OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Nampa Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting - July 14, 2026

Public MeetingsTuesday, July 14, 2026
BodyNampa, Idaho
SessionPublic Meetings
DateTuesday, July 14, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:16:24

Transcript — Verbatim
0:35

I don't have this kind of time.

0:58

Okay, I've got six PM.

1:00

I'd like to start by welcoming everybody to the July 14th, 2026 NAMPA Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.

1:13

Garner.

1:14

Here.

1:14

Miller.

1:15

Here.

1:15

Staffer.

1:16

Here.

1:17

Turner.

1:17

Here.

1:18

Keyhoe.

1:19

Here.

1:19

Morgan.

1:20

Here.

1:21

Kirkman.

1:22

Yeah.

1:22

Copeland.

1:23

Here.

1:24

Feam.

1:24

Here.

1:25

All present.

1:26

Thank you.

1:29

Miss Watkins.

1:40

Good evening, Commissioners.

1:43

Thank you very much.

1:44

Um, Sir Report on Council Actions from July 6th.

1:49

They approved the industrial subdivision for the one parcel split on Park Center Way.

1:56

Um, they approved the Sunshine Meadows final platego street, which you recommended approval on both of those.

2:06

Uh comprehensive plan map and text amendment to change residential mixed use to medium density residential and commercial to medium density residential on Madison Avenue.

2:17

You recommended denial.

2:19

They supported that decision and they denied it as well.

2:22

Um comprehensive plan map amendment from industrial to commercial um for the uh forty-three hundred east victory road and Picard Lane.

2:35

So that's over by the airport.

2:37

You recommended approval, they denied it.

2:40

Um comprehensive plan map amendment from commercial to medium density residential, and to change the map in the state highway sixteen plan from high density residential neighborhood commercial to all medium density residential.

2:54

You recommended approval and they also approved that.

2:58

Um there was also a variance in an IL zone for a reduced landscape buffer to make a property actually feasible for use, and they approved that.

3:09

So do you have any questions?

3:13

The reason they denied that uh industrial one that we recommended approval was did they just want to keep the industrial land?

3:21

Was that the reason for it?

3:22

Do you know?

3:22

It's not that big.

3:23

No, Commissioner Kirkman.

3:25

Um they didn't feel like they didn't feel like they provided enough information for what the buildings were ultimately going to look like.

3:34

Um and they were worried about the conflict with the airport, and so they wanted to see elevations of the buildings.

3:40

But wouldn't those have to go through design review anyway?

3:43

Yes.

3:44

Thank you.

3:45

I will leave it and we'll just leave it there.

3:49

All right, thank you.

3:50

Thank you.

3:54

Mr.

3:55

Chairman.

3:55

Yes.

3:56

I make a motion that we uh approve the consent agenda.

3:59

Second.

4:02

Then move by Garner, second by Keyhoe to approve the consent agenda.

4:05

All those in favor?

4:06

Aye.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use Planning█████████████████████████████████████████████65%
Procedural████████12%
Public Safety██████8%
Transportation Safety████6%
Engineering And Infrastructure██3%
Economic Development2%
Parks and Recreation2%
Affordable Housing1%
Water And Wastewater Management1%
Summary of Proceedings

Nampa Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting - July 14, 2026

The Nampa Planning and Zoning Commission held a regular meeting on July 14, 2026, at 6:00 PM. All commissioners were present. The commission considered three conditional use permits and a major development proposal involving a rezone, development agreement modification, and preliminary plat. All items were approved.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved the consent agenda, which included the staff report on council actions from July 6, 2026: approvals of an industrial subdivision on Park Center Way and Sunshine Meadows final plat; denials of a comprehensive plan map/text amendment on Madison Avenue and a map amendment from industrial to commercial on Victory Road and Picard Lane; approval of a commercial to medium density residential map amendment and state highway 16 plan changes; and approval of a variance in an IL zone.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Item 3-1 (Firearm Sales Home Occupation): Two written public comments were received: Eunice Smith expressed support; Jason Klein expressed opposition citing concerns about disruption and security. No oral testimony.
  • Item 3-2 (Auto/Truck Repair): No public comments were received.
  • Item 3-3 (Springshores Commons): Tim Barrera, a 30-year resident at 7044 Latigo Drive, spoke in opposition due to traffic congestion and safety concerns at the Cherry Lane/11th Avenue intersection, noting that the development would add traffic and that the area lacks adequate pedestrian connectivity. He stated he was not opposed to improvements overall. One written comment from Mark Bottles Real Estate supported the proposal.

Discussion Items

  • Item 3-1: Conditional Use Permit for Home Occupation Firearm Sales – Applicant Carson Bice (Bison Defense Arms) proposed firearm repair, light manufacturing, and off-site sales from his residence at 1024 10th Avenue South. Staff noted that the business would be appointment-only and that security measures included a gun safe and alarm system. Commissioners discussed the code restriction on using accessory structures for customer service; the applicant clarified customers would not enter the shed. The commission approved the CUP with conditions.
  • Item 3-2: Conditional Use Permit for Automobile and Truck Repair – Applicant Brandon Chandler (for Mike Cutler) proposed a custom accessory installation and retail storefront at 126 11th Avenue North. The use was classified as ambiguous under the code, requiring a CUP. Staff recommended approval, noting no public opposition. The commission approved unanimously.
  • Item 3-3: Rezone, Development Agreement Modification, and Preliminary Plat for Springshores Commons – Applicant Sabrina Durchy (Trilogy Development) requested a rezone from BC to BN and RD, modification of the 2006 development agreement, and preliminary plat approval for 68 single-family lots, 63 townhouse units (with a target price of $280,000), one commercial lot, and seven common lots on 15.2 acres. The project includes 18.5% open space, a dog park, and a central gathering area. Traffic concerns were raised by the public and addressed by staff, who noted a roundabout is planned at the intersection and that impact fees exceeding $900,000 will fund future roadway improvements. The commission voted to recommend approval to city council.

Key Outcomes

  • Item 3-1: Approved (motion by Morgan, second by Garner; roll call 10-0). The CUP will become effective 15 days after the written decision is provided, pending no appeals.
  • Item 3-2: Approved (motion by Kirkman, second by Daffer; roll call 10-0). Effective 15 days after written decision, pending no appeals.
  • Item 3-3: Recommended approval to city council (motion by unknown; roll call 10-0). The project will proceed to city council for final action.
  • Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned at approximately 8:15 PM.

Meeting Transcript

I don't have this kind of time. Okay, I've got six PM. I'd like to start by welcoming everybody to the July 14th, 2026 NAMPA Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. Garner. Here. Miller. Here. Staffer. Here. Turner. Here. Keyhoe. Here. Morgan. Here. Kirkman. Yeah. Copeland. Here. Feam. Here. All present. Thank you. Miss Watkins. Good evening, Commissioners. Thank you very much. Um, Sir Report on Council Actions from July 6th. They approved the industrial subdivision for the one parcel split on Park Center Way. Um, they approved the Sunshine Meadows final platego street, which you recommended approval on both of those. Uh comprehensive plan map and text amendment to change residential mixed use to medium density residential and commercial to medium density residential on Madison Avenue. You recommended denial. They supported that decision and they denied it as well. Um comprehensive plan map amendment from industrial to commercial um for the uh forty-three hundred east victory road and Picard Lane. So that's over by the airport. You recommended approval, they denied it. Um comprehensive plan map amendment from commercial to medium density residential, and to change the map in the state highway sixteen plan from high density residential neighborhood commercial to all medium density residential. You recommended approval and they also approved that. Um there was also a variance in an IL zone for a reduced landscape buffer to make a property actually feasible for use, and they approved that. So do you have any questions? The reason they denied that uh industrial one that we recommended approval was did they just want to keep the industrial land? Was that the reason for it? Do you know? It's not that big. No, Commissioner Kirkman. Um they didn't feel like they didn't feel like they provided enough information for what the buildings were ultimately going to look like. Um and they were worried about the conflict with the airport, and so they wanted to see elevations of the buildings. But wouldn't those have to go through design review anyway? Yes. Thank you. I will leave it and we'll just leave it there.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com