The Naperville City Council convened for the second of three workshops to discuss the proposed 2026 operating budget, focusing on balancing revenues and expenses amid moderating tax revenues and rising personnel costs. The meeting featured presentations from city finance staff, department heads, and community partners, followed by public testimony and extensive council deliberation. No final budget actions were taken during this workshop; however, significant discussions were held regarding the SECA funding cap, community broadcasting support, and strategic planning for special areas.
2026 General Fund Overview & Revenue Forecast:
Special Initiatives & Capital Requests:
Special Services Area (SECA) & Community Partners:
Library & Settlement Budgets:
I can tell you about that. Good evening. Welcome to the second workshop for the proposed 2026 budget. Tonight our professional staff will focus on the preliminary operating budget. As a reminder, no final actions are being taken at this meeting since it is only a workshop. Also, all the rules of the city council still apply. Speakers are asked to present their comments in a respectful and courteous manner. Speakers would should stay on topic and be cognizant of their words. Speakers are given three minutes to address the council and to help speakers stay within the three-minute time frame. We now have a timer on the side dice to your right. Timer will buzz when it hits zero, and we will alert the speaker when their time is up. Mr. Krieger, do we have any speakers this evening? Uh yes, we do, Mayor. One speaker, Marilyn Schweitzer. That's okay. That might go. Okay, I think I got it. Okay. So my thanks again to staff and council for publicly airing the budget this way. Um, as you do. And I really like this themes, um, this year's themes, money with a mission. As somebody who likes to anthropomorphize, I envision dollar bills with very serious expressions, running around just trying to do the very best they can. So I have four points I hope you will consider as you uh go through the topics tonight. The first is staff capacity on page 16. That if there is insufficient staff, dollars are not programmed is a wonderful idea, and this strategy should be maintained year-round. Staff seems to be stretched stretched thin and at times at risk of being penny wise and pound foolish in the wrong long run because of that. In budget discussions, my impression is that council scrutinizes spending on staff far more than what is spent towards uh studying other services. Please work to achieve a good balance. Two, the city website on page 20. This is important. The overall strategy should address all aspects of service delivery, and please confirm that this work includes the open data portal as well as the rather deficient help center. Three special area services on page 21. Floundering around with planning strategies besides wasting time and money, so is community, business owner, and developer mistrust. Developers and the community deserve some level of certainty. The choice to have either yet another failed Fifth Avenue initiative or more waffling around I-88 is hard. But please prioritize Fifth Avenue and commit to I-88 in 2027. Fifth Avenue does not have the complications of RI zoning. It has a far better defined identity and has received more public input than along I-88. Fifth Avenue should be much easier to wrap up. If the city can't manage to successfully complete Fifth Avenue, I can't imagine the city would be capable of transforming the I-88 corridor into the I-88 vision of a vibrant walkable mixed-use, live work play environment. In the meantime, use the 2022 land use plan for planning and development along I-88. Data centers in particular should not be approved in areas slated for residential development, and especially those that have already been proceeding around that course. Planning strategies should not be cast in stone, but they should also not be discarded readily for what appears to be just a quick buck. Number four, CICA funding cap on page 30. This spending needs more thought and public vetting. Please don't raise the cap until a thorough analysis of the food and beverage tax, including that of SQL obligations and CICA grants is available to the public. Thank you very much for your time. Thank you, and thank you for your emails as well. Are there any other speakers?