Moline Committee-of-the-Whole Meeting – August 19, 2026
Moline Committee-of-the-Whole Meeting – August 19, 2026
Note: The official agenda listed the meeting date as August 11, 2026, but per instruction the date is August 19, 2026. This summary uses the latter date.
The Moline Committee-of-the-Whole met on August 19, 2026, to discuss three major agenda items: a fee review across city departments, the Build Moline housing program, and the 2027–2029 Special Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) for the riverfront development. Presentations were given by city staff and an intern, followed by council discussion and direction for future action.
Discussion Items
Build Moline Program
- Staff presented a review of the starter home concept, evaluating city-owned lots (70 total, only 2 deemed buildable) and privately owned lots (approximately 300, with 80 considered buildable and 20 “ready”).
- The economics of building a starter home were estimated at $250 per square foot, with prevailing wage adding costs.
- The primary recommendation was a subordinate mortgage program using $500,000 from the city’s housing fund to provide up to $50,000 second mortgages, enabling 9–10 new homes. The program would target buyers earning $67,000–$95,000, with a 10-year term and potential forgiveness.
- Council discussion favored a multi-pronged approach: building on a few city-owned lots as a pilot, using the subordinate mortgage program, and considering duplexes or higher density on suitable sites (e.g., the John Deere Middle School lot).
- Staff will return before the end of the year with a triage plan to match lot types with appropriate development strategies.
Fee Review
- Intern Scarlett and Finance staff reviewed 180 city fees, recommending increases or structural changes for 34 fees.
- The largest impact came from EMS fees: proposed base rates of $1,449 for ALS and $1,231 for BLS, eliminating the resident/non-resident differential. This would raise cost recovery from 54% to 82%, driven by House Bill 2785 (effective Jan. 1, 2027).
- Council questioned the burden on uninsured residents (9% of calls are self-pay). Staff noted that most payments come from insurance and state GEMT subsidies.
- Other departments saw smaller changes: police (five fee increases, $16,275 total), fire (eight increases, $702,375 total, mostly EMS), finance ($448), clerk ($275), public works ($11,110), building (one decrease, four new fees), and utilities ($22,028, including shift from door posting to mailed past-due notices).
- Council also discussed creating a short-term rental license fee (approx. $1,000) to capture revenue and improve enforcement. Staff will bring ordinances for consideration in September.
2027–2029 Special Capital Improvement Plan (Riverfront)
- Daniel Davies and Chris presented a proposed $10 million general obligation bond to fund initial riverfront infrastructure, design, and engineering.
- Funding sources include reallocation of $1.5 million from the Build Moline housing fund (leaving $500k for the mortgage program), plus new property tax and franchise fee increases.
- The revenue plan calls for:
- Annual property tax increase of $200,000 (approx. $9/year per resident) starting in 2028.
- Raising the gas/electric franchise fee from 3% to 4% then 5%, adding ~$1.65/month per resident.
- Grant opportunities (ITEP, Brownfields, BUILD, etc.) could leverage up to $12 million.
- Council expressed support but requested more detail on the fire station funding ($27M in 2027) and opposed the $500,000 city hall remodel (council member: “thumbs down”).
- Further discussion on the CIP and revenue plan will occur in September.
Key Outcomes
- No formal votes were taken at this meeting.
- Council directed staff to:
- Develop a triage plan for the Build Moline program (multi-prong approach).
- Bring ordinances for fee changes (including EMS fees and short-term rental licensing) in September.
- Continue refining the CIP and revenue plan for the riverfront, with a focus on securing grants and finalizing bond terms.
- The committee acknowledged the work of summer interns Charles and Scarlett, who contributed to the presentations.
Meeting Transcript
You want to move us to that? Yes. Thank you. So I'm gonna give a short report on the Bill Moline program. And you have kind of the too long didn't read version in front of you there. If you want to see kind of our little executive sign, I think you also have the full report with the exhibits. So I'm gonna reference those exhibits as we go through this case to our speech center. Um as you know, we were presented uh a few months back with this idea from older person Timmy about Bill Moline, the idea of building starter houses, city, city financing those, possibly taking even a loss on those, but the idea of really understanding that the market is not producing those and that the city should consider it. So we really took that idea, pulled out little parts of it and examine those because they are gonna help us in other development people that we're working on right now because of our suspects process regardless of that, then provide you with some recommendations at the end of the ways you could go forward with some. So um so as I mentioned, the first thing we want to do is really define what is a starter house. And so we're looking at an 1100 square foot model. Um could maybe have a basement or a garage, but the examples you're gonna see in here don't have that, and it all kind of comes down to a specific amount of money you have, what makes that spying it, right? The the targeted buyers when we think about the Bill Moline program, we think about starter houses. Targeted buyers are gonna be young couple um looking to start a family, elderly retirees looking to downsize or maybe single professionals. That was kind of the idea. Um there's also the idea of like building these on city owned lots. So we took a good hard look at the city owned lots, roughly 70 lots that say they're owned by the city of Moline, they are owned by the city of Moline. Um but when it comes down to it, I would say maybe two of those are doable right now, as far as like yes, this is a buildable lot. I didn't rate it by you going up there and trying to put something on. So point is you can look through that exhibit the you can see all those lots, and basically there's a storyline every single one of them, whether it's a ravine, you think it may have been dumped on in the past, no one has a landfill, other things that maybe make it not the most ideal to build a house on. Um, of course, we did not we did not include Case Creek in some of the city's farms for that for that, but that is something to keep in mind that the city has uh three farms south of the airport that are a base here of 70 acres, so I'm gonna kick it over to Charles here right now because one of the things that Charles looked at uh for us, and like you said, Mayor, he's with our intern this year, our abundance intern and worked on this project. He looked at the privately owned lots and so Charles, you want to add something on private lots and what you were able to find on them. Yeah, so given uh depending on if you don't want to go with publicly owned blocks, you all see the privately help lock would be an option. So we started off with the list of around 300 privately help bacon lots and Todd that he assembled using Arc GIS, and I went through a little bit uh more so that we can okay if we have a lot of lots, but we can actually develop them uh in which I'll build a little at all in the end. Um we found that there's a good deal of them that would work for the program around 80 that I would consider buildable, and within that, like around 20 that are really buildable and pre perfect for the program now. Some of them uh did say that had to pay money to get them uh requiring them wouldn't necessarily be simple, but something pass it back to Chris. Okay, so um so also we looked at kind of the economics of building a house as part of this, right? There's a couple different elements to look at one was floor plans. I know there was a desire from certain folks on the council, and then older person timmy push the idea of having housing plans that are ready to go basically. Some comes down to see here here's a pre-improved plan. Um talking to the building official a little bit about that. One thing I would tell you is building a house is kind of similar to a garage, but we don't really need we don't need a full plan for an architect, right? So we can certainly have these plans and file that support the city council, they can do it. But what we do for garages, for example, is like your garage packet. You really kind of answer these questions about your garage, and we can permanent interest from that. So another thing we could think about is staff. I mean, it's not given obvious reasons why we don't have a house package. We just it's not something we care about. We'll request for a lot, but we could kind of change the game and be compared with some kind of packet to be help people you know pre-approved good process. But I did just want to make sure everybody knows like you don't need an archetype for a house. Um really can find it design it fairly simply. And the other thing is that typically the type of application will see for that is usually somebody who's I'm closer to 250 a square foot than most of the python. So I think 250 a square foot is a realistic price for uh for a new house. Obviously, sort of things in the county's scale are gonna differ with that. Um, and then the top one is a public prevailing wage. So we didn't want to look at case the city council does want to guarantee the prevailing wage is paying job. Now we're looking at roughly 38 square to a certain estimating that. How does that change the bill? Usually the plumber and the electrician are gonna be getting prevailing wage anyway, so it's really gonna be those others in a job that wouldn't get it for reverse uh the other uh jobs that would have high range. And we also show you here some of the comparisons to like habitat community, how they build it.
openpublica.com