OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

Nashua Zoning Board of Adjustment Meeting - January 14, 2026

Board of Aldermen MeetingsWednesday, January 14, 2026
BodyNashua, New Hampshire
SessionBoard of Aldermen Meetings
DateWednesday, January 14, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 49:13

Transcript — Verbatim
0:09

I don't think any of them are here from the good.

0:23

Good evening, everybody, and welcome to the January 12th meeting of the Zoning Board of Adjustment.

0:28

My name is Jamin Cara, ZBA chair.

0:31

To my right is ZBA Vice Chair Josh Neely, followed by member JP Boucher.

0:37

And then across the stage, Member Robert Shaw and Member Steve Lynell.

0:41

We also have Joseph Potri, alternate.

0:44

We do have a full complement of board members this evening.

0:47

So unless a member recuses himself, Mr.

0:50

Potcher will not be voting but will be participating or is free to participate, I should say, in all the discussions.

0:57

So this evening we have our requests for a special exception and for variances.

1:14

And the zoning board can only grant a variance if it finds that five criteria are met.

1:19

That granting the variance would not be contrary to the public interest, that it would be uh consistent with the spirit of the ordinance, that granting the variance would do substantial justice to the applicant seeking it, uh, that there'd be no diminution of surrounding property values, and that owing to a special condition of property, denying the variance would result in an unnecessary hardship to the owner seeking it.

1:43

Just in terms of the uh order of business, uh I will read the case into the record, and then uh the applicant uh will be requested to come forward, and uh you would have 15 minutes that you address the board.

1:57

Uh first you state your name and address, then you have up to 15 minutes to address the board to explain the reasons uh behind your application and what you're seeking and how you meet the criteria.

2:06

Uh you don't have to use the full 15 minutes, but it is available to you.

2:10

Uh afterward, we will ask if there's anybody in the audience who wishes to speak in favor of the application.

2:16

Anyone wishing to do so is will again come up to the microphone, uh, state your name and address, and you have up to five minutes to address the board.

2:25

Following that, uh, we'll ask if there's anybody in the audience who has any questions, concerns, or opposition to the application.

2:32

Similarly, uh each person will come up to the microphone, state his or her uh name and address, and we'll have up to five minutes to address the board.

2:40

Following that, um the applicant will have the opportunity to come forward and we'll have up to five minutes to provide any rebuttal or final uh comments they wish to make.

2:51

And then following that, we will ask uh if there is anybody in the audience who spoke with questions, concerns, or opposition, um, who wants to have the final word.

3:01

That would only be one person.

3:02

Uh so sometimes I don't think that's going to be the case tonight, but sometimes we do allow for a few minutes for people to confer amongst themselves.

3:10

So that is the um general order of the business.

3:13

Uh are there any changes to the and I did neglect to say that to my left is Deputy Cleaning Manager Carter Falk.

3:19

Uh Mr.

3:20

Falk, are there any changes to the agenda this evening?

3:22

Yes, Mr.

3:22

Chairman.

3:23

The case for Teak Drive, it was the first case on tonight for a water line for the DPW and fire department.

3:29

That will not be held tonight.

3:30

That will be on February 10th, 2026.

3:34

And we do have a request uh for that recusal, so that will be a motion or to continue that.

3:39

So that'll be a motion of the board, and uh we'll we'll take that up in just a moment for um so uh unless there's any other changes I'll call the role.

3:48

Mr.

3:48

Neely, present, Mr.

3:50

Boucher, present, Mr.

3:51

Shaw.

3:52

Present.

3:52

Mr.

3:53

Lynnal.

3:53

Present.

3:54

Mr.

3:54

Potri.

3:55

Present.

3:56

Okay, so with that, the first case on the agenda um this evening was uh this or I should say is the city of Nashua through Chief Buxton, Nashua Fire Rescue for 25 Teak Drive, and as noted, uh the applicant is seeking a continuance.

4:11

I am going to uh read the request into the record so we can all uh understand the rationale behind the request.

4:19

Um this is addressed to Mr.

4:20

Falk on behalf of the City of Nashua and National Fire Rescue.

4:24

We respectfully request that the Board of Adjustment continue our pending wetland special exception application until the board's February 10th, 2026 hearing.

4:33

We are mindful of the attention this application is receiving, but we make this request to allow us time to update the waterline plan, very similar to what was suggested by board member Shaw at the last meeting or at our last hearing.

4:46

Please see attached sketch.

4:48

We expect this new approach will reduce the temporary wetland impact and minimize the visual impact for the neighbors.

4:54

Also, we want the opportunity to update the conservation commission, which next meets on February 3rd, 2026.

5:00

Please call with any questions.

5:02

Thanks, Andy.

5:04

So that we do have the request for the continuance.

5:07

Any comments, thoughts, concerns from the board?

5:11

If not, does anybody want to make a motion?

5:18

February 103.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning Variances██████████████████████████████████34%
Signage Regulations█████████████████████████████████33%
Procedural███████████████████19%
Transportation Safety███████████11%
Affordable Housing███3%
Summary of Proceedings

Nashua Zoning Board of Adjustment Meeting - January 14, 2026

The Nashua Zoning Board of Adjustment convened on January 14, 2026, with a full complement of members including Chair Jamin Kara, Vice Chair Josh Neely, and members JP Boucher, Robert Shaw, Steve Lynell, and alternate Joseph Potri. The agenda included a request to continue a DPW water line application, three substantive variance requests, and the review of previous meeting minutes. The Board granted all variance requests after deliberations focused on neighborhood compatibility, traffic safety, and property hardship.

Consent Calendar

  • The Board reviewed and approved the minutes from the previous meeting as amended, correcting typographical errors regarding street names (Dearborn vs. Dearbore) and clarifying the existence of public opposition during the prior hearing.
  • Officer slate for 2026 established: Jamin Kara confirmed as Chair and Josh Neely as Vice Chair.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Christopher Delucia (Applicant, 12 Waltham Drive): Expressed support for his own request to build an 8x10 shed, stating he needs storage but has a small lot abutting Greenwood Park. He noted that 11 of the 18 houses abutting the park already have sheds within the setback line.
  • Gage Armand, owner of 106 West Holloway Street LLC: Stated that the proposed basement apartment would not increase traffic or noise beyond existing levels, would be owned and occupied by the business operator, and would treat the property consistently with neighboring mixed-use buildings.
  • Morgan Hollis, Attorney for Law Realty Co. Inc.: Explained the complex signage needs for a redevelopment involving three lots (338, 340, 350 Amherst Street). The applicant argued that the proposed locations were necessary for traffic flow and safety on a busy road and requested specific variances for sign size, location, and definition.

Discussion Items

  • 25 Teak Drive (City of Nashua/Fire Rescue): The Board discussed a request to continue the wetland special exception application. The applicant noted a desire to update the waterline plan to reduce temporary wetland impacts and visual effects, aligning with suggestions made by Board Member Shaw previously. They sought to coordinate with the Conservation Commission meeting scheduled for February 3, 2026.
  • 12 Waltham Drive (Christopher Delucia): Board members discussed the applicant's small lot size and the impracticality of building the shed in the center of the yard if the setback were not modified. Board Member Shaw expressed that the proposal was consistent with the neighborhood and that the fence backing the property to a public park further diminished any potential negative impact. Board Member Lynell supported the use of a fence as a mitigating factor.
  • 106 West Holloway Street LLC (Gage Armand): The Board deliberated on a use variance for a live-work unit in a basement apartment. Board Member Shaw expressed strong support for owner-occupied units in commercial zones, noting it fosters neighborhood investment. Board Member Neely supported the request, stating he is a "big fan of a business owner putting down roots" and that the use fits the character of the RC zoning district.
  • 350 Amherst Street (Law Realty Co. Inc.): The Board reviewed a complex request involving three variances related to ground signage for a multi-building redevelopment. Board Member Lynell questioned the traffic flow and the necessity of the proposed sign locations. The Board discussed the safety implications of having clear signage on a high-traffic road (Amherst Street/Whittier Highway), concluding that the proposed signs would prevent drivers from slamming brakes or missing turns. Board Member Neely commended the applicant's detailed planning and argued the variances were necessary to maintain traffic flow between the three interconnected properties.

Key Outcomes

  • Continuance: The application for the water line at 25 Teak Drive was tabled and continued to February 10, 2026, upon motion by Mr. Neely and second by Mr. Lynell. All members present voted in favor.
  • Variance Granted (12 Waltham Drive): Application by Christopher Delucia to encroach 4 feet 8 inches into the rear yard setback for an 8x10 shed was granted. The Board found the variance met all five criteria, including substantial justice and unnecessary hardship due to the small lot size. A motion to approve was made by Mr. Shaw and seconded by Mr. Boucher; the vote was unanimous. The applicant noted a 30-day appeal window.
  • Variance Granted (106 West Holloway Street): Application by Gage Armand for a single residential unit in the basement of a commercial property was granted as a use variance. The Board found this met the criteria for public interest (housing stock, live-work character), spirit of the ordinance (preserving underused space), and hardship (owner-occupancy and unique building history). A motion to approve was made by Mr. Neely and seconded by Mr. Shaw; the vote was unanimous.
  • Variances Granted (350 Amherst Street): Three variances for Law Realty Co. Inc. were granted: (1) to exceed the 100 sq ft limit for a ground sign (123.5 sq ft exists), (2) to maintain an existing sign within 75 feet of an intersection, and (3) to place a ground sign on 350 Amherst Avenue for the benefit of the adjacent 340 Amherst Street. The Board found these actions would not be contrary to public interest, would enhance safety, and would not diminish property values. A motion to grant was made by Mr. Shaw (Chair) and seconded by Mr. Potri; the vote was unanimous. A condition was suggested that no ground sign be placed directly on 340 Amherst Street, which the applicant accepted.
  • Adjournment: The meeting was adjourned following the approval of the new officer slate and the motion to adjourn, with the next meeting scheduled to cover the Orient Street agenda.

Meeting Transcript

I don't think any of them are here from the good. Good evening, everybody, and welcome to the January 12th meeting of the Zoning Board of Adjustment. My name is Jamin Cara, ZBA chair. To my right is ZBA Vice Chair Josh Neely, followed by member JP Boucher. And then across the stage, Member Robert Shaw and Member Steve Lynell. We also have Joseph Potri, alternate. We do have a full complement of board members this evening. So unless a member recuses himself, Mr. Potcher will not be voting but will be participating or is free to participate, I should say, in all the discussions. So this evening we have our requests for a special exception and for variances. And the zoning board can only grant a variance if it finds that five criteria are met. That granting the variance would not be contrary to the public interest, that it would be uh consistent with the spirit of the ordinance, that granting the variance would do substantial justice to the applicant seeking it, uh, that there'd be no diminution of surrounding property values, and that owing to a special condition of property, denying the variance would result in an unnecessary hardship to the owner seeking it. Just in terms of the uh order of business, uh I will read the case into the record, and then uh the applicant uh will be requested to come forward, and uh you would have 15 minutes that you address the board. Uh first you state your name and address, then you have up to 15 minutes to address the board to explain the reasons uh behind your application and what you're seeking and how you meet the criteria. Uh you don't have to use the full 15 minutes, but it is available to you. Uh afterward, we will ask if there's anybody in the audience who wishes to speak in favor of the application. Anyone wishing to do so is will again come up to the microphone, uh, state your name and address, and you have up to five minutes to address the board. Following that, uh, we'll ask if there's anybody in the audience who has any questions, concerns, or opposition to the application. Similarly, uh each person will come up to the microphone, state his or her uh name and address, and we'll have up to five minutes to address the board. Following that, um the applicant will have the opportunity to come forward and we'll have up to five minutes to provide any rebuttal or final uh comments they wish to make. And then following that, we will ask uh if there is anybody in the audience who spoke with questions, concerns, or opposition, um, who wants to have the final word. That would only be one person. Uh so sometimes I don't think that's going to be the case tonight, but sometimes we do allow for a few minutes for people to confer amongst themselves. So that is the um general order of the business. Uh are there any changes to the and I did neglect to say that to my left is Deputy Cleaning Manager Carter Falk. Uh Mr. Falk, are there any changes to the agenda this evening? Yes, Mr. Chairman. The case for Teak Drive, it was the first case on tonight for a water line for the DPW and fire department. That will not be held tonight. That will be on February 10th, 2026. And we do have a request uh for that recusal, so that will be a motion or to continue that. So that'll be a motion of the board, and uh we'll we'll take that up in just a moment for um so uh unless there's any other changes I'll call the role. Mr. Neely, present, Mr. Boucher, present, Mr. Shaw. Present. Mr. Lynnal. Present. Mr. Potri. Present. Okay, so with that, the first case on the agenda um this evening was uh this or I should say is the city of Nashua through Chief Buxton, Nashua Fire Rescue for 25 Teak Drive, and as noted, uh the applicant is seeking a continuance. I am going to uh read the request into the record so we can all uh understand the rationale behind the request. Um this is addressed to Mr. Falk on behalf of the City of Nashua and National Fire Rescue. We respectfully request that the Board of Adjustment continue our pending wetland special exception application until the board's February 10th, 2026 hearing.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com