OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Milwaukee, Wisconsin/Common Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Milwaukee Zoning, Neighborhoods & Development Committee Meeting - October 27, 2026

Common Council — Tuesday, October 27, 2026
BodyMilwaukee, Wisconsin
SessionCommon Council
DateTuesday, October 27, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:06:15

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Speaker 1

0:00

Committee for Tuesday, October 27, 2026, at 9 05 A.M.

0:04

I'm Alderman Bauman, Chair of the Committee.

0:06

We're also joined by the Vice Chair Alderman Stamper to my right.

0:09

To my far left is Alderman Spiker.

0:12

Uh to his right is Alderman DeAndre Jackson.

0:15

Uh to my immediate left is our staff assistant Chris Lee.

0:18

And Alderwoman Cogs is joining us on the big board.

0:20

So we have a full compliment.

0:22

First item on the agenda is uh file 260563.

0:26

The substitute ordinance relating to notification by the Board of Zoning Appeals of expired appeals.

0:32

There's a proposal for a substitute.

0:35

Is there a motion to amend the file by introducing a substitute?

0:40

Okay.

0:41

Uh hearing no objection, substitute A is before us.

0:45

Uh this is sponsored by Alderman's Perez, Westmoreland, Jackson, and Alderwoman Taylor.

0:50

Uh would the sponsors like to take the leading order or let the okay.

Speaker 2

0:53

Well, I'll start.

0:54

I just want to thank you and committee members for the opportunity today.

0:58

Um for some time we have been convening um different departments, whether it's licensing BOSA uh DNS and uh wanting to make sure that we can have a streamlined approach.

1:12

Uh oftentimes uh there's a very strict and hard rule that before you come apply for your license, whether it's food dealer or liquor license, that you make sure you have the occupancy for BOSA.

1:22

Sometimes um some of those sneak through without having a boza.

1:27

But what we realized in the process too is that we have many expired occupancies and many for years, and uh we believe by codifying um this to make sure that that we all know DNS knows and um our offices know of occupancies that have been expired within 15 days of being expired.

1:47

We have an opportunity to um work with uh property owners and business owners uh in order to to fix this because um I've had I had one I can give you an example.

1:59

I had someone from 2018, a mechanic that had been expired and um doing business all that time.

2:06

The terms of condition weren't being followed about parking on the street with vehicles they were repairing, there were landscaping issues, and we kept wondering what was going on, and when we looked into it, uh they had been uh their occupancy had a had been expired four years, and then um DNS did their enforcement and they kind of ate the fines until they rectified the situation.

2:26

And so um it was very costly to them, very costly to the neighborhood with complaints and um and time and resources of departments going out and following up on a daily basis because of the expiration.

2:39

So we believe that codifying this at least for the issues in my district will will help believe that those efforts.

Speaker 1

2:46

Okay, very

Speaker 2

2:47

good.

Unassigned speaker

2:47

I

Speaker 2

2:48

don't know if any of the other sponsors want to mention anything.

2:50

Anyone else

Speaker 3

2:52

I've just

Speaker 1

2:53

got some questions, but I'll wait.

2:55

Okay.

2:55

Uh to to the board.

2:57

Ms.

2:57

Gara is here.

2:58

Good morning.

Speaker 4

2:59

Good morning.

Speaker 1

3:00

How is this gonna work in practice?

3:01

Uh do you think?

Speaker 4

3:02

Um so we have been working with ITMD.

3:04

We have um we use a cellar and so a sala.

3:08

We have a field where it lists the expiration date.

3:10

So any time something is approved through the board, we're able to indicate in that field when it expires.

3:16

Um so we were able to work with ITMD to get a report drafted out where we can pull these items and then send out the report to the alder and to DNS.

3:25

So we'll because

Speaker 1

3:25

there's probably a lot of that going on, right?

Speaker 4

3:28

There yes, unfortunately.

3:29

Well, upon digging through all of that, we find that there are quite a few that have been sneaking through without coming back for their approvals.

3:38

So,

Speaker 1

3:40

very good.

3:40

Any other questions?

Speaker 3

3:42

Um thank you.

3:44

When the Bozo approval expires, what are the dominoes that fall after that?

Speaker 4

3:49

Um so technically, when that approval expires, the permit also expires.

3:54

Um right now it's been looking like unfortunately somebody will make a complaint and then the person will come back.

4:03

Uh basically DNS will issue an order for them to come back and reapply for their occupancy or whatever permit is associated with that BOSA approval and let them know through that order that they have to reapply.

4:14

So that's typically how it's been done, at least in the since I've been here.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use Planning█████████████████17%
Affordable Housing███████████████15%
Zoning Regulations██████████████14%
Data Center Regulation███████████11%
Public Safety██████████10%
Public Engagement██████6%
Public Works██████6%
Permitting█████5%
Historic Preservation███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Milwaukee Zoning, Neighborhoods & Development Committee Meeting - October 27, 2026

The Zoning, Neighborhoods & Development Committee met Tuesday, October 27, 2026, in Room 301-B of Milwaukee City Hall. The meeting was scheduled for 9:00 a.m., convened at 9:07 a.m., and adjourned at 11:13 a.m. Members present were Chair Ald. Robert J. Bauman, Vice-Chair Ald. Russell W. Stamper II, Ald. Milele A. Coggs (joining remotely), Ald. DiAndre Jackson, and Ald. Scott P. Spiker. The committee considered 16 items, including an ordinance on expired Board of Zoning Appeals approvals, an accessory dwelling unit design-package agreement, data center policy and dashboard resolutions, a downtown Planned Development zoning change, a Tax Incremental District amendment, and ten City-owned property sale-backs.

Consent Calendar

  • Items 7-16, the tax-deeded property sale-back resolutions, were each approved unanimously (4-0, with Ald. Coggs excused). These authorize sale-backs to former owners of City-owned properties at: 1810 West Fairmount Avenue (1st Ald. Dist.); 4450 North 37th Street (7th); 2754A North 12th Street (15th); 2318 West Maple Street (8th); 6930B North Raintree Drive (9th); 1241A West Scott Street (12th); 1960B South 7th Street (12th); 1116 West Scott Street (12th); 1628-30 North 24th Street (15th); and 2543-45 North 36th Street (15th).

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Cade Gerlach, resident of 700 East Kilbourn Avenue, expressed full support for the Zenith development, saying more housing supply helps stabilize rents and citing a $100-per-month rent reduction he negotiated after a previous high-rise was built.
  • Allen Cooper, property owner at 815 North Cass Street, raised concerns about additional alley traffic from 30 parking spaces, noise pollution from HVAC systems, construction vibration and potential cracking of older masonry buildings, garbage pickup in the alley, and requested a regular point of contact with the development team. The development team responded that parking ventilation would be at the top of the tower, they had offered pre-construction building inspections, and they would provide a project contact.
  • Curtis Oquist, property manager at 835 North Cass Street, opposed the development, arguing that removing the surface parking lot would worsen street parking shortages for nearby tenants and visitors, and questioned why the east elevation was not shown. He suggested the City build a public parking structure instead.

Discussion Items

  • File 260563 - BOZA expired appeals notification: Ald. Jackson moved substitution of the file with Proposed Substitute A (5-0). Appearing for discussion were sponsors Ald. Perez, Ald. Westmoreland, Ald. Taylor, DCD's Tanya Fonseca, BOZA's India Gaar, and DNS Deputy Commissioner Mike Mazmanian. The ordinance would require notification when Board of Zoning Appeals approvals expire, but discussion covered enforcement gaps, the end of the proactive BOZA periodic inspection program due to staffing shortages, currently 10 special enforcement inspectors (down from 16 in 2020), and the possibility of automated renewal notices through ITMD. BOZA staff estimated 18 to 50 expirations per month over the next three months. City Plan Commission had recommended unanimous approval at its October 19 public hearing. Ald. Spiker moved to hold the file for one cycle to obtain ITMD input; the motion prevailed 5-0.
  • File 260884 - ADU design packages: The resolution authorizes the Commissioner of City Development to execute an agreement, funded by the Daniel Hoan Foundation, to make free accessory dwelling unit design packages available to the public. Designers from Navarte Development and Dream Builders said the packages would be customizable within limits and intended to be permitted by right. Discussion addressed the need for flexibility, neighborhood character, historic district compatibility, and prior city design-catalog efforts. The committee recommended adoption 5-0.
  • File 260497 - Data processing center policy recommendations: Ald. Pratt and co-sponsors presented a substitute resolution directing DCD to work with city agencies, outside experts, and stakeholders to recommend policies and regulations to prevent negative environmental, neighborhood, and community impacts of data processing centers. DCD Deputy Commissioner Sam Leichtling committed to a six-month deadline for policy recommendations. Ald. Perez, Stamper, Jackson, Bauman, and Spiker were added as cosponsors. Recommended for adoption 5-0.
  • File 260637 - Data center dashboard: A substitute resolution creating a public-facing data center dashboard was discussed. DCD noted that some requested data may be difficult to present because current records do not consistently track data centers, and an official dashboard may be more feasible once a city definition and permit tracking exist. Recommended for adoption 5-0.
  • File 260533 - Zenith Detailed Planned Development zoning change: DCD and the project team (New Land Enterprises, Korb Architects) presented a request to rezone 711 East Kilbourn Avenue and 822 North Van Buren Street from the General Planned Development known as Bookends to a Detailed Planned Development known as Zenith. The approved 2008 Bookends plan already permitted up to 230 residential units and a 20-story building on the site. The proposed Zenith is a 25-story, for-sale condominium tower with up to 226 units, 412 indoor parking spaces, and 68 bicycle spaces. The site's current assessed value is $2,148,400; projected construction cost is over $150 million. Chair Bauman noted that the 2008 approval had already established the property owner's right to build a high-rise. City Plan Commission recommended approval on September 28 after a public hearing. Following public testimony, the committee recommended passage 5-0.
  • File 260874 - TID No. 70 (735 N Water) Amendment No. 5: DCD's Alyssa Remington presented a fifth amendment adding $4 million in project costs: $3.75 million for City Hall Square Plaza design and construction, $100,000 for Water Street median improvements, $50,000 for 35 river rescue ring stations at $1,400 each, and $100,000 in administrative fees. The district has a current value exceeding $35 million and generates about $450,000 in annual increment, and is projected to be paid off by 2029. Ald. Stamper moved substitution of the file (4-0, Ald. Coggs excused), and the committee recommended adoption 4-0.

Key Outcomes

  • File 260563: Substitute adopted (5-0); ordinance held to call of the chair for one cycle (5-0).
  • File 260884: Recommended for adoption (5-0).
  • File 260497: Recommended for adoption (5-0); five additional cosponsors added.
  • File 260637: Recommended for adoption (5-0).
  • File 260533: Recommended for passage (5-0).
  • File 260874: Substitute adopted (4-0) and recommended for adoption (4-0), with Ald. Coggs excused.
  • Files 260745, 260876, 260877, 260879, 260747, 260743, 260746, 260875, 260744, 260878: Each recommended for adoption (4-0), with Ald. Coggs excused.
  • The meeting adjourned at 11:13 a.m.

Meeting Transcript

Committee for Tuesday, October 27, 2026, at 9 05 A.M. I'm Alderman Bauman, Chair of the Committee. We're also joined by the Vice Chair Alderman Stamper to my right. To my far left is Alderman Spiker. Uh to his right is Alderman DeAndre Jackson. Uh to my immediate left is our staff assistant Chris Lee. And Alderwoman Cogs is joining us on the big board. So we have a full compliment. First item on the agenda is uh file 260563. The substitute ordinance relating to notification by the Board of Zoning Appeals of expired appeals. There's a proposal for a substitute. Is there a motion to amend the file by introducing a substitute? Okay. Uh hearing no objection, substitute A is before us. Uh this is sponsored by Alderman's Perez, Westmoreland, Jackson, and Alderwoman Taylor. Uh would the sponsors like to take the leading order or let the okay. Well, I'll start. I just want to thank you and committee members for the opportunity today. Um for some time we have been convening um different departments, whether it's licensing BOSA uh DNS and uh wanting to make sure that we can have a streamlined approach. Uh oftentimes uh there's a very strict and hard rule that before you come apply for your license, whether it's food dealer or liquor license, that you make sure you have the occupancy for BOSA. Sometimes um some of those sneak through without having a boza. But what we realized in the process too is that we have many expired occupancies and many for years, and uh we believe by codifying um this to make sure that that we all know DNS knows and um our offices know of occupancies that have been expired within 15 days of being expired. We have an opportunity to um work with uh property owners and business owners uh in order to to fix this because um I've had I had one I can give you an example. I had someone from 2018, a mechanic that had been expired and um doing business all that time. The terms of condition weren't being followed about parking on the street with vehicles they were repairing, there were landscaping issues, and we kept wondering what was going on, and when we looked into it, uh they had been uh their occupancy had a had been expired four years, and then um DNS did their enforcement and they kind of ate the fines until they rectified the situation. And so um it was very costly to them, very costly to the neighborhood with complaints and um and time and resources of departments going out and following up on a daily basis because of the expiration. So we believe that codifying this at least for the issues in my district will will help believe that those efforts. Okay, very good. I don't know if any of the other sponsors want to mention anything. Anyone else I've just got some questions, but I'll wait. Okay. Uh to to the board. Ms. Gara is here. Good morning. Good morning. How is this gonna work in practice? Uh do you think? Um so we have been working with ITMD. We have um we use a cellar and so a sala. We have a field where it lists the expiration date. So any time something is approved through the board, we're able to indicate in that field when it expires. Um so we were able to work with ITMD to get a report drafted out where we can pull these items and then send out the report to the alder and to DNS. So we'll because there's probably a lot of that going on, right? There yes, unfortunately.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com