OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Milwaukee, Wisconsin/Common Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Charter School Review Committee Meeting – October 22, 2026

Common Council — Thursday, October 22, 2026
BodyMilwaukee, Wisconsin
SessionCommon Council
DateThursday, October 22, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:05:56

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:00

Um I'd like to call the order to order the Charter School Review Committee meeting for Thursday, October 22nd, 2026 at 5.03 p.m.

0:15

And we will start with roll call.

Speaker 2

0:21

Good morning.

0:22

Good morning, good afternoon.

0:23

I'm sorry.

0:24

Mr.

0:24

Cherry Kevin Ingram.

Speaker 1

0:26

Here.

Speaker 2

0:28

Member Balbaki.

0:32

Member Christensen.

Speaker 3

0:34

Here.

Speaker 2

0:37

Member Harwell Young.

0:43

Member Dr.

0:44

Brookshire.

Speaker 4

0:46

Present.

Speaker 2

0:48

Member Sparrow.

0:53

And Member Davies.

1:02

Member Davies.

1:14

Okay, thank you.

Speaker 1

1:16

Um you

Speaker 2

1:17

have a quote, Mr.

1:18

Chair.

Speaker 1

1:19

Okay.

1:19

Second order of business will be the review and approval of the minutes for March 26, 2026 for a while back.

1:29

Any questions, comments regarding the approval of the minutes or any suggestions, updates.

1:40

Seeing any uh entertain a motion to accept and approve the March 26, 2026 meeting.

Unassigned speaker

1:49

This

Speaker 5

1:49

is a bill, all motion to approve.

Speaker 6

1:57

This is Dr.

1:57

Navy Sasek.

Speaker 1

1:59

Okay, thank you very much.

Unassigned speaker

2:00

Um,

Speaker 1

2:01

all in favor say aye.

2:04

Okay.

2:05

Um before I before I start, turn it over to Dr.

2:09

Baylor.

2:10

I just wanted to I got an opening, three opening questions for everybody since everybody's here, because I generally know that people don't stay to necessarily listening.

2:19

I hope I'm gonna encourage everyone to stay to the end of the presentation, but I have three quick questions and an opening comment.

2:27

Um, and this opening comment, these questions are based on Monday the 19th.

2:32

I had the opportunity to have an in-personal meeting

Unassigned speaker

2:35

with

Speaker 1

2:36

our division leaders and assistant state superintendents at DPI.

2:41

And DPI, I'm gonna put a I'm gonna put this link in the chat um at their website.

2:47

Um they're promoting um portrait of a graduate.

2:53

But before I talk about the portrait of a graduate in the state of Wisconsin, there were just three quick little questions I wanted to ask you guys, and this is based on my summation of reading all the collective reading of the um school cultural and climate survey summary.

3:11

But I want to be permissive.

3:13

I want to

Unassigned speaker

3:13

be, I

Speaker 1

3:14

don't want to mess up without acknowledging the fact

Unassigned speaker

3:19

that I

Speaker 1

3:19

want the brewers to go in, but I just want them to just do it and win the world series.

3:25

With that said, uh three quick questions is this.

3:29

No, you don't have to answer these right now.

3:31

One is what would we do?

3:35

What would we be doing if we didn't have any students?

3:40

That's the first

Unassigned speaker

3:41

question.

Speaker 1

3:42

Second question is how many of

Unassigned speaker

3:45

you

Speaker 1

3:46

are taking advantage of the services that are offered through the Wisconsin Resource Center for Charter Schools.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Public Education Funding█████████████████████████████████████████████75%
Procedural████6%
Public Health███5%
Personnel Matters██4%
Public Engagement██4%
School Culture██4%
Community Engagement█1%
Business Licensing█1%
Summary of Proceedings

Charter School Review Committee Meeting – October 22, 2026

The Charter School Review Committee met virtually (5:03 PM) to review annual performance reports for five Milwaukee charter schools. Chair Kevin Ingram opened by sharing insights from a recent meeting with Wisconsin DPI, highlighting the agency’s “Portrait of a Graduate” initiative and posing three reflective questions about school vision, professional resources, and graduate readiness. Dr. Baylor then presented each school’s data (demographics, academic outcomes, culture/climate survey results) followed by committee discussion. The committee voted on each school’s monitoring recommendation.

Consent Calendar

  • Minutes of March 26, 2026 – Approved unanimously.

Discussion Items

1. Darrell Lynn Hines College Preparatory Academy of Excellence (DLHA)

  • Enrollment: 209 students; 97.1% free/reduced lunch; 20% special education.
  • Attendance: 87.7% (K‑5), 86.2% (6‑8).
  • Licensure: Partially met – one expired teacher license, one administrator lacking appropriate licensure (position no longer requires it). Current teachers licensed; one teacher on a license-with-stipulations pending DPI review.
  • Academic Growth (local measures): reading 71% (elem.), 66% (middle); math 62% (elem.), 71% (middle); writing 77% (elem.), 88% (middle); 100% of IEP students met at least one goal.
  • Forward Exam Proficiency: 3‑5 ELA 14.1%, math 6.3%; 6‑8 ELA 14.1%, math 15.6%.
  • Year‑to‑year Progress: ELA 38.2%, math 30.9%.
  • Contract Compliance: Progress target of 35% was not met in math (29%); overall 37% of students in developing/approaching range made progress.
  • Scorecard: Elementary 65.3%, Middle 63.3%, Weighted 64.7%.
  • Culture/Climate: Improved in all categories except ambitious instruction (flat). Gaps in facility conditions, middle‑school academic culture, discipline consistency.
  • Improvement Goals: Restorative practices, academic‑culture norms for middle school, structured family engagement.
  • Recommendation: Five‑year contract renewal with continued annual monitoring, emphasis on reading and math.
  • Committee Questions: Bill Christianson asked about strengthening academic culture; Principal Dr. Fletcher described tiered instruction and social‑emotional learning. Dr. Brookshire inquired about special education services; Dr. Fletcher explained push‑in/pull‑out models. Chair followed up on licensure status.
  • Vote: Motion carried unanimously.

2. Downtown Montessori Academy (DMA)

  • Enrollment: 232 students; 14.7% free/reduced lunch; 14.5% special education.
  • Attendance: 94.5% (K‑5), 95% (6‑8).
  • Licensure: All teachers appropriately licensed.
  • Academic Growth: reading 86% (elem.), 69% (middle); math 75% (elem.), 74% (middle); writing 78% (elem.), 81% (middle); 86% of IEP students met at least one goal.
  • Forward Exam Proficiency: 3‑5 ELA 69.8%, math 33.3%; 6‑8 ELA 90.5%, math 73.8%.
  • Year‑to‑year Progress: ELA 89.6%, math 67.5%.
  • Contract Compliance: ELA 71.4%, math 54.3% met (target ≥35%).
  • Scorecard: Elementary 80.4%, Middle 83.6%, Weighted 81%.
  • Culture/Climate: Overall 75.8% (proficient), but declines in supportive environment (−20), collaborative teachers (−15), effective leaders (−29), involved families (−5.6). Staff reported limited PD and unclear career pathways.
  • Improvement Goals: Structured professional development, establish parent advisory committee with board seat (already completed), strengthen math instruction in grades 1‑5.
  • Recommendation: Continue annual monitoring with emphasis on math.
  • Committee Questions: Bill Christianson asked about the gap between high academics and lower climate scores. Interim Principal Dawn Zant and board member Lauren Taylor cited leadership transitions; Dawn listed measures including shared‑decision‑making teams and increased visibility. Chair commended the school for maintaining certified staff through transition and for having a parent on the board.
  • Vote: Motion carried unanimously.

3. Escuela Verde (EV)

  • Enrollment: 111 students; 100% free/reduced lunch; 24% special education; 30.6% ESL.
  • Licensure: All teachers appropriately licensed.
  • Academic Growth (STAR): Reading growth percentages presented inconsistently (40% and 80% of students met goal in different parts of the presentation); math growth reported at 55%.
  • Pre‑ACT Secure (9‑10): English 18.6% proficient, math 0% proficient.
  • Four‑Year Graduation Rate (2024‑25): 73.1%; 93.3% post‑secondary acceptance; $400,000+ in scholarships.
  • ACT Progress (11th graders): 64.5% made progress over pre‑ACT.
  • Contract Compliance: 10th grade improvement 40% (target 50%); 11th grade 64.5%.
  • Scorecard: 72.8% (single grade‑band).
  • Culture/Climate: Declines from previous cycle; supportive environment and ambitious instruction flagged. Staff reported isolation, fragmented curriculum.
  • Improvement Goals: Structured onboarding/mentorship for new teachers, strengthen instructional rigor, improve student voice on policies.
  • Recommendation: Continue annual monitoring with emphasis on reading and math.
  • Committee Questions: Bill Christianson asked about downward trends and instructional guidance. School representatives acknowledged turnover and the challenge of project‑based learning; they have begun more regular teacher meetings. Chair encouraged the school to embrace the feedback and use it to fuel innovation.
  • Vote: Motion by Bill Christianson, second by Dr. Davis; carried unanimously.

4. Milwaukee Academy of Science (MAS)

  • Enrollment: 1,734 students (K‑12); 100% free/reduced lunch; 12.4% special education.
  • Attendance: 88.3% (K‑5), 87.2% (6‑8), 82.2% (9‑12).
  • Licensure: 32 issues (14 expired, 9 pending, 8 no file, 1 invalid lifetime). School reports many teachers struggling to pass licensure tests; HR case‑managing each individual.
  • Academic Growth: reading 57% (elem.), 77% (middle), 57% (high school); math 55% (elem.), 66% (middle), 52% (high school); writing 54% (elem.), 49% (middle), 66% (high school); IEP goals met: 88% (elem.), 58% (middle), 77% (high school).
  • Forward Exam Proficiency: 3‑5 ELA 12%, math 9.4%; 6‑8 ELA 20.2%, math 22.3%.
  • Pre‑ACT Secure (9‑10): English 12%, math 3.3%.
  • Four‑Year Graduation Rate: 93.5% (2025); 97.1% post‑secondary acceptance; $5.3 million in scholarships.
  • ACT Progress: 59.2% of 11th graders improved.
  • Year‑to‑year Progress: ELA 43.3%, math 34.7%.
  • Scorecard: Elementary 57.5%, Middle 60.8%, High School 75.7%, Weighted 62.1%.
  • Culture/Climate: Overall 74.5% (developing); supportive environment up 6.2 points; effective leaders down 6.9. Staff reported limited decision‑making influence and inconsistent discipline across grade levels.
  • Improvement Goals: Increase academic rigor and student ownership (especially math), strengthen PLCs and coaching, ensure speech/language pathology staffing, build coherence in discipline and communication across campuses.
  • Recommendation: Continue annual monitoring with emphasis on reading and math.
  • Committee Questions: Dr. Davis asked about middle‑school suspensions and restorative practices; Dr. Mallet described dean PLCs and SEL curriculum. Dr. Brookshire inquired about low 9‑10 English and math; Dr. Mallet outlined a new ninth‑grade cohort structure. Chair asked about licensure improvement; Dr. Mallet noted investment in test preparation and study groups. Chair also cautioned about growth‑related staffing challenges. Dr. Brookshire pressed on the elementary scorecard under 60%; Dr. Mallet responded with focus on early literacy and math fluency.
  • Vote: Motion by Bill Christianson, second by Dr. Davis; carried unanimously.

5. Milwaukee Math and Science Academy (MMSA)

  • Enrollment: 230 students (K‑8); 94.8% free/reduced lunch; 20% special education; 13.5% ELL.
  • Attendance: 85.8% (K‑5), 83.2% (6‑8).
  • Licensure: Two concerns – one teacher in support role working toward bachelor’s (no license), one teacher with expired license scheduled for test.
  • Academic Growth (MAP): Reading 65% (overall seems), math data unclear; growth percentages for reading and math were reported with apparent transcription inconsistencies. Writing 80% (elem.), 51% (middle); 100% of IEP students met at least one goal.
  • Forward Exam Proficiency: 3‑5 ELA 23.6%, math 13.9%; 6‑8 ELA 11.3%, math 3.2%.
  • Year‑to‑year Progress: ELA 40.7%, math 27.2%.
  • Contract Compliance (progress): ELA 34.7% (target 35%), math 27.8%.
  • Scorecard: Elementary 63.2%, Middle 59.8%, Weighted 22.2% (appears inconsistent with component scores).
  • Culture/Climate: Overall 88.8% (proficient), improved in all areas. Staff reported strong professional culture; students raised fairness and discipline concerns.
  • Improvement Goals: Improve foundational math/reading through core instruction; extend relational strengths to formal student voice and career development; build SEL/digital citizenship programming; diversify certified staff.
  • Recommendation: Continue annual monitoring with emphasis on reading and math.
  • Committee Questions: Chair asked about current licensure; principal confirmed one teacher in support role finishing degree, one testing. Bill Christianson opened for broader comment; principal addressed support‑staff development and student‑voice gaps. Dr. Davis asked about enrollment retention (76.7%); principal cited academic/behavioral attrition and new strategies (positive calls, summer bridge). Dr. Brookshire questioned math performance and student/teacher beliefs; principal described bridging NWEA to Forward exam with multi‑step problem practice and CISA support. Chair asked about parent involvement; principal noted opportunities but limited uptake. Chair also encouraged outreach to DPI regarding Portrait of a Graduate.
  • Vote: Motion by Bill Christianson, second by Dr. Davis; carried unanimously.

Key Outcomes

  • All five schools’ recommendations were approved unanimously.
  • DLHA received a recommendation for a five‑year contract renewal with continued annual monitoring and emphasis on reading and math.
  • DMA, EV, MAS, and MMSA received recommendations to continue annual academic monitoring and reporting, each with emphasis on reading and/or math outcomes.
  • No action was taken on administrative matters (Item 8) as there were no formal proposals.
  • The meeting adjourned at 7:09 PM.

Meeting Transcript

Um I'd like to call the order to order the Charter School Review Committee meeting for Thursday, October 22nd, 2026 at 5.03 p.m. And we will start with roll call. Good morning. Good morning, good afternoon. I'm sorry. Mr. Cherry Kevin Ingram. Here. Member Balbaki. Member Christensen. Here. Member Harwell Young. Member Dr. Brookshire. Present. Member Sparrow. And Member Davies. Member Davies. Okay, thank you. Um you have a quote, Mr. Chair. Okay. Second order of business will be the review and approval of the minutes for March 26, 2026 for a while back. Any questions, comments regarding the approval of the minutes or any suggestions, updates. Seeing any uh entertain a motion to accept and approve the March 26, 2026 meeting. This is a bill, all motion to approve. This is Dr. Navy Sasek. Okay, thank you very much. Um, all in favor say aye. Okay. Um before I before I start, turn it over to Dr. Baylor. I just wanted to I got an opening, three opening questions for everybody since everybody's here, because I generally know that people don't stay to necessarily listening. I hope I'm gonna encourage everyone to stay to the end of the presentation, but I have three quick questions and an opening comment. Um, and this opening comment, these questions are based on Monday the 19th. I had the opportunity to have an in-personal meeting with our division leaders and assistant state superintendents at DPI. And DPI, I'm gonna put a I'm gonna put this link in the chat um at their website. Um they're promoting um portrait of a graduate. But before I talk about the portrait of a graduate in the state of Wisconsin, there were just three quick little questions I wanted to ask you guys, and this is based on my summation of reading all the collective reading of the um school cultural and climate survey summary. But I want to be permissive. I want to be, I don't want to mess up without acknowledging the fact that I

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com