OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Napa Planning Commission Meeting: Le Petit Elephant Use Permit Approved April 4, 2024

Planning CommissionThursday, April 4, 2024
BodyNapa, California
SessionPlanning Commission
DateThursday, April 4, 2024
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
0:00

And ask staff to conduct roll call.

0:03

Commissioner Heuther.

0:05

Present.

0:05

Commissioner Masaro.

0:06

Present.

0:07

Commissioner Myers.

0:08

Present.

0:09

Vice Chair Kelly.

0:10

Present.

0:10

And Chair Shotwell.

0:12

Present.

0:13

We will now stand for the Pledge of Allegiance.

0:26

One nation under God.

0:28

Indivisible with deliberately.

0:39

The Planning Commission conducts all meetings in accordance with the Ralph Milton Brown Act.

0:44

And pursuant to the city's rules of order for planning commission meetings, policy resolution 10.

0:50

Staff, are there any changes to this evening's agenda?

0:53

There are none.

0:54

Commissioners, any proposed changes to this meeting's agenda.

0:59

Okay.

1:00

Public comment.

1:01

Public comment provides an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the planning commission on items of not of interest not otherwise noted on the agenda.

1:11

Each speaker's comments will be limited to three minutes and will comply with the rules of order for planning commission meetings.

1:18

Do we have any members of the public who wish to provide public comments on non-agenda items?

1:24

This would be an item that it's not already on the agenda.

1:28

Seeing none, we'll move forward.

1:31

Consent calendar.

1:32

These routine items may be approved by a single vote.

1:36

However, any member of the public or commissioner may remove an item for consideration during the public hearing portion of the agenda.

1:43

This evening we are reviewing the planning commission regular meeting minutes for March 21st, 2024.

1:50

Is there a motion to approve the consent calendar as submitted?

1:54

Madam Chair, so moved.

1:55

All in uh second.

1:58

Second.

1:59

All in favor?

2:02

Motion passes.

2:04

Consent hearings.

2:05

We have none tonight.

2:07

Public hearings slash appeals.

2:10

These are items that are formally presented to the planning commission and provide an opportunity for members of the public to comment.

2:18

Applicants or appellants are allowed 10 minutes to present testimony at the beginning of the public hearing, and if needed, five minutes to present rebuttal at the end of the public hearing.

2:29

All other speakers will be limited to two minutes.

2:33

Tonight we have item 7a, le petit elephant use permit at 15 Chapel Hill Drive, PL 23-0159.

2:45

Commissioner disclosures, please.

2:50

Sure.

2:50

I'll start.

2:51

Okay.

2:53

Ah.

2:53

Yes.

2:53

Due to existing financial interests and to prevent the appearance of bias, I will be recused from this hearing.

2:59

You will be sorely missed.

3:00

Thank you.

3:01

Thank you.

3:04

Proceed.

3:04

So for my disclosure, I uh disclosures.

3:07

I met with the applicant and her team at the site and walked to the site.

3:12

Uh earlier this week, I met with a group of maybe seven or eight neighbors also at the site.

3:19

And I spent about a half an hour on the phone with uh our um planning manager Ricky Caperton just discussing um uh just had some questions and had everything that was within our staff report.

3:35

Thank you.

3:36

I met with the applicant at the site, toured the site, converse with Ricky Capperton, converse with one city council member, and that's the extent of my disclosures.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Child Care██████████████████18%
Public Safety██████████10%
Transportation Safety██████████10%
Procedural████████8%
Childcare Facility Permitting████████8%
Economic Development███████7%
Zoning Ordinance Update██████6%
Public Engagement██████6%
Childcare Services██████6%
Summary of Proceedings

Napa Planning Commission Meeting: Le Petit Elephant Use Permit Approved April 4, 2024

The Napa Planning Commission held a regular meeting on April 4, 2024, at 5:30 PM in City Hall Council Chambers. The primary agenda item was a public hearing on a Use Permit application (PL23-0159) by Le Petit Elephant Nursery and Preschool to operate a daycare facility for up to 250 children and ancillary youth services, with reduced parking, at 15 Chapel Hill Drive in the Alta Heights neighborhood. After extensive public testimony and deliberation, the Commission voted 4-0 (one member recused) to approve the permit with two additional conditions.

Consent Calendar

  • Approved the Planning Commission Regular Meeting Minutes for March 21, 2024, by unanimous vote.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Supporters: Over 60 speakers, including parents, educators, business owners, and child care advocates, testified in favor. Key points: severe shortage of child care in Napa (only 1 space per 10 children), the need for infant care, the high quality of Le Petit Elephant's program, the economic necessity for working parents, and the adaptive reuse of an existing church building. Many noted that the current facility has not caused traffic issues. Speakers included Stephanie Shay (Community Resources for Children), who cited a loss of 97 child care spaces since July 2023; Nick Devlin (former CEO of Naked Wines) on workforce impact; and Teresa Schinder (pediatrician) on health care access. The applicant, Millie Pentacci, gave a personal statement emphasizing her credentials and the dire need for a permanent home.
  • Opponents: Approximately 20-30 speakers, mostly Alta Heights residents, voiced opposition. Concerns centered on traffic congestion, safety at the five-way intersection (already rated Level of Service F), lack of sidewalks, emergency evacuation risks (especially wildfire), noise, and the commercial nature of the proposed ancillary uses (weekend gym rental, playroom). Residents argued the site is inappropriate for a large-scale for-profit business in a single-family residential zone. Speakers like Doug Barnett and Lynn Haubaugh highlighted existing speeding and congestion. Several questioned the adequacy of the draft evacuation plan and the CEQA exemption.

Discussion Items

  • Staff Presentation: Planning Manager Angela Alvarez-Cendejas presented the project, noting the 2.6-acre site, existing 97 parking spaces (95 usable), proposed parking reduction (24-space deficit weeknights, 53-space deficit weekends), and a traffic study estimating 1,002 net new daily trips. The study concluded intersections would remain at acceptable levels of service or better, with a fair-share fee for the future five-way roundabout.
  • Fire Marshal Testimony: Greg Fortune, City Fire Marshal, stated the project is fire code compliant and that the area is not currently designated as a Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zone (VHFHSZ) per state maps. He noted the fire department does not review neighborhood evacuation plans, only building egress. He confirmed that the facility would be required to install a full fire sprinkler system.
  • Public Works Testimony: Tim Wood, Senior Development Engineer, discussed traffic calming programs and the planned roundabout at the five-way intersection (design phase, construction estimated 5 years out). He confirmed the traffic study was reviewed by city staff.
  • Traffic Consultant Testimony: Daine Whitlock (W-Trans) explained that the trip generation rates are conservative and that actual trips may be lower due to siblings and 80% attendance. He noted that congestion is not a CEQA impact; the project's VMT (vehicle miles traveled) would be less than significant.
  • Commissioner Deliberation: Commissioners expressed strong support for the project, citing the critical need for child care, the applicant's qualifications, the adaptive reuse of the building, and the thorough staff analysis. Concerns about traffic and evacuation were addressed by professional reports. Commissioner Kelly proposed two additional conditions: (1) a one-year review by the Planning Commission after occupancy, and (2) explicit prohibition of weddings, ceremonies, and alcohol sales, with uses limited to the project description. Commissioner Masaro emphasized the need to support young families to prevent population decline.

Key Outcomes

  • Motion: Commissioner Kelley moved to approve the Use Permit with the two additional conditions. Seconded by Commissioner Myers. Approved 4-0 (Commissioner Huether recused himself due to financial interests).
  • Conditions:
    1. The applicant shall adhere to the uses in Attachment 3 (Project Description) and shall prohibit weddings, ceremonial gatherings, and any sale of alcohol. The Community Development Director may determine if a proposed use is not subordinate, similar, or ancillary to the primary use.
    2. One year from the date of building occupancy, the applicant shall present to the Planning Commission a demonstration of compliance with the Use Permit obligations. The public will be notified.
  • Next Steps: The applicant must finalize an emergency evacuation plan with NVTA before opening (target August 2025). The next regularly scheduled Planning Commission meeting on April 18, 2024, was canceled.

Meeting Transcript

And ask staff to conduct roll call. Commissioner Heuther. Present. Commissioner Masaro. Present. Commissioner Myers. Present. Vice Chair Kelly. Present. And Chair Shotwell. Present. We will now stand for the Pledge of Allegiance. One nation under God. Indivisible with deliberately. The Planning Commission conducts all meetings in accordance with the Ralph Milton Brown Act. And pursuant to the city's rules of order for planning commission meetings, policy resolution 10. Staff, are there any changes to this evening's agenda? There are none. Commissioners, any proposed changes to this meeting's agenda. Okay. Public comment. Public comment provides an opportunity for members of the public to directly address the planning commission on items of not of interest not otherwise noted on the agenda. Each speaker's comments will be limited to three minutes and will comply with the rules of order for planning commission meetings. Do we have any members of the public who wish to provide public comments on non-agenda items? This would be an item that it's not already on the agenda. Seeing none, we'll move forward. Consent calendar. These routine items may be approved by a single vote. However, any member of the public or commissioner may remove an item for consideration during the public hearing portion of the agenda. This evening we are reviewing the planning commission regular meeting minutes for March 21st, 2024. Is there a motion to approve the consent calendar as submitted? Madam Chair, so moved. All in uh second. Second. All in favor? Motion passes. Consent hearings. We have none tonight. Public hearings slash appeals. These are items that are formally presented to the planning commission and provide an opportunity for members of the public to comment. Applicants or appellants are allowed 10 minutes to present testimony at the beginning of the public hearing, and if needed, five minutes to present rebuttal at the end of the public hearing. All other speakers will be limited to two minutes. Tonight we have item 7a, le petit elephant use permit at 15 Chapel Hill Drive, PL 23-0159. Commissioner disclosures, please. Sure. I'll start. Okay. Ah. Yes. Due to existing financial interests and to prevent the appearance of bias, I will be recused from this hearing.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com