OpenPublica

Accountability starts with access.

© 2026 · Filed for the public record

Use casesAboutAPIPrivacyTermsLinkedIn
Home/New Orleans, Louisiana/City Council
OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

New Orleans City Council 2027 Proposed Budget Hearings – Day 1 (September 29, 2026)

City Council — Tuesday, September 29, 2026
BodyNew Orleans, Louisiana
SessionCity Council
DateTuesday, September 29, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 4:12:20

Original source
Transcript — VerbatimClick a timed line to jump · ⧉ to share it

Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.

Speaker 1

3:24

All right, guys, it's nine thirty.

3:29

And I know that we have some folks coming in late, so why don't we go ahead and get started?

3:33

Because I know we have a long day today, tomorrow, and for the next ten days.

Speaker 2

5:02

But other than that, everything the council is going to see today is both something we have discussed and is quite publicly available.

5:10

So again, these are the millages that we'll start with that are potentially subject to the roll forward proposition.

5:17

They are broken down here essentially as to the ones that would go directly to the general fund or supporting something that is a direct city service.

5:29

And so in the first uh tranche, you see general alimony and unrestricted general fund.

5:36

If those are rolled forward all the way or 1.82 mills, that could potentially generate up to 10 million dollars in additional revenue.

5:46

And then for city dedicated use, that would then go to these departments specifically, and then the goal would obviously be then that takes money pressure off of the general fund as a result of this money being infused.

6:02

There is police protection, fire protection, park and parkways, and NOR, it says a recreation department.

6:11

Again, it's about 1.911 mills and a potential increase of 11.388 million dollars.

6:21

Also, there's buyer police platoon.

6:24

That goes directly to potential pay for the police and buyer based on what the millage was originally set up for, and if that is rolled forward is potentially 4.3 million dollars.

6:38

And then the other potential millages as discussed are library, early childhood education, Audubon, and City Park, and collectively, those are almost three mills, 2.93 that would generate close to 16.35 million dollars.

6:58

So the bottom line number, the grand total is if you take the 10 million from general fund, the 11 million for city dedicated use, the 4 million, and the 16 million, you get to 42 million.

7:11

Now, Councilmember Harris, you asked the last meeting, and I know some media outlets have already reported on this, and obviously we want to put the information out there.

7:21

Is if you have a 200,000 home that is homestead exempt, and all these millages were rolled forward, the annual increase would be 103.94 cents.

7:36

So that is a monthly increase of only $8.66.

7:41

Similarly, for $250,000 home, a full roll forward would be an annual increase of $141.13 cents for a monthly increase of $11.76.

7:55

And then just for purposes of brevity, I'll stop at $300,000, which is $178.33 annually and a monthly increase of only $14.86.

8:08

So those are the all-in numbers.

8:12

Obviously, if any council member wants, we can talk about what does it look like if you only do general alimony?

8:19

What does it look like if you do general alimony and the city dedicated ones?

8:24

What does it look like if you do the city dedicated ones and part of the other ones?

8:29

Like we can we can provide all that to you.

8:32

I mean, the the bottom line is obviously the number decreases because I'm giving you the all-in number right now for these millages that haven't been rolled forward since 2015.

8:43

And then here are the rest of the parts that have the levy.

8:48

These are millages that are not being rolled forward.

8:51

The Board of Liquidation has confirmed, I think I said this last week, that they are not going to roll their millage forward.

8:58

So it's 14.5 mills will stay the same.

9:01

Um I think that's a real credit to them, particularly considering the fact that the bonds were issued this year and will be in subsequent years.

9:11

If you see there's three different sewage and waterboard drainage millages, all of those remain static.

9:18

The school board already rolled their millages forward a couple of years ago, so they are not going to obviously do that again.

9:25

And the Orleans law enforcement district is the sheriff.

9:29

And you can see how many of the mills overall are for these outside agencies.

9:41

Talk about special millages, actually, just this one.

9:44

I thought there may be one more on the levy.

9:46

Uh but downtown development district remains the same for now.

Unassigned speaker

9:50

The garden district remains the same, Turo Bulony, and then the levy boards on both the east and the west bank stop at the same level as well.

Speaker 2

10:01

So that's what we have.

10:05

We just wanted to make sure that obviously we know that these are ordinances.

10:09

This is the way we always begin the presentations.

10:12

And particularly since the council members have asked, what are potential impacts on households?

10:17

We just wanted to make sure we were providing more detail, particularly after you asked Councilmember Ayers last week.

Speaker 1

10:22

Yeah, I I appreciate that COJRUS.

10:25

So I I do want uh would like some discussion about the various scenarios as you uh predicted because clearly there are options that the city council can take.

10:36

We can roll forward the general alimony, we could do general alimony plus the city services side, all of it.

10:43

Um do you have from the administration side what that would look like as far as cuts?

Unassigned speaker

10:50

So if we only roll forward the general alimony, what would be off of the shopping block if we didn't know?

Speaker 2

10:56

Yeah, I mean it's it's it's a basic math proposition.

11:00

So again, if you have the let's just take the one that you said first, council member.

11:05

If you took the general alimony plus you did the city dedicated services, that's you know roughly 21 and a half million dollars, then that subtracts from the 77 million that is there.

11:18

So you take the 77 million minus essentially 21 and a half, you get to what like 56 and a half at that point.

11:27

Um so you know, it is this is this is part of what we're we're trying to explain overall, is that it's a series of choices, and I keep on saying this because it's it's how we feel that it's a menu of options.

Speaker 1

11:41

Right.

Speaker 2

11:41

The option is number one, we need to make 77 million dollars of cuts.

11:46

Here are the proposed ones, and obviously all of these meetings will be leading towards which ones um are more potentially acceptable than others.

11:56

And then next, if in the realm of 77 million dollars of cuts, if there's additional revenue that's raised, then which of those cuts come off of the board as a result of that?

12:08

And and and again, these are the ones that you could say would do it.

12:13

I mean, and and just to completely answer your question, council member.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Budget Equity Analysis██████████████████████████████30%
Technology and Innovation██████████████14%
Public Engagement███████████11%
Personnel Matters██████████10%
Fiscal Sustainability████████8%
Environmental Protection█████5%
Education█████5%
Public Safety████4%
Healthcare███3%
Summary of Proceedings

2027 Proposed Budget Hearings – Day 1: New Orleans City Council (September 29, 2026)

The New Orleans City Council convened Day 1 of its 2027 Proposed Budget Hearings on Tuesday, September 29, 2026, beginning at 9:30 a.m. The administration presented the proposed 2027 millage rates and budgets for the Department of Finance, the Chief Administrative Office (Budget, IT, Innovation/Performance, HR, and Sustainability), an update on the Early Childhood Education millage (Year 4), and the Civil Service Department. The session opened with a detailed discussion of a potential millage roll-forward — the first since 2015 — as a partial offset to a projected $77 million general fund gap. No ordinances were voted on; the session was informational and the first of a multi-day hearing schedule.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Larry J. Morgan (8312 Orianda Street) opposed any further tax increases, stating that residents' salaries cannot accommodate higher taxes while city services decline. He directly criticized CAO Joe, saying "Joe, you're a joke," and alleged the council gave itself a raise after campaigning on lowering costs.
  • A speaker from Apple Street (Mr. Adun) warned that regressive impacts extend beyond taxes to fines, parking tickets, and code enforcement, which disproportionately hit poor communities, particularly Black communities in New Orleans East. He cited Superintendent Ann Kirkpatrick's earlier statement against penalizing citizens with civil penalties during the austerity crisis.

Discussion Items

Tax Levy Ordinance – Proposed Millage Rates (Ords 35582 & 35583)

  • CAO Joe presented the proposed millage roll-forward scenarios: general alimony/unrestricted general fund (1.82 mills, up to $10 million in additional revenue); city-dedicated uses including police, fire, parks and parkways, and NOR recreation (1.911 mills, $11.388 million); a police platoon millage ($4.3 million); and library, early childhood education, Audubon, and City Park millages (2.93 mills combined, ~$16.35 million) — a grand total of about $42 million.
  • For a homestead-exempt home, a full roll-forward would cost: $103.94 annually ($8.66/month) for a $200,000 home; $141.13 annually ($11.76/month) for a $250,000 home; $178.33 annually ($14.86/month) for a $300,000 home; and $513 annually for a $750,000 home.
  • Millages not being rolled forward include the Board of Liquidation (14.5 mills), the Sewerage & Water Board drainage millages, the school board (which rolled forward years ago), the Orleans law enforcement district (sheriff), and various district/levy boards. The last full roll-forward of city-benefiting millages was 2015.
  • Councilmember Willard cautioned against framing increases in monthly terms because taxes are due annually and unpaid balances accrue interest penalties. He also noted that homeowners with special assessment freezes will still pay more when the millage rate rises.
  • Councilmember King urged better public education, citing widespread misinformation and his own barbershop conversations where residents did not know the actual numbers. He asked the administration for an explicit position on the roll-forward; CAO Joe described the budget as a "menu of options" rather than taking a yes/no position and said an interactive web page with a millage calculator would be posted this week.
  • Councilmember Green listed cost drivers since 2015: ~$30 million in increased health care costs, $18 million in previously unbudgeted debt service, ~$5 million in retention and terminal leave pay, $26 million in across-the-board pay increases, ~$98 million for outside agencies (about $75 million of it for Orleans Justice Center operations and jail health care), the loss of ARPA funds, and a $138 million surplus (18.1–18.4% of the general fund, above the GFOA 16% benchmark).
  • Councilmember Morrell described a proposed arrangement in which Audubon would take over maintenance of Crescent Park in exchange for its millage roll-forward, and argued that property taxes are less regressive than sales taxes because they rise with property value.
  • The administration confirmed that even a full $42 million roll-forward would not close the gap: the starting deficit is $99 million, roughly $21.5 million in one-time savings reduces it to about $77 million in cuts, and CAO-estimated proposed cuts of ~$16 million would reduce — but not eliminate — the remaining gap. Councilmember Morrell said the council, not the administration, would ultimately decide which cuts are restored if millages are rolled forward.

Department of Finance

  • Finance leadership presented a proposed 2027 budget of $38.7 million versus $19.3 million adopted in 2026. The increase is driven mainly by $18.2 million in principal and $2.3 million in interest — debt service moved into the general fund. Excluding debt service, operations are about $1 million below 2026.
  • Accounting: FTEs reduced from 22 to 20 (a 9% reduction); ADP payroll software funded at $3 million (including a $250,000 reduction and $50,000 in new investments). The FY2025 audit was completed on time, and the LLA approved it in one business day — a first.
  • Purchasing: 6.5 FTEs (down from 9.5); hosted the annual procurement fair at one-third of its allowed budget. A $10,000 hearing-officer line for responsible-contracting determinations was removed, with the department flagging it as a priority to restore.
  • Revenue: 46 employees; the sales-tax audit team was doubled; on pace for ~200 audits and $3.3 million in sales-tax collections as of August 2026; audit return on investment is 4.6:1. A tax amnesty runs October 1–December 31, 2026, waiving 100% of penalties and 50% of interest. Only 2–5% of registered businesses are audited annually; penalties are 5% per month (capped at 25%) plus uncapped 1.25% interest.
  • Treasury: 20 FTEs (down 3); zero non-general fund budget proposed; tax sales for adjudicated properties are paused pending a new vendor expected within six months. Councilmember Harris pushed for a faster timeline, noting unrecognized revenue.
  • Retirement: 7.5 FTEs; $621 million investment portfolio; ~$4.3 million paid monthly to retirees; about 70% of the office is eligible to retire in January. A one-time COLA continues in February, but a permanent 1% COLA (costing north of $20 million) is not in the 2027 budget and will be studied for 2028.
  • Councilmember Morrell praised moving debt service into the general fund as the honest approach and encouraged all departments to budget for terminal leave. Councilmember McCarron requested org charts for every department and noted that FTE reductions are vacant positions; she also asked the city to maximize use of the short-term rental funding stream.
  • Councilmember Harris noted discrepancies between presentation slides and the budget book (e.g., Finance director's office listed as 5 FTEs in the presentation but 6 in the budget book; the accurate number is 6) and said such variances should be watched throughout the hearings.

Chief Administrative Office

  • Office of Budget and Management (Assistant CAO Brandy DeLarge): Proposed general fund budget of $2.8 million, up $1.25 million, primarily to establish the new Contracts Management Office (about 10 staff); citywide postage moved into the general fund. Non-general fund drops from $350,000 to $121,000.
  • Office of Information and Technology (Chief Innovation Officer Jonathan Wisby): The 2027 budget is $3 million above the 2026 adopted level but still $1 million below 2025. Four contract staff convert to full-time (personnel from 40 to 42 FTEs, with two budgeted positions actually lost); department furloughs are eliminated. Efficiencies include ending a cyber-command lease, licensing audits, and removing low-use public Wi-Fi (Duncan Plaza; Lafayette Square ~1,000 users/month). Cybersecurity risk score dropped ~85% following a CISA review. A new 311 module launches around Q2 2027 ($500–600K capital implementation; ~$100K annual maintenance; past-ticket data import poses challenges). The Lama permitting-system replacement RFP is targeted for November, and a website accessibility deadline is April 2027.
  • Councilmember Morrell pressed for consolidating or eliminating OPSE through centralized police detail scheduling and a quartermaster model, arguing it would cut duplication and generate department revenue without tax increases. Councilmember Green questioned the city's investment in OPCD, which he noted is a state agency.
  • Office of Service and Innovation / Performance and Accountability (Chief Performance Officer Abby V): Budget rises from $563,000 to $1.2 million, mostly correcting 2026 under-budgeting of existing FTEs (7 general fund + 3 grant-funded); other operating funding is eliminated. The office led 2025 spending controls, quarterly spending reviews, and supports the new contracts office and jail health care contract.
  • Office of Employee & Labor Relations / HR (Assistant CAO Christina Hamilton): Proposed general fund budget of ~$3.9 million (+$159,000); personnel up $364,000 (budgeting for actuals and no furloughs); other operating down 37.2%. Health plan costs rose sharply (2025 gross medical claims $53.5M vs $44M in 2024; pharmacy $26.3M vs $16.8M; net employer cost $62.3M). The city is adopting ~$11.95 million in savings ($3.9M plan design, $2.7M pharmacy, $3.08M eligibility/coordination, $1.64M site of care, $647K employee contributions). A Select Ochsner narrow network was not implemented. New for 2027: a $1,000-deductible PPO and a $3,000-deductible HSA-compatible HDHP; family out-of-pocket max drops from $13,500 to $12,000; employee+spouse and employee+family dental premiums rise $20/month. Pre-65 retirees move to a separate self-funded plan with the deductible rising from $750 to $1,250; retiree per-member cost rose 33% ($1,620 to $2,154). Open enrollment runs October 1–31, 2026. Councilmember Willard asked whether employees are paying more for less; HR responded "Absolutely not" and noted the city still bears most of the cost.
  • Office of Sustainability (Chief Sustainability Officer Meagan Williams): Proposed budget is ~$177,000, mostly operating; two staff would be split-funded ($22,000 personnel). The office eliminated funding for Recycled At and Christmas tree recycling (~$20,000), though the CAO hopes to restore it with other funds. Grant-funded work continues: Gordon Plaza solar farm RFQ imminent; Recovery One consent-decree maintenance; Gentilly Resilience District ($141M HUD; Willie Hall site has ~5 million gallons of underground stormwater storage); 41-building energy assessments and 14-building solar PV under the CPRG grant; Lincoln Beach phase one; and a Climate Action Plan update (C40 requirement). Green-infrastructure maintenance uses the 5135 fund (~$300,000); an adopt-a-stormwater-lot program is planned. Councilmember Green asked about private-sector help for bioswale maintenance and highlighted the new Tremé green infrastructure project; Councilmember Harris asked for a cost-benefit analysis of Recycled At versus landfill hauling and flagged community concerns about AL Davis Park's grass, which is being replaced with sod.

Early Childhood Education Millage Presentation (Year 4)

  • The 2022 early childhood millage is in its fourth full year. It funds about 1,000 infant/toddler seats, matched 1:1 by the state ($21.5 million) for another 800 children, for 1,800 total served across 40 centers — over 60% of publicly funded seats in the network.
  • New Orleans serves 31% of low-income infants/toddlers versus a 12% statewide average. Kindergarten-readiness scores exceed the statewide average in every demographic group. 94% of families said the program improved their ability to work or attend school; 89% would recommend their site; 77% of children return year to year; 97% of directors rated the program positively.
  • Wraparound services include vision, developmental, and hearing screenings, with over a quarter of screened children enrolled in care coordination, and about 1,000 two-generation mental health consultation visits.
  • NORA has received $4.6 million since 2022 for child care facilities; ~2,000 hours of technical assistance went to ~130 centers; three centers have opened (Firehouse and Wilcox Academy in District B; Shiloh Gardens in District E).
  • The current millage is 4.39 mills (~$21.5 million/year). Rolling forward to 5 mills would add ~$3.4 million and roughly 100–200 more seats, but demand is far larger: more than 5,000 eligible children and 50+ centers cannot be served due to funding limits. Average teacher wage is $11/hour; retention bonuses have helped — 90% of surveyed teachers said the supports reduced stress, and 83% said they would stay in the field. Seventeen communities across the state now compete for the state match.

Civil Service

  • Director Amy Trapnier presented a standstill 2027 budget: personnel ~$2.4 million (+$26,000, due to fringe costs) and other operating fixed at $509,364. Two vacant positions are eliminated, one replaced by a new learning management system. About 92% of other operating funds cover software (63%) and the disciplinary appeals process (29%, mostly hearing examiners and court reporters).
  • Public safety promotional testing remains unfunded for 2027; the commission has extended existing eligible lists into 2027.
  • Goals include rule modernization, per-vacancy job postings, weekly recertification of eligible lists, electronic onboarding, addressing critical vacancies via hiring-rate and classification changes, and a train-the-trainer session for the employee growth and development program in early 2027.

Key Outcomes

  • No votes were taken; the session was Day 1 of the 2027 budget hearings. Day 2 (public safety) was scheduled for the following day, with Councilmember Morrell signaling he will ask NOPD to identify offsetting cuts for any requested increases.
  • The administration committed to posting an interactive millage-impact web page/calculator this week, allowing residents to toggle scenarios by home value and roll-forward option.
  • Councilmembers directed departments to provide org charts (filled/vacant) as part of budget materials.
  • The administration was asked to produce a revised cut list if partial or full millage roll-forwards are adopted; CAO Joe said the cut list would be a "continued dialogue" with the council.
  • Finance will continue discussions on accelerating the new tax-sale vendor timeline; the revenue amnesty program begins October 1, 2026; HR open enrollment begins October 1, 2026.
  • Councilmember Harris requested a Recycled At cost-benefit analysis (versus landfill hauling) before the end of budget season; Councilmember Morrell flagged potential near-term work on OPSE consolidation and centralized police detail management.

Meeting Transcript

All right, guys, it's nine thirty. And I know that we have some folks coming in late, so why don't we go ahead and get started? Because I know we have a long day today, tomorrow, and for the next ten days. But other than that, everything the council is going to see today is both something we have discussed and is quite publicly available. So again, these are the millages that we'll start with that are potentially subject to the roll forward proposition. They are broken down here essentially as to the ones that would go directly to the general fund or supporting something that is a direct city service. And so in the first uh tranche, you see general alimony and unrestricted general fund. If those are rolled forward all the way or 1.82 mills, that could potentially generate up to 10 million dollars in additional revenue. And then for city dedicated use, that would then go to these departments specifically, and then the goal would obviously be then that takes money pressure off of the general fund as a result of this money being infused. There is police protection, fire protection, park and parkways, and NOR, it says a recreation department. Again, it's about 1.911 mills and a potential increase of 11.388 million dollars. Also, there's buyer police platoon. That goes directly to potential pay for the police and buyer based on what the millage was originally set up for, and if that is rolled forward is potentially 4.3 million dollars. And then the other potential millages as discussed are library, early childhood education, Audubon, and City Park, and collectively, those are almost three mills, 2.93 that would generate close to 16.35 million dollars. So the bottom line number, the grand total is if you take the 10 million from general fund, the 11 million for city dedicated use, the 4 million, and the 16 million, you get to 42 million. Now, Councilmember Harris, you asked the last meeting, and I know some media outlets have already reported on this, and obviously we want to put the information out there. Is if you have a 200,000 home that is homestead exempt, and all these millages were rolled forward, the annual increase would be 103.94 cents. So that is a monthly increase of only $8.66. Similarly, for $250,000 home, a full roll forward would be an annual increase of $141.13 cents for a monthly increase of $11.76. And then just for purposes of brevity, I'll stop at $300,000, which is $178.33 annually and a monthly increase of only $14.86. So those are the all-in numbers. Obviously, if any council member wants, we can talk about what does it look like if you only do general alimony? What does it look like if you do general alimony and the city dedicated ones? What does it look like if you do the city dedicated ones and part of the other ones? Like we can we can provide all that to you. I mean, the the bottom line is obviously the number decreases because I'm giving you the all-in number right now for these millages that haven't been rolled forward since 2015. And then here are the rest of the parts that have the levy. These are millages that are not being rolled forward. The Board of Liquidation has confirmed, I think I said this last week, that they are not going to roll their millage forward. So it's 14.5 mills will stay the same. Um I think that's a real credit to them, particularly considering the fact that the bonds were issued this year and will be in subsequent years. If you see there's three different sewage and waterboard drainage millages, all of those remain static. The school board already rolled their millages forward a couple of years ago, so they are not going to obviously do that again. And the Orleans law enforcement district is the sheriff. And you can see how many of the mills overall are for these outside agencies. Talk about special millages, actually, just this one. I thought there may be one more on the levy. Uh but downtown development district remains the same for now. The garden district remains the same, Turo Bulony, and then the levy boards on both the east and the west bank stop at the same level as well. So that's what we have. We just wanted to make sure that obviously we know that these are ordinances. This is the way we always begin the presentations. And particularly since the council members have asked, what are potential impacts on households? We just wanted to make sure we were providing more detail, particularly after you asked Councilmember Ayers last week. Yeah, I I appreciate that COJRUS. So I I do want uh would like some discussion about the various scenarios as you uh predicted because clearly there are options that the city council can take. We can roll forward the general alimony, we could do general alimony plus the city services side, all of it. Um do you have from the administration side what that would look like as far as cuts? So if we only roll forward the general alimony, what would be off of the shopping block if we didn't know? Yeah, I mean it's it's it's a basic math proposition.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com