OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Naperville City Council 2026 Budget Workshop (Oct 28, 2025)

City CouncilTuesday, October 28, 2025
BodyNaperville, Illinois
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, October 28, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 2:36:57

Transcript — Verbatim
0:41

I can tell you about that.

0:49

Good evening.

0:49

Welcome to the second workshop for the proposed 2026 budget.

0:52

Tonight our professional staff will focus on the preliminary operating budget.

0:56

As a reminder, no final actions are being taken at this meeting since it is only a workshop.

1:01

Also, all the rules of the city council still apply.

1:05

Speakers are asked to present their comments in a respectful and courteous manner.

1:08

Speakers would should stay on topic and be cognizant of their words.

1:12

Speakers are given three minutes to address the council and to help speakers stay within the three-minute time frame.

1:16

We now have a timer on the side dice to your right.

1:19

Timer will buzz when it hits zero, and we will alert the speaker when their time is up.

1:23

Mr.

1:24

Krieger, do we have any speakers this evening?

1:26

Uh yes, we do, Mayor.

1:27

One speaker, Marilyn Schweitzer.

1:40

That's okay.

1:40

That might go.

1:41

Okay, I think I got it.

1:43

Okay.

1:44

So my thanks again to staff and council for publicly airing the budget this way.

1:48

Um, as you do.

1:49

And I really like this themes, um, this year's themes, money with a mission.

1:54

As somebody who likes to anthropomorphize, I envision dollar bills with very serious expressions, running around just trying to do the very best they can.

2:02

So I have four points I hope you will consider as you uh go through the topics tonight.

2:09

The first is staff capacity on page 16.

2:14

That if there is insufficient staff, dollars are not programmed is a wonderful idea, and this strategy should be maintained year-round.

2:21

Staff seems to be stretched stretched thin and at times at risk of being penny wise and pound foolish in the wrong long run because of that.

2:30

In budget discussions, my impression is that council scrutinizes spending on staff far more than what is spent towards uh studying other services.

2:39

Please work to achieve a good balance.

2:42

Two, the city website on page 20.

2:45

This is important.

2:46

The overall strategy should address all aspects of service delivery, and please confirm that this work includes the open data portal as well as the rather deficient help center.

2:58

Three special area services on page 21.

3:03

Floundering around with planning strategies besides wasting time and money, so is community, business owner, and developer mistrust.

3:11

Developers and the community deserve some level of certainty.

3:15

The choice to have either yet another failed Fifth Avenue initiative or more waffling around I-88 is hard.

3:24

But please prioritize Fifth Avenue and commit to I-88 in 2027.

3:29

Fifth Avenue does not have the complications of RI zoning.

3:33

It has a far better defined identity and has received more public input than along I-88.

3:39

Fifth Avenue should be much easier to wrap up.

3:42

If the city can't manage to successfully complete Fifth Avenue, I can't imagine the city would be capable of transforming the I-88 corridor into the I-88 vision of a vibrant walkable mixed-use, live work play environment.

3:57

In the meantime, use the 2022 land use plan for planning and development along I-88.

4:04

Data centers in particular should not be approved in areas slated for residential development, and especially those that have already been proceeding around that course.

4:14

Planning strategies should not be cast in stone, but they should also not be discarded readily for what appears to be just a quick buck.

4:22

Number four, CICA funding cap on page 30.

4:25

This spending needs more thought and public vetting.

4:28

Please don't raise the cap until a thorough analysis of the food and beverage tax, including that of SQL obligations and CICA grants is available to the public.

4:37

Thank you very much for your time.

4:39

Thank you, and thank you for your emails as well.

4:43

Are there any other speakers?

4:45

Uh no, sir.

4:46

Do any council members have an item for the public forum portion of the workshop?

4:51

Seeing none.

4:52

Before I turn things over to the city manager, just a reminder as far as the presentation goes, there will be an opportunity throughout the presentation designated for questions from members of the city council on the dais.

5:05

So uh please hold your questions, write down the slide number that should be in the bottom right hand quarter, I believe, of each slide.

5:12

If it looks correct, uh, and then we will go back and refer to that particular slide for the QA portion at the designated moments.

5:24

I will also be recognizing you in order of the um the button presses.

5:28

So, Mr.

5:29

Krieger.

5:30

Are you ready?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Budget Equity Analysis████████████████████████████28%
Economic Development█████████████13%
Transportation Safety████████████12%
Technology and Innovation███████████11%
Public Engagement██████████10%
Fiscal Sustainability██████████10%
Procedural████4%
Public Safety███3%
Community Engagement██2%
Summary of Proceedings

Naperville City Council 2026 Budget Workshop (Oct 28, 2025)

The Naperville City Council convened for the second of three workshops to discuss the proposed 2026 operating budget, focusing on balancing revenues and expenses amid moderating tax revenues and rising personnel costs. The meeting featured presentations from city finance staff, department heads, and community partners, followed by public testimony and extensive council deliberation. No final budget actions were taken during this workshop; however, significant discussions were held regarding the SECA funding cap, community broadcasting support, and strategic planning for special areas.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Marilyn Schweitzer (Citizen):
    • Expressed support for the theme "money with a mission" and acknowledged staff efforts in publicizing the budget.
    • Expressed concern regarding insufficient staff capacity, noting that current resource levels risk "penny wise and pound foolish" long-term outcomes.
    • Stated support for a comprehensive city website strategy that must include an open data portal and a improved help center.
    • Expressed opposition to "waffling" on planning strategies for the I-88 corridor and argued for prioritizing the Fifth Avenue area first, citing fewer complications and better public input.
    • Stated that data centers should not be approved in areas currently slated for residential development.
    • Expressed support for raising the SECA funding cap only after a thorough public analysis of the food and beverage tax and SQL obligations is completed.

Consent Calendar

  • No items listed in the transcript for the Consent Calendar; the meeting proceeded directly to public comments and the budget presentation.

Discussion Items

  • 2026 General Fund Overview & Revenue Forecast:

    • Deputy City Manager Ray Munch presented a balanced budget of $685 million, noting a $4 million deficit that was addressed by correcting a utility billing error.
    • Speaker Position Summary: Staff clarified that the corrected electric use tax error will generate $1.8 million in 2026. Councilman Kelly expressed concern regarding equity by not backbilling the $1.8 million to 2025, but staff maintained support for a forward-looking correction to avoid upsetting business budgets.
    • Health Insurance Costs: Councilman McGroom expressed shock at the 18.5% projected increase in health premiums. Director Munch confirmed the increase is driven by pharmaceutical costs and claims experience, stating it is premature to conclude the trend is unsustainable or to immediately seek risk pools based on a single year's data.
    • Parking Fund: Deputy City Manager Munch noted the commuter parking fund is projected to deplete in 2027. Councilman McGroom requested clarification on the fund's relationship with special area studies, and Director Krieger confirmed the parking fund issues are distinct from the I-88 or Fifth Avenue planning.
  • Special Initiatives & Capital Requests:

    • Drone as First Responder (DFR) Program: Chief Harry presented a $150,000 request to launch a pilot program for autonomous drone deployment, distinct from the current manual piloting model. Chief Harry and Councilman Kelly expressed strong support for the program's safety benefits.
    • City Website Overhaul: Staff requested $100,000 to modernize the city website to meet DOJ accessibility standards by mid-2026.
    • Special Area Studies: Staff requested $150,000 to initiate a planning study for either the I-88 Corridor or Fifth Avenue. Director Louden noted that internal staff time and consultant costs for both projects are estimated similarly at $150,000, but only one can be pursued in 2026 due to resource constraints.
  • Special Services Area (SECA) & Community Partners:

    • NCTV 17 Funding: Staff proposed a $200,000 permanent increase to NCTV 17 operating support, requiring a revision to the SECA cap from a 2% limit to an inflation-based limit (approx. $2.51 million total). The proposal aims to move NCTV 17 funding from the General Fund to the Food and Beverage fund obligation.
    • Council Positions on SECA Cap:
      • Councilman Holzer, White, Sayed, Wilson, Gibson, and Kelly expressed unqualified or strong support for increasing the SECA cap and funding NCTV 17, citing its value as a trusted local news source and community amenity.Councilman McRuham expressed opposition to raising the cap, citing concerns about the sustainability of the business model, the risk of 100% public funding dependence, and the potential loss of journalistic independence.Councilwoman Gibson expressed partial support, suggesting the cap be increased but recommending trimming grant awards to offset the cost before NCTV receives the full amount.
      • Mayor clarified that the final decision reflects a "yes" on the request to raise the cap and fund NCTV, noting that while a minority had reservations, the intent is not to reduce the funding below the proposed level.
    • Naperville Development Partnership (NDP): NDP Board President Monica Connors requested $150,000 to make I-88 corridor marketing permanent and $185,000 for restaurant marketing. Councilman Kelly inquired about the distinction between marketing and zoning plans, and Ms. Connors clarified that marketing strategies are independent of the zoning study timelines.
  • Library & Settlement Budgets:

    • Naperville Public Library: Executive Director Dave Della Terza requested a 3.7% property tax levy increase. Councilman White asked for clarification on the relationship between declining tax rates and increasing actual revenue, and Staff Director confirmed that rising property value assessments allow for increased revenue despite lower rates.
    • Naper Settlement: Staff requested a 2.5% property tax levy increase and a 2% increase in the food and beverage contribution to cover rising salaries and benefits.

Key Outcomes

  • No Final Vote: No final budget actions were taken as this was a workshop; the budget will return for a public hearing on December 2nd and final approval on the last December meeting.
  • SECA Cap Revision Approved in Principle: The council indicated support for revising the SECA cap to accommodate the NCTV 17 funding increase and other obligations, with the understanding that the budget will proceed with the proposed numbers despite some individual council members' reservations.
  • Pilot Program Authorization Pending: The $150,000 allocation for the "Drone as First Responder" pilot program was discussed and broadly supported, but requires final council approval in the subsequent budget adoption phase.
  • Special Area Study Direction Not Finalized: While staff requested $150,000 to begin studying either Fifth Avenue or I-88, the council did not designate a priority for 2026 during this workshop, leaving the decision for future deliberation.
  • Property Tax Levy Strategy Confirmed: Staff confirmed the strategy of lowering tax rates while capturing growth through rising property valuations to maintain revenue stability for the library and general services.

Meeting Transcript

I can tell you about that. Good evening. Welcome to the second workshop for the proposed 2026 budget. Tonight our professional staff will focus on the preliminary operating budget. As a reminder, no final actions are being taken at this meeting since it is only a workshop. Also, all the rules of the city council still apply. Speakers are asked to present their comments in a respectful and courteous manner. Speakers would should stay on topic and be cognizant of their words. Speakers are given three minutes to address the council and to help speakers stay within the three-minute time frame. We now have a timer on the side dice to your right. Timer will buzz when it hits zero, and we will alert the speaker when their time is up. Mr. Krieger, do we have any speakers this evening? Uh yes, we do, Mayor. One speaker, Marilyn Schweitzer. That's okay. That might go. Okay, I think I got it. Okay. So my thanks again to staff and council for publicly airing the budget this way. Um, as you do. And I really like this themes, um, this year's themes, money with a mission. As somebody who likes to anthropomorphize, I envision dollar bills with very serious expressions, running around just trying to do the very best they can. So I have four points I hope you will consider as you uh go through the topics tonight. The first is staff capacity on page 16. That if there is insufficient staff, dollars are not programmed is a wonderful idea, and this strategy should be maintained year-round. Staff seems to be stretched stretched thin and at times at risk of being penny wise and pound foolish in the wrong long run because of that. In budget discussions, my impression is that council scrutinizes spending on staff far more than what is spent towards uh studying other services. Please work to achieve a good balance. Two, the city website on page 20. This is important. The overall strategy should address all aspects of service delivery, and please confirm that this work includes the open data portal as well as the rather deficient help center. Three special area services on page 21. Floundering around with planning strategies besides wasting time and money, so is community, business owner, and developer mistrust. Developers and the community deserve some level of certainty. The choice to have either yet another failed Fifth Avenue initiative or more waffling around I-88 is hard. But please prioritize Fifth Avenue and commit to I-88 in 2027. Fifth Avenue does not have the complications of RI zoning. It has a far better defined identity and has received more public input than along I-88. Fifth Avenue should be much easier to wrap up. If the city can't manage to successfully complete Fifth Avenue, I can't imagine the city would be capable of transforming the I-88 corridor into the I-88 vision of a vibrant walkable mixed-use, live work play environment. In the meantime, use the 2022 land use plan for planning and development along I-88. Data centers in particular should not be approved in areas slated for residential development, and especially those that have already been proceeding around that course. Planning strategies should not be cast in stone, but they should also not be discarded readily for what appears to be just a quick buck. Number four, CICA funding cap on page 30. This spending needs more thought and public vetting. Please don't raise the cap until a thorough analysis of the food and beverage tax, including that of SQL obligations and CICA grants is available to the public. Thank you very much for your time. Thank you, and thank you for your emails as well. Are there any other speakers?

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com