The New Orleans City Planning Commission (CPC) met on Monday, April 15, 2024, at 10:00 AM in Council Chambers to consider multiple variance requests, appeals of the Director of Safety and Permits, and the election of officers. The board voted on nine docket items, approving deferrals, granting one variance with conditions, and denying one appeal. The meeting adjourned after the election of officers was deferred to the July meeting.
Candice Forest present. Todd James is absent. Tamara Eggins is absent. Jose Alvarez. Present. Ramiro Diaz is present. Alfonso Gonzalez. Present. And Jason Richards. Present. At this time, would the board make a motion to adopt the minutes from the March 18th meeting? So move. Second. It's been moved by Commissioner Gonzalez. Second by Commissioner Alvarez, I believe, to adapt the minutes from our last meeting. Vote your screens. Four yes. Four yays, no nays. The motion carries. Please note that the board will recess at approximately 1 p.m. if the meeting has not already been adjourned and reconvene at approximately 1 30. As a reminder to applicants, action that the board takes today will be released in the form of a disposition notice by April 25th and sent via email and mail to the applicant as well as posted on the one stop app for other interested parties. Requests that the board votes to approve must show compliance with any noted provisos before the case is finalized and granted final approval. At the March meeting, the board discussed taking the consideration of the election of officers item out of order at the beginning of the meeting. Would the board consider a motion to suspend the rules to take this item out of order? I think it might be prudent to wait to the end of the meeting for more commissioners to be present for the vote. Okay. We will begin with unfinished business for variance. Will the chair please read the hearing rules for variances? Yes. Rules and procedures for public hearings, variance requests. The following procedures shall be observed during the hearing. Each speaker shall give their name and address prior to speaking on the proposal. The applicant or representative will speak first. The presentation shall be limited to a maximum of three minutes for each applicant or representative speaker. But in no event shall the cumulative presentation total by applicants or their representatives exceed 10 minutes. Proponents or persons in favor of the proposal will speak next and be allowed two minutes per speaker. Opponents or persons in opposition of the proposal will speak next and be allowed two minutes per speaker. The applicant or representative will be allowed a rebuttal. The rebuttal shall be limited to a cumulative maximum of three minutes. For an exceptional case, the time limitations may be extended by the presiding officer with the approval of the board. As the board deems necessary, the case may be acted upon at this meeting or deferred for additional information or review. If the case is deferred, it will be acted on at a subsequent meeting as provided by law. All proper parliamentary procedures shall be followed, including recognition of speakers, relevance of argument, and absolute prohibition of applause or demonstration. Standard of review. Article 12, section 12.3.1 point E, and Article 12, Section 14.3.1 point F of the comprehensive zoning ordinance to permit a restaurant with insufficient ground floor transparency, visually obtrusive ADA ramps, and insufficient first floor ceiling height. Based on this report, the staff believes the requested variance of Article 12, Section 12.3 point B. Point 1. Ground floor transparency failed to meet criterion 2 of the standards of variance for Article 4, Section 4.6. Additionally, based on the report, the staff believes that requested variances of Article 12, Section 12.3.1 point E.