Newport City Council Budget Workshop: Water and Water Pollution Control - April 16, 2026
Newport City Council Budget Workshop: Water and Water Pollution Control - April 16, 2026
This budget workshop, held on April 16, 2026, focused on the proposed fiscal year budget for the city's water and water pollution control utilities. The presentation, led by city staff member Rob, outlined a flat rate for the upcoming year, driven by one-time reserve use, and emphasized the need for a stormwater fee restructuring to address inequities and future rate pressures. Six new positions were proposed, offset by overtime reduction, and the council discussed the transition year leading to a potential stormwater fee adoption in FY28.
Discussion Items
Budget Overview and Staffing Positions
- Rob presented the water division budget at $28.7 million, with no rate increase (PUC regulated), and the water pollution control budget at $54.2 million (including $20 million in bonds and grants). The water pollution control budget is held flat using one-time reserves that are not repeatable.
- Six positions are proposed: two groups — Group 1 (shared): assistant administrative office manager, finance, and two customer care associates (currently temporary staff); Group 2 (water only): a water treatment plant operator, a distribution supervisor, and a water meter supervisor. All positions are budget-neutral, offsetting overtime and temporary staffing costs.
- Rob explained that overtime is high, particularly at treatment plants, and staffing shortages pose risks of burnout, compliance coverage, and loss of customer-facing temporary staff. The city lags in market competitiveness for licensed operators, with a small regional candidate pool.
- A council member asked if the positions are budget neutral; Rob confirmed that the overtime budgeted in the current fiscal year would be offset by the new full-time positions, making them neutral or beneficial.
Stormwater Fee and Rate Structure
- Rob detailed that stormwater costs (currently $6–$7 million annually, estimated to grow to $8–$10 million) are hidden in the sewer bill and billed based on water usage, creating inequity. A new stormwater fee based on impervious area would make costs transparent and align charges.
- The fee is not a new cost, tax, or double charge; it reallocates existing costs. Without the fee, the council would face a 15% increase next year on the CSO fixed fee and sewer usage fee, plus 3–4% compounded through 2031. With the fee, typical residential customers would see a 0–5% increase.
- A council member expressed strong support, calling the stormwater fee a triple bottom line benefit: equitable burden sharing, reliable funding for infrastructure resilience, and affordability for year-round residents. They noted it could be one of the most important city initiatives this decade.
- Rob mentioned a web viewer is being developed so residents can compare current and future bills. The ordinance for the stormwater fee is targeted for FY28 or sooner, with public input opportunities.
Lead Service Line Replacement
- A council member asked about lead service line replacement. Rob stated the capital plan includes a large unfunded amount (estimated $100 million overall) and that the city received $1 million in congressionally directed spending last year. The budget includes advanced surveillance and water quality monitoring above required levels, but the full program remains an unfunded mandate with no identified funding stream.
Key Outcomes
- The council did not take a formal vote but provided direction to proceed with the proposed budget, holding rates flat using one-time reserves and adding the six positions.
- The next step is to develop the stormwater fee ordinance and public outreach, with a web viewer and additional workshops. The council acknowledged that the stormwater fee is critical to avoid significant rate increases in future years.
- The council noted the need to address the unfunded lead service line replacement mandate at the state and federal levels.
- The presentation and video will be posted on the city website, and residents are encouraged to provide feedback via email or QR code.
Meeting Transcript
I don't know. I don't think so. It is. You're just too tall for it. That'll be all right. So tonight is uh very much a budget workshop. You know, there's a bunch of different elements in it. Uh they're there for transparency. Uh so it's been fairly complicated in trying to get the budget uh framing with a bunch of different moving moving pieces. Uh I've tried to simplify it down to um three elements tonight. So there's kind of three apps or three pieces uh that we can walk through. So we're gonna walk through the system, the numbers, uh, the decisions, and then you know, we we can we can go from there. So uh the three sections that I've broken it down tonight is uh water, water pollution control, um, which covers both sewer and stormwater. Uh that's that's often lost, and then there's a decision path. That decision path isn't this year, um, but we've set this year up as a transition year, and it has a major impact going forward and into the future. Um, so I want to keep it pretty tight and quick tonight, and then get into discussion from uh the council or any public if they want to. Um so just to kind of outline where it is or how I see it for tonight. We've got budget direction and positions that are included in it. There's six positions in it. Um there's elements in here that need a lot of discussion, but I don't really uh believe that that they're tonight. We can touch on it on a high level if you want. So there's a stormwater rate uh adoption, there's rate setting methodology overall for water pollution control, and then there's a bunch of elements in it. If you look at the Ref TELUS assessment or others that come back to the collective bargaining agreement for the majority of our staff that's approaching two years um overdue. So we're one utility, uh, one department, um, but really you have two different divisions in that. Uh and those divisions operate across three different elements of the the water sector. Um they're not large, but they're very complex, and we're not only unique for uh Rhode Island, but much of New England. Um that makes sense when you consider the Aquidneck Island nature of it and and how things kind of shaped out uh overall. Um the main difference for them is the water end is PUC regulated, and the water pollution control end is kept governed by uh the council and the city. So the so the rate setting comes there on an independent assessment. And so there was some work that's was done in the rate case 23 or 24. We came back to council, I believe in around 25 to get a detailed one on uh water pollution control and and going forward. Um the basically came back that were well run. The major risk we have is staffing and funding. Um from the original contact we had with them with the water rate case. We've completed four of their tasks that they had there, and we have two that are pending. Um those two issues that remain or two pending critical ones are uh basically a big core of what you're gonna see in in the budget tonight. Um the the stormwater fund and then positions. So the six positions uh go to the heart of what what we're trying uh to do. Um we've done some of those steps over the past uh few years, some have been held up with the contract. Um, but the detailed report will be available soon on the website so anyone can take a look at it uh in and go through. So the water division, uh overall it is uh stable system. The decision tonight for council is really on positions. So we're gonna be adding positions in there, but we're not increasing any of the rates. Any rate increase would have to go back through that PUC structure uh to do so. And uh overall it's at 28.7 million uh breakdown personnel operations, debt service capital, and depreciation. Um the detail if you get bored and you want to go onto the Rhode Island PUC website and look, there'll be thousands of pages of supporting material on that here. Uh I will point out one uh critical thing outside of any of the cost changes where we move stuff around now is that uh we're probably two years behind on what our rate program was because we need the collective bargaining agreement to get to get executed. Uh major cost changes uh in the budget this year is really service delivery. Um treatment had major increases before. This year it's customer service and and distribution.
openpublica.com