A special meeting of the Standing Bonding Subcommittee of the Common Council Committee on Administration, Finance and Law was called to order at 6:10 PM on Wednesday, March 19, 2025, in Council Chambers, City Hall, New Britain, Connecticut. The subcommittee considered three bond authorization items totaling over $204.7 million: school projects ($157.5 million), the White Bridge Waterworks facility ($40.9 million), and various capital improvements ($6.3 million). Public testimony and extensive committee discussion preceded votes on each item.
Good evening, everyone. Thanks for bearing with us. I call to order the March nineteenth, twenty twenty-five special meeting of the Standing Bonding Committee. The time is now six ten PM. Mr. Clerk, will you please call the roll? Alderman McNamara. Alderman Santiago. I'm sitting as an alternate for um Jason. Alderman Pabone. Alderman Smedley. Alderwoman's Beloin Savedra. Daddy, sorry. Sitting as a voting member for Alderman Simpson is Aldwoman McAdam. And sitting as a voting member for Alderman Smedley is Alderman Russell. Okay, he's here for Gibson Stand corrected. You have correct. Very important in uh need to move ahead. Uh I I think, however, the second two items on the agenda tonight are uh somewhat problematic. The forty-seven point two million dollars in new bonding authorization uh will create an issue for us in Hartford. Um for the city to issue new bonds for paving drinking and a huge authorization or the redevelopment of water production wells um is short-sighted, I would say. Uh these projects may need it at some point, uh approving these projects now at the same time that the delegation is arguing that the city can't afford to fund the Allen Tree project um would significantly undermine our hate here at the Capitol and make it more difficult for us to access state funding for Allen Street. Um I know I I've been on the council in Britain. I understand that that these are tough decisions, um, and there's a limited pool of resources to go around. Um I understand that each one of these projects has pluses and minuses associated with it. Um, but the Allen Tree project uh is at a critical juncture. Uh is time sensitive. The project is shovel ready. It's only gonna get more expensive the longer we wait, uh, and it impacts about fifty households in that neighborhood. Uh at a minimum, simple the bond project on tonight's agenda um should be reconsidered uh or postponed to a later date. Um, and if possible money diverted to fund the Allen Tree project to some degree. Uh and the reason for that is is simple. Any additional commitment um that the city makes in terms of bond allocation to the Allen Three project sends a clear message to state officials that the city is curious about addressing the problem, uh, and it would help make us our case here that much stronger. Uh I know all of you have a very difficult job. Uh I I and the rest of the folks here at the Disney delegation appreciate all the hard work that you do on behalf of the city. Um I appreciate you giving me some time to speak uh in a little bit of a unique way. Um, and so I'm happy to try to answer any questions people have. Um otherwise, thank you very much. And I'll I'll hang here for a little bit. I have a question. Thank you, Representative Franzo. Uh Alder Woman Blaine Savedra will start with a question. Hi, State Representative DeFranzo, Sharon Savedra here. I have a couple questions for you. Um, the Allen Street Project. I walked Allen Street before you were elected, so a little over a year ago with the bonding co-chairs from the state capital. And at that time, clearly it was a bipartisan walk. Both sides of the caucuses here were represented. Um and your bonding commissioners are also bipartisan. So they clearly told us that if we put up a third of the money, they pretty much could come through with the rest of the project.