OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Monroe, Wisconsin/Common Council & Commissions
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Monroe Finance and Taxation Committee Meeting – October 13, 2026

Common Council & Commissions — Tuesday, October 13, 2026
BodyMonroe, Wisconsin
SessionCommon Council & Commissions
DateTuesday, October 13, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 25:30

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:06

Order, which clerk please take the roll call.

Speaker 2

0:09

Alder True Hart

Speaker 1

0:10

here.

Speaker 2

0:11

Alder Tolman here.

0:12

Older Schaefer.

0:14

Here.

0:14

Older McGuire.

0:15

Here.

Speaker 1

0:17

Are there any corrections to the September 28th minutes?

0:24

Hearing none, those will stand as written.

0:28

First order business discussion and possible recommendation to common council approval of the 2027 fee schedule.

Unassigned speaker

0:37

This

Speaker 3

0:37

is administrator Rindy, and um annually we review our fee schedule prior to the new year.

0:45

It's sent out to all of the department heads and or other organizations like the airport board to kind of review and send back if they'll be making any changes.

1:17

Try not to necessarily do every year increase, especially for some of them, like licenses and permits versus kind of doing in every kind of other couple years, so you can have fair and equal amounts of increases.

2:06

Also some license and permit increases.

2:09

I do want to note cert I failed to, we had some discussions after we kind of drafted this.

2:31

Um fee, and part of that is um we are shifting with some of the historic preservation discussions.

2:40

Um right now they're having if they're doing a sign in the historic district, they're having to pay for apply for a sign permit and the certificate of appropriateness, and that's creating some kind of confusion and and duplication and efforts.

2:56

So kind of combining that into one application and one fee.

3:00

Um, so just kind of increasing that to align with with those reviews consistently.

3:07

Um other than that, there are some park and rec changes that were also noted.

3:14

Um, those are well evaluated compared to services and what's being provided and and the revenues, um, trying to offset kind of the the work that's provided.

3:24

Um I know there was one question that Mayor Miller even kind of asked the after school program, so I'll just highlight on

Unassigned speaker

3:30

that.

Speaker 3

3:30

Um they've separated it out into two sessions, and so while it looks like it's a significant decrease in the fee, it's actually still an increase, but there's just two separate sessions that you can sign up for.

3:42

So 600 for each session.

3:44

Um if you do both, it would be 1150 versus what would be the 975 when it was just indicated as one session this year.

3:52

Um, and then there's also some increases to sanitation um the garbage cards as well, and that helps to build the sanitation fund side of things.

4:03

Other than that, kind of just that's a very high-level summary.

4:06

Um, I guess if you have any questions or comments,

Speaker 1

4:23

could you kind of give an overview of the increases in the fire department service fees?

Speaker 3

4:39

Um, so they do some inspections with the fire suppression system.

4:44

Um, so there's some increases noted with that.

4:48

Um, trying to kind of recover some of the work and efforts that go into there.

Unassigned speaker

4:53

Um, similarly for um testing of the fire smoke alarm systems.

Speaker 3

5:00

I think one kind of noteworthy.

5:04

So

Unassigned speaker

5:07

and

Speaker 3

5:08

then I guess two, they've kind of taken a look with some of those those per hour.

5:12

So that's not for like every emergency response that we we respond to in the city.

5:19

We don't charge for calls that we respond to, but if we're responding to additional or separate things that we charge then per the hour.

5:26

So to clarify on that, I guess.

5:30

And then I know there's also a change with the false alarms.

5:35

That finding that typically it was kind of seemed to be burdensome and a little unfair of charging for that first three.

5:44

Sometimes when they're installing a new system and having those alarms to kind of give them those three free before then starting to charge.

5:51

So changing that instead of the third in a calendar year to then being fourth or more for those additional charges.

Speaker 1

6:00

Thank you.

6:04

Any other comments, questions?

Speaker 4

6:10

Seems like a pretty

Unassigned speaker

6:12

I

Speaker 4

6:12

mean, especially when it comes to the parks department, seems like a pretty thorough review went into their fees and a comfortable increase is pretty evident.

6:31

And I say that just as opposed to waiting and holding and holding and holding and then bigger increases.

Speaker 3

6:44

Correct.

Unassigned speaker

6:45

Yeah,

Speaker 3

6:45

and the parks department, Matt and Skippet does a good job of kind of really looking at what the programs are costing and versus for to operate versus what's kind of being recovered and ensuring that that's captured each year.

Speaker 5

7:14

Which is a kind of an odd amount.

7:16

And now it's down to 1250.

7:18

What it was there something going on?

Speaker 3

7:22

So that I didn't quite get to connect with Matt before he left, but there it what I the notes that I have from what he submitted is that those are like based on like actuals for I think the program, and so it fluctuates year by year based on I think number of enrollees and things of that that get kind of say billed back out, so it adjusts and fluctuates.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Budget Equity Analysis█████████████████████████████████████████████63%
Procedural███████████16%
Public Safety█████7%
Economic Development████6%
Historic Preservation████5%
Engineering And Infrastructure██3%
Summary of Proceedings

Monroe Finance and Taxation Committee – October 13, 2026

The City of Monroe Finance and Taxation Committee met on October 13, 2026, in City Hall Council Chambers. Members present were Alder Truehart, Alder Tolman, Alder Schaefer, and Alder McGuire. The committee recommended approval of the 2027 fee schedule and the 2027 budget to the Common Council, entered closed session on four property and development matters, and returned to open session to forward the North Industrial Park site investigation proposal to the Common Council. No public comments were heard.

Minutes

  • The committee reviewed the September 28, 2026 minutes. No corrections were offered, and the minutes stood as written.

2027 Fee Schedule

  • Administrator Rindy presented the annual fee schedule review. Department heads and organizations such as the airport board were asked to review fees and report changes. Increases are not automatic every year; the city tries to keep increases fair and equal over time, and some license and permit fees are adjusted every couple of years.
  • Historic preservation: the city is combining sign permits and certificates of appropriateness in the historic district into one application and one fee to reduce confusion and duplication.
  • After-school program: the program was split into two sessions, each costing $600. Registering for both would cost $1,150, compared with $975 when it was offered as one session this year, so the apparent decrease is actually an increase. Fees can fluctuate based on program actuals and enrollment.
  • Sanitation fees, including garbage cart fees, were increased to build the sanitation fund.
  • Fire department service fees: increases were proposed for fire suppression system inspections and fire/smoke alarm system testing. Per-hour charges apply only to additional or separate responses, not to every emergency call. False alarm charges were changed so the first three false alarms in a calendar year are free, with charges beginning on the fourth or more, to avoid penalizing new system installations.
  • A committee member praised the parks department’s thorough review, saying it avoids waiting and then making larger increases later.

2027 Budget Update

  • Administrator Rindy provided an updated budget presentation reflecting recent direction from Finance and Salary/Personnel.
  • Debt service increased by a little over $58,000. TID 12, the newest tax incremental district on the east side, does not yet generate enough increment to cover its full principal and interest payment in its first year of increment. The general tax levy will cover the shortfall, and the general fund could be reimbursed later if the TID generates enough increment. TID values are as of January 1, 2026, and additional value is expected by January 1, 2027.
  • The total budget remains $14.3 million, with a little more added by the debt service increase.
  • Expenditure Restraint Program: the city is eligible for a little over $200,000 in state revenue if expenditures stay within the state’s inflation-based limit. The city has an additional cushion of over $300,000, but cannot increase expenditures by that amount because of the levy limit, illustrating a gap between the LEMI levy limit formula and inflation.
  • Staff COLA was increased from 2.5% to 2.8%, plus step increases, not reaching the requested 3%.
  • Organization funding requests were accommodated: GCDC received an increase of around $8,000, Main Street Monroe was increased from $35,000 to $40,000, the Chamber stayed the same, and the cemetery increase to 55 was included.
  • Main Street Monroe’s funding will be shifted to TID 7 funding because TID 7’s project plan allows support for general Main Street operations. TID 7 has a positive balance and increment available, and the shift frees $35,000 in general levy funding for other requests and COLA. A future resolution will formalize funding Main Street through TID 7; when the TID closes, funding would return to the general levy. If TID 7 closed today, the city could add around $116,000 to the levy, enough to absorb the $40,000 Main Street payment.
  • Transit/shared ride service: SSM is willing to contribute based on ridership. An alliance community grant was attempted without success. The Administrator plans to present a shared-ride program summary, including usage and revenues, before the end of the year; monthly data shows pick-up and drop-off locations.
  • Special event fee structure had been incorporated into the fee schedule; Public Safety recommended keeping it the same this year, and the committee discussed revisiting it next year with a cost breakdown of events before deciding on fees.
  • The Administrator also noted the building permit threshold is $2,000 or more and that another increase will be proposed through the Judiciary & Ordinance process.

Closed Session

  • The committee moved into closed session under Wis. Stat. § 19.85(1)(e) to discuss four items: a potential offer to purchase or lease city-owned downtown property; the North Industrial Park site investigation proposal and potential sale of property; a residential development request for a developer’s incentive in TID 7; and a letter of intent for potential city property acquisition for residential development in TID 9.

Post-Closed Session Action

  • After returning to open session, the committee voted to recommend the North Industrial Park site investigation proposal to the Common Council.

Key Outcomes

  • Recommended the 2027 fee schedule to the Common Council; motion passed.
  • Recommended the 2027 budget to the Common Council; roll call vote passed with Alder Tolman, Alder Schaefer, Alder McGuire, and Alder Truehart voting aye.
  • Voted to forward the North Industrial Park site investigation proposal to the Common Council; motion passed.
  • No votes were taken in open session on the downtown property, TID 7 developer incentive, or TID 9 acquisition discussion items.

Meeting Transcript

Order, which clerk please take the roll call. Alder True Hart here. Alder Tolman here. Older Schaefer. Here. Older McGuire. Here. Are there any corrections to the September 28th minutes? Hearing none, those will stand as written. First order business discussion and possible recommendation to common council approval of the 2027 fee schedule. This is administrator Rindy, and um annually we review our fee schedule prior to the new year. It's sent out to all of the department heads and or other organizations like the airport board to kind of review and send back if they'll be making any changes. Try not to necessarily do every year increase, especially for some of them, like licenses and permits versus kind of doing in every kind of other couple years, so you can have fair and equal amounts of increases. Also some license and permit increases. I do want to note cert I failed to, we had some discussions after we kind of drafted this. Um fee, and part of that is um we are shifting with some of the historic preservation discussions. Um right now they're having if they're doing a sign in the historic district, they're having to pay for apply for a sign permit and the certificate of appropriateness, and that's creating some kind of confusion and and duplication and efforts. So kind of combining that into one application and one fee. Um, so just kind of increasing that to align with with those reviews consistently. Um other than that, there are some park and rec changes that were also noted. Um, those are well evaluated compared to services and what's being provided and and the revenues, um, trying to offset kind of the the work that's provided. Um I know there was one question that Mayor Miller even kind of asked the after school program, so I'll just highlight on that. Um they've separated it out into two sessions, and so while it looks like it's a significant decrease in the fee, it's actually still an increase, but there's just two separate sessions that you can sign up for. So 600 for each session. Um if you do both, it would be 1150 versus what would be the 975 when it was just indicated as one session this year. Um, and then there's also some increases to sanitation um the garbage cards as well, and that helps to build the sanitation fund side of things. Other than that, kind of just that's a very high-level summary. Um, I guess if you have any questions or comments, could you kind of give an overview of the increases in the fire department service fees? Um, so they do some inspections with the fire suppression system. Um, so there's some increases noted with that. Um, trying to kind of recover some of the work and efforts that go into there. Um, similarly for um testing of the fire smoke alarm systems. I think one kind of noteworthy. So and then I guess two, they've kind of taken a look with some of those those per hour. So that's not for like every emergency response that we we respond to in the city. We don't charge for calls that we respond to, but if we're responding to additional or separate things that we charge then per the hour. So to clarify on that, I guess. And then I know there's also a change with the false alarms. That finding that typically it was kind of seemed to be burdensome and a little unfair of charging for that first three. Sometimes when they're installing a new system and having those alarms to kind of give them those three free before then starting to charge. So changing that instead of the third in a calendar year to then being fourth or more for those additional charges. Thank you. Any other comments, questions? Seems like a pretty

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com