STREAMING COPY IN PREPARATION — RECORDING AVAILABLE FROM THE ORIGINAL SOURCE
Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The Norcross City Council held its regular meeting on December 1, 2025, at 6:30 PM in Council Chambers. The meeting covered a wide range of agenda items including multiple public hearings on zoning and historic preservation matters, approval of a consent agenda, board appointments, and a discussion on voting procedures at policy work sessions. All council members were present: Mayor Craig Newton, Mayor Pro Tem Marshall Cheek, Councilmembers Andrew Hixson, Josh Bare, Matt Myers, and Bruce Gaynor.
The Council held a public hearing. The applicant spoke briefly. No public comments in support or opposition were made. A motion to approve with the five recommended conditions (hours of operation M-F 8:30 AM-1:30 PM, office hours M-F 8:00 AM-4:00 PM; comply with state and health department requirements; prohibit peddlers/parking lot sales; repair graffiti/vandalism within 72 hours) passed unanimously.
Staff and Planning & Zoning Board recommended approval with five conditions. The applicant requested removal of conditions 3 and 4 (buffer requirements) noting that a stream buffer variance would be needed separately. After discussion, Council approved the rezoning with the remaining three conditions: general conformance with site plan, 10-foot landscape strip along rights-of-way, and no auto-oriented commercial use. The applicant was advised to submit a separate application for the stream buffer variance. Motion passed unanimously.
The applicant requested withdrawal without prejudice. The Council accepted the withdrawal unanimously.
The applicant (Susan Tanner) requested demolition of a historic contributing structure built in 1920 and construction of a new home. After presentation and opposition testimony (including concerns about historic character and property size), the Council discussed options. A motion to table the item to the January 20, 2026 Policy Work Session passed unanimously.
This was a de novo appeal of the Architectural Review Board's approval of a Certificate of Appropriateness. The appellant (Brady Rhinehart) raised concerns about stormwater, retaining wall, trees, and shared driveway. The applicant’s representatives argued the ARB only reviews architectural standards and offered to conduct a hydrology study. The appellant noted the shared driveway agreement was not in writing. After extensive discussion about the scope of the appeal and the need for more information, a motion to table the item to the December 15, 2025 Policy Work Session passed unanimously.
Staff presented proposed changes to multiple UDO sections to improve clarity and consistency. Councilmember Bare requested that certain sections be tabled for further review (specifically Chapter 100 definitions, Chapter 200 accessory use standards, parking, and nonconforming situations). A motion to approve the amendments as presented, with the addition of Section 202-3 (Accessory Uses or Structures) to the tabled items, and to extend the existing ADU moratorium through the February 2, 2026 Regular Council Meeting (with possibility of earlier dissolution) passed unanimously.
Yeah um two minutes yeah um maybe uh you know we don't see an old man to let's be asking to go on uh anyway sending on the uh need to uh watch your house on the uh here was uh moving it doesn't matter in the public thing uh why uh yeah oh really yeah it's not good. Good afternoon every time I will go ahead and just start and thank you all for being here uh uh as we head to the stretch of the Christmas season. Everybody took time out to uh come and participate in specific government tonight. Well we didn't the uh the meeting to call the order and the communication with council member buyers. Well called for another reflection. Yeah, for the wisdom maybe it's offered team to have this council ensuring that every decision to be up with our community instead of the box and makers, let us find the security focus and both web. Uh uh individual. Thank you, Councilmember. Let's uh move to Roll with the record show that all the president moving on down. We have a really robust to do this, so we're gonna try to get through those expeditions to possible. Presentation of previous minutes. Um regular council meetings executive session and over special column and number one to policy work session and executive session. So have a motion and second to approve the minute says presenting any objection to moving questions. Seeing none all in favor saying aye. I oppose this sending sign. Motion passed. Okay that's uh move down to item F and set the agenda for tonight uh this is the acceptance of the agenda and approval of the consent agenda. I get you to move your eyes down to item L the consent agenda we'll go through each of these and eliminate which you want we would like further conversation or discussion on and we dispute the monitor of consent agenda item. We'll start with number one consideration of adoption adopting of Dupert Highway safe streets for all safety action plan created by the city of Doorville Georgia. Consent number two public safety building Quarterola 911 radio equipment agreement item three cybersecurity grant opportunity requests for approval to move forward with accepting a state and a local cyber security grant. Item four residential decorated decorative street lighting this is to approve continuing the current practice of replacing decorative decorative street lights with similar LED fixtures. Okay. Number five accept uh and appropriate grant funds for Norfolk 7 consent okay sits uh number six the ability to vote on select items at policy work sessions discussion item seven policy on the use of AI discussion number eight adopt a publication of news uh and news letters using a rough draft publication this is to approve a change in the city's newsletter publication to set to a set of mailed online materials distributed by rough graft rough draft in lieu of uh the current monthly newsletter and authorize mayor to sign an agreement that's it okay that was the last item we go over these make sure we are we're clear item one is consent um item two is consent three is consent four is consent five is consent six discussion uh seven is discussion and eight tickets consent yet a motion Mr. Mayor uh I guess I was thinking of that they decided we weren't ready on number seven yet but if that's just directing and the headquarters developing something then I'll I'd like to to agree with that consent on number seven as well council okay seven is now consent okay with that revision chair one or two motion that I'd like to make a motion to accept the agenda and approve the consent agenda second motion is second to accept and approve the consent agenda and you access to motion question seeing done all in favor that we known by raising your right hand saying aye aye opposed at same time motion okay that's um let's move down to item G there are no ceremonial presentations or recognition uh at this point and we'll move to item eight which is a floor opening floor to citizens design to address the council uh the governing authority if you have a uh comment that you would like to bring please come to the voting to be night and also we we do have our public hearing coming up where you will have the opportunity to speak I thought I would just get my over with but now Jeff Hopper 442 P Street Street chair of the architectural review board and I'll gonna be going over a couple of public hearing items that the architectural review board was actually directly involved in and so just for your consideration I just wanted to set forth uh starting with the uh historic demolition uh what we which we approved um of course they met here the qualifications of that one I thought I would just go by novel with but uh Jeff Hopper, 442 Street and Chair of the Architectural Review Board, and we're gonna be going over a couple of uh public hearing items uh that the architectural review board was actually directly involved in, and so on, just for your consideration. I just wanted to put forth uh starting with the uh historic demolition uh what we which we approved.