This is application BOA-339-2026, Southern States Milford Co-op Inc.

2:10

Uh, this is for a property that's owned by Southern States, but it's the small uh strip center on the north side of Milford Harrington Highway, just west of the Williamsville Road intersection that contains a five-tenant um uh commercial structure.

2:25

The property is on uh C3 Highway Commercial, and uh it's on approximately 1.9 acres of land.

Unassigned speaker

2:33

Um,

Speaker 4

2:34

the applicant's proposing to remove two existing freestanding signs that are located on the property and construct one new 10-foot-tall freestanding sign in the same location.

2:44

Uh, in order to construct the sign as shown on the provided exhibits, uh, the applicant has to obtain a variance uh from the zoning code.

Unassigned speaker

2:52

Um

Speaker 4

2:52

the variance would be from chapter 230-24.16, paragraph B1C, which states freestanding signs shall have a minimum setback of 10 feet from the front lot line and a minimum setback of 25 feet from adjacent property lines.

3:07

The applicant seeking permission to reduce the front yard setback for the freestanding sign from 10 feet to four feet, resulting in a freestanding sign six feet closer to the front property line than what is permitted by the zoning code.

Unassigned speaker

3:20

Uh

Speaker 4

3:20

section two of the staff report provides staff's analysis and the applicant's response to the four criteria used to evaluate an area variance.

3:29

We have the location and zoning map showing um the location of the property and the property zones around

Unassigned speaker

3:37

it.

Unassigned speaker

3:38

Uh,

Speaker 4

3:39

we have a copy of a rendering showing what the new freestanding sign would look like uh to be located in the front yard area.

3:49

Uh we have a survey indicating the location of the sign placement uh within the grassy area between the two entrances to the site.

Unassigned speaker

3:58

Uh

Speaker 4

3:58

we have a narrative from the applicant.

Unassigned speaker

4:01

Uh

Speaker 4

4:01

they also provided some pictures of the existing signage.

4:04

Uh the existing signage would be considered legal non-conforming from a front setback standpoint.

4:10

Uh the existing sign structures are four feet from that front property line already.

4:16

Uh so they would be taking these two signs down and and erecting the one on uh under the exhibit that was shown a few slides ago.

4:24

And again, they just provided some additional pictures uh from a little bit more of a distance.

4:30

Um looking the other way down the road and coming back and looking at the sign.

Unassigned speaker

4:40

Uh

Speaker 4

4:40

we have a copy of the zoning code highlighting the sections that are impacted by this application.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Planning and Zoning█████████████████████████████████████████████54%
Land Use Regulation███████████████18%
Procedural█████████████16%
Public Engagement███████8%
Government Structure███4%
Summary of Proceedings

Milford Board of Adjustments Meeting - July 9, 2026

The Milford Board of Adjustments held a meeting on July 9, 2026, addressing variance requests for three properties and conducting annual officer elections. All variance requests were approved unanimously.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • No members of the public spoke during the open comment period for non-agenda items. Two individuals signed up but their topics were on the agenda.

Discussion Items

  • Southern States Sign Variance (BOA-339-2026): The applicant sought to replace two existing non-conforming signs with a single 10-foot freestanding sign located 4 feet from the front lot line, requiring a reduction from the required 10-foot setback. Staff noted the existing signs were already at 4 feet. The applicant argued that moving the sign back would impact parking. The Board granted the variance unanimously, citing hardship and aesthetic improvements.
  • Pierce Hardy Storage Shed Variance (BOA-308-2026): The applicant proposed constructing a 5,250 sq. ft. accessory storage shed in the front yard of an industrial property (I-1), requiring two variances: (1) to place an accessory structure in the front yard instead of the rear, and (2) to reduce the setback from a non-industrial (C3) boundary from 200 feet to 135 feet. The shed was needed for relocated equipment. The Board approved both variances unanimously, noting the shape of the lot and existing building placement created a hardship.
  • Brian Scheipe Fence Variance (BOA-349-2026): The applicant sought a variance to erect a 5-foot tall privacy fence along Wild Goose Lane on a corner lot, where the code allows only 3.5-foot non-privacy fences in front yards. The fence would enclose backyard space lost to a retention area and provide safety for pets. The Board approved both height and privacy fence variances unanimously, citing safety and hardship.

Key Outcomes

  • Votes: All three variance requests (Southern States, Pierce Hardy, and Brian Scheipe) were approved by unanimous votes of the five board members (Rizzo, Wiley, Maskola, White, Werfel). Each variance had a motion and second, and all members voted in favor.
  • Organizational Officers: The Board elected Brendan Werfel as Chair, Joe Wiley as Vice Chair, and Andrea White as Secretary for the upcoming term.
  • Next Steps: The findings of fact for the June meeting will be prepared for the August meeting, along with the July meeting findings.

Meeting Transcript

We'll call the July 9th, 2026 Board of Adjustments meeting to order. The first item is if anyone signed up on an open public comment period, which is not to do with directly something on the application. Has anyone signed up? Mr. Chairman, it appears that two people have signed up, but I think their items are on the agenda. At least I'm correct. And if so, um they they can of course talk. But originally was Brian Scheip, which I believe has an application, and then Matt Phillips, which is also uh regarding the issue an issue which is going to be before the board. I don't see anyone else that has signed up, and I don't know if there's anyone else online. Is there anyone online who wishes to make a public comment? Please uh come forward. Uh nobody's raising their hand. Okay. We'll close the open public comment period. Go into the regular meeting. Please rise and we'll pledge allegiance. We do have all the members here and all the staff, so we're good on that end. See, did we have the minutes? No minutes. So there's no minutes, so we'll move right into the public hearings. First application is Southern States. Um I won't list their address in Richmond. It's on the Milford Harrington Highway. Mr. Pierce will explain the applicant's request. Yes, this application begins on page five of your packet. This is application BOA-339-2026, Southern States Milford Co-op Inc. Uh, this is for a property that's owned by Southern States, but it's the small uh strip center on the north side of Milford Harrington Highway, just west of the Williamsville Road intersection that contains a five-tenant um uh commercial structure. The property is on uh C3 Highway Commercial, and uh it's on approximately 1.9 acres of land. Um, the applicant's proposing to remove two existing freestanding signs that are located on the property and construct one new 10-foot-tall freestanding sign in the same location. Uh, in order to construct the sign as shown on the provided exhibits, uh, the applicant has to obtain a variance uh from the zoning code. Um the variance would be from chapter 230-24.16, paragraph B1C, which states freestanding signs shall have a minimum setback of 10 feet from the front lot line and a minimum setback of 25 feet from adjacent property lines. The applicant seeking permission to reduce the front yard setback for the freestanding sign from 10 feet to four feet, resulting in a freestanding sign six feet closer to the front property line than what is permitted by the zoning code. Uh section two of the staff report provides staff's analysis and the applicant's response to the four criteria used to evaluate an area variance. We have the location and zoning map showing um the location of the property and the property zones around it. Uh, we have a copy of a rendering showing what the new freestanding sign would look like uh to be located in the front yard area. Uh we have a survey indicating the location of the sign placement uh within the grassy area between the two entrances to the site. Uh

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com