OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Milford, Delaware/Planning Commission
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Milford Planning Commission Meeting - November 18, 2025

Planning Commission — Tuesday, November 18, 2025
BodyMilford, Delaware
SessionPlanning Commission
DateTuesday, November 18, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:30:02

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:12

Thank you, sir.

Speaker 2

0:13

Uh good evening, everyone.

0:15

This is a public comment period before the planning commission.

0:18

Meeting the city of Milford, the city has set aside 15 minutes for public comment.

0:23

We allow three minutes per person.

0:25

Anyone who has wished to speak should have signed up on the comment pad.

0:29

We will also check with anyone online.

0:32

When your name is called, please come to the podium, give your name and address and the topic which you want to speak.

Unassigned speaker

0:38

Um

Speaker 2

0:38

it appears that we only have one person signed up for this evening, so I will call that person Julie Morris.

0:44

Please come forward.

Speaker 3

0:51

Julie Morris, 210 East Street.

0:53

Speaking tonight for myself and for many Milford residents who feel worn down by the direction this town is heading.

1:01

People are not angry because they hate growth.

1:04

We're angry because

Unassigned speaker

1:05

the

Speaker 3

1:06

growth in Milford no longer matches the reality of living in Milford.

1:10

Every meeting we hear the same phrases that it fits the zoning.

1:17

But none of those documents sit in traffic.

1:20

None of those documents have children in overcrowded schools, and none of those documents wait for EMS when minutes matter.

1:51

So let's be honest.

1:52

Part of the frustration comes from the fact that several people involved in these decisions working construction, real estate, development, or industries that financially benefit from non-stop growth.

2:03

There's nothing wrong with anyone's career, but when the people approving projects also profit from the type of projects being approved, residents lose trust.

2:34

If you lived in town with kids in this town, you would care about these impacts.

2:38

You would care about road safety, school capacity, EMS response times, drainage failures, water quality, policing safety, and the growing pressures on our fire company.

2:50

You'd care that this town is losing its identity, becoming something built for outsiders instead of the people who have been

Unassigned speaker

2:57

here.

Speaker 3

3:05

Stop treating public input like a box to check.

3:08

Milford deserves planning that reflects the people who call this place home, not planning driven by builders, not planning driven by profit, and not planning driven by pressure.

3:18

Please make decisions tonight and moving forward that shows our voices matter.

3:23

Again, thank

Unassigned speaker

3:24

you.

Speaker 2

3:27

There's no one else signed up.

Speaker 4

3:32

Anyone online wish to make a comment, please come forward.

Speaker 2

3:49

And I turn it back.

3:50

Oh

Speaker 4

3:56

it that's only for general comment.

3:58

If you had a comment related to one of the applications, there'll be public comments associated with it as well.

Unassigned speaker

4:04

So

Speaker 4

4:04

if you're here for the 609 Walnut Street development, you'll be able to make comment um during that application.

4:13

Okay.

4:14

All right, thank

Unassigned speaker

4:15

you.

Speaker 5

5:02

March.

Speaker 4

5:03

March 18th's minutes are in the packet for your review and approval.

Speaker 6

5:24

I'll make a motion that we accept the minutes as presented.

5:34

Aye.

5:35

Aye.

5:36

All right.

Speaker 7

5:39

Any opposed.

Unassigned speaker

5:42

All

Speaker 7

5:43

right.

5:43

Motion carries.

5:45

I guess we're going to a public hearings now.

5:47

Do we need

Unassigned speaker

5:47

to

Speaker 7

5:48

do the

Speaker 4

5:49

and solicitor?

5:50

Before we get into the public hearings, I wanted to um welcome Harold Sylvester, who's the newly appointed planning commissioner.

5:57

Um we appreciate your volunteering uh to serve on the commission and uh look forward uh to working with you.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use Regulation█████████████████████████████████████████████48%
Planning and Zoning███████████12%
Procedural██████████11%
Public Engagement██████████11%
Water And Wastewater Management█████5%
Community Engagement████4%
Engineering And Infrastructure██2%
Transportation Safety██2%
Environmental Protection██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Milford Planning Commission Meeting - November 18, 2025

The Milford Planning Commission convened on November 18, 2025, at 6:00 PM to hear two public hearing items: a preliminary major subdivision application for 609 Walnut Street and an annexation request for a property in Shawnee Acres. The commission also approved the consent calendar and held elections for officers. Acting as a fact-finding body, the commission makes recommendations to the Milford City Council, which will hold its own independent hearings on November 24, 2025, at 6:00 PM in City Hall.

Consent Calendar

  • The minutes from the March 18th meeting were approved as presented.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • General Comment (Julie Morris, 210 East Street): Ms. Morris expressed frustration that growth in Milford does not match the reality of living in the town. She argued that trust is undermined when decision-makers involved in approving projects also financially benefit from development. She urged the commission to treat public input as more than a checkbox and to plan for residents, not builders.
  • 609 Walnut Street (Ordinance 2025-19):
    • In Opposition (Karen Duffy, 607 N. Walnut St.): Ms. Duffy opposed the single-family lot on lot 10, stating it does not match the neighborhood and that street parking will remain a problem despite new driveways. She stated she felt unheard by city officials.
    • In Opposition (Julie Morris, 210 East St.): Ms. Morris argued the project's density is too intense for the R2 district, stating that cramming six units onto 40-foot wide lots conflicts with the purpose of R2 zoning. She criticized the lot width variance and the reliance on cash-in-lieu of open space. She raised safety concerns regarding 71 new daily trips and eight new driveways on a busy residential corridor.
    • In Opposition (Greg Kelly, 602 N. Walnut St.): Mr. Kelly stated the applicant's motive for the layout is maximizing profit at the expense of neighbors and altering the character of the main street into town.
    • In Opposition (Trish Marvel, via Zoom): Ms. Marvel expressed concern about the city making exceptions to zoning codes and questioned how cash-in-lieu fees would be tracked.
  • Annexation (Ordinance 2025-18):
    • In Opposition (Julie Morris, 210 East St.): Ms. Morris argued the homeowner would likely qualify for a hardship exemption from Den Rec to replace the septic system, making the annexation unnecessary. She criticized the logistics and legal complexities of the city annexing a single lot within a platted HOA, stating she could find no precedent in Delaware or neighboring states. She noted the homeowner never applied for a septic permit.
    • In Opposition (Trish Marvel, via Zoom): Ms. Marvel raised concerns about the logistical challenges and potential legal issues for the city in servicing a single property within a larger, privately governed HOA. She suggested helping the homeowner replace the septic system instead.

Discussion Items

  • 609 Walnut Street Subdivision (Ordinance 2025-19): The applicant (Mark Davidson, Pannoni Associates) presented plans to subdivide three parcels (1.44 acres) into eight lots, comprising two single-family detached dwellings and six single-family semi-detached dwellings (duplexes). A variance for lot 10 (reducing minimum lot width from 80 feet to 56.45 feet) was previously granted by the Board of Adjustment. Planning Director Rob Pierce noted the project generally complies with zoning and subdivision codes excepting the variance, and is subject to a cash-in-lieu payment for open space. Commission discussion considered lot density, neighborhood compatibility, traffic safety from the eight driveways, and the impact on the character of North Walnut Street. The applicant confirmed the existing “White House” will be retained.
  • Annexation of 2 North Brandywine Road (Ordinance 2025-18): The applicant’s realtor, Joanne Milton, stated the homeowner (Pamela Davis Thompson) has a failing septic system and is seeking annexation to connect to city water and sewer. Staff confirmed the annexation is consistent with the comprehensive plan and was supported unanimously by the annexation committee. The city already provides electric service and fire protection to the area. Commission discussion explored whether a hardship exception for a new septic was viable (it was investigated and found not applicable), the precedent for other Shawnee Acres properties, and the logistical complexity of the city providing services to a single home inside an unincorporated HOA. Planning Director Pierce stated the city’s longstanding policy requires annexation when properties become contiguous and connect to city utilities.

Key Outcomes

  • 609 Walnut Street (Ordinance 2025-19): The commission voted 5-1 to recommend approval of the preliminary major subdivision to the City Council.
    • In favor: Wright, Hammond, Purcell, Sylvester, Reddin. The majority cited general consistency with the codes as the primary reason for the recommendation.
    • Against: Soles. The commissioner stated the project was too crowded for the neighborhood.
  • Annexation (Ordinance 2025-18): The commission voted unanimously (6-0) to recommend approval of the annexation to the City Council. Commissioners noted the request was initiated by the homeowner, existing services are available, and the plan is consistent with comprehensive plans.
  • Election of Officers: Ian Wright was elected Chairperson. Shelby (absent) was elected Vice Chairperson. Jim Purcell was elected Secretary.
  • Next Steps: The Milford City Council will hold public hearings for both applications on November 24, 2025, at 6:00 PM in City Hall and will make final independent decisions on each matter.

Meeting Transcript

Thank you, sir. Uh good evening, everyone. This is a public comment period before the planning commission. Meeting the city of Milford, the city has set aside 15 minutes for public comment. We allow three minutes per person. Anyone who has wished to speak should have signed up on the comment pad. We will also check with anyone online. When your name is called, please come to the podium, give your name and address and the topic which you want to speak. Um it appears that we only have one person signed up for this evening, so I will call that person Julie Morris. Please come forward. Julie Morris, 210 East Street. Speaking tonight for myself and for many Milford residents who feel worn down by the direction this town is heading. People are not angry because they hate growth. We're angry because the growth in Milford no longer matches the reality of living in Milford. Every meeting we hear the same phrases that it fits the zoning. But none of those documents sit in traffic. None of those documents have children in overcrowded schools, and none of those documents wait for EMS when minutes matter. So let's be honest. Part of the frustration comes from the fact that several people involved in these decisions working construction, real estate, development, or industries that financially benefit from non-stop growth. There's nothing wrong with anyone's career, but when the people approving projects also profit from the type of projects being approved, residents lose trust. If you lived in town with kids in this town, you would care about these impacts. You would care about road safety, school capacity, EMS response times, drainage failures, water quality, policing safety, and the growing pressures on our fire company. You'd care that this town is losing its identity, becoming something built for outsiders instead of the people who have been here. Stop treating public input like a box to check. Milford deserves planning that reflects the people who call this place home, not planning driven by builders, not planning driven by profit, and not planning driven by pressure. Please make decisions tonight and moving forward that shows our voices matter. Again, thank you. There's no one else signed up. Anyone online wish to make a comment, please come forward. And I turn it back. Oh it that's only for general comment. If you had a comment related to one of the applications, there'll be public comments associated with it as well. So if you're here for the 609 Walnut Street development, you'll be able to make comment um during that application. Okay. All right, thank you. March. March 18th's minutes are in the packet for your review and approval. I'll make a motion that we accept the minutes as presented. Aye. Aye. All right. Any opposed.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com