OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

New Orleans Board of Zoning Adjustments Meeting - January 29, 2025

City Planning CommissionWednesday, January 29, 2025
BodyNew Orleans, Louisiana
SessionCity Planning Commission
DateWednesday, January 29, 2025
StatusFILED
Video Record

STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE

Transcript — Verbatim
3:57

Good morning.

3:58

I would like to call the Monday, January twenty-seventh, Board of Zoning Adjustments meeting to order.

4:04

We will begin with roll call, Candace Forest.

4:21

At this time, the board make a motion to adopt the minutes from the December sixteenth meeting meeting.

5:00

It's been moved by Commissioner James, uh second by Commissioner Richards to adopt the minutes from our last meeting.

5:05

Vote your screens.

5:15

I think we're missing one vote.

5:18

Got it.

5:20

Five years, no nays.

5:21

The motion carries.

5:23

Please note that the board will recess at approximately 1 p.m.

5:26

if the meeting has not already been adjourned and will reconvene at approximately 1 30 p.m.

5:31

As a reminder to applicants, action that the board takes today will be released in the form of a disposition notice by February 6th and sent via email and mail to the applicant as well as posted on the one-stop app for other interested parties.

5:43

Requests that the board votes to approve must show compliance with any noted provisos before the case is finalized and granted final approval.

5:51

Item one is for an executive session.

5:53

Would the board consider a motion to defer the executive session for 30 days for the purpose of discussing the following pending litigation?

6:00

Maureen Greer et al.

6:02

versus the City of New Orleans through its board of zoning adjustments.

6:26

Second it's been moved by Commissioner James.

6:30

Second by Commissioner Richards to defer uh item one executive session uh for 30 days.

6:35

Vote your screens.

6:41

Five yes, no nays.

6:43

The motion carries.

6:46

We will now begin with unfinished business for variances.

6:49

Will the chair please read the hearing rules for variances?

6:52

Yes.

6:53

Rules and procedures for public hearings, variance requests.

6:57

The following procedures shall be observed during the hearing.

7:00

Each speaker shall give their name and address prior to speaking on the proposal.

7:04

The applicant or representative will speak first.

7:07

The presentation shall be limited to a maximum of three minutes for each applicant or representative speaker.

7:13

But in no event shall the cumulative presentation total by applicants or their representatives exceed 10 minutes.

7:20

Proponents are persons in favor of the proposal will speak next and be allowed two minutes per speaker.

7:26

Opponents are persons in opposition of the proposal will speak next and be allowed two minutes per speaker.

7:33

The applicant or representative will be allowed a rebuttal.

7:36

The rebuttal shall be limited to a cumulative maximum of three minutes.

7:40

For an exceptional case, the time limitations may be extended by the presiding officer with the approval of the board.

7:46

As the board deems necessary, the case may be acted upon at this meeting or deferred for additional information or review.

7:54

If the case is deferred, it will be acted on at a subsequent meeting as provided by law.

7:59

All proper parliamentary procedures shall be followed, including recognition of speakers, relevance of argument, and absolute prohibition of applause or demonstration.

8:10

Standard of review.

9:03

At the last meeting, staff or sorry, the board deferred this item so that the applicants could conduct their neighborhood participation program, which they have done.

9:14

All those documents are in the file.

9:25

Is the applicant present for BCA docket 074-24?

9:29

You could give your name and address for the record.

9:35

You can go ahead with your comments.

9:40

Nothing's changed.

9:41

We did go through the NPP process.

9:47

So I'm just more here to answer any questions that may have come.

9:50

Thank you.

9:51

Thank you.

9:52

Is there anyone else here in support of the applicant for BZA Docket 074-24?

10:00

Good morning.

10:01

My name is Aaron Holmes.

10:02

I'm here representing uh VCPORA.

10:04

Um, it was uh they they did hold the NPP and I did attend, and we had a really good conversation with the architects of the plan.

10:12

Um we're excited to see a vacant building being put back in utilization into the French corner.

10:17

We just wanted to make sure that the proper protocols and process were met, and uh we are in support of this project.

10:25

Thank you.

10:25

Anyone else here in support of the applicant for BCA docket 074-24?

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Zoning And Land Use█████████████████████████████████████████████53%
Procedural███████████████18%
Pending Litigation████████████14%
Public Records████5%
Community Engagement████5%
Public Engagement███4%
Public Safety1%
Summary of Proceedings

New Orleans Board of Zoning Adjustments Meeting - January 29, 2025

The New Orleans Board of Zoning Adjustments (BZA) convened on January 29, 2025, to address a docket including variance requests, appeals of safety and permits decisions, an extension request, and an amendment to the 2025 meeting schedule. All votes were unanimous (5-0) unless noted.

Consent Calendar

  • The board unanimously adopted the minutes from the December 16, 2024 meeting.
  • An executive session regarding pending litigation (Maureen Greer et al. v. City of New Orleans) was deferred for 30 days.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • BZA074-24 (525 Iberville Street): Aaron Holmes of VCPORA expressed support for the project, noting a successful neighborhood participation program (NPP) and vacancy redevelopment.
  • BZA062-24 (2501-2537 Tulane Avenue): Appellants' counsel Mary Howell argued against deferral, alleging staff altered a disposition 391 days after the hearing without public notice or a hearing, calling it a "secret public document" and requesting an investigation and a stay of the permit. Karen Acker (Louisiana Landmarks Society) opposed a letter from Chip Lyons, arguing buffer yards must be located between the structure and adjoining lot lines, not in the public right-of-way. Chip Lyons (for the property owner) argued the appeal lacked jurisdiction because it concerned a building permit, not a zoning decision, and that the 20-foot landscape buffer did not apply to the non-residential double-frontage property.
  • BZA076-24 (7533 Jeanette Street): Appellant Susan Johnson argued the Department of Safety and Permits (DSP) approved a sketch for a non-structural renovation permit without labeling room uses, in violation of the University Area Overlay (CZO 18.30). She claimed this enabled four unaccounted new bedrooms and lacked corresponding off-street parking. Neighbors Melinda Alfonso and Richard Fergerson described repeated violations of stop-work orders and unlicensed contracting. DSP Chief Zoning Official Dan McNamara requested dismissal, stating the appeal failed to state a basis for relief. Commissioner questions confirmed the appeal documents did not clearly articulate an existing error.
  • BZA002-25 (4917 Freret Street): Appellant Ben Flaxenberg (for neighbors) argued that approved plans for a restaurant included a pool and DJ booth, constituting a pool club rather than a permitted restaurant use in the HUMU district. Architect Seamus McGuire was present as opposition. DSP argued the pool and live entertainment had not been applied for or approved, making the appeal premature.
  • BZA003-25 (2045 N. Rocheblave Street): Applicant Zach Smith (for United Fellowship Full Gospel Baptist Church) argued the proposed new building on a separate lot should be considered a principal place of worship, as it would host worship, youth outreach, and community services independently from the adjacent sanctuary. Pastor Brandon Boutane emphasized the church's growth and need for space. DSP determined the new structure would be an accessory use to the adjacent church, requiring a resubdivision. Commissioners questioned definitions and functional independence; Commissioner James noted that how a church worships cannot be defined and the building plan allowed for separate assembly occupancy.

Discussion Items

  • BZA074-24 (525 Iberville Street): Applicant reported NPP completion. Commissioner motion to approve the requested waivers (minimum lot area, residential conversion) with two provisos, finding nine criteria met. Approved 5-0.
  • BZA001-25 (2500-2512 Constance Street): Staff recommended 30-day deferral due to weather-related city hall closures. Approved 5-0.
  • BZA062-24 (2501-2537 Tulane Avenue): After public testimony, the board deferred the matter 60 days pending active litigation in Civil District Court and a new lawsuit regarding an allegedly altered disposition. Approved 5-0.
  • BZA076-24 (7533 Jeanette Street): Following discussion about the lack of a clear error stated in the appeal, the board denied the appeal and upheld DSP's decision, finding no error in interpretation of the CZO. Approved 5-0.
  • BZA002-25 (4917 Freret Street): The board denied the appeal, upholding DSP's decision, as the pool and live entertainment uses had not been applied for or approved at the time of the appeal. Approved 4-0 (one commissioner not listed as voting, but motion carried).
  • BZA003-25 (2045 N. Rocheblave Street): The board overturned DSP's decision, granting the appeal and finding an error. The board determined the new building met the definition of a place of worship and could function independently from the adjacent church, and that the accessory use requirement did not apply. Approved 5-0.
  • BZA058-22 (4040 Canal Street): The applicant requested a first extension of time (previously granted administrative extension) to obtain building permits; only plumbing review with DPW remained. The board granted the extension, finding criteria still met. Approved 5-0.
  • Item 9 (Amendment to 2025 BZA Meeting Schedule): Staff presented a revised docketing schedule due to difficulty securing Council Chambers for all dates. The board unanimously adopted the amendment. Approved 5-0.

Key Outcomes

  • Unanimous approvals for consent items, deferrals, variances, and schedule amendment.
  • Deferred executive session (30 days) and BZA062-24 (60 days) pending litigation.
  • Denied appeals for BZA076-24 and BZA002-25, upholding DSP decisions.
  • Granted appeal for BZA003-25, overturning DSP decision on accessory use determination.
  • Granted extension for BZA058-22.
  • The meeting adjourned after the schedule amendment.

Meeting Transcript

Good morning. I would like to call the Monday, January twenty-seventh, Board of Zoning Adjustments meeting to order. We will begin with roll call, Candace Forest. At this time, the board make a motion to adopt the minutes from the December sixteenth meeting meeting. It's been moved by Commissioner James, uh second by Commissioner Richards to adopt the minutes from our last meeting. Vote your screens. I think we're missing one vote. Got it. Five years, no nays. The motion carries. Please note that the board will recess at approximately 1 p.m. if the meeting has not already been adjourned and will reconvene at approximately 1 30 p.m. As a reminder to applicants, action that the board takes today will be released in the form of a disposition notice by February 6th and sent via email and mail to the applicant as well as posted on the one-stop app for other interested parties. Requests that the board votes to approve must show compliance with any noted provisos before the case is finalized and granted final approval. Item one is for an executive session. Would the board consider a motion to defer the executive session for 30 days for the purpose of discussing the following pending litigation? Maureen Greer et al. versus the City of New Orleans through its board of zoning adjustments. Second it's been moved by Commissioner James. Second by Commissioner Richards to defer uh item one executive session uh for 30 days. Vote your screens. Five yes, no nays. The motion carries. We will now begin with unfinished business for variances. Will the chair please read the hearing rules for variances? Yes. Rules and procedures for public hearings, variance requests. The following procedures shall be observed during the hearing. Each speaker shall give their name and address prior to speaking on the proposal. The applicant or representative will speak first. The presentation shall be limited to a maximum of three minutes for each applicant or representative speaker. But in no event shall the cumulative presentation total by applicants or their representatives exceed 10 minutes. Proponents are persons in favor of the proposal will speak next and be allowed two minutes per speaker. Opponents are persons in opposition of the proposal will speak next and be allowed two minutes per speaker. The applicant or representative will be allowed a rebuttal. The rebuttal shall be limited to a cumulative maximum of three minutes. For an exceptional case, the time limitations may be extended by the presiding officer with the approval of the board. As the board deems necessary, the case may be acted upon at this meeting or deferred for additional information or review. If the case is deferred, it will be acted on at a subsequent meeting as provided by law. All proper parliamentary procedures shall be followed, including recognition of speakers, relevance of argument, and absolute prohibition of applause or demonstration. Standard of review. At the last meeting, staff or sorry, the board deferred this item so that the applicants could conduct their neighborhood participation program, which they have done. All those documents are in the file. Is the applicant present for BCA docket 074-24? You could give your name and address for the record. You can go ahead with your comments. Nothing's changed. We did go through the NPP process. So I'm just more here to answer any questions that may have come. Thank you.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com