NYC Council Governmental Operations Committee Hearing on Community Boards and Ethics Bills – June 22, 2026
NYC Council Governmental Operations Committee Hearing on Community Boards and Ethics Bills – June 22, 2026
The Committee on Governmental Operations, State & Federal Legislation, chaired by Council Member Gale A. Brewer, held an oversight hearing on community board resources and structure, and considered five proposed local laws. Topics included disclosure of AI-generated content in elections, codifying the Staten Island flag, council member appointments to community boards, district manager term limits and removal authority, and prohibiting insider trading on prediction markets by policymakers. Testimony was heard from agency representatives, borough presidents, community board members, district managers, and good government groups. All introductions were heard; some were amended and all were laid over for further consideration.
Public Comments & Testimony
- Community Board Resources and Structure Oversight: Chair Brewer noted community boards are the most local form of government, stressed the importance of institutional knowledge, and expressed concerns about upcoming term limits for board members. She also voiced opposition to giving council members binding appointment power (Int 0322) and to district manager term limits (Int 0501).
- Int 0320-2026 (Staten Island Flag): Sponsor Council Member Frank Morano described the bill as a way to recognize borough identity and make Staten Island feel more part of the city. Amo Micah from the Staten Island Borough President’s office presented the design and symbolism of the flag, which includes historical allegory.
- Int 0322-2026 (Council Member Appointments to Community Boards): Council Member Morano argued the bill would give voters the choice to allow council members binding appointment power over half of community board members, preventing borough presidents from ignoring nominations. Chair Brewer expressed concern that council members lack the staff to properly vet candidates.
- Int 0501-2026 (District Manager Term Limits): A statement from Council Member Natasha Williams was read in support, arguing it would establish clear expectations and accountability. However, overwhelming opposition came from district managers, community board chairs, and the Manhattan Borough President’s office (joined by Bronx and Queens BPs). They argued the bill would politicize the position, undermine institutional knowledge, and create instability—especially as board members themselves face term limits. Several district managers (Susan Stetzer, Mark Diller, Laura Singer, Celestina Leong, Irsa Weatherspoon, etc.) testified that existing charter provisions already give boards authority to hire and fire, and that a four-year term would deter qualified candidates and weaken continuity. Robert Camacho (CB4) stressed that term limits for board members and district managers together would cripple boards.
- Int 0951-2026 (Prediction Markets Insider Trading): Sponsor Council Member Thomas Henry emphasized the need to prohibit public officials from profiting from non-public information via prediction markets. The Conflicts of Interest Board (COIB) testified that existing law (Chapter 68 of the Charter) already prohibits use of confidential information for private gain, and that the bill’s reporting requirements are overly broad and burdensome. They opposed the provision allowing COIB to remove public servants from office and to sanction relatives. Citizens Union and Reinvent Albany also recommended amending existing law rather than creating a separate framework, and cautioned against extending penalties to relatives.
- Int 0012-2026 (AI Disclosure in Elections): The Campaign Finance Board (CFB) supported the shift from a prohibition to a disclosure model, but recommended narrowing the scope to avoid requiring disclosure of innocuous uses (e.g., AI in fundraising emails). CFB noted implementation would require at least a year and significant vendor support. Reinvent Albany called for disclosure on the communication itself and alignment with state law.
- Civic Engagement Commission (CEC): Provided data on training efforts: 29 workshops, 11 topics, 703 registered, 298 attended, and 22 videos with 12,894 views. They discussed collaboration on member term limits transition but took no position on pending bills.
Discussion Items
- The committee reviewed each bill in detail, with debate on scope, enforcement, and alignment with existing laws. Chair Brewer raised practical concerns about vetting and staffing for appointment changes. Council members asked questions about penalties, implementation timelines, and resource needs.
Key Outcomes
- Oversight T2026-2007 (Community Board Resources): Hearing held; item filed.
- Int 0012-2026 (AI Disclosure): Hearing held; amendment proposed and adopted by committee; then laid over.
- Int 0320-2026 (Staten Island Flag): Hearing held; laid over.
- Int 0322-2026 (Council Appointments to Community Boards): Hearing held; laid over.
- Int 0501-2026 (District Manager Terms): Hearing held; amendment proposed and adopted by committee; then laid over.
- Int 0951-2026 (Prediction Markets): Hearing held; laid over (agency rule-making required noted in minutes).
- No final votes were taken; all matters were laid over for future consideration.
Meeting Transcript
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the New York City Council hearing for the Committee on Governmental Operations, State and Federal Legislation. At this time, I'd like to remind everyone to please silence all devices and at no point during the hearing. May you approach the dais. If you wish to testify at today's hearing, please see a sergeant at the back of the room to fill out a testimony slip. Even if you have already registered previously online. Chair, we are ready to begin. Thank you very much. I am Gail Brewer. I am the chair of the governmental operations, state and federal legislation. I want to thank everyone who's here. I know that there are those who are going to be speaking from campaign finance, borough president's office, civic engagement commission, conflicts of interest board, as well as members of the public who are very interested in community boards and other topics. We're going to be talking about community boards. I think you know they're the most local form of government. I certainly know that. They are intentionally designed to give people who live or work in the neighborhood a voice and governing. They provide valuable feedback to agencies and other government bodies on how services are being delivered. They also provide local policymakers with information on how their decisions could affect a local community district. I think I know, I think I've been to more community board members than any other human being I know. Borough presidents, and I was one of them, appoint all community board members. Half of the members must come from nominations made by the local council member or members. Each borough president has their own method for selecting members, but generally applicants must fill out an online application and appear for an interview by a representative from the borough president's office. A 2018 ballot proposal imposed a requirement that borough presidents seek out community board applications from diverse backgrounds. Council members do not directly appoint members, which I think is a good thing. They can only nominate members who then may or may not be appointed by the borough president. Actually, I think that's how it should stay. Community board members are all volunteers, they are unpaid, they're expected to attend monthly board meetings. I used to take people off who did not do that. In addition to serving at least one committee, most of them meet monthly. Board members serve two-year terms. The 2018 ballot proposal also imposed term limits on board members. I thought that was a terrible idea. No members may serve more than four consecutive terms. The first members subject to these new terms will be need to be replaced by 2020-17, which is a brain drain. While this will create room for newer members, it will also mean the loss of long time members with significant knowledge about complex issues, particularly land use. Their duties include processing complaints, presiding over the district service cabinet, and other duties assigned by the board. District managers are responsible for organizing both committee and full board meetings. The Civic Engagement Commission created by the 2018 Charter Revision Commission was formed to provide assistance to community boards. That assistance seemed to come primarily in the form of Zoom trainings designed for community board members with some additional trainings that appear to be designed for the board's executive leadership. There are past trainings that are available on the CEC's website, have included parliamentary proceedings, the budget, land use and equity planning. As a board president, just so you know I did all that. Just so you know. In addition to doing oversight, we will also be hearing five pieces of legislation. We'll be hearing proposed intro number 12A, sponsored by the Speaker, which would require the disclosure of digitally altered content in local elections. Also, intro 320, sponsored by council member Morano, which would codify the official flag of Staten Island. I think that's a good idea. Introduction 322, sponsored by Council Member Morano, which would give council members the power to make appointments at community boards. You know how I feel about that. Intro 501A, sponsored by Councilmember Williams, which will alter the terms of appointment for district managers. I don't like that one.
openpublica.com