OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Mountain View, California/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Administrative Zoning Public Hearing - October 26, 2026

City Council — Monday, October 26, 2026
BodyMountain View, California
SessionCity Council
DateMonday, October 26, 2026
StatusNEW · FILED
Video Record
0:00 / 8:45

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:12

Okay.

Unassigned speaker

0:13

Well,

Speaker 1

0:14

good afternoon and welcome to the administrative zoning public hearing of October 14th, 2026.

Unassigned speaker

0:19

My

Speaker 1

0:20

name is George Schroeder, and I'm presiding over the hearing today as zoning administrator.

Unassigned speaker

0:24

I would

Speaker 1

0:25

like to call the meeting to order today at 4 p.m.

0:27

Today's hearing will operate in a hybrid format.

0:30

Staff, the applicant, and subcommunity members are in person.

0:33

However, we will ask if community members joining us virtually want to speak on an item at certain points of the meeting.

0:40

When those opportunities arise, typically during the public comment period of each item, members of the public wishing to comment may do so by clicking on the raise hand feature in Zoom when I announce the item on which you wish to speak.

0:54

Speakers will be notified of their turn shortly before they are called on to speak.

0:58

All speakers, virtual or in person, will have two to three minutes to provide comments with timing dependent on the total number of speakers for each item.

Unassigned speaker

1:07

If

Speaker 1

1:07

you're in person and wish to comment on the agenda item, please also fill out a yellow speaker card for us so we're able to accurately spell your name for the meeting minutes.

Unassigned speaker

1:16

The

Speaker 1

1:16

next portion of the meeting is rural communications for the public.

1:19

This is a time set aside for persons wishing to address the zoning administrator on any matter not the agenda.

1:27

Speakers are limited to three minutes.

1:34

Is there anyone that would like to speak on any items that are not on the agenda?

1:38

Seeing the members of the public in the audience here.

1:41

Roxanne, do we have anyone online?

Speaker 2

1:43

Next.

Speaker 1

1:44

Okay, no.

1:45

So I will now move on to item three, which is a zoning administrator public hearing.

1:50

Item 3.1 is at 761 West Middlefield Road with a request for a development review permit to install three new bollards on an existing driveway of an apartment development on a 3.81 acre site, which requires modifications to conditions of approval numbers 86, 102, 130, and 131 of a previously approved planned unit development permit and development review permit, and the addition of two new conditions of approval, and a recommended determination that the project is categorically exempt.

2:23

California Environmental Quality Act or CEQA pursuant to Section 15301, existing facilities, Section 15303, new construction or conversion of small structures, the SIBO guidelines.

2:38

The project is on the west side of West Middlefield Road between North Shoreline Boulevard, Moffat Boulevard, R3-2 zoning district.

2:47

Tristan White is the project planner.

Speaker 3

2:54

Am I promoted to my name is Tristan White and I am project planner for this item at 761 West Middlefield

Unassigned speaker

3:18

Road.

Speaker 3

3:23

This project is located on a 3.81 acre site on the west side of West Middlefield Road between North Shoreline Boulevard and Moffat Boulevard in the R3-2 multifamily residential zoning district.

3:37

The existing project site contains a 75-unit apartment development, Hero Apartments by Prometheus.

3:44

And that had previously been approved by permit number PL-2018-094.

4:11

With the proposed modification, the site's main form of egress and ingress would be from the West Middlefield Road rather than from the 7th property as originally approved.

4:23

The connection to the 7th will remain available to emergency vehicles, but will no longer allow standard vehicle access between the sites.

Unassigned speaker

5:00

The condition allowed Hero to construct a driveway entrance along Middlefield Road if the Sevens driveway had not yet opened.

Speaker 3

5:04

And upon the Seventh driveway opening, Hero had six months to connect to the shared driveway and remove the Hero

Speaker 1

5:10

Middlefield Road entrance.

Speaker 3

5:14

Considering traffic safety issues, traffic traffic safety and issues concerning parking spillover from adjacent residential development.

5:24

Staff is recommending that the Hero Project be permitted to maintain the existing entrance off West Middlefield Road.

5:31

Upon acceptance by City Council to uh to install a traffic signal at the 7th entrance.

5:37

Prometheus will be required within 30 days to remove the ballards between the two properties.

5:42

Additionally, conditions 102, 130, and 131 from uh PL 2018 094 are modified by this project to be current with the 2025 California Building Standards

Unassigned speaker

5:58

Code.

Unassigned speaker

5:58

Uh

Speaker 3

5:59

two new conditions have also been added to administrate this permit and the modifications to existing conditions.

6:06

To conclude,

Unassigned speaker

6:07

uh

Speaker 3

6:08

staff has completed review of the application and is recommending approval based on the findings and conditions of approval and finds that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to section uh 15301, existing facilities, and section 15303,

Unassigned speaker

6:25

uh

Speaker 3

6:25

new construction or conversion of small structures of the CQ guidelines.

6:30

Uh that concludes our presentation.

6:32

Uh and staff is available to respond to any questions.

6:35

And a member of the applicant team could also be available for any questions at this

Unassigned speaker

6:40

time.

Speaker 1

6:41

Okay.

Unassigned speaker

6:42

Thank you,

Speaker 1

6:42

Tristan.

6:43

I understand Apkin's online today.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning Code████████████████████████████████████████████44%
Procedural█████████████████████████████████████37%
Public Comment███████████████████19%
Summary of Proceedings

Administrative Zoning Public Hearing - October 26, 2026

On October 26, 2026, the Mountain View Zoning Administrator (George Schroeder) held a public hearing to consider a Development Review Permit for 761 West Middlefield Road. The proposal involved installing three bollards on an existing driveway and modifying conditions from a prior permit. The hearing included staff presentation, applicant remarks, and no public testimony. The administrator approved the item.

Public Comments

No members of the public spoke during the non-agenda public comment period or on the agenda item.

Discussion Items

  • Item 3.1: 761 West Middlefield Road – Staff planner Tristan White presented the request by Hero Apartments/Prometheus to install three bollards to allow permanent vehicle access from West Middlefield Road instead of the originally required shared driveway with the adjacent Sevens property. The modification aimed to address traffic safety and parking spillover issues. Staff recommended approval based on findings and CEQA exemptions. Applicant representative Michael DeCoti expressed support for staff's recommendation.

Key Outcomes

  • Approval: Zoning Administrator George Schroeder approved item 3.1 based on the findings and conditions posted online and the application materials. The decision is appealable to the City Council within 10 calendar days.

Meeting Transcript

Okay. Well, good afternoon and welcome to the administrative zoning public hearing of October 14th, 2026. My name is George Schroeder, and I'm presiding over the hearing today as zoning administrator. I would like to call the meeting to order today at 4 p.m. Today's hearing will operate in a hybrid format. Staff, the applicant, and subcommunity members are in person. However, we will ask if community members joining us virtually want to speak on an item at certain points of the meeting. When those opportunities arise, typically during the public comment period of each item, members of the public wishing to comment may do so by clicking on the raise hand feature in Zoom when I announce the item on which you wish to speak. Speakers will be notified of their turn shortly before they are called on to speak. All speakers, virtual or in person, will have two to three minutes to provide comments with timing dependent on the total number of speakers for each item. If you're in person and wish to comment on the agenda item, please also fill out a yellow speaker card for us so we're able to accurately spell your name for the meeting minutes. The next portion of the meeting is rural communications for the public. This is a time set aside for persons wishing to address the zoning administrator on any matter not the agenda. Speakers are limited to three minutes. Is there anyone that would like to speak on any items that are not on the agenda? Seeing the members of the public in the audience here. Roxanne, do we have anyone online? Next. Okay, no. So I will now move on to item three, which is a zoning administrator public hearing. Item 3.1 is at 761 West Middlefield Road with a request for a development review permit to install three new bollards on an existing driveway of an apartment development on a 3.81 acre site, which requires modifications to conditions of approval numbers 86, 102, 130, and 131 of a previously approved planned unit development permit and development review permit, and the addition of two new conditions of approval, and a recommended determination that the project is categorically exempt. California Environmental Quality Act or CEQA pursuant to Section 15301, existing facilities, Section 15303, new construction or conversion of small structures, the SIBO guidelines. The project is on the west side of West Middlefield Road between North Shoreline Boulevard, Moffat Boulevard, R3-2 zoning district. Tristan White is the project planner. Am I promoted to my name is Tristan White and I am project planner for this item at 761 West Middlefield Road. This project is located on a 3.81 acre site on the west side of West Middlefield Road between North Shoreline Boulevard and Moffat Boulevard in the R3-2 multifamily residential zoning district. The existing project site contains a 75-unit apartment development, Hero Apartments by Prometheus. And that had previously been approved by permit number PL-2018-094. With the proposed modification, the site's main form of egress and ingress would be from the West Middlefield Road rather than from the 7th property as originally approved. The connection to the 7th will remain available to emergency vehicles, but will no longer allow standard vehicle access between the sites. The condition allowed Hero to construct a driveway entrance along Middlefield Road if the Sevens driveway had not yet opened. And upon the Seventh driveway opening, Hero had six months to connect to the shared driveway and remove the Hero Middlefield Road entrance. Considering traffic safety issues, traffic traffic safety and issues concerning parking spillover from adjacent residential development. Staff is recommending that the Hero Project be permitted to maintain the existing entrance off West Middlefield Road. Upon acceptance by City Council to uh to install a traffic signal at the 7th entrance. Prometheus will be required within 30 days to remove the ballards between the two properties. Additionally, conditions 102, 130, and 131 from uh PL 2018 094 are modified by this project to be current with the 2025 California Building Standards Code. Uh two new conditions have also been added to administrate this permit and the modifications to existing conditions. To conclude, uh staff has completed review of the application and is recommending approval based on the findings and conditions of approval and finds that the project is categorically exempt pursuant to section uh 15301, existing facilities, and section 15303,

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com