OPENPUBLICA · PUBLIC MEETING RECORD
Record of Proceedings

New Rochelle HLRB Meeting – April 15, 2026: Residential Certificate of Appropriateness & Planning Board Referral

Meeting PortalWednesday, April 15, 2026
BodyNew Rochelle, New York
SessionMeeting Portal
DateWednesday, April 15, 2026
StatusFILED
Video Record
0:00 / 1:17:53

Transcript — Verbatim
1:05

Good evening, everyone.

1:07

Welcome to the City of New York Shell Department of Development, Historical and Landmark Review Board.

1:14

We have a couple of things on the agenda, but first, uh if we have any minutes already, that's item one point one.

1:20

I don't think we have any for approval tonight.

1:22

Okay.

1:25

And then from there, we we do attendance, of course, yes.

1:29

Yeah, sure.

1:30

I'm being here.

1:32

Rosal Famante here.

1:34

Will Chia Elliott is out.

1:36

Jim Fleming here.

1:37

Keith Gordon is out.

1:38

Leanne Merchant here.

1:40

Belk is Ray's CUNY.

1:41

Here.

1:42

Don Richards.

1:43

Here.

1:43

And staff members with us today, Saraya Ben Habib, uh Deputy Building Official, Kevin Kane, Director of Planning and Sustainability, and myself, Benito Seha, Senior Project Manager.

1:55

Okay, we can start right in.

1:58

Uh item number two, public hearings, 2.1 application HLRB 52-2025 by Walter Nestler for certificate of appropriateness to construct a below ground pool and install a four-inch black aluminum picket pool, picket pool enclosure fence along with four foot high air green hedging planted outside the fence at 10 Manhattan Avenue, block 825 lot 51.

2:24

And in our R1 historic zone district, adjourned until further notice, so we're not going to hear that tonight.

5:02

And finally, there's a little bit also of Spanish revival, so it's a little bit of a blend of all of these.

5:08

We have the bright wide stucco with the dark trims, which is also similar to the tutor revival, and um the rafter tails, which even though around the time that this house was built, it could also be referenced as like a craftsman, American craftsman architecture.

5:26

Um you could also uh interpret it as being kind of like the scroll brackets from a Spanish architecture along with the stocco.

5:38

So these are the proposed elevations.

5:42

In terms of um the architectural style of the home, we are not proposing to change any of it.

5:48

Um what we're proposing to change is starting with the windows.

5:54

The um of the first floor windows have these very shallow elliptical arch.

6:02

Hello?

6:02

Okay, so we're planning on squaring those out, and because we don't think it's a feature that it's relevant to the main identity of like the historical identity of this house, and we just want to have a more consistent look throughout the home.

6:24

So starting with the front elevation, which is the top left in the screen.

6:32

We are adding a um a center window, and on the second floor, that center, three side-by-side windows.

6:39

Currently, there's only two, and there's a space in the middle, which seems a little empty, just waiting for something.

6:45

So we're completing that third window.

6:47

Then if we move over to the next elevation over, we are removing one window in the master bedroom where we're proposing full height cabinets on the other side, and the same elevation further to the right.

7:02

We are removing a door that currently leads to nowhere, which is the one in the middle of that wall to the right.

7:09

And so I think previously there might have been a deck there that was removed.

7:14

So I don't think that was an original deck from the property.

7:18

There's no signs to the architecture of the home that it was, so we would like to remove that opening altogether.

7:24

If we move over to the lower left elevation, which is the back elevation, we are adding a window.

7:34

Let's see if I can point this.

7:35

Yeah, so we're adding this window right here, which um it just to center the proposed location of the kitchen sink.

7:45

Um let me see.

7:47

So over here on the next over, we are removing very small window on the kitchen and just redoing the opening for the patio door that goes to the side yard, which is actually their main recreational yard since they don't have much space towards the back.

8:07

Um, and then I think that's about it in terms of window modifications.

8:14

Make sure.

8:15

Yeah.

8:17

So in terms of structural changes, uh the main structural change that we're doing to the exterior is proposing the enlargement of the carport.

8:32

So, as the Mr.

8:33

and Mrs.

8:34

Tineo have been going back and forth to the house, they did notice that the existing carboard is quite tight, so it's very hard to fit the entire of the car in it.

8:44

So, we're just proposing widening it by three feet.

8:47

So the shaded, the dark-shaded area, it's the new footprint of the carport we're proposing.

8:53

So extending it three feet to the side and then about nine feet to the back.

8:58

This would give them about a 14 by 22 feet carport or available parking space for their car, enough to open doors, walk around the car, and then also conceal the car for rain or snow.

9:11

In doing so, we are um having to redo three of the Doric columns.

9:19

So these currently there's two of them existing a little bit further to the left.

9:24

So we're shifting them all right, about three feet, and they're all will be new.

9:30

And this also goes hand in hand with um with a point that we're gonna talk about later, which is the tree removal, which some of the overgrown roots are pushing on the footings of those posts, so we would like to eliminate that risk altogether for that.

9:47

Okay, so in terms of finishes, I did bring some samples that they're available for review, starting from the roof.

Discussion Breakdown — Share of Meeting
Historic Preservation█████████████████████████████████████████████49%
Zoning And Land Use█████████████████19%
Engineering And Infrastructure██████████████15%
Procedural███████████12%
Community Engagement██2%
Parking Management██2%
Parks and Recreation1%
Summary of Proceedings

New Rochelle Historical and Landmark Review Board Meeting – April 15, 2026

The Historical and Landmark Review Board (HLRB) met on April 15, 2026, to consider two items: a certificate of appropriateness application for substantial alterations to a historic home at 10 Manhattan Avenue, and a referral from the Planning Board regarding a proposal to convert an existing office building into a place of worship at 3 of the Boulevard. The board heard public testimony and deliberated on materials, design compatibility, and parking impacts.

Public Comments & Testimony

  • Alena Harrison Cowie (70 Hunter Avenue) expressed strong opposition to the use of plastic materials (composite decking, PVC railing, vinyl-clad windows) in a historic district, stating, "a lot of plastic is no longer historic" and urged the board to require all-wood windows on the front elevation.
  • Margaret Chadwick (95 Hamilton Avenue) voiced concerns about allowing vinyl-clad wood windows, noting she had been told aluminum-clad was required; questioned the proposed nine-foot extension of the carport as visually out of scale; and requested that approval documents explicitly list approved brands, colors, and styles to prevent future deviations.
  • Gordon Bell (51 Hamilton Avenue) spoke in support of the homeowners, acknowledged the maintenance burden of wood windows, and encouraged the board to weigh practical durability versus historic integrity. He also advised the applicant to consider removing additional diseased trees for yard usability.

Discussion Items

1. Application HLRB 52-2025 – 10 Manhattan Avenue (Certificate of Appropriateness)

The applicant, represented by Benito Seha (Senior Project Manager), presented a comprehensive plan to: square off shallow-arched first-floor windows, add a third window on the second floor, remove a door and several windows, enlarge the existing carport by 3 feet in width and 9 feet in depth, replace the roof, gutters, deck, railings, front door (re-painted dark blue), and install composite columns and railings. All six existing trees were proposed for removal due to disease or root damage, with ten new coniferous trees to be planted. The board raised several concerns:

  • Don Richards questioned the use of vinyl-clad wood windows on visible facades and suggested matching wood windows for side elevations visible from the street.
  • Rosal Famante asked whether the arched windows on either side of the front door could be retained, citing their consistency with the transom.
  • Leanne Merchant inquired about the choice of vinyl cladding versus aluminum, and noted that composite decking and PVC railings were departures from traditional materials.
  • Jim Fleming requested an arborist report to justify the removal of six trees.
  • Multiple board members expressed a preference for wood over composite materials (columns, deck, railings) and asked the applicant to consider all-wood windows on the front and side elevations. The applicant indicated willingness to revisit material choices and adjourn to address feedback.

2. Planning Board Referral – Application PB 3-2026 (3 of the Boulevard)

The board reviewed a referral from the Planning Board for a proposal to convert an existing non-conforming office building into a place of worship with a 191-person sanctuary. The primary change from a prior application was the addition of a valet parking plan. Board members expressed strong concerns:

  • Rosal Famante and Don Richards stated the valet plan would create a chaotic traffic situation in a residential historic district, with 55 parking spaces in a tight lot with no apparent circulation flow.
  • Benito Seha noted that religious land uses receive legal deference under the Supreme Court, but the board could still relay its concerns.
  • Jim Fleming maintained a neutral position, preferring to let the Planning Board evaluate the details. The board ultimately voted on a recommendation: three members (Famante, Merchant, Fleming) voted neutral, and two (Richards, ?) voted negative. The motion for a neutral recommendation passed.

Key Outcomes

  • 10 Manhattan Avenue Application Adjourned: The board agreed to adjourn the application to the next monthly meeting without a vote, allowing the applicant to address concerns regarding material choices (wood vs. composite, vinyl vs. aluminum cladding), the carport extension, and the arborist report. The applicant will return with revised proposals.
  • Planning Board Referral – Neutral Recommendation: The HLRB voted (3 neutral, 2 negative) to refer the place of worship application to the Planning Board with a neutral recommendation. The board will also convey its members' concerns about the feasibility and neighborhood impact of the valet parking plan.

Meeting Transcript

Good evening, everyone. Welcome to the City of New York Shell Department of Development, Historical and Landmark Review Board. We have a couple of things on the agenda, but first, uh if we have any minutes already, that's item one point one. I don't think we have any for approval tonight. Okay. And then from there, we we do attendance, of course, yes. Yeah, sure. I'm being here. Rosal Famante here. Will Chia Elliott is out. Jim Fleming here. Keith Gordon is out. Leanne Merchant here. Belk is Ray's CUNY. Here. Don Richards. Here. And staff members with us today, Saraya Ben Habib, uh Deputy Building Official, Kevin Kane, Director of Planning and Sustainability, and myself, Benito Seha, Senior Project Manager. Okay, we can start right in. Uh item number two, public hearings, 2.1 application HLRB 52-2025 by Walter Nestler for certificate of appropriateness to construct a below ground pool and install a four-inch black aluminum picket pool, picket pool enclosure fence along with four foot high air green hedging planted outside the fence at 10 Manhattan Avenue, block 825 lot 51. And in our R1 historic zone district, adjourned until further notice, so we're not going to hear that tonight. And finally, there's a little bit also of Spanish revival, so it's a little bit of a blend of all of these. We have the bright wide stucco with the dark trims, which is also similar to the tutor revival, and um the rafter tails, which even though around the time that this house was built, it could also be referenced as like a craftsman, American craftsman architecture. Um you could also uh interpret it as being kind of like the scroll brackets from a Spanish architecture along with the stocco. So these are the proposed elevations. In terms of um the architectural style of the home, we are not proposing to change any of it. Um what we're proposing to change is starting with the windows. The um of the first floor windows have these very shallow elliptical arch. Hello? Okay, so we're planning on squaring those out, and because we don't think it's a feature that it's relevant to the main identity of like the historical identity of this house, and we just want to have a more consistent look throughout the home. So starting with the front elevation, which is the top left in the screen. We are adding a um a center window, and on the second floor, that center, three side-by-side windows. Currently, there's only two, and there's a space in the middle, which seems a little empty, just waiting for something. So we're completing that third window. Then if we move over to the next elevation over, we are removing one window in the master bedroom where we're proposing full height cabinets on the other side, and the same elevation further to the right. We are removing a door that currently leads to nowhere, which is the one in the middle of that wall to the right. And so I think previously there might have been a deck there that was removed. So I don't think that was an original deck from the property. There's no signs to the architecture of the home that it was, so we would like to remove that opening altogether. If we move over to the lower left elevation, which is the back elevation, we are adding a window. Let's see if I can point this. Yeah, so we're adding this window right here, which um it just to center the proposed location of the kitchen sink. Um let me see. So over here on the next over, we are removing very small window on the kitchen and just redoing the opening for the patio door that goes to the side yard, which is actually their main recreational yard since they don't have much space towards the back. Um, and then I think that's about it in terms of window modifications. Make sure. Yeah. So in terms of structural changes, uh the main structural change that we're doing to the exterior is proposing the enlargement of the carport. So, as the Mr. and Mrs.

SUMMARIZED BY OPENPUBLICA AI
TRANSCRIPT VIA PUBLIC VIDEO
openpublica.com