OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Milwaukee, Wisconsin/Common Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Finance & Personnel Committee Meeting - September 16, 2026

Common Council — Wednesday, September 16, 2026
BodyMilwaukee, Wisconsin
SessionCommon Council
DateWednesday, September 16, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 3:11:42

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:00

I'm Chairwoman Marina Dmitrievich, joined by our Vice Chairperson Alderman Peter Bergelis.

0:05

Alderman Scott Spiker is president.

0:07

Present.

0:10

There you go.

0:11

That's not a nice Alder Woman Malele Cogs is here.

0:16

And Alder Woman Charlotte Moore.

0:19

That provides us a quorum to conduct our business today on Wednesday, September 16th, 2026.

0:25

We will begin with item number one.

0:28

251 682, a substitute ordinance relating to salaries for certain elected officials.

0:36

Okay.

0:37

Come on up, city attorney.

0:41

Okay.

0:42

And the clerk would like us to read item two in as well, because they do correspond when you take one action, you have to then reflect it in the accompanying salary file.

0:52

So item two is 260726 communication relating to the salaries of certain elected officials.

1:04

I did want to bring Jim.

1:05

Do you mind coming up?

1:07

This is kind of a three-part fix.

1:16

All right.

1:17

And so there also may be a mixture of feelings on a mixture of items.

1:23

So Jim, would you mind on item one and two, we'll start?

1:28

Actually, why don't we start with the city attorney and then go to Jim?

1:30

That'd be a little bit easier.

1:31

So thank you, City Attorney.

1:33

I'll note in the file there are three items I'd like to bring your attention to.

1:37

Um a um really uh clear memo from the city attorney's office on kind of how we got here and the fix they recommend, as well as then um kind of a side-by-side chart because we've we've had to kind of play some catch-up here.

1:53

And then the third part was kind of an older analysis from 2023.

1:57

Um you kind of do have to roll back the tape and think into when this council had a lengthy deliberation kind of back then on the executive pay plan to get here.

2:08

So go ahead, city attorney, then just briefly um your recommendation.

2:14

I'll have Jim explain it and then we'll take the vote.

2:16

Thank you, Madam Chair.

2:16

Just uh Evan Goike, City Attorney to my right is Deputy Uh City Attorney Robin Peterson, and to my to my left is uh assistant city attorney Alex Foundos.

2:25

Uh as you mentioned, there are com there are materials that we produced in the file that lays out uh as clear as we could um uh provide a brief history and and our recommendations, just so that everybody is clear.

2:42

Um at the beginning of 2024, but before the election, and the new current cohort of alder persons were elected, uh we advised the council that uh an ordinance was lawful and enforceable that would tie aldermanic and mayoral salary increases capped at uh no greater than three percent, but with uh if a raise to general city employees was initiated, that that would apply to the council and the mayor as well.

3:09

Uh that actually was uh finally or for for the first time enacted in the budget in the fall of 2025 for the current year, 2026, as those mechanics were um actually you know sought to be placed into action and we saw how it was working.

3:27

We uh reviewed and revised and frankly reversed our advice about whether the council and the mayor could receive that 3 percent increase in 2026, and ultimately I advised the council that they could not receive that benefit, otherwise it would be in violation of a state statute that prohibits the members of the legislative body and and the mayor of local governments around the state from basically voting on their own increase and giving themselves an increase during their term.

3:58

So we have advised that this cohort, the 2024 to 2028 cohort of the Milwaukee Common Council, should you elect to um i increase the position of alder person that that be prospective beginning April of 2028 for the cohort of 15 alders from 2028 to 2032.

4:21

I would note that it's very important here.

4:24

No alder person, the mayor or elected officials, including myself, received any not one penny increase of that three percent.

4:34

Uh and so a debate will ensue.

4:37

It's you know the legislative prerogative to set these numbers, but the position of alder person and mayor in the city of Milwaukee is effectively frozen and not receiving uh salary increases that general city employees would receive, and it would be our opinion that this same mechanics would play out should the 2027 budget include an additional raise for general city employees.

5:05

So in essence, you're frozen uh until April of 2028, and there is uh uh in the substitute in the file today would uh unfreeze the position of Alder and Mayor, but starting in April of 2028 and moving forward.

5:20

We've also included in the memo that in uh January uh no elected uh position, including the Comptroller, the treasurer, the uh the city attorney, and the three branches of municipal court received a raise.

5:34

Uh the state law bars those individuals in in a position to vote on their own salaries, and because those other elected officials do not have a vote on their salaries, they should have received the three percent raise in starting in January, with two exceptions.

5:51

One, there isn't a unique state law related to municipal court judges where they may not receive a raise during the first year of their term.

6:00

So branch one was elected in April of 2025, and so should not be eligible for the three percent until April of 2026.

6:09

And then the city attorney, the position of city attorney cannot exceed the salary of the mayor, and I'm pretty close to the mayor, and so I cannot receive the three percent myself because I cannot exceed the mayor.

6:20

So uh we've outlined those uh actions that we would recommend the council take in amending the salary ordinance.

6:27

Um I think that kind of covers where we where we're at, and happy to answer any questions.

6:33

Okay, and before I go to Jim, um, our city clerk is just I think three additional takeaways if we haven't made it totally clear in the file and discussion here is is that this is something that was already deliberated.

6:47

Um this is doing what we said we would do, which is attach things to city employee increases if and when they were, and this is not for this term, it is for next term.

6:57

So I think those are our three takeaways in case someone's just tuning in.

7:01

So then I take it to um our city clerk.

7:05

So members because there's a couple moving parts here because we deal with the mayor and council members kind of separately from the other electeds in this group.

7:14

The vote here now, which would be passage on item one.

7:18

Um can you just explain you know what we're doing there and then kind of how it correlates to number two?

7:23

Sure.

7:24

Thank you, Madam Chairman Jimazarski, City Clerk and members.

7:27

There are actually three files before you that pertain to the salary of elected officials here in the city.

7:31

The first is the ordinance that is before you as you described, item one, that establishes by code the salary of the mayor and the common council members for the period 2028 to 2032.

7:41

It reflects the two percent annual increase previously described, and it is as the city attorney indicated perspective.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Fiscal Sustainability███████████████████19%
Personnel Matters█████████████████17%
Technology and Innovation██████████████14%
Budget Equity Analysis████████████12%
Financial Reporting██████████10%
Procurement and Contracts█████████9%
Public Engagement█████5%
Public Works████4%
Engineering and Infrastructure███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Finance & Personnel Committee Meeting - September 16, 2026

The Finance and Personnel Committee, chaired by Ald. Marina Dimitrijevic, met on Wednesday, September 16, 2026, at 9:27 AM in Room 301-B of City Hall. The committee considered 22 agenda items, including a substitute ordinance on elected official salaries, the city's five-year fiscal forecast, labor negotiations in closed session, employee wage adjustments, audits of the city's financial statements and Milwaukee Water Works, a proposal to implement a new health plan (held), the semi-annual innovation report, and several administrative resolutions. Key votes included a split 3-2 approval of the salary ordinance for elected officials for the 2028-2032 term, and unanimous approval or placement on file of most other items.

Consent Calendar

  • Item 2 (Communication on elected official salaries) was placed on file 5-0.
  • Item 3 (Five-year fiscal forecast) was placed on file 5-0.
  • Item 5 (Employee wages, benefits, regulations) was recommended for passage 5-0.
  • Item 7 (Audit of 2025 financial statements) placed on file 5-0.
  • Item 8 (Audit of Milwaukee Water Works financial administration) placed on file 4-0 (Dimitrijevic excused).
  • Item 9 (Positions ordinance for Water Main Replacement and GIS) placed on file 4-0 (Dimitrijevic excused).
  • Item 10 (Innovation Office semi-annual report) placed on file 5-0 with a request for future reporting on UCC call intake and resolution data.
  • Item 11 (Increase 2026 Tax Incremental Borrowing Authority from $25M to $65M) recommended for adoption 5-0.
  • Item 12 (Firefighters Relief Fund expenditure) recommended for adoption 5-0.
  • Item 13 (Vacancy requests, fund transfers, equipment) approved 5-0.
  • Item 14 (Sole source contract waivers) placed on file 5-0.
  • Item 15 (BMO Harris contribution account for Vendor Fair) recommended for adoption 5-0.
  • Items 17-19 (Salary ordinance amendments for recruitment rates and clerical corrections) placed on file 5-0.
  • Item 21 (Further amend 2026 offices and positions) recommended for passage 5-0.
  • Item 22 (Travel authorization) recommended for adoption 5-0.

Discussion Items

  • Items 1 & 2 – Salaries for elected officials (251682 & 260726): City Attorney Evan Goyke explained that state law prohibits the current council from voting themselves a raise during their term, so the substitute ordinance sets automatic 2% annual increases for the mayor and council beginning in April 2028, with the possibility for future councils to decline them. The 8% catch-up proposed earlier for other elected officials was reduced to 2% per year because those officials are eligible for raises now. Ald. Spiker and Burgelis voted against, citing economic conditions and a preference for a more progressive approach. The ordinance passed 3-2 (Dimitrijevic, Coggs, Moore aye; Burgelis, Spiker no). The companion communication (item 2) was placed on file.
  • Item 3 – Five-year fiscal forecast (260606): Comptroller Bill Christianson presented the first-ever forecast, projecting budget deficits growing from $52.5M in 2027 to $104.5M in 2031 under baseline assumptions, with a structural deficit due to expenditure growth outpacing revenue. Reserves can only temporarily bridge the gap. Scenarios showed deficits ranging from $87.3M (favorable) to $160.8M (unfavorable) by 2031. Key reserves (tax stabilization fund) grew to $125M in 2025. The report emphasizes the need for state action. Committee members discussed the tax stabilization fund's appropriate balance (16.7% of operating revenues best practice) and the transportation fund's cash deficit. Chair noted the forecast will guide budget discussions.
  • Item 4 – Labor negotiations (241273): The committee convened into closed session at 10:58 AM under Wis. Stat. § 19.85(1)(e) for bargaining reasons, reconvening at 11:29 AM. The communication was held to the call of the chair.
  • Item 5 – Employee wages, benefits, regulations (260546): DER requested authority to raise the vacation accrual cap for employees working on the Workday project during a blackout period, with a 12-month use window and 80-hour cap. Approved 5-0.
  • Item 6 – UnitedHealthcare NexusACO program (260550): Held to call of the chair at the administration's request. Chair requested additional information: coinsurance details, an equity impact statement, analysis from the Office of Compliance and Engagement, percentage of staff using each tier, and history of tier differentiation.
  • Item 7 & 8 – Audits: BakerTilly presented an unmodified opinion on the 2025 financial statements; comptroller noted growth in public debt amortization fund ($62.1M), tax stabilization fund ($125M), and the general fund advance to transportation fund increased to $35.4M. The Water Works audit found two medium-risk findings: travel expenses approved by subordinates and late expense reports, and improper pro card sharing. Recommendations partially implemented.
  • Item 9 – Water Works positions: Two positions (Civil Engineer 3 and GIS Analyst) added to support lead service line replacement and expanded GIS use, funded by department revenue.
  • Item 10 – Innovation Office semi-annual report: Jim Bohl presented on projects: ADU architectural renderings, gateway signage, a virtual assistant widget (MIL), expanded employee health clinics, youth apprenticeships, state innovation grant applications, and a front desk virtual agent system to reduce call wait times. Pilot data showed 27% call reduction on weekends. Committee requested future reporting on call intake/resolution data and annual updates on new technology integration.
  • Item 11 – Tax Incremental Borrowing Authority: Increased from $25M to $65M for TID-supported infrastructure projects (street paving, pedestrian safety). No impact on tax levy.
  • Item 16 – Local Business Enterprise bid incentive report (260479): Held to call of the chair.
  • Item 20 – Amend 2026 rates of pay (260544): Substitute A changed the originally proposed 8% catch-up for other elected officials to 2% per year for 2028-2032, and added the city attorney to those eligible. Passed 5-0, with Alds. Burgelis and Spiker objecting to Part 8 (elected officials).

Key Outcomes

  • Item 1 (Salaries for mayor and council): Recommended for passage 3-2. Objections by Burgelis and Spiker noted.
  • Item 2 (Communication on salaries): Placed on file 5-0.
  • Item 3 (Fiscal forecast): Placed on file 5-0.
  • Item 4 (Labor negotiations): Held to call of chair after closed session.
  • Item 5 (Employee benefits): Recommended for passage 5-0.
  • Item 6 (Health plan): Held; further information requested.
  • Items 7-15, 17-19, 21-22: Approved or placed on file as noted above.
  • Item 20: Recommended for passage 5-0 with objections to Part 8.
  • Meeting adjourned at 1:09 PM.

Meeting Transcript

I'm Chairwoman Marina Dmitrievich, joined by our Vice Chairperson Alderman Peter Bergelis. Alderman Scott Spiker is president. Present. There you go. That's not a nice Alder Woman Malele Cogs is here. And Alder Woman Charlotte Moore. That provides us a quorum to conduct our business today on Wednesday, September 16th, 2026. We will begin with item number one. 251 682, a substitute ordinance relating to salaries for certain elected officials. Okay. Come on up, city attorney. Okay. And the clerk would like us to read item two in as well, because they do correspond when you take one action, you have to then reflect it in the accompanying salary file. So item two is 260726 communication relating to the salaries of certain elected officials. I did want to bring Jim. Do you mind coming up? This is kind of a three-part fix. All right. And so there also may be a mixture of feelings on a mixture of items. So Jim, would you mind on item one and two, we'll start? Actually, why don't we start with the city attorney and then go to Jim? That'd be a little bit easier. So thank you, City Attorney. I'll note in the file there are three items I'd like to bring your attention to. Um a um really uh clear memo from the city attorney's office on kind of how we got here and the fix they recommend, as well as then um kind of a side-by-side chart because we've we've had to kind of play some catch-up here. And then the third part was kind of an older analysis from 2023. Um you kind of do have to roll back the tape and think into when this council had a lengthy deliberation kind of back then on the executive pay plan to get here. So go ahead, city attorney, then just briefly um your recommendation. I'll have Jim explain it and then we'll take the vote. Thank you, Madam Chair. Just uh Evan Goike, City Attorney to my right is Deputy Uh City Attorney Robin Peterson, and to my to my left is uh assistant city attorney Alex Foundos. Uh as you mentioned, there are com there are materials that we produced in the file that lays out uh as clear as we could um uh provide a brief history and and our recommendations, just so that everybody is clear. Um at the beginning of 2024, but before the election, and the new current cohort of alder persons were elected, uh we advised the council that uh an ordinance was lawful and enforceable that would tie aldermanic and mayoral salary increases capped at uh no greater than three percent, but with uh if a raise to general city employees was initiated, that that would apply to the council and the mayor as well. Uh that actually was uh finally or for for the first time enacted in the budget in the fall of 2025 for the current year, 2026, as those mechanics were um actually you know sought to be placed into action and we saw how it was working. We uh reviewed and revised and frankly reversed our advice about whether the council and the mayor could receive that 3 percent increase in 2026, and ultimately I advised the council that they could not receive that benefit, otherwise it would be in violation of a state statute that prohibits the members of the legislative body and and the mayor of local governments around the state from basically voting on their own increase and giving themselves an increase during their term. So we have advised that this cohort, the 2024 to 2028 cohort of the Milwaukee Common Council, should you elect to um i increase the position of alder person that that be prospective beginning April of 2028 for the cohort of 15 alders from 2028 to 2032. I would note that it's very important here. No alder person, the mayor or elected officials, including myself, received any not one penny increase of that three percent. Uh and so a debate will ensue. It's you know the legislative prerogative to set these numbers, but the position of alder person and mayor in the city of Milwaukee is effectively frozen and not receiving uh salary increases that general city employees would receive, and it would be our opinion that this same mechanics would play out should the 2027 budget include an additional raise for general city employees. So in essence, you're frozen uh until April of 2028, and there is uh uh in the substitute in the file today would uh unfreeze the position of Alder and Mayor, but starting in April of 2028 and moving forward. We've also included in the memo that in uh January uh no elected uh position, including the Comptroller, the treasurer, the uh the city attorney, and the three branches of municipal court received a raise. Uh the state law bars those individuals in in a position to vote on their own salaries, and because those other elected officials do not have a vote on their salaries, they should have received the three percent raise in starting in January, with two exceptions. One, there isn't a unique state law related to municipal court judges where they may not receive a raise during the first year of their term. So branch one was elected in April of 2025, and so should not be eligible for the three percent until April of 2026. And then the city attorney, the position of city attorney cannot exceed the salary of the mayor, and I'm pretty close to the mayor, and so I cannot receive the three percent myself because I cannot exceed the mayor. So uh we've outlined those uh actions that we would recommend the council take in amending the salary ordinance. Um I think that kind of covers where we where we're at, and happy to answer any questions. Okay, and before I go to Jim, um, our city clerk is just I think three additional takeaways if we haven't made it totally clear in the file and discussion here is is that this is something that was already deliberated. Um this is doing what we said we would do, which is attach things to city employee increases if and when they were, and this is not for this term, it is for next term.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com