OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Mountain View, California/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Mountain View City Council EPC Applicant Interviews Study Session – October 20, 2026

City Council — Tuesday, October 20, 2026
BodyMountain View, California
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, October 20, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:46:35

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording. Names come from transcript evidence. “Possibly” marks uncertain attribution.

Unassigned speaker

0:00

And

Speaker 1

0:01

we should

Speaker 2

0:01

have your visible justice.

0:07

Okay.

Speaker 1

0:08

Thank you.

0:09

The city clerk will take attendance by roll call.

Speaker 3

0:15

Councilmember Hicks.

0:17

Here.

0:18

Councilmember Kamei?

0:19

Here.

0:20

Councilmember McAllister.

0:21

Councilmember Ramirez.

Speaker 4

0:22

Here.

Speaker 3

0:23

Vice Mayor Clark?

0:23

Here.

0:24

Mayor Ramos?

0:25

Here.

0:25

You have a quorum with Councilmember Showalter absent.

Speaker 1

0:28

Thank you.

0:30

We'll now move on to item four.

0:32

Study session.

Unassigned speaker

0:34

Huh?

Speaker 1

0:34

Study session.

0:36

4.1.

0:37

Environmental planning commission applicant interviews.

0:40

The purpose of this meeting this evening is for the council to interview applicants for two openings on the environmental planning commission.

0:47

And make a recommendation for adoption at the December 15th, 2026 council meeting.

0:53

Would any member of the public joining us virtually or in person like to provide comment on this item?

0:58

If so, please click the raise hand button in Zoom or submit a blue speaker card to the city clerk.

1:03

We will take in-person speakers first.

1:05

Each speaker will have three minutes.

1:10

Speakers, seeing none, I will now take virtual speakers.

1:16

Seeing none, thank you.

1:18

For the selection process outlined in council policy number K-2.

1:22

Interviews will be conducted in a panel format.

1:25

Each applicant will receive the same amount of time to answer each question, and the questions selected by the council will be asked in a randomized round robin order.

1:34

The council may ask a limited number of clarifying questions in the event that the applicant's answer was unclear or otherwise not understood.

1:42

Clarifying questions should not be used to allow an applicant additional opportunity to expand on the original response.

1:52

On October 21st, 2025, Council posts the following questions to EPC applicants in the denoted time limit for each category.

2:01

Would any council member like to suggest changes to the questions or propose a time allocation per question?

2:14

Councilmember Hicks.

Speaker 2

2:20

Excuse me.

2:20

Perhaps I would like to add um to question number three, which reads what are your thoughts on the city's existing plans, like the general plan, precise plans, and specifically the downtown precise plan.

2:35

Maybe add and the Moffitt precise plan.

Speaker 1

2:40

And any objections to that?

2:42

Seeing none, we'll put and the Moffitt precise plan.

2:57

Any other changes to the time limits or the questions itself?

3:07

Alright, how do we want to break down the questions?

3:13

All right.

3:13

What we're gonna do is that we're gonna start from Councilmember Ramirez, and then we're just gonna go down with asking east questions.

3:21

You there's a little less than five questions, or there's six of us, but five questions.

3:30

So you know what?

3:31

All of you guys will be asking the questions.

3:33

So councilmember Ramirez, you'll have the handling question one.

3:37

Uh Vice Mayor Clark, you'll be handling question two.

3:40

Councilmember Kamei will be handling question three.

3:42

Councilmember Hicks, you'll be handling question four, and uh Councilmember McCallister, you'll be handling question five.

3:49

Sound

Unassigned speaker

3:50

good.

Speaker 1

3:51

All right.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Procedural███████████████████████23%
Community Engagement████████████████████20%
Council Policy███████████████15%
Board Governance███████████11%
General Plan███████████11%
Environmental Impact Assessment█████████9%
Environmental Planning Commission█████████9%
Housing██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Mountain View City Council EPC Applicant Interviews Study Session – October 20, 2026

The Mountain View City Council convened a special study session on October 20, 2026, to interview four candidates for two upcoming vacancies on the Environmental Planning Commission (EPC). The session combined structured interviews with an extensive procedural debate over the appointment timeline, prompted by the possibility that a sitting EPC member might be elected to the City Council in the November election. The Council voted 4-2 to advance all applicants as finalists and prepare a contingency process for potential additional vacancies.

Discussion Items

Applicant Interviews The Council interviewed four candidates using a standard set of questions in a round-robin format:

  • Alexander Amaroso: An environmental and conservation professional with experience working with the Army Corps of Engineers and Native American tribes. He expressed support for the downtown and Moffett precise plans and identified climate change and sustainable infrastructure as key priorities for the EPC.
  • Elizabeth Conlin: A scientist who emphasized her technical expertise in reviewing environmental impact reports and biological site assessments. She identified the implementation of SB 79 as the most pressing immediate issue facing the commission.
  • Daniel Holsey: A mechanical engineer and PhD who stressed his ability to analyze complex systems. He argued the EPC's role is shifting toward broader policy documents and identified the rapid pace of state housing laws as the commission's biggest challenge.
  • Patricia Scarborough: An industrial engineer and 24-year Mountain View resident who served on the Environmental Benefits Committee. She advocated for a sustainable, equitable community and a systems-thinking approach to planning.

Procedural Debate on Appointment Process The debate centered on whether to make final selections from the existing candidate pool or to wait until after the November election to account for the potential resignation of Commissioner Donahue, who is running for City Council.

  • Vice Mayor Clark proposed advancing all four candidates as finalists without immediate selection. He argued this would allow the Council to make a holistic decision knowing the full number of vacancies and the final composition of the Council and EPC.
  • Councilmember Hicks supported this approach, emphasizing the importance of EPC composition and having complete information.
  • Councilmember McAlister agreed, calling the delay an exercise in "better government."
  • Councilmember Kamei supported the delay, noting the importance of a full seven-member Council vote and that she did not have enough information from the interviews to vote confidently.
  • Councilmember Ramirez opposed the motion, arguing it was unfair to the applicants who met the established deadline and that changing the rules mid-process was inappropriate. He suggested the outcome might have differed had the applicant pool represented different interests.
  • Mayor Ramos also voted no, grounding her opposition in her mayoral theme of treating all volunteers with gratitude and following through on the advertised process.

Key Outcomes

  • Vote: The motion passed 4–2. Voting in favor: Vice Mayor Clark, Councilmember Hicks, Councilmember McAlister, Councilmember Kamei. Voting against: Councilmember Ramirez and Mayor Ramos. Councilmember Showalter was absent.
  • Finalists: All four applicants (Amaroso, Conlin, Holsey, Scarborough) were designated as finalists for the EPC openings.
  • Contingent Process: If Commissioner Donahue is elected to Council and vacates his EPC seat, the City Clerk will open a new recruitment period for all vacant seats. Current finalists remain in the pool without needing to re-interview, though they have the option to do so.
  • Standardized Questions: Any interviews for a second round of candidates must use the identical set of questions used in this session.
  • Future Referral: The Council directed a referral to the Council Policy and Procedure Committee to review the alignment of EPC terms to prevent this scheduling conflict in future election years.
  • Next Steps: A study session for potential additional interviews is anticipated for December 8 or December 15, 2026. Final appointments will be made at the December 15 Council meeting.

Meeting Transcript

And we should have your visible justice. Okay. Thank you. The city clerk will take attendance by roll call. Councilmember Hicks. Here. Councilmember Kamei? Here. Councilmember McAllister. Councilmember Ramirez. Here. Vice Mayor Clark? Here. Mayor Ramos? Here. You have a quorum with Councilmember Showalter absent. Thank you. We'll now move on to item four. Study session. Huh? Study session. 4.1. Environmental planning commission applicant interviews. The purpose of this meeting this evening is for the council to interview applicants for two openings on the environmental planning commission. And make a recommendation for adoption at the December 15th, 2026 council meeting. Would any member of the public joining us virtually or in person like to provide comment on this item? If so, please click the raise hand button in Zoom or submit a blue speaker card to the city clerk. We will take in-person speakers first. Each speaker will have three minutes. Speakers, seeing none, I will now take virtual speakers. Seeing none, thank you. For the selection process outlined in council policy number K-2. Interviews will be conducted in a panel format. Each applicant will receive the same amount of time to answer each question, and the questions selected by the council will be asked in a randomized round robin order. The council may ask a limited number of clarifying questions in the event that the applicant's answer was unclear or otherwise not understood. Clarifying questions should not be used to allow an applicant additional opportunity to expand on the original response. On October 21st, 2025, Council posts the following questions to EPC applicants in the denoted time limit for each category. Would any council member like to suggest changes to the questions or propose a time allocation per question? Councilmember Hicks. Excuse me. Perhaps I would like to add um to question number three, which reads what are your thoughts on the city's existing plans, like the general plan, precise plans, and specifically the downtown precise plan. Maybe add and the Moffitt precise plan. And any objections to that? Seeing none, we'll put and the Moffitt precise plan. Any other changes to the time limits or the questions itself? Alright, how do we want to break down the questions? All right. What we're gonna do is that we're gonna start from Councilmember Ramirez, and then we're just gonna go down with asking east questions.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com