OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/Nampa, Idaho/Public Meetings
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Nampa Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting - September 29, 2026

Public Meetings — Tuesday, September 29, 2026
BodyNampa, Idaho
SessionPublic Meetings
DateTuesday, September 29, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 3:11:23

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

0:48

Okay, ladies and gentlemen.

0:51

Welcome tonight to our regularly scheduled planning and zoning meeting for the 29th of September.

0:58

We'll go ahead and start.

Speaker 2

1:03

Garner.

Speaker 1

1:05

You say Garner?

1:07

Yeah, here.

Speaker 2

1:08

Miller.

Speaker 1

1:10

Here.

Speaker 2

1:11

Caffer.

Speaker 1

1:12

Here.

Speaker 2

1:12

Turner.

Speaker 1

1:13

Here.

Speaker 2

1:13

Keyhoe.

Speaker 1

1:14

Here.

Speaker 2

1:15

Morgan.

Speaker 1

1:15

Here.

Speaker 2

1:16

Kirkman.

1:17

Copeland.

1:18

Fiend.

Speaker 1

1:19

Here.

Speaker 2

1:20

All present.

Speaker 1

1:21

Thank you.

1:23

Okay.

1:24

Christy or Rodney.

1:25

Somebody want to do council actions.

Unassigned speaker

1:33

Mr.

Speaker 3

1:34

Chair, Commissioners, Rodney Ashby Planning Zone Director

Unassigned speaker

1:37

for the

Speaker 3

1:37

record.

Unassigned speaker

1:38

So

Speaker 3

1:38

City

Speaker 4

1:38

Council.

1:39

I can follow Rodney.

Speaker 3

1:41

Thank you.

1:44

I'll start that again.

1:46

Rodney Ashby Planning and Zoning Director for the record.

1:50

City Council last week met the first one that they considered was a final plat that you had recommended for Regatta Crossing number one.

1:59

This is off of Eustick Road and North Side Boulevard.

2:03

And that one you again you had recommended for approval, and they did approve that

Unassigned speaker

2:08

one.

Speaker 3

2:08

The next uh one was a public hearing for it was an annexation to RMH or multifamily residential.

2:17

And um this was at 17245 and 17187 North Canada Road,

Unassigned speaker

2:26

uh

Speaker 3

2:27

northwest of Cherry in Canada.

2:29

Um you had recommended approval.

2:31

This was a um 12 multi-family two and three-story buildings with 312 residential dwelling units and a clubhouse and you had recommended approval.

2:42

All in favor, none opposed.

2:44

And um the city council uh denied the the request with four to two um vote.

2:55

And it really kind of came down to um pretty standard concerns about density and um and traffic and um that kind of thing.

3:08

So um next one was an annexation and zoning to RS4, uh conditional use permit for

Speaker 5

3:15

duplexes

Speaker 3

3:15

in the RS zone, and then subdivision preliminary plat and planned unit development um at one one one South Side Boulevard, uh southwest of Amity Avenue and South Side Boulevard.

3:31

And um you this was for six single family detached and 13 to duplex dwellings.

3:39

Um this was recommended for approval with a four to two vote from you and um the city council denied that one as

Unassigned speaker

3:48

well.

Speaker 3

3:49

Um

Unassigned speaker

3:50

they

Speaker 3

3:51

were concerned about the setbacks and the appearance that they were trying to put as many units in that space as possible.

4:01

It was that really narrow uh lot just south of Amity.

4:06

Um so they they denied that one.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Land Use Planning██████████████████████████26%
Airport Management█████████████13%
Transportation Safety████████████12%
Public Safety██████████10%
Zoning████████8%
Home Occupation Permits██████6%
Procedural█████5%
Legal████4%
Agriculture████4%
Summary of Proceedings

Nampa Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting - September 29, 2026

The Nampa Planning and Zoning Commission met on September 29, 2026, to consider three public hearing items: an annexation for light industrial zoning, a conditional use permit for an expanded in-home daycare, and a major subdivision proposal for 487 homes at the northeast corner of Amity Avenue and Happy Valley Road (Brayburn Creek). The commission also approved the consent agenda and received updates on recent City Council actions.

Consent Calendar

  • The commission approved the consent agenda, which included a correction to the minutes from a previous meeting: the vote on the 111 South Side Boulevard project was recorded as 6-0 in the minutes but was actually 4-2. The corrected version was accepted.

Annexation & Zoning to IL – 17501 North Side Boulevard

  • Applicant: Michael Spiers representing Nampa Logistics Center LLC. Request to annex 1.69 acres and zone IL (Light Industrial). Consistent with surrounding industrial uses and Nampa 2040 Comp Plan.
  • Staff Report: Candice Fry presented. No public comments received. Conditions of approval recommended.
  • Public Testimony: None.
  • Commission Deliberation: The item was straightforward; motion to recommend approval with correction of street name (North Side, not Canada). Approved unanimously.

Conditional Use Permit for In-Home Daycare Expansion – 1495 North Fishing Creek Avenue

  • Applicant: Tato Almasi (via interpreter). Request to increase in-home daycare from 6 to up to 12 children in RS-6 zone.
  • Staff Report: Terry Friend presented. Conditions include building permit, fire inspection, state licensing. Public correspondence: none.
  • Public Testimony: One person expressed concerns about employee ratio and lack of playground equipment. Applicant clarified they have two staff, take children to parks, and have a large backyard.
  • Commission Deliberation: Commissioners noted the applicant already runs a daycare with six children, has adequate staff, and provides a needed service. Motion to approve with conditions. Approved unanimously.

Brayburn Creek – Annexation, Zoning, and Preliminary Plat – 0 Amity Avenue & 324 South Happy Valley Road

  • Applicant: Jeff Bauer (Toll Brothers) presented a plan for 487 single-family homes on 138 acres. Mixed zoning (RS4, RS6, RS7). Density 3.5 units/acre (low end of medium density). Proposed amenities: pool, pickleball, pathways, 28 acres open space. Traffic mitigations include widening Happy Valley and Amity, roundabout improvements. Impact fees ~$6M.
  • Staff Report: Christy Watkins presented. Staff analysis found compliance with comp plan and codes. Conditions of approval recommended. Issues raised: airport compatibility, traffic congestion, water capacity, police staffing.
  • Public Testimony (14 signed up, plus additional):
    • Opposition: Many residents cited severe traffic congestion on Happy Valley and Amity, especially near Columbia High School. Concerns about airport safety, bird strikes, and potential loss of FAA grants. Concerns about loss of farmland, infrastructure strain, and police/fire resources. Some questioned the need for more housing when interest rates are high.
    • Support: The landowner family (Brandy Cranick, Travis Cranick) expressed emotional difficulty in selling but noted farming is no longer viable due to traffic and costs. They hope to continue farming elsewhere. Nearby residents supported the development for its quality (Toll Brothers) and expected road improvements. Some argued development is inevitable and this plan is better than alternatives.
    • Specific Requests: Brian Ertz (adjacent property owner) objected to the proximity of a collector road (12 feet from his structure) and lack of buffer. Others asked for crosswalks and traffic calming.
  • Applicant Rebuttal: Jeff Bauer clarified the road is entirely on their property; they can add a privacy fence. Traffic engineer Sonia Delight explained roundabout improvements to address existing congestion. They agreed to a crosswalk analysis. Airport compatibility: the property is not in the airport planning area per comp plan and master plan; residential use is allowed.
  • Commission Deliberation: Extensive discussion on traffic, airport grants, and crosswalk. Staff confirmed water capacity and that the airport grant area is not affected. Commissioners expressed concerns but were satisfied with staff analysis. Motion to recommend approval with two additional conditions: (1) a warrant analysis for a crosswalk connecting the development to Columbia High School, and (2) a privacy fence along the northern boundary. Motion carried (7-0, with two commissioners recused).

Key Outcomes

  • Consent Agenda: Approved with correction of the vote tally for 111 South Side Boulevard.
  • Item 1 (Annexation - Nampa Logistics Center): Recommended approval to City Council (unanimous).
  • Item 2 (Daycare CUP): Approved (unanimous).
  • Item 3 (Brayburn Creek): Recommended approval to City Council with added conditions (7-0). The recommendation will be considered by City Council at a future meeting.

Meeting Transcript

Okay, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome tonight to our regularly scheduled planning and zoning meeting for the 29th of September. We'll go ahead and start. Garner. You say Garner? Yeah, here. Miller. Here. Caffer. Here. Turner. Here. Keyhoe. Here. Morgan. Here. Kirkman. Copeland. Fiend. Here. All present. Thank you. Okay. Christy or Rodney. Somebody want to do council actions. Mr. Chair, Commissioners, Rodney Ashby Planning Zone Director for the record. So City Council. I can follow Rodney. Thank you. I'll start that again. Rodney Ashby Planning and Zoning Director for the record. City Council last week met the first one that they considered was a final plat that you had recommended for Regatta Crossing number one. This is off of Eustick Road and North Side Boulevard. And that one you again you had recommended for approval, and they did approve that one. The next uh one was a public hearing for it was an annexation to RMH or multifamily residential. And um this was at 17245 and 17187 North Canada Road, uh northwest of Cherry in Canada. Um you had recommended approval. This was a um 12 multi-family two and three-story buildings with 312 residential dwelling units and a clubhouse and you had recommended approval. All in favor, none opposed. And um the city council uh denied the the request with four to two um vote. And it really kind of came down to um pretty standard concerns about density and um and traffic and um that kind of thing. So um next one was an annexation and zoning to RS4, uh conditional use permit for

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com