The Mobile City Council pre-council meeting on June 9, 2026, addressed routine approvals, several discussion items, and ended with a unanimous vote to enter executive session regarding active litigation and an ongoing criminal investigation. Key discussions focused on the Downtown Development District code amendment, a Bloomberg grant program, the Alabama Construction Trade Academy Fund, and infrastructure projects.
It's good to see everyone this Tuesday morning. Ladies and gentlemen, we're now in the hands of our capable city clerk, Ms. Lisa Carroll. This is the pre mobile city council Tuesday, June the 9th. We have approval of minutes from May 26th and June 2nd. Any issues anyone? All right, Madam Clerk. Okay. Um appeals. We have requested away with the noise ordinance on July the 11th from 7 p.m. until 10 p.m. in public safety memorial park. September 12th from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. on St. Anthony Street. October the 10th from 2 p.m. until 10 p.m. in Mardi Gras Park, July the 4th from 2 p.m. until 10 p.m. on Alba Street. Any issues, uh, Councilwoman Inger. No, sir. All right, Madam Clerk. Public hearing today is the public hearing to consider the rezoning of property located at the east side of Tacon Street, north of Cameron Street from R1 to B3. Presentation of petitions and other communications to the council. Clisky Adams provide an update on the progress progress of opportunity for entertainers and its various programs. Margaret Nichols request window depot. Oh, Margaret Um Nichols, Barbara McCleskey, and Dakota Biller Billerby. Want to discuss window depot, all weather, roofing business license. And Estella Trotter, eliminating deceptive practice of city officials stating their only jurisdiction with the MHB is for the mayor to appoint MHP Commissioners. Dale Hall, concerns about MPD assisting ICE enforcement in Mobile. Ordinances held over 11024, Mend Chapter 11, Article 2, Section 11 Mobile City Code to include a subsection title Alabama Construction Trade Academy Fund Feel. I guess I'd I would be okay with offering amendment for that, but um I'll I'll work with uh with Jonathan and we'll we'll try to get something before get something before uh for uh big council. All right, Madame Clerk 64025 amend appendic appendix a downtown development district of the mobile of the city of Mobile Unified Development Code Chapter 64. Mr. President. Yes, ma'am. Um I do have uh a few questions for administrative in terms of the amendment, uh, and mainly uh in terms of the change from the CRC to the admin review, just to give the public um more understanding and and us more understanding of the why behind that. Good morning. Um, so the uh CRC is the consolidated review committee. Um ordinance, it's a uh a committee that is appointed by the mayor, mostly of city staff. Um they have a very limited scope as the ordinance currently reads with regard to their ability to uh approve projects. Um currently uh that board is made up of city staff, it's multidisciplinary, um, historic development, planning and zoning, um, and other uh staff level level level leadership who have expertise uh in the area of architecture and planning. Um we do not have appointments outside of the committee currently. Um, so we receive, I would say, I think uh the volume of approvals last year was somewhere around 60 plus applications that were made to the CRC. Um, in an effort to try to streamline the DDD process and recognizing that external appointments made by the mayor to that board, um, they do not have the ability either because of the time that's required. Um, there's a significant amount of time that is required of an of all of the participants of the CRC to review those applications. Additionally, we find that the level of expertise that we needed from those appointments, um, oftentimes we're finding that they were having to recuse themselves uh from the review process simply because um they are architects in that realm and the projects that they are um working with clientele on, they they're heavily involved. So what we were simply asking to do with that is to because this is an administrative uh function that rests primarily with city staff that have the expertise to review is to eliminate the CRC as a committee and have that review as a part of our plan review process.