OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Mobile, Alabama/City Council Meetings
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Mobile City Planning Commission Meeting - September 17, 2026

City Council Meetings — Thursday, September 17, 2026
BodyMobile, Alabama
SessionCity Council Meetings
DateThursday, September 17, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:44:58

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it
0:27

Good afternoon.

0:28

Uh, this is the meeting for the Mobile City Planning Commission for September 17th, 2026.

0:33

Would like to take a moment to review our general operating procedures.

0:37

For those of you that haven't been to a planning commission in a while, or this is your first time, each agenda item is divided into two sessions public hearing and deliberation.

0:47

In the public hearing, an agenda item is called.

0:50

The applicant makes their presentation.

0:52

Commission members ask questions if any and members of the public make their comments to the commission.

0:58

Only four people can speak for an agenda item and four people in opposition.

1:02

Each speaker is limited to five minutes, subject to questions by the commission.

1:07

A speaker at one minute remaining will have a warning beep prompting you to summarize your comments.

1:14

After opposition speakers have finished, an applicant is allowed a two-minute rebuttal.

1:19

If you do do intend to speak, please come to the bottom of the stairs at the podium, speak into the microphone, and provide your name and address for the record.

1:27

Please direct all your comments to the commission only and not to the applicant, the staff, or the audience.

1:34

After hearing the application, the commission will then go into deliberation on that application.

1:39

In deliberation, we will discuss each application with input from the staff as necessary, but with no input from the audience.

1:45

The commissioners will then vote on each application, and the results of that can be learned if you have to leave from the planning department.

1:52

If issues arise during deliberation that were not addressed in the public hearing, we have the discretion to allow additional comments pertaining to those issues in order to resolve them, or we will call for the agenda item to be held over for future meeting.

2:06

Occasionally there may be a commissioner recuse themselves from discussing and voting on a given application.

2:11

That does not mean that the member is directly involved with the application or the applicant, but depending on the circumstances, ethical rules may require a recusal.

2:20

If there is one, a supernumerary will vote in their stead.

2:24

A reminder the planning commission makes final decisions on subdivisions with appeals of these decisions to the circuit court.

2:30

The planning commission is strictly a recommending body for rezonings, conditional use permits, and planned developments.

2:38

The city council makes the final decision on these applications, and all appeals of city council decisions are to the circuit court.

2:45

At this time, do me a favor and please turn your cell phones and other devices to vibrate or silent or off.

2:50

If you have to take a call, we ask that you leave the uh auditorium.

2:54

Commissioners and staff, please turn on your microphones when speaking.

2:58

I'll go ahead and call the roll.

3:00

Myself, Jay Stubbs President, Mr.

3:01

Kirk Mate, Miss Jennifer Denson, Mr.

3:04

Harry Brislin.

3:05

Here, Mr.

3:06

Larry Dorsey, Mr.

3:08

Chad Anderson, Mr.

3:09

Matt Anderson, Mr.

3:11

Nick Amberger.

3:12

Here, Mr.

3:13

Josh Woods.

3:14

Here, Mr.

3:14

Kenny Nichols.

3:15

Here.

3:15

Miss Ellie Edwards.

3:17

Here.

3:17

We do have a quorum for today's agenda.

3:20

I will ask, or I will go ahead and move that we approve.

3:24

Need a second.

3:26

Second.

3:26

Properly moved and seconded.

3:28

All in favor?

3:28

Aye.

3:29

The agenda for today passes.

3:31

At this time, I'd like to remind those that would like to speak on an agenda item, a reminder to know that only four for an item and four in opposition.

3:39

We ask that you now take this time before you or agenda item comes up to decide who and in what order that speaker will come to the podium and speak.

3:48

And a reminder that you will have a four minutes, then a beep, and then a one-minute summary.

3:54

Number one on the agenda, new item application at 5685 I-10 Industrial Parkway, District 4 subdivision of two lots at 3.22 acres.

4:04

This has been suggested from planning commission staff for a holdover until October 15th.

4:09

Is the applicant present?

4:12

Agreement with that.

4:18

No problem.

4:19

Okay.

4:33

All right, seeing none, we will close public hearing.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning And Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████64%
Community Engagement████████12%
Procedural███████10%
Environmental Protection██████9%
Transportation Safety██3%
Engineering And Infrastructure█2%
Summary of Proceedings

Mobile City Planning Commission Meeting - September 17, 2026

The Mobile City Planning Commission met on September 17, 2026, to consider a variety of subdivision, rezone, and modification applications. The meeting included public hearings on several items, most notably a major modification at 900 Paper Mill Road in the Africatown overlay district and a rezone application for 5070 Old Shell Road for Food Pack grocery. The commission approved most items with conditions, denied the rezone for Food Pack, and held over other items.

Consent Calendar

  • Agenda Approval: Approved unanimously.
  • Subdivision at 5685 I-10 Industrial Parkway (Item 1): Held over to October 15, 2026, as requested by the applicant.
  • Subdivision at 64 South Dearborn Street (Item 2): Approved with conditions, including waiver of substandard lot width and area.
  • Subdivision at 429 Lincoln Boulevard (Item 3): Approved with conditions, including waiver of substandard lot area and width.
  • Subdivision at 59 and 61 Bradford Avenue and 1311 Azalea Street (Item 4): Held over to October 15, 2026, at applicant's request, pending resolution of PUD issues.
  • Subdivision and sidewalk waiver at 270 Government Boulevard (Item 8): Approved subdivision with waiver of substandard lot width; sidewalk waiver approved due to no existing sidewalks to connect to.
  • Triple application at 53 Foreman Road and 6784/6788 Dickens Ferry Road (Item 9): Approved subdivision and two modifications, with modifications to corner radius requirements (15-foot radius instead of 25-foot at southwest corner on Foreman and Dickens Ferry).
  • Other Business: Correction to a previously approved subdivision (August 20, 2026) to remove a 25-foot corner radius requirement, approved unanimously.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Item 5 (900 Paper Mill Road – Major Modification):

    • Ramsey Sprague, President of Mobile Environmental Justice Action Coalition (MeJAC), presented extensive written comments and opposed the application. He argued that the staff report failed to address the Africatown Overlay requirements, including a Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED) plan, and that criterion six for approval (noxious or offensive emissions) was not addressed. He noted that ADEM permits already address emissions, dust, odor, etc. He requested a 30-day holdover for proper community engagement, stating that the applicant ignored multiple requests for a neighborhood meeting.
    • Dr. Joe Womack, retired Marine Major and Africatown native, spoke in opposition. He accused the applicant of clearing land before obtaining permission and criticized lack of community outreach. He emphasized Africatown's historic significance and ongoing revitalization plans (e.g., Lewis Landing, Africatown Blueway). He requested the commission require the applicant to share environmental studies and engage with the community.
    • Jay Broughton, applicant representative, rebutted that the modifications are within the existing footprint and would reduce visibility and noise by placing materials under a roof. He stated the facility is already operating under existing permits.
  • Item 7 (5070 Old Shell Road – Rezone from R1 to B2 for Food Pack grocery):

    • Supporters:
      • Maheen Hijazzi, applicant and owner of Food Pack, spoke in favor, noting 35 years of service, 5,000 petition signatures, and community support. She emphasized that the rezoning would allow the business to continue after losing its lease.
      • Tim Spifford, architect, presented site plan details and noted that the property was historically labeled commercial but never zoned. He indicated that variances were needed but the site could meet B2 requirements.
      • Jerry Spiegel, resident, expressed strong support, citing Food Pack's unique offerings and positive neighborhood impact.
      • Ben Haskassimi, representative of the Iranian community, spoke in favor, highlighting the business's cultural contributions and the need to allow it to continue.
    • Opponents:
      • Richard Smith, resident of Spring Hill Woods, cited concerns about traffic, stormwater drainage, and the permanent impact of B2 zoning. He noted that the proposed site is not on a thoroughfare and lacks direct frontage.
      • Kyle Angerson, resident of Country Club Village, opposed the rezoning based on site incompatibility (half-acre lot for a large commercial building), required variances, and potential harm to adjacent homes. He cited drainage, wildlife, and loss of residential character.
      • Linda St. John, resident of Avalon Street and representative of the Village of Spring Hill, stated opposition, arguing the rezoning violates the Spring Hill Community Master Plan and would set a dangerous precedent. She noted that a residential subdivision was previously approved for the site.
      • Thomas Myers, resident of Horloester Court, voiced strong opposition, asserting that the application fails to meet objective criteria for rezoning. He highlighted that the property was purchased with knowledge of residential zoning, prior failed commercial attempts, and that the proposed development does not meet basic design requirements.

Discussion Items

  • Item 5 (900 Paper Mill Road): Commissioners discussed the applicability of the Africatown Overlay. Staff clarified that the property is within the overlay district but not the safety zone, and that CPTED requirements would be addressed during permitting. A commissioner noted that the condition about fencing was not binding forever; a different fence could be used. The neighborhood meeting requirement applies to planned developments, not modifications of previously approved PUDs. The application was approved with findings of fact A-H.

  • Item 7 (5070 Old Shell Road): Extensive deliberation occurred. Commissioners discussed the history of the property, including its subdivision label as commercial but actual zoning as R1 since 1967. Staff confirmed that subdivision labels do not dictate zoning. Commissioner Kenny Nichols made a detailed argument against the rezoning, noting: the lot is second-row without direct frontage on Old Shell Road; no commercial development has occurred on similar lots within half a mile in 41 years; 87% of nearby residents opposed; and the applicant's justification (a landlord-tenant dispute) is not sufficient. Commissioner Josh Woods agreed, citing no substantive change in the area to warrant rezoning. The commission voted to deny the rezone recommendation to the City Council.

Key Outcomes

  • Item 1 (5685 I-10 Industrial Parkway): Held over to October 15, 2026.
  • Items 2, 3, 8: Subdivisions approved with conditions and waivers.
  • Item 4: Held over to October 15, 2026, in conjunction with Item 10.
  • Item 5 (900 Paper Mill Road): Major modification approved with staff recommendations and findings of fact A through H. (Vote: unanimous)
  • Item 6 (East side of Cochrane Causeway): Rezone from R1 to I2 approved with findings of fact C, D, E, and G. (Vote: unanimous)
  • Item 7 (5070 Old Shell Road): Rezone from R1 to B2 denied by a vote of 9-0 (motion to deny passed). The commission cited lack of manifest mistake, incompatibility with surrounding uses, potential adverse impacts, and lack of changing conditions.
  • Item 9 (Grace Point Mobile Subdivision): Subdivision and two modifications approved with modified corner radius requirements.
  • Item 10 (50 and 60 South Ann Street): Held over to October 15, 2026.
  • Other Business: Correction to condition regarding corner radius at Highway 90 and I-10 Industrial Parkway approved.

Meeting Transcript

Good afternoon. Uh, this is the meeting for the Mobile City Planning Commission for September 17th, 2026. Would like to take a moment to review our general operating procedures. For those of you that haven't been to a planning commission in a while, or this is your first time, each agenda item is divided into two sessions public hearing and deliberation. In the public hearing, an agenda item is called. The applicant makes their presentation. Commission members ask questions if any and members of the public make their comments to the commission. Only four people can speak for an agenda item and four people in opposition. Each speaker is limited to five minutes, subject to questions by the commission. A speaker at one minute remaining will have a warning beep prompting you to summarize your comments. After opposition speakers have finished, an applicant is allowed a two-minute rebuttal. If you do do intend to speak, please come to the bottom of the stairs at the podium, speak into the microphone, and provide your name and address for the record. Please direct all your comments to the commission only and not to the applicant, the staff, or the audience. After hearing the application, the commission will then go into deliberation on that application. In deliberation, we will discuss each application with input from the staff as necessary, but with no input from the audience. The commissioners will then vote on each application, and the results of that can be learned if you have to leave from the planning department. If issues arise during deliberation that were not addressed in the public hearing, we have the discretion to allow additional comments pertaining to those issues in order to resolve them, or we will call for the agenda item to be held over for future meeting. Occasionally there may be a commissioner recuse themselves from discussing and voting on a given application. That does not mean that the member is directly involved with the application or the applicant, but depending on the circumstances, ethical rules may require a recusal. If there is one, a supernumerary will vote in their stead. A reminder the planning commission makes final decisions on subdivisions with appeals of these decisions to the circuit court. The planning commission is strictly a recommending body for rezonings, conditional use permits, and planned developments. The city council makes the final decision on these applications, and all appeals of city council decisions are to the circuit court. At this time, do me a favor and please turn your cell phones and other devices to vibrate or silent or off. If you have to take a call, we ask that you leave the uh auditorium. Commissioners and staff, please turn on your microphones when speaking. I'll go ahead and call the roll. Myself, Jay Stubbs President, Mr. Kirk Mate, Miss Jennifer Denson, Mr. Harry Brislin. Here, Mr. Larry Dorsey, Mr. Chad Anderson, Mr. Matt Anderson, Mr. Nick Amberger. Here, Mr. Josh Woods. Here, Mr. Kenny Nichols. Here. Miss Ellie Edwards. Here. We do have a quorum for today's agenda. I will ask, or I will go ahead and move that we approve. Need a second. Second. Properly moved and seconded. All in favor? Aye. The agenda for today passes.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com