Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The New Rochelle City Council held its regular legislative meeting on October 20, 2026, at 11:15 AM. All council members were present. The meeting covered approval of prior meeting minutes, a contested mid-year budget amendment (Item 7), a lawsuit settlement, and several public hearing items including garbage regulations, school speed zone cameras, property maintenance, and site plan administration.
Good evening and welcome to the October 2026 regular legislative meeting. Madam Clerk, please call the roll. Certainly. Mayor English Herbert is here. Council Member Lopez. Council Member Tarantino here. Council Member Peters. Council Member Asilay. Councilmember K. Okay, here. Thank you. Okay. We're all here. Again, welcome again to the October 20th, 2026. Regular legislative meeting. Our first item on the agenda is the approval of minutes for the regular legislative meeting of Tuesday, July 21st, 2026, and the committee of the whole session held on Tuesday, September 8th of 2026. And I have a motion and a second adopting the minutes, please. Stern and K all in favor say aye. Okay. Any opposed. I think the submission of minutes for the regular legislative meeting, which was held on Tuesday, September 15th, 2026, and the minutes for the committee of the whole session held on Tuesday, October 13, 2026. Items two through 10 are items that we previously moved and seconded to our consent agenda. Um are there any questions or comments on any of these items? Councilman Tarantino. Yeah, I do on um item seven, and what I want to do is I want to do the statement, and I also would like to have voted on separate. Sure. Okay. So let's go through two through six and then I'll come back. That's fine. All right, that's fine. Um items two through six were previously moved for the consent agenda, may have a motion and a second adopting two through six. Please, Stern and K. All in favor say aye. All right. Any opposed. Moving on to item number seven, Councilman Tarantino. Okay, yeah. What I'm what I'm gonna read is it's about budget amendments, the overall, these are my overall comments. This is a highly unusual that we would have a budget amendment with the increases projected revenues. I can't remember ever doing that. Additionally, only the finance commissioner can project revenues. I would like to hear from him about why the projections were wrong and why we need to do this now. In the past, if revenues come in higher, then adjustments are made at the end of the year. Um, you want to respond or you don't want to resolve? We can't commissioner was