Napa Planning Commission Regular Meeting – September 17, 2020
STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Napa Planning Commission Regular Meeting – September 17, 2020
The Napa Planning Commission met on September 17, 2020, at 5:30 PM via Zoom due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The meeting included approval of consent calendar items, a public hearing on the Lavender Hill Remodel (967 First Street), and an extended administrative report on the General Plan Update – Preferred Land Use Plan Draft. The commission received extensive public comment and decided to continue the General Plan discussion to November 5, 2020.
Consent Calendar
- Approved the minutes from the August 20, 2020 regular meeting, with Commissioner Painter recusing himself from that item (conflict of interest). Commissioner Painter abstained from the September 3, 2020 minutes. The motion passed on a roll call vote with the remaining four commissioners voting in favor.
Public Comments & Testimony
- General Public Comment (non-agenda): Eve Kahn, representing the Napa Housing Coalition, announced a candidate forum on housing scheduled for September 24, 2020.
- Lavender Hill Remodel (Item 7A): No public comments were offered.
- General Plan Update (Item 7B): Numerous members of the public spoke, representing groups such as the Browns Valley Action Group, Stop Napa Oaks, Napa Vision 2050, Napa County Progressive Alliance, Napa Climate Now, Napa Valley Horseman’s Association, and individual residents. Key themes included:
- Strong opposition to proposed higher-density designations (very low density residential) for Timber Hill/West Browns Valley and Napa Oaks, citing wildfire risk, seismic hazards, loss of open space, traffic, and lack of affordability. Speakers urged greenbelt designations.
- Support for the Gisletta (horsemen’s) property to be preserved for equestrian and community uses; calls for further study and a master plan.
- Concern about proposed streamlining of historic residential conversions to commercial uses in downtown neighborhoods; speakers argued the current permit process should remain.
- Requests to include climate change, environmental justice, and health-in-all-policies elements in the General Plan.
- Appeals to prioritize infill development and address unincorporated islands (e.g., Pueblo Linda Vista) for annexation and representation.
- Written comments (read into the record) echoed these positions, with many referencing the GPAC’s unanimous recommendation for greenbelt designations.
Discussion Items
- Lavender Hill Remodel (Item 7A): Staff presented a design review permit for exterior modifications to the former Burger Fi building at 967 First Street, to accommodate a new tiki-themed restaurant. Proposed changes include wood veneer, stone accents, a canopy, and a future mural. The commission discussed:
- Concerns about the stone material feeling out of place; preference for more wood.
- Temporary nature of tiki carvings on columns; they should be removable.
- The mural: should not constitute signage; applicant committed to a mural but design is not final (subject to staff approval).
- Connectivity to future river trail: staff explained that a trail crossing mid-block is not feasible; a future alignment under the First Street bridge is preferred.
- General Plan Update (Item 7B): Consultant Rajiv Bhatia and staff presented the draft preferred land use plan, including four corridor focus areas (Trancas, Jefferson, Soscol/Lincoln, Soscol/Imola) and downtown. The plan adds new residential designations and proposes changes to key properties (Timber Hill, Napa Oaks, Gisletta, Big Ranch Road). Commissioners expressed:
- Strong concerns that the draft plan contradicts the community’s stated values of preserving open space and small-town character.
- Need for more data on infill potential, infrastructure capacity, housing targets, and environmental impacts before making decisions.
- Support for greenbelt designations for Timber Hill and Napa Oaks, as recommended by GPAC.
- Interest in a specific plan or master plan for the Gisletta property, considering seismic issues, viewsheds, and equestrian uses.
- Commissioner Painter noted a conflict of interest regarding 237 2nd Street (property in draft plan) and recused from that portion; Commissioner Murray recused from 592–598 Lincoln Avenue. Those properties were deferred to a future meeting.
Key Outcomes
- Lavender Hill Remodel (Item 7A): The commission voted 4-0 (Commissioner Painter recused) to approve the design review permit, finding it exempt from CEQA under Section 15301. Approval was conditioned on staff working with the applicant to refine the design based on commissioner comments (less stone, more wood, removable tiki elements, mural not used as signage).
- General Plan Update (Item 7B): The commission voted unanimously to continue this item to its November 5, 2020 regular meeting. Staff will prepare a framework for future discussions, addressing commissioner questions and incorporating public input. The commission will not take final action on the preferred land use plan until further study and public input are completed.
Meeting Transcript
But 35 of them are not. Okay, well, that's a pretty big. That's our biggest Zoom crowd so far, that's for sure. It's 5 30, I believe. Uh Patty, if you can give us the thumbs up. Yes, okay, we can start the meeting. All right. Um, let's see. Are we everybody present and accounted for? Are we on? Yes, we are. Good evening, everyone. Welcome to the September 17th City of Napa regular meeting for the Planning Commission. Um, our first item is a call to order. So I'd like to call this meeting to order and ask staff to conduct a roll call, please. Chair Hewther. I am present. Vice Chair Kelly. Present. Commissioner Painter. Present. Commissioner Murray. Commissioner Onyate. Present. All commissioners are present. Very good. So now we're going to item two, summary of meeting procedures. Aaron, could you please explain to our viewers, our participants from the public how they will be participating in the meeting this evening? Thank you, Chair Hewther. For each section of the agenda where public comment is called for, members of the public who wish to speak on that item should use Zoom's raise hand feature to indicate that they would like to speak. If you're logged in to Zoom through the internet, it's an on-screen button to raise your hand. If you're joining us by phone, you would push star nine when the item of interest comes up. The other thing to note, Chair Hewther, is we offer an opportunity for members of the public to provide email comments, 500 words or less before the meeting. We have none of those comments for the first item on the agenda, Lavender Hill, but we do have eight read aloud comments that we'll be sharing with you during that um during the general plan update item. Very good. Thank you so much. Um so now we have item number three, which is our agenda review. The planning commission conducts all meetings in accordance with the Ralph Brown Act and pursued to the city's rule of order for planning commission meetings. Due to the unfortunate COVID-19 pandemic, the commission will conduct this meeting as a teleconference in accordance with the governor's executive orders. Um Aaron, are there any changes to this evening's agenda? None proposed by staff. My colleagues on the commission, are any of you needing to propose changes to this evening's agenda? No. No. Commissioner Murray. No. Okay. No. So now I believe we are on to public comment. Public comment provides an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the planning commission on items of interest, not otherwise on the agenda.
openpublica.com