OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Milford, Delaware/Board of Adjustment
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Milford Board of Adjustment Meeting Summary – October 8, 2026

Board of Adjustment — Thursday, October 8, 2026
BodyMilford, Delaware
SessionBoard of Adjustment
DateThursday, October 8, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 43:07

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:00

Meeting to order.

0:01

The first item is the open public comment period, which is comments not pertaining to an applicant on the agenda.

0:09

No one has signed up.

0:10

Is there anyone online?

Speaker 2

0:12

Is there anyone online who wishes to make a general public comment before the meeting begins?

0:20

Nobody's coming forward.

Speaker 1

0:21

Okay.

Unassigned speaker

0:23

And

Speaker 1

0:23

we can close the open public comment period and move into the regular regular meeting.

0:29

Please stand and we'll pledge allegiance.

0:52

We do have a all members here and the solicitor.

0:56

So we have a full quorum.

0:59

Do we have previous minutes?

1:02

We have no previous minutes to review.

1:04

So we'll move right into the public hearings.

1:09

The first applicant is a clean energy seven Marshall Street, Melford.

1:15

Mr.

1:16

Pierce will explain the applicant's request.

Speaker 2

1:19

Thank you.

1:20

Good morning.

1:20

This application begins on page five of your packet.

1:23

This is application BOA-379-2026 Clean Energy Inc.

1:29

This is a property that zone C3 Highway Commercial that currently contains a single family detached dwelling.

1:36

The proposed use is a single family detached dwelling with a warehouse building that's gonna house an automotive service within

Unassigned speaker

1:44

it.

Speaker 2

1:44

The property is located at uh 1022 North Walnut Street at the southwest corner of Buccaneer Boulevard and North Walnut.

Unassigned speaker

1:53

Uh

Speaker 2

1:53

the applicant's proposing to construct a 2400 square foot warehouse and uh service building on a property containing an existing single-family home as shown on the provided preliminary site plan.

2:04

The applicant seeking three variances from the board related to the placement of the structure and uh some of the zoning requirements.

Unassigned speaker

2:12

Uh

Speaker 2

2:13

variance one is from chapter 230-14, paragraph D5, which states the minimum front yard setback shall be 30 feet.

2:20

The applicant seeking permission to reduce the front yard setback from 30 feet to 20 feet along Buccaneer Boulevard, resulting in a 10-foot encroachment.

2:28

Second variance is from chapter 230-14, paragraph D6, which states side yards shall be provided as follows.

2:35

Each lot have shall have two side lots, uh side yards, a minimum of 20 feet with an aggregate of two side yards of 50 feet.

2:43

The applicant seeking permission to reduce the side yard setback from 20 feet to 10 feet, resulting in a 10-foot encroachment.

2:51

The last variants they're seeking is from chapter 230-22B6, which states a 15-foot visual and sound buffer area shall be provided on non-residential uses when abutting a residential use in a C3 district.

3:04

The applicant seeking permission to reduce the landscape buffer area from 15 feet to 10 feet, which results in a reduction of five feet of the landscape buffer.

3:13

Section two of the staff report provides staff's analysis along with the applicant's responses to the four criteria used to evaluate area variances.

3:57

We have a letter of support from the neighbor to the south.

4:01

And we have a copy of the zoning regulations highlighting the sections are seeking a variance from

Unassigned speaker

4:08

at

Speaker 2

4:08

the end of the packet.

4:09

Material for this item is a copy of the public notice.

4:12

The public notice was advertised in the Daily State News on September 23rd, 2026.

4:17

And all properties within 200 feet of the property were mailed a copy of the public notice for this morning's meeting, and the property is posted with a public notice sign meeting our advertising requirements.

4:29

So with that, I'll be available to answer any questions, and the applicant's engineer uh and and the applicant are here to go over uh the proposal.

Speaker 1

4:42

In the packet, there's not a like a proposed drawing of the building or just the lay just the site plan.

Speaker 2

4:50

Yeah, it's just the site plan.

4:51

Um we don't really have an architectural review um for general commercial property.

4:58

For

Unassigned speaker

4:58

that

Speaker 2

4:59

okay.

Speaker 1

5:01

Any questions for Mr.

5:02

Pierce?

Unassigned speaker

5:05

All

Speaker 1

5:05

right.

5:06

Someone here on behalf of the applicant that wants to speak.

5:10

Please state your name and address, and Mr.

5:12

Morris will swear you in.

Unassigned speaker

5:15

Uh

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use Regulation█████████████████████████████████████████████67%
Procedural████████12%
Engineering And Infrastructure██████9%
Public Engagement██████9%
Legal Precedent██3%
Summary of Proceedings

Milford Board of Adjustment Meeting Summary – October 8, 2026

The Milford Board of Adjustment convened on October 8, 2026, to conduct public hearings on three variance applications and adopt findings of fact for three previously heard cases. All motions carried unanimously. Two public comments were submitted by a single speaker during the hearings.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Julie Morris (21142 CDB Troy, Milford) addressed two applications. For the Clean Energy Inc. application, Ms. Morris opposed the reductions of the side yard setback and landscape buffer along the southern property line, arguing that a six-foot fence does not adequately mitigate the building being five feet closer to a neighboring residence. She also requested further clarification that the proposed use is not an automotive service. For the Halpern Plaza sign variance, Ms. Morris questioned the legal necessity of the variance, arguing the city's ordinance does not explicitly restrict freestanding signs to tenants of specific buildings and citing the Delaware Supreme Court ruling Jack Lingo (2022) regarding ambiguous zoning ordinances. She suggested the issue should have been handled as an appeal of interpretation rather than a variance request.

Discussion Items

1. Clean Energy Inc. – Variances (BOA-379-2026)

  • Applicant's Representation: Chad Warren (Davis Bell & Fradel) presented on behalf of Clean Energy Inc. for the property at 1022 North Walnut Street (southwest corner of Buccaneer Boulevard and North Walnut Street), zoned C3. The application requested three area variances: front yard setback reduction (30 ft to 20 ft on Buccaneer Boulevard), side yard setback reduction (20 ft to 10 ft on the south side), and landscape buffer reduction (15 ft to 10 ft on the south side).
  • Proposed Use: The 2,400-square-foot warehouse will house a filter cleaning operation. The applicant explicitly stated the business is not an automotive service center and no heavy trucks would remain on site. The existing single-family home will be retained.
  • Hardship Argument: The parcel (0.4 acres, 70 ft wide) is a pre-existing non-conforming lot under the current code (minimum 1 acre, 170 ft wide). Current standards leave only a 20-foot buildable area, making normal improvements impractical without relief.
  • Board Deliberations: Board members acknowledged the practical difficulty imposed by the lot's non-conforming dimensions. A letter of support from the neighbor to the south was noted as evidence the variances would not seriously affect surrounding properties.

2. Joseph Phillips – Fence Height Variance (BOA-395-2026)

  • Applicant's Representation: Joseph Phillips requested a variance from the 3.5-foot maximum fence height in the front yard (R-1 district) to allow a 4-foot fence around an existing fish pond on his property at Causeway Avenue (southwest corner of Causeway Avenue and South Walnut Street).
  • Proposed Use: The fence is intended to ensure safety for guests attending events held on the property, such as Hippie Fest and a ghost tour.
  • Board Deliberations: Members noted the proposed fence will be located inside an existing perimeter fence and would not be more visible from the street than the current fencing. The Board found the variance reasonable for public safety.

3. Halpern Plaza – Sign Usage Variance (BOA-401-2026)

  • Applicant's Representation: Kevin Esslinger requested a variance to allow either of the two permitted freestanding signs at Halpern Plaza (North DuPont Boulevard) to advertise tenants operating from either building within the shopping center, rather than being restricted to building-specific signage.
  • Proposed Use: The plaza functions as one integrated commercial property with common ownership, management, and parking. The variance sought flexibility to balance tenant advertising across the two signs as tenancy changes.
  • Staff Position: Staff interpreted the code as requiring each building's sign to serve that specific building, creating the need for the variance. The variance does not increase the number, size, height, or illumination of signs.
  • Board Deliberations: The Board found the restriction created an unnecessary hardship given the integrated nature of the development and approved the request for greater flexibility.

Findings of Fact

The Board approved findings of fact for three applications heard previously: 387-2026 (Lands of Timothy Lesnar), 374-2026 (Telos Properties), and 380-2026 (Baltimore Air Coil). No further discussion was held on these cases.

Key Outcomes

  • Clean Energy Inc. Variances: Motion to grant all three variances (front setback, side setback, landscape buffer). Vote: 5-0 (Rizzo, Wiley, Muscola, White, Warful).
  • Joseph Phillips Fence Height Variance: Motion to grant the 0.5-foot variance. Vote: 5-0 (Wiley, White, Muscola, Rizzo, Warful).
  • Halpern Plaza Sign Variance: Motion to grant the variance for flexible advertising across signs. Vote: 5-0 (Wiley, Rizzo, White, Muscola, Warful).
  • Findings of Fact: Approved unanimously for applications 387-2026, 374-2026, and 380-2026.

Meeting Transcript

Meeting to order. The first item is the open public comment period, which is comments not pertaining to an applicant on the agenda. No one has signed up. Is there anyone online? Is there anyone online who wishes to make a general public comment before the meeting begins? Nobody's coming forward. Okay. And we can close the open public comment period and move into the regular regular meeting. Please stand and we'll pledge allegiance. We do have a all members here and the solicitor. So we have a full quorum. Do we have previous minutes? We have no previous minutes to review. So we'll move right into the public hearings. The first applicant is a clean energy seven Marshall Street, Melford. Mr. Pierce will explain the applicant's request. Thank you. Good morning. This application begins on page five of your packet. This is application BOA-379-2026 Clean Energy Inc. This is a property that zone C3 Highway Commercial that currently contains a single family detached dwelling. The proposed use is a single family detached dwelling with a warehouse building that's gonna house an automotive service within it. The property is located at uh 1022 North Walnut Street at the southwest corner of Buccaneer Boulevard and North Walnut. Uh the applicant's proposing to construct a 2400 square foot warehouse and uh service building on a property containing an existing single-family home as shown on the provided preliminary site plan. The applicant seeking three variances from the board related to the placement of the structure and uh some of the zoning requirements. Uh variance one is from chapter 230-14, paragraph D5, which states the minimum front yard setback shall be 30 feet. The applicant seeking permission to reduce the front yard setback from 30 feet to 20 feet along Buccaneer Boulevard, resulting in a 10-foot encroachment. Second variance is from chapter 230-14, paragraph D6, which states side yards shall be provided as follows. Each lot have shall have two side lots, uh side yards, a minimum of 20 feet with an aggregate of two side yards of 50 feet. The applicant seeking permission to reduce the side yard setback from 20 feet to 10 feet, resulting in a 10-foot encroachment. The last variants they're seeking is from chapter 230-22B6, which states a 15-foot visual and sound buffer area shall be provided on non-residential uses when abutting a residential use in a C3 district. The applicant seeking permission to reduce the landscape buffer area from 15 feet to 10 feet, which results in a reduction of five feet of the landscape buffer. Section two of the staff report provides staff's analysis along with the applicant's responses to the four criteria used to evaluate area variances. We have a letter of support from the neighbor to the south. And we have a copy of the zoning regulations highlighting the sections are seeking a variance from at the end of the packet. Material for this item is a copy of the public notice. The public notice was advertised in the Daily State News on September 23rd, 2026. And all properties within 200 feet of the property were mailed a copy of the public notice for this morning's meeting, and the property is posted with a public notice sign meeting our advertising requirements. So with that, I'll be available to answer any questions, and the applicant's engineer uh and and the applicant are here to go over uh the proposal. In the packet, there's not a like a proposed drawing of the building or just the lay just the site plan. Yeah, it's just the site plan. Um we don't really have an architectural review um for general commercial property. For

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com