The Newport Zoning Board of Review held a special meeting on Monday, April 13, 2026, at 11:00 AM (11:00+00:00). The board considered several petitions for dimensional variances and special use permits. All five members present (Chair Wick Rudd, Vice Chair Dave Riley, Secretary Bark Rhimes, members Cole Chevry, Melissa Padovina, and first alternate Richard Berlinski) voted unanimously on each item. No consent calendar, public comments, or staff communications were presented. The meeting lasted approximately two hours and concluded with a unanimous vote to adjourn.
Okay, we are on the record. Good evening, everyone. This is a special meeting of the Newport Zoning Board of Review. Today's date is Monday, April 13th, 2026. And uh I always say this and jinx myself. It looks like we've got a schedule that we're going to be able to get through tonight. Um let's get moving right away. First order of businesses uh roll call of officers. Uh Cole Chevry will be serving as a regular member. Uh Dave Riley, our vice chairman, myself, Wick Rudd, the chairman. Uh today, uh tonight, uh Bark Rhimes will be um serving as uh our secretary. And um we will have serving as well for Russ Johnson, Melissa Padovina, and then Richard uh uh Berlinski is our um uh is our first alternate tonight. And he will be listening in on all the cases as well. Um so moving on. Uh we don't really have much to before we get going here. We don't have any minutes, um, communications. There are no extension requests, there are no withdrawal requests, and there is no staff communications to us. Um, and uh for the first time in my memory, we don't have a summary calendar tonight. Um, which is always a little disappointing since they go a little bit quicker. But we do have two abbreviated summaries uh this evening. So I'm gonna ask our acting secretary, Mr. Grimes, if you would read in the first abbreviated summary. The first the first petition is that of Edward Boudil, applicant and owner of 6 KC Court, tax accessor plat 37, lot 025, and an R 10A zone for dimensional variances to construct the 40 40 square foot third floor deck where 30 square feet is permitted. Not long not located, the requisite three feet from exterior walls of the floor below, and located eight feet from the west or left side of the property where 10 feet is required. Great. Thank you, Mr. Acting Secretary. Yes, Mr. Lees. Uh good evening, Mr. Chair, members of the board, Matt Lees representing the applicant and owner, Edward Bidill of 6K Court. Um the variances that are required was described there and uh by Mr. Grimes and the need for the variance is driven by the fact that although this is a large lot, um, it is an L-shaped lot, and the house was built uh over a hundred years ago before zoning, uh very close to uh the boundary line, one of the boundary lines. Um it's as close as actually two feet to the uh westerly boundary line toward the front there as can be seen on the site plan. Um and so anything that is gonna need to be done on the west side of the house will will require some kind of some kind of variance. And um the deck will be adjacent to an existing third floor bedroom. Makes sense to have it there uh to take advantage of the breezes and the light and air coming uh off the Almy Pond. This house uh sort of looks out over to the almy pond. Uh the deck size four by 10, slightly um nonconforming to the requirement, but it's minimal. Umriginally with an application had been filed seeking a four by thirteen deck, uh, but it was realized that that could be reduced uh and still be functional. It's essentially set up so that you can have a couple of uh chairs and a side table and be able to have enough room to get around it, but it'd be by no means anything that you could have a party on or anything like that. It would just be something that you would sit on and and enjoy a cup of coffee or a glass of wine or something of that nature. Uh the requirement that it be set in three feet from the floor below is not achievable because the uh the second floor and the third floor line up with each other. Uh the third floor is not set in, and there's already limited living space on the third floor, so you couldn't push it back into the into the bedroom. It would it would impair the living space. Um it will, however, be entirely over the first floor because the first floor comes out a bit uh from the second and third floors, so there won't be any increase in lot coverage as a result of this deck. It's a common feature in this area, as some of you may know. Uh the area from basically Coxhill Avenue down to the pond. Many of the many of the houses have decks uh on the upper floors and and rooftops. So we believe it really is minimal to to a reasonable enjoyment of the permitted use, particularly in that area.