Nampa Joint Work Session on 2050 Comprehensive Plan Update - September 30, 2025
Nampa Joint Work Session on 2050 Comprehensive Plan Update - September 30, 2025
On September 30, 2025, the Nampa Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council held a joint work session to review the progress of the Nampa 2050 Comprehensive Plan update. The session featured presentations from consultant Logan Simpson and city staff on the planning process, public engagement results, and a facilitated discussion on priorities and next steps.
Discussion Items
- Miriam McGilbray of Logan Simpson presented an overview of comprehensive plan basics, the three-phase process (visioning, drafting, adoption), and data analysis. Key statistics: Nampa's population is approximately 123,000; 60% of residents are core workforce (18–64), 25% are under 18; an estimated 19,000 additional housing units are needed (2,400 to address existing shortage plus 16,000 for future growth); about 50,000 jobs exist, with a significant commuter imbalance.
- Brianna (staff) and Doug Critchfield reported on public engagement to date: 14 community events, 10 pop‑up events, 2,291 estimated event participants, and over 470 questionnaire responses. Key themes from engagement include: strong desire to preserve a small‑town feel, concerns about growth, need for easier access to commercial services, accessible public transportation, safety, and stable neighborhoods. Survey results showed top values guiding the plan as preservation of natural areas, public safety, and stable neighborhoods; bold ideas were revitalized downtown, affordable housing, and traffic solutions.
- Discussion on growth: Attendees debated whether to frame growth as inevitable or manageable, the consequences of growth restrictions (e.g., increased housing costs), and the importance of addressing public concerns about traffic and infrastructure. Mark Swer (Senior Director of Development Services) clarified Valley Regional Transit’s services and costs ($850,000 annual city contribution for on‑demand and regional routes).
- Downtown revitalization: Several council members and commissioners expressed that current historic preservation regulations may hinder marketplace investment. Councilman Bills and Matt argued for allowing creative, non‑traditional designs to spur development, referencing examples like the Guggenheim Museum and Paley Park. The need to free up property owners and reduce regulatory barriers was emphasized.
- Vision themes: Using an interactive Menti poll, participants submitted priorities for the plan. Frequent terms included downtown revitalization, family orientation, housing attainability, infill, transportation, pedestrian consistency, placemaking, and mixed‑use commercial pockets.
- Plan usability: Suggestions included an FAQ section addressing common public hearing questions (e.g., how growth pays for itself, school and road funding), educational resources on regional economics and land use maturation, and data on current ratios of residential, commercial, and industrial land to guide future planning.
Key Outcomes
- Staff and consultants will complete phase one engagement (remaining events: State of the City and a housing dinner) and begin phase two, which includes forming a steering committee and focus groups for in‑depth policy discussions.
- The final comprehensive plan will likely be organized around a handful of vision themes rather than traditional siloed chapters, with an emphasis on being concise, graphic, and implementable.
- Consideration will be given to adding an educational/FAQ component to the plan to help the public understand growth dynamics and city processes.
- Data snapshots from the presentation will be shared with participants.
- A follow‑up joint work session is anticipated in approximately two months.
Meeting Transcript
There we go. Well, welcome everybody. Thank you for being here this morning. My name's Doug Critchfield. I'm uh with the planning and zoning department. Uh we're uh sorry for locking you out of the building, but we're glad that you you made it. So we uh are grateful for the opportunity to bring to you the uh first uh meeting that we have of several meetings for the uh NAMPA twenty fifty comprehensive plan. We're in the middle of outreach right now, and uh we wanted to give you an update of of where we are with the process, what we've discovered so far, uh what we've been doing. So I'm gonna turn the time over to uh Miriam McGilbray of uh Logan Simpson. Uh Logan Simpson is our consultant on this project. Uh they worked on both the Caldwell and the Meridian uh comprehensive plans. They're a wonderful firm. And we'll turn some time over to her and then Bree and I will be back to tell you a little bit about the uh feedback that we received. Thank you so much. Good morning. I'm thrilled to be here again. Uh today I'm gonna walk through a couple of um kind of complan one oh one, why we've all uh asked you to join us this morning and through the process. Uh and then we're gonna talk a little bit about the the whole f uh process of updating a comp plan, what to expect over the next year and a half, how we want to get you guys involved, the type of feedback we're hoping that you can help uh in in uh input into this process, and what we've heard already from the public engagement that staff has been doing. So um it'll stay a little bit high level in terms of my presentation, but if you have any questions about what a comp plan is, why you're here, what we're doing, please this is a a a wonderful opportunity to to learn, and um we want to make sure you leave today with all the answers. So Nampa 2050 is the next iteration of your comprehensive plan, which is Nampa 2040. A comprehensive plan is really your primary policy document for the long-range future of your city. It is the umbrella document for all of your other master plans or other topic specific plans that you might have uh in terms of other policy or or planning initiatives. Um so it is a very important document. Um and in terms of uh updating it, you know, it's it's only been about five years um since your last plan was adopted. Um but best practice is keep it updated. You've got a lot of residents coming in, uh influx of growth. Uh we want to hear from those new residents, make sure that their vision for their community aligns with what we have in the plan. Um and we can make any tweaks in terms of um market changes, uh, you know, what's happening in the city, what's changing, and how we can plan for the future and adapt as as accordingly. So why up to the update the plan? Um as I mentioned, you have seen exponential growth recently. Uh we want to make sure that those new residents have a voice in here too. Um but growth does present its own challenges. So this is an opportunity to rethink through some of the approaches, pivot as needed, and make sure that this plan continues to work for your city moving forward. Of course, state law also requires you to keep it updated. That's not a good sign. Here we go. Okay. So in terms of how we're approaching the plan, we do have unique branding for this effort. We are using the city's color scheme, so it is recognizable as a city initiative, but we wanted to make it feel special and unique so that people can visually recognize it on the street and feel like they can get engaged and recognize it. So we have a main project brand, which is that logo at the top. We do have a couple of variations of that logo so that we can use it throughout the process, whether we're engaging with people or talking about specific topics, just a couple options, but we wanted to make sure that that brand was recognizable for the community. So we've broken up the process into three phases. Phase one is coming to an end this fall, but really is focused on visioning big ideas, getting our footing, getting our foundation about what we're doing and what we're what our planning context is. Phase two is really where the rubber hits the road or where you are going to be seeing a lot of sausage making. It's wrestling with hard ideas, new ideas. We are working through a steering committee and focus group process through the next year in that phase two, which really will be able to have those in-depth conversations with community members so that we can build a plan that works and reflects those values and reflects the market trends. Phase three goes into plan adoption, pulling it all together, make sure we we've heard and accurately captured what we've heard and discussed throughout the phase one and phase two through adoption. So overall, it's about almost a two-year process, 18 months really. So we're kind of wrapping up phase one, and this is really the process where we we talk about those big ideas. We're calling it a visioning, a visioning engagement process.
openpublica.com