Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.
The Milford Board of Adjustment convened on October 8, 2026, to conduct public hearings on three variance applications and adopt findings of fact for three previously heard cases. All motions carried unanimously. Two public comments were submitted by a single speaker during the hearings.
1. Clean Energy Inc. – Variances (BOA-379-2026)
2. Joseph Phillips – Fence Height Variance (BOA-395-2026)
3. Halpern Plaza – Sign Usage Variance (BOA-401-2026)
The Board approved findings of fact for three applications heard previously: 387-2026 (Lands of Timothy Lesnar), 374-2026 (Telos Properties), and 380-2026 (Baltimore Air Coil). No further discussion was held on these cases.
Meeting to order. The first item is the open public comment period, which is comments not pertaining to an applicant on the agenda. No one has signed up. Is there anyone online? Is there anyone online who wishes to make a general public comment before the meeting begins? Nobody's coming forward. Okay. And we can close the open public comment period and move into the regular regular meeting. Please stand and we'll pledge allegiance. We do have a all members here and the solicitor. So we have a full quorum. Do we have previous minutes? We have no previous minutes to review. So we'll move right into the public hearings. The first applicant is a clean energy seven Marshall Street, Melford. Mr. Pierce will explain the applicant's request. Thank you. Good morning. This application begins on page five of your packet. This is application BOA-379-2026 Clean Energy Inc. This is a property that zone C3 Highway Commercial that currently contains a single family detached dwelling. The proposed use is a single family detached dwelling with a warehouse building that's gonna house an automotive service within it. The property is located at uh 1022 North Walnut Street at the southwest corner of Buccaneer Boulevard and North Walnut. Uh the applicant's proposing to construct a 2400 square foot warehouse and uh service building on a property containing an existing single-family home as shown on the provided preliminary site plan. The applicant seeking three variances from the board related to the placement of the structure and uh some of the zoning requirements. Uh variance one is from chapter 230-14, paragraph D5, which states the minimum front yard setback shall be 30 feet. The applicant seeking permission to reduce the front yard setback from 30 feet to 20 feet along Buccaneer Boulevard, resulting in a 10-foot encroachment. Second variance is from chapter 230-14, paragraph D6, which states side yards shall be provided as follows. Each lot have shall have two side lots, uh side yards, a minimum of 20 feet with an aggregate of two side yards of 50 feet. The applicant seeking permission to reduce the side yard setback from 20 feet to 10 feet, resulting in a 10-foot encroachment. The last variants they're seeking is from chapter 230-22B6, which states a 15-foot visual and sound buffer area shall be provided on non-residential uses when abutting a residential use in a C3 district. The applicant seeking permission to reduce the landscape buffer area from 15 feet to 10 feet, which results in a reduction of five feet of the landscape buffer. Section two of the staff report provides staff's analysis along with the applicant's responses to the four criteria used to evaluate area variances. We have a letter of support from the neighbor to the south. And we have a copy of the zoning regulations highlighting the sections are seeking a variance from at the end of the packet. Material for this item is a copy of the public notice. The public notice was advertised in the Daily State News on September 23rd, 2026. And all properties within 200 feet of the property were mailed a copy of the public notice for this morning's meeting, and the property is posted with a public notice sign meeting our advertising requirements. So with that, I'll be available to answer any questions, and the applicant's engineer uh and and the applicant are here to go over uh the proposal. In the packet, there's not a like a proposed drawing of the building or just the lay just the site plan. Yeah, it's just the site plan. Um we don't really have an architectural review um for general commercial property. For