OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Napa Planning Commission Regular Meeting - June 15, 2023

Planning CommissionThursday, June 15, 2023
BodyNapa, California
SessionPlanning Commission
DateThursday, June 15, 2023
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:03

Okay, we're good to go.

0:05

Thank you.

0:06

Thank you.

0:07

Good evening.

0:08

Welcome to the June 15th meeting of the Napa City Planning Commission.

0:13

Can I ask you all to silence your telephones?

0:16

Staff, would you please do roll call?

0:19

Commissioner Heather.

0:21

Present.

0:22

Commissioner Urtelo.

0:23

Present.

0:24

Chair Masaro.

0:25

Present.

0:25

And Commissioner Kelly and Shotwell noted absent.

0:28

Please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance.

0:33

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands.

0:41

One nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all.

0:59

The Planning Commission conducts all meetings in accordance with the Ralph M.

1:02

Brown Act in pursuant to the city's rules of order.

1:05

Staff, are there any changes to this evening's agenda?

1:08

No changes to the agenda, but there were late communications for items 6A and 8A, which are forwarded on to you, and copies are provided in the back.

1:16

I received those, and I believe the other commissioners did.

1:19

Commissioners, any changes to tonight's agenda.

1:22

Nope.

1:23

Nope.

1:24

Very good.

1:24

Public comment.

1:26

Public comment provides an opportunity for members of the public to direct to directly address the planning commission on any agenda item that is not on tonight's agenda.

1:36

So if you would like to um talk to us about anything that we're not going to talk about, which is going to be the um potential restaurant and um the hotel.

1:48

If you would not like to, if you'd like to talk about anything besides those two, please come to the podium.

1:54

Okay, very good.

1:57

Uh consent calendar.

1:59

These routine items may be approved by a single vote.

2:02

However, any member of the public or commissioner may remove an item for consideration during the public portion of the agenda.

2:10

This evening, the only thing there's two things on the consent calendar.

2:14

One includes the regular meeting meetings of June 1st, and the other is the Brookfield Napa Pipe tentative map.

2:23

Do we have a motion to approve the consent calendar?

2:27

Mr.

2:27

Chair, we kind of need to break those into two because I need to abstain from item A.

2:32

Thank you.

2:32

All right, since Commissioner Heather was not here for the minutes.

2:36

Um Commissioner Hurtado, can you move to approve the minutes, please?

2:40

So move.

2:41

And I second that, and so the minutes are approved.

2:44

Now moving to the consent calendar, having to do with the Brookfield Napa Pipe.

2:48

May we have a motion to approve that part of the consent calendar.

2:52

So Chair if I may interrupt before proceeding, I would ask if there's any members of the public that want to speak on that um item since it's a consent hearing and could be pulled upon request.

3:02

Uh thank you.

3:03

Is there anyone in the audience who would like to pull the Brookfield Napa pipe from the consent?

3:10

That means we would hear a staff report and you would have an opportunity to speak on that item.

3:16

Okay, seeing no one, thank you.

3:20

Counselor seeing no one, we're going to proceed with approving that on consent.

3:24

Do I have a motion?

3:25

So move.

3:26

Second.

3:27

All in favor.

3:28

Aye.

3:28

Aye.

3:29

Very good.

3:30

Um we now have public hearings and appeals.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Downtown Development███████████████████████████27%
Food Truck Regulation█████████████13%
Public Engagement████████████12%
Parking Management███████████11%
Procedural███████7%
Public Art██████6%
Housing████4%
Traffic Management███3%
Zoning Ordinance Update███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Napa Planning Commission Regular Meeting - June 15, 2023

The Napa Planning Commission met on June 15, 2023, at 13:30 UTC (note: the agenda listed the meeting at 5:30 PM PDT, creating a discrepancy in the recorded time). The meeting covered a consent calendar, a public hearing for a restaurant use permit, and a study session for a major mixed-use development. Commissioners Gordon Huether, Paul Kelley (absent), Bob Massaro (Chair), Alexander Myers, and Beverly Shotwell (absent) were present. Commissioner Huether and Hurtado were present; Kelley and Shotwell were noted absent.

Consent Calendar

  • Approval of Minutes (June 1, 2023): Approved unanimously. Commissioner Huether abstained as he was not present at the prior meeting.
  • Brookfield Napa Pipe Tentative Map (PL23-0042): Approved on consent without public comment. The subdivision creates 89 lots (66 single-family, 58 townhomes) on blocks 13, 14, 17, and 18, implementing part of the Napa Pipe Development Plan. The CEQA action was previously certified.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Public Hearing – 872 Vallejo Street: No public speakers.
  • Administrative Report – South Oxbow Mixed-Use Pre-Application:
    • Jean Massey, co-owner of Napariu (event venue on the site), stated his business was not informed of the project; he fears displacement and loss of clients due to media reports. He requested correction of the staff report’s description of his business as a “retail store.”
    • Kara Werner, Napa County Bicycle Coalition, expressed support for the project’s class I bike path (river trail) but urged a 12-foot width (not 10), long-term bike parking, lighting, and safe intersections. She noted the renderings showed a parklet in the bike lane, which should be avoided.
    • Maureen Tripp, Slowdown Napa, appreciated the developer’s outreach on traffic calming but called for a safety review of First Street, where the speed limit is 30 mph.
    • Chuck Shinneman, representing a group of Napa residents, argued the project is too large and out of character with the Oxbow district’s organic, small-scale evolution. He cited potential over 1,100 hotel rooms in the area and urged a master plan and full EIR.
    • Francie Winnon, Friends of the Napa River, asked for a comprehensive approach; noted a UC Berkeley graduate study on the Oxbow (available via the city) that should inform planning.
    • John Salman, a land-use professional, stated the project is “too much on too small a piece of property.” He emphasized the need for a parking solution (e.g., a central garage) and a community-led plan, not just individual landowner decisions.
    • David Graves, director of the sanitation district, also called for a comprehensive parking analysis and expressed concern that the density bonus puts “five pounds of sugar in a three-pound bag.”

Discussion Items

1. 872 Vallejo Street – Stateline Road Smokehouse (PL23-0008) Staff presented a request for a Use Permit and Design Review Permit for a full-service restaurant and bar (exceeding 1,000 sq. ft.) at 872 Vallejo Street, with an open-air smoke yard, off-site parking, and a reduction in required parking from 40 to 20 spaces. The applicant, Daryl Bell and Jeremy Threat, described their vision for an elevated Kansas City barbecue concept serving the community. They noted the building is an adaptive reuse of a dilapidated Quonset hut. Commissioners asked about hours of operation (proposed 9 a.m.–10 p.m., typical 11 a.m.–9 p.m. Thu–Mon), peak customer counts (80–100 transactions per meal), smoke mitigation (enclosed smokers with tall stacks, screened), and art (a mural planned). No public comment was offered. The commission unanimously approved the resolution (motion by Commissioner Hurtado, second by Commissioner Huether).

2. South Oxbow Mixed-Use Pre-Application (PL22-0117) A preliminary review of a 6.7-acre mixed-use development: 130 for-sale residential units (21 townhomes, 109 condos), 170-room hotel, retail/restaurant space, and a riverfront trail. The applicant, Wayne O’Connell (Oxbow Holdings LLC), stated the project is 68% residential and includes 10% inclusionary affordable housing (13 units at 80% AMI). He requested a height waiver (up to 75 feet) and a parking waiver under density bonus law. The architect presented elevations using brick, stone, wood, and stucco, with stepped massing and pedestrian-oriented design. Commissioners and public provided extensive feedback:

  • Parking: The project provides 362 spaces; 388 are required under code. A parking study is planned for August/September 2023. Chair Massaro expressed concern about the use of mechanical lifts (due to power outages).
  • Environmental sustainability: Chair Massaro urged the applicant to aim for zero net energy, graywater systems, and all-electric design, not just Title 24 compliance.
  • Bike path: The class I trail is proposed at 14 feet; the Bicycle Coalition requested 12 feet, and the applicant was open to adjustment.
  • Affordable housing: While 10% is provided, Chair Massaro noted that 100+ hotel employees are unlikely to afford 80% AMI units; he suggested exploring live-work units and enhanced infrastructure districts.
  • Architecture: Commissioners praised the Stanley Ranch aesthetic but requested more detailed renderings and a pedestrian/cyclist fly-through to better visualize scale.
  • Context: Several speakers noted that a master plan for the Oxbow district is needed, given the cumulative impact of multiple hotel projects. Staff acknowledged that the project’s PD overlay (from Copia) will be evaluated.
  • Displacement: Napariu’s tenant issue was acknowledged; the applicant stated the lease includes early exit provisions and that disclosure was made. No formal action was taken; the session was for guidance only. The applicant will return with a more detailed application after addressing feedback.

Key Outcomes

  • Consent Calendar: Approved unanimously.
  • 872 Vallejo Street: Resolution approved unanimously (4-0, with Commissioners Huether and Hurtado voting yes, Massaro chair, Kelley and Shotwell absent). The project will proceed to building permits.
  • South Oxbow Pre-Application: No vote. The applicant was directed to refine the design, address parking (especially lifts), aim for higher environmental standards, provide more detailed visualizations, and consider the Oxbow district’s broader context. The next step is a formal application, which will come back to the Planning Commission for a recommendation to the City Council.
  • Adjournment: The meeting adjourned at approximately 8:30 PM (local time). The next regular meeting (July 6, 2023) was canceled due to lack of agenda.

Meeting Transcript

Okay, we're good to go. Thank you. Thank you. Good evening. Welcome to the June 15th meeting of the Napa City Planning Commission. Can I ask you all to silence your telephones? Staff, would you please do roll call? Commissioner Heather. Present. Commissioner Urtelo. Present. Chair Masaro. Present. And Commissioner Kelly and Shotwell noted absent. Please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the Republic for which it stands. One nation under God, indivisible with liberty and justice for all. The Planning Commission conducts all meetings in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act in pursuant to the city's rules of order. Staff, are there any changes to this evening's agenda? No changes to the agenda, but there were late communications for items 6A and 8A, which are forwarded on to you, and copies are provided in the back. I received those, and I believe the other commissioners did. Commissioners, any changes to tonight's agenda. Nope. Nope. Very good. Public comment. Public comment provides an opportunity for members of the public to direct to directly address the planning commission on any agenda item that is not on tonight's agenda. So if you would like to um talk to us about anything that we're not going to talk about, which is going to be the um potential restaurant and um the hotel. If you would not like to, if you'd like to talk about anything besides those two, please come to the podium. Okay, very good. Uh consent calendar. These routine items may be approved by a single vote. However, any member of the public or commissioner may remove an item for consideration during the public portion of the agenda. This evening, the only thing there's two things on the consent calendar. One includes the regular meeting meetings of June 1st, and the other is the Brookfield Napa Pipe tentative map. Do we have a motion to approve the consent calendar? Mr. Chair, we kind of need to break those into two because I need to abstain from item A. Thank you. All right, since Commissioner Heather was not here for the minutes. Um Commissioner Hurtado, can you move to approve the minutes, please? So move. And I second that, and so the minutes are approved. Now moving to the consent calendar, having to do with the Brookfield Napa Pipe. May we have a motion to approve that part of the consent calendar. So Chair if I may interrupt before proceeding, I would ask if there's any members of the public that want to speak on that um item since it's a consent hearing and could be pulled upon request. Uh thank you. Is there anyone in the audience who would like to pull the Brookfield Napa pipe from the consent? That means we would hear a staff report and you would have an opportunity to speak on that item.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com