OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Nampa Planning and Zoning Meeting – February 25, 2026: Approvals for Grace Beauty Co., Budget Tires, Hudson Yards, and Rezoning

Public MeetingsWednesday, February 25, 2026
BodyNampa, Idaho
SessionPublic Meetings
DateWednesday, February 25, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:16:28

Transcript — Verbatim
1:47

Okay.

1:48

I got six o'clock.

1:49

Let's get this party started.

1:52

I would like to welcome everyone to the February tenth, two thousand tenth.

1:59

Uh February twenty-fourth, twenty twenty-six planning and zoning meeting for the city of Nampa.

2:04

Um we really appreciate your attendance and being part of helping us shape the future of the city.

2:10

Um let's start with roll call, please.

2:19

Copeland.

2:21

Morgan.

2:22

Here.

2:23

Keyhoe.

2:23

Here.

2:24

Turner.

2:24

Here.

2:25

Gaper.

2:26

Miller.

2:27

Here.

2:27

Garner.

2:28

Here.

2:29

All right, you have a quorum.

2:31

Thank you.

2:34

Have a report.

2:37

Senior Ashby.

2:46

Good evening.

2:47

Um Chairman and Commissioners, Rodney Ashby, planning and zoning director for the record.

2:52

Um we had several projects go before a couple of projects go before the city council last week.

2:58

The first one was the subdivision final plot approval for Middlebury Middlebury North number four, and this was northwest of Orchard Avenue and Midway Road.

3:09

Um you had recommended approval on the tenth of uh February.

3:15

This was for thirteen single family detached dwelling units and four common lots.

3:20

And the city council did approve that.

3:23

The next one was a public hearing for annexation and um zoning for the right-of-way along Cherry Lane as part of the East Ranch subdivision.

3:32

Really simple one, if you recall, we just we they just missed some rocket that they needed to incorporate into the annexation, and so that one was approved.

3:43

You had recommended approval as well.

3:46

And then um the next one was a variance of ten twenty-three twenty limiting permanent freestanding pole or monument signs in the BC zone.

3:57

Uh this is near the um or excuse me, the northwest of Lake Lowell Avenue and Twelfth Avenue Road, uh right along um I'm trying to think of the name of the shopping center there where true value it Hawaii Center.

4:16

Um that one was approved for a little bit larger sign and um height.

4:25

Essentially they're keeping the same sign height.

4:28

It was just approved in the past when it was allowed at that height, and now our current code would not allow it, and they're just um putting in a new sign.

4:38

Um and then last of all was annexation and zoning for Orchard Acres to BC and Orchard Acres is one south of Greenhurst Road, east of um Happy Valley Road.

5:00

Um you had recommended denial, and there was five yeses and three no's on that one due to traffic uh concerns and uh the proximity of the train and congestion um impact to schools and multifamily were some of the concerns expressed at the hearing and uh city council as well denied that uh project.

5:20

So that was uh four to two vote, and that's all I have for you.

5:26

Thank you, Mr.

5:29

Chairman.

5:30

Yes.

5:31

I make a motion that we remove from the consent agenda subdivision final plan approval for Middlebury South number one at zero midway road.

5:40

Uh for Kent Brown representing endurance holdings LLC original concept was for 50 single family detached lots and seven common lots, and the applicant has requested to put this on hold.

5:50

So I would make a motion that we remove from the consent agenda.

5:55

Okay.

6:01

All those in favor?

6:03

Aye.

6:03

Any opposed.

6:05

Okay, we'll go ahead and remove that item.

6:08

And Chairman, if I may um maybe a clarification on the motion, is this to remove it from consent to general agenda or to continue it to a later date.

6:20

So some clarification for that they're not ready to do anything with it at this point.

6:25

They will resubmit and we will put them on a new agenda when they resubmit.

6:28

Okay.

6:30

Well, we might just for clarity's sake, we'll maybe have another motion to remove it entirely from the entire agenda.

6:36

Okay.

6:36

Because usually when we lift something from consent, it will then go into the remainder agenda for further discussion.

6:43

Okay.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use Planning████████████████████████████████████36%
Zoning██████████████████████████████████34%
Procedural███████████11%
Engineering And Infrastructure██████████10%
Public Safety████4%
Traffic Management███3%
Public Engagement██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Nampa Planning and Zoning Meeting – February 25, 2026

Note on date discrepancy: The transcript begins with the chair stating "February twenty-fourth, twenty twenty-six," while the provided meeting date is 2026-02-25 00:58:32+00:00. This summary uses the provided date as instructed.

The Nampa Planning and Zoning Commission met on February 25, 2026, at 6:00 PM. The meeting included a director's report on recent city council actions, approval of a consent agenda (with one item removed), and public hearings on four items: a conditional use permit for a nail salon, a conditional use permit for a tire and auto repair shop, an annexation and preliminary plat for a subdivision, and a zoning map amendment for a mobile auto repair business. All four items were approved.

Consent Calendar

  • Director's Report: Rodney Ashby reported that the city council approved the following items on which the commission had previously recommended approval: Middlebury North #4 subdivision final plat (13 single-family detached units, four common lots); annexation and zoning for Cherry Lane right-of-way (East Ranch subdivision); a variance for a freestanding sign at the Hawaii Center (northwest of Lake Lowell Avenue and Twelfth Avenue Road); and a denial of annexation and zoning for Orchard Acres (five yes, three no on traffic, train proximity, schools, and multifamily concerns).
  • Item Removal: The commission voted unanimously to remove the subdivision final plat approval for Middlebury South #1 (50 single-family lots, seven common lots) from the consent agenda entirely, at the applicant's request. The item was removed from the agenda.
  • Amended Consent Agenda Approved: The amended consent agenda was approved unanimously.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Item 3-1 (Grace Beauty Co.): No public testimony was offered.
  • Item 3-2 (Budget Tires): Christy Butler, a member of the public, commented on the building's paint and noted that the applicant's current location has similar traffic access issues.
  • Item 3-3 (Hudson Yards): No public testimony was offered.
  • Item 3-4 (Rezoning for mobile auto repair): No public testimony was offered.

Discussion Items

  • Item 3-1 – Conditional Use Permit for Grace Beauty Co. (Nail Salon): Applicant Desiree Vasquez described the salon as a family-oriented, calm environment. Staff planner Damien Snodgrass noted this was the first application under the new form-based code for the Central Historic district. The building is existing, so only certain form-based requirements apply (e.g., 30-foot required occupied space from the façade). A neighboring business submitted a late comment about ventilation; staff noted that the building department will require proper ventilation per code at the time of tenant improvement. Commissioners discussed that the market should determine business saturation and that competition is healthy. The applicant agreed to the conditions. Approved unanimously.
  • Item 3-2 – Conditional Use Permit for Budget Tires (Auto Repair): Applicant Javier Gonzalez explained the business will sell new and used tires and perform light auto repair, serving about 1,000–1,500 vehicles per year. Staff noted that the site requires parking improvements, a fence for tire storage, and fire mitigation. Access on 11th Avenue is under Idaho Transportation Department (ITD) jurisdiction; a condition requires ITD review. Commissioner concerns about potential access restrictions were addressed, but staff noted the city cannot override ITD. Approved unanimously.
  • Item 3-3 – Annexation, Zoning to RS7, and Preliminary Plat for Hudson Yards: Applicant Bonnie Leighton proposed 59 single-family residential lots on 21.51 acres, with 34.22% open space, a basketball court, and walking trails. Density is 2.74 dwelling units per acre (low end of medium density). The project will be developed in two phases. Staff reported that water, sewer, and pressurized irrigation will connect to the adjacent New York Landing subdivision. The police department recommended funding for 0.02 additional officers and 0.17 firefighters. The commission praised the infill and open space. Approved unanimously.
  • Item 3-4 – Zoning Map Amendment from RS6 to BC (Mobile Auto Repair): Applicant Lenin Caballero, representing the property owners, requested rezoning to allow a mobile auto repair business with on-site storage of tools and parts but no repair work on site. Staff noted that home occupation does not permit this use, and the BC zone allows the intended uses. Commissioners expressed concern about creating a spot zone of BC in a residential area, but noted the property is adjacent to industrial uses and the comprehensive plan allows commercial stretching. The applicant agreed to conditions. Approved unanimously.

Key Outcomes

  • Item 3-1 (Grace Beauty Co.): Motion to approve as presented with recommended conditions and proposed findings. Passed unanimously. The CUP becomes effective 15 calendar days after written decision, pending appeal.
  • Item 3-2 (Budget Tires): Motion to approve as presented with recommended conditions and proposed findings. Passed unanimously. Effective 15 days after written decision, pending appeal.
  • Item 3-3 (Hudson Yards): Motion to recommend approval of annexation, zoning to RS7, and preliminary plat as presented. Passed unanimously. The recommendation will go to city council.
  • Item 3-4 (Rezoning to BC): Motion to recommend approval of the zoning map amendment with all recommended conditions and proposed findings. Passed unanimously. The recommendation will go to city council.
  • Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned unanimously after the regular agenda.

Meeting Transcript

Okay. I got six o'clock. Let's get this party started. I would like to welcome everyone to the February tenth, two thousand tenth. Uh February twenty-fourth, twenty twenty-six planning and zoning meeting for the city of Nampa. Um we really appreciate your attendance and being part of helping us shape the future of the city. Um let's start with roll call, please. Copeland. Morgan. Here. Keyhoe. Here. Turner. Here. Gaper. Miller. Here. Garner. Here. All right, you have a quorum. Thank you. Have a report. Senior Ashby. Good evening. Um Chairman and Commissioners, Rodney Ashby, planning and zoning director for the record. Um we had several projects go before a couple of projects go before the city council last week. The first one was the subdivision final plot approval for Middlebury Middlebury North number four, and this was northwest of Orchard Avenue and Midway Road. Um you had recommended approval on the tenth of uh February. This was for thirteen single family detached dwelling units and four common lots. And the city council did approve that. The next one was a public hearing for annexation and um zoning for the right-of-way along Cherry Lane as part of the East Ranch subdivision. Really simple one, if you recall, we just we they just missed some rocket that they needed to incorporate into the annexation, and so that one was approved. You had recommended approval as well. And then um the next one was a variance of ten twenty-three twenty limiting permanent freestanding pole or monument signs in the BC zone. Uh this is near the um or excuse me, the northwest of Lake Lowell Avenue and Twelfth Avenue Road, uh right along um I'm trying to think of the name of the shopping center there where true value it Hawaii Center. Um that one was approved for a little bit larger sign and um height. Essentially they're keeping the same sign height. It was just approved in the past when it was allowed at that height, and now our current code would not allow it, and they're just um putting in a new sign. Um and then last of all was annexation and zoning for Orchard Acres to BC and Orchard Acres is one south of Greenhurst Road, east of um Happy Valley Road. Um you had recommended denial, and there was five yeses and three no's on that one due to traffic uh concerns and uh the proximity of the train and congestion um impact to schools and multifamily were some of the concerns expressed at the hearing and uh city council as well denied that uh project. So that was uh four to two vote, and that's all I have for you. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Yes. I make a motion that we remove from the consent agenda subdivision final plan approval for Middlebury South number one at zero midway road. Uh for Kent Brown representing endurance holdings LLC original concept was for 50 single family detached lots and seven common lots, and the applicant has requested to put this on hold. So I would make a motion that we remove from the consent agenda. Okay. All those in favor? Aye.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com