OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Montgomery County PHP Committee Meeting - March 9, 2026

County Council & CommitteesMonday, March 9, 2026
BodyMontgomery County, Maryland
SessionCounty Council & Committees
DateMonday, March 9, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:01

Good afternoon.

0:03

We are here for Planning Housing and Parks Committee.

0:05

It's March 9th at 145.

0:08

We have a few items on the agenda, starting with our parks capital improvements program.

0:16

Before we turn it over to Ms.

0:18

Don and Council staff, I'll just turn it over to the planning board chair and to the director to see if you want to walk through and give some overview of your budget request and your budget that's before us, and then we can walk through with Pam and the packet.

0:33

Yeah, thank you.

0:34

Already here is chair of the Montgomery County Planning Board, and I'll let uh our directive Mitty Figuero uh start lead us out this morning.

0:41

Thank you.

0:42

Thank you so much, Middy Figaro for the record.

0:45

Um when we were preparing our CIP request this cycle, we were trying to do what we hope we have a reputation for doing, which is bring to the planning board and then to the council a request that reflects really what our fundamental needs are in order to keep a well-maintained park system and move forward with projects for which there is broad support from the council and frankly the community.

1:19

So to simplify matters and give you a very sort of high-level view of what our request ultimately is and what we would be asking to have restored to us, is we requested an increase in general obligation bonds for Wheaton Regional Park.

1:37

We requested an additional $4 million a year to sub out for program open space funding that we are no longer getting, and an additional million dollars to add a bathroom to the Wheaton Action Sports Park.

1:51

We requested $2.4 million in geo bonds for our solar initiative.

1:57

Again, um that is an initiative that seeks to double the amount of solar we produce on parkland over the next five years, and that's $400,000 a year that we were asking for.

2:08

I do want to note that for those first two years in the CIP, 400,000 each of those years.

2:15

Um that's really important funding for us because it leverages some federal tax credits that are sunsetting.

2:21

In addition, we had an ask of $4.8 million in additional current revenue.

2:28

$3 million of that current revenue request is for PLAR.

2:32

And as you all know, PLR is the PDF that fixes all of the broken things in parks that need to be fixed.

2:39

It's fundamental to the maintenance of our infrastructure.

2:43

Um and then the additional 1.8 million in current revenue was to go to natural surface trails, which is our most popular amenity in parks.

2:53

And this 1.8 million dollars would allow us to fix something or at least start making progress on fixing something like 60 bridges along our natural surface trails that need to be replaced and make some important connections between Little Bennett and Black Hill Regional Park.

3:11

So at a very high level, that was what we asked for, and that was what was cut from our request, and we would be asking for it to be restored.

3:21

So thank you.

3:25

Great.

3:26

Um you want to talk a little bit about what the impact would be of the cuts and kind of you know, are there kind of different points at which you know restoration would have different impacts.

3:39

If you want to talk a little bit about that, if you can.

3:42

So I'll start with our request for the additional geobonds for Wheaton Regional Park.

3:47

Um, if you all recall, um we succeeded kind of beyond our wildest hopes over the last couple of years in securing $5.5 million in state capital grants for wheat and regional park.

4:02

Um if we were not to receive the geobond funding that we asked for during this cycle for Wheaton, we cannot move forward with the Wheat in Action Sports Park, and we put that $5.5 million at risk.

4:15

That's the impact to Wheaton.

4:18

Um the solar initiative, again, um without the $2.4 million in geobonds.

4:26

Um, I will say we would have to probably delay some of these solar projects that we had hoped would get us to this goal of doubling solar.

4:36

We can with some money move forward, but probably won't hit that five-year goal.

5:00

The impact of not getting the current revenue on PLAR, you know, we pulled together, just to give you a picture, some of the projects that we expect to fund out of PLAR over this cycle, and they include things like improvements, really mold remediation to our Brookside Nature Center, the rehabilitation of the amphitheater at Cabin John Regional Park, renovation of the picnic area at Valley Mill, Candy Kane uh City replacement of the bridge, which is really important, and a bunch of other of these kinds of, I would describe them as unsexy but very necessary repairs.

5:21

And then, of course, you know, our natural surface trails.

5:24

Um, that's really scalable.

5:26

That's the beauty part of you know, natural surface trails is that we can build with what we have.

5:32

But again, it's our most popular amenity and the one that's most cost effective for us to um to quickly implement for park users.

5:40

I hope that's helpful.

5:42

It is.

5:43

It is.

5:43

Thank you.

5:44

Okay.

5:45

Umber Gerwondo.

5:48

I was going to turn it over to staff and then open up to questions and comments if that's okay.

5:52

Uh all right.

5:53

Uh happy to go through the packet, Ms.

5:55

Dunn.

5:55

If you could just briefly go through the the issues uh that you raised in the packet, and then we can open it up to colleagues for comments and questions for both you and for uh parks.

6:06

Great.

6:06

Thank you, and good afternoon.

6:08

Um so the way that the staff report is laid out, um, this is at the top of the second page of the staff report, is that in the very first section we'll address some general issues.

6:17

I'll go through those for the committee.

6:18

You can ask questions.

6:20

The second section describes um new projects.

6:23

There's just one.

6:23

It won't really be very new to you.

6:25

We've talked about it before.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Parks and Recreation██████████████████████████████████████████42%
Budget Equity Analysis█████████████████████21%
Planning And Zoning████████████████16%
Economic Development████████████12%
Affordable Housing███████7%
Energy Management██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Montgomery County Planning, Housing and Parks Committee Meeting - March 9, 2026

The Planning, Housing and Parks (PHP) Committee met on March 9, 2026, from 1:46 p.m. to approximately 3:30 p.m. to discuss four agenda items: the FY27-32 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) for Montgomery Parks, Zoning Text Amendment (ZTA) 26-02 regarding regional shopping center overlay zones, ZTA 26-03 on biohealth priority campus eligibility, and ZTA 26-04 on mixed-income housing community eligibility. The committee took votes on all items and set next steps for the parks CIP.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • For the parks CIP, public hearing testimony was overwhelmingly supportive of the park system and its value to residents.
  • For ZTA 26-02, 26-03, and 26-04, the only registered speaker at each public hearing was a representative from the Montgomery County Planning Board, and no written testimony was received.

Discussion Items

  • Parks CIP (FY27-32): The committee reviewed the Planning Board's requested $11.2 million increase (including $2.4 million in GO bonds for solar, $5 million for Wheaton Regional Park, $3 million for Planned Life-cycle Asset Replacement (PLAR), and $1.8 million for natural surface trails). The County Executive's Affordability Reconciliation PDF proposed reducing GO bonds by $6.4 million and current revenue by $4.8 million. The committee discussed the impact of potential cuts, including loss of federal solar tax credits (30% of $800,000 over two years) and risk to $5.5 million in state grants for Wheaton Action Sports Park. Councilmember Fani-González strongly opposed any cuts to Wheaton Regional Park, while Councilmember Jawando expressed concern over the lack of formal non-recommended reductions from Parks and the need for shared sacrifice across county agencies.
  • Johnson's Local Park: The committee approved creating a standalone Project Description Form (PDF) for Johnson's Local Park, separating it from the Ballfield Initiatives PDF. The additional funding request of $2.5 million in GO bonds was discussed but not committed, with the committee noting other potential funding sources (current revenue, state aid) and deferring the amount to later budget discussions.
  • Parkway Improvements PDF: The committee supported the budget-neutral transfer of the Resurfacing Park Roads PDF from the Department of Transportation to Parks, now named Parkway Improvements, following execution of the required MOU.
  • ZTA 26-02 (Regional Shopping Center Overlay): The committee supported the Planning Board's amendment to remove the 30% gross floor area cap on all housing types and a technical amendment to replace "gross floor area" with "gross leasable area" for consistency.
  • ZTA 26-03 (Biohealth Priority Campus): The committee supported lowering the square footage threshold for expedited review from 150,000 to 100,000 sq. ft. for new construction and from 50,000 to 25,000 sq. ft. for existing buildings, and adding adaptive reuse of 100,000 sq. ft. as eligible. A technical amendment updated references to the new Expedited Approval Plan section.
  • ZTA 26-04 (Mixed-Income Housing): The committee supported eliminating the 150,000 sq. ft. requirement and instead requiring at least 50 dwelling units (up from 30) to qualify as a mixed-income housing community. Added 4% Low-Income Housing Tax Credits (LIHTC) to the eligible project types, expected to allow 2-3 additional projects per year. A technical amendment updated cross-references.

Key Outcomes

  • Parks CIP:
    • Recommended approval of standalone PDF for Johnson's Local Park; funding amount and source to be determined during FY27 Operating Budget review.
    • Supported the transfer of Parkway Improvements PDF from MCDOT to Parks (budget-neutral).
    • Supported the Planning Board's recommended changes to Legacy Urban Space acquisition PDF.
    • Supported consent-level approval for numerous development PDFs with minimal changes (e.g., Advance Land Acquisition Revolving Fund, ADA Compliance, Ballfield Initiatives, Cost Sharing, Energy Conservation, Facility Planning, Minor New Construction, Planned Life-cycle Asset Replacement, Trails, Vision Zero, Warner Circle Special Park, and others).
    • Expressed preference for full funding of the Parks CIP but requested that Parks provide a detailed summary of operational impacts if reductions are required, including scalable options (e.g., potential loss of solar tax credits if first two years are cut).
    • Deferred final funding decisions to the March 24 Council worksession, pending further information on current revenue and the operating budget.
  • ZTA 26-02: Recommended enactment as amended (removing 30% cap and technical correction) by a 3-0 vote. Council action tentatively scheduled for March 24, 2026.
  • ZTA 26-03: Recommended enactment as amended (lowered thresholds and technical correction) by a 3-0 vote. Council consideration tentatively scheduled for March 17, 2026.
  • ZTA 26-04: Recommended enactment as amended (adjusted thresholds, added 4% LIHTC, technical correction) by a 3-0 vote. Council action tentatively scheduled for March 17, 2026.

Meeting Transcript

Good afternoon. We are here for Planning Housing and Parks Committee. It's March 9th at 145. We have a few items on the agenda, starting with our parks capital improvements program. Before we turn it over to Ms. Don and Council staff, I'll just turn it over to the planning board chair and to the director to see if you want to walk through and give some overview of your budget request and your budget that's before us, and then we can walk through with Pam and the packet. Yeah, thank you. Already here is chair of the Montgomery County Planning Board, and I'll let uh our directive Mitty Figuero uh start lead us out this morning. Thank you. Thank you so much, Middy Figaro for the record. Um when we were preparing our CIP request this cycle, we were trying to do what we hope we have a reputation for doing, which is bring to the planning board and then to the council a request that reflects really what our fundamental needs are in order to keep a well-maintained park system and move forward with projects for which there is broad support from the council and frankly the community. So to simplify matters and give you a very sort of high-level view of what our request ultimately is and what we would be asking to have restored to us, is we requested an increase in general obligation bonds for Wheaton Regional Park. We requested an additional $4 million a year to sub out for program open space funding that we are no longer getting, and an additional million dollars to add a bathroom to the Wheaton Action Sports Park. We requested $2.4 million in geo bonds for our solar initiative. Again, um that is an initiative that seeks to double the amount of solar we produce on parkland over the next five years, and that's $400,000 a year that we were asking for. I do want to note that for those first two years in the CIP, 400,000 each of those years. Um that's really important funding for us because it leverages some federal tax credits that are sunsetting. In addition, we had an ask of $4.8 million in additional current revenue. $3 million of that current revenue request is for PLAR. And as you all know, PLR is the PDF that fixes all of the broken things in parks that need to be fixed. It's fundamental to the maintenance of our infrastructure. Um and then the additional 1.8 million in current revenue was to go to natural surface trails, which is our most popular amenity in parks. And this 1.8 million dollars would allow us to fix something or at least start making progress on fixing something like 60 bridges along our natural surface trails that need to be replaced and make some important connections between Little Bennett and Black Hill Regional Park. So at a very high level, that was what we asked for, and that was what was cut from our request, and we would be asking for it to be restored. So thank you. Great. Um you want to talk a little bit about what the impact would be of the cuts and kind of you know, are there kind of different points at which you know restoration would have different impacts. If you want to talk a little bit about that, if you can. So I'll start with our request for the additional geobonds for Wheaton Regional Park. Um, if you all recall, um we succeeded kind of beyond our wildest hopes over the last couple of years in securing $5.5 million in state capital grants for wheat and regional park. Um if we were not to receive the geobond funding that we asked for during this cycle for Wheaton, we cannot move forward with the Wheat in Action Sports Park, and we put that $5.5 million at risk. That's the impact to Wheaton. Um the solar initiative, again, um without the $2.4 million in geobonds. Um, I will say we would have to probably delay some of these solar projects that we had hoped would get us to this goal of doubling solar. We can with some money move forward, but probably won't hit that five-year goal. The impact of not getting the current revenue on PLAR, you know, we pulled together, just to give you a picture, some of the projects that we expect to fund out of PLAR over this cycle, and they include things like improvements, really mold remediation to our Brookside Nature Center, the rehabilitation of the amphitheater at Cabin John Regional Park, renovation of the picnic area at Valley Mill, Candy Kane uh City replacement of the bridge, which is really important, and a bunch of other of these kinds of, I would describe them as unsexy but very necessary repairs. And then, of course, you know, our natural surface trails. Um, that's really scalable. That's the beauty part of you know, natural surface trails is that we can build with what we have. But again, it's our most popular amenity and the one that's most cost effective for us to um to quickly implement for park users. I hope that's helpful. It is. It is. Thank you. Okay. Umber Gerwondo. I was going to turn it over to staff and then open up to questions and comments if that's okay. Uh all right. Uh happy to go through the packet, Ms. Dunn.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com