Speaker numbers apply only to this recording.
The Norcross City Council met Tuesday, September 8, 2026, at 6:30 p.m. in Council Chambers, with Mayor Craig Newton presiding. Mayor Pro Tem Bruce Gaynor was absent; Councilmembers Andrew Hixson, Josh Bare, and Matt Myers were present. The meeting was called to order at 6:32 p.m. All votes taken during the meeting were 3-0 among the three present members unless otherwise noted. The council approved prior minutes, set the agenda, pulled four consent items for discussion, held two public hearings, approved contracts and several funding/policy actions, and ended by moving into executive session at 7:38 p.m.
We're gonna talk about them all or individually? Individually. Okay. Um, my feelings about a lot of uh cash giving has evolved over time. Um I feel these companies and these organizations do great work in our city, and um I just feel that uh it's hard for me as a city council member as a steward of the the funds to give a cash investment. Um it's harder and harder for me to do that. I know it's for consulting assistance, and it does great work for the Latino community here in our um in our city, and I'm excited about that. There's direct jobs benefits, um, and we anticipate that continuing. Uh it's just hard to give a cash cash bonus for not a bonus of cash investment for me. Okay, any other discussion relative to prosperous. Okay, at this time we'll need to entertain a motion. Like I make a motion to deny uh a $15,000 investment with Prospera for FY 2027. We have a motion on the floor. Do we have a second? Second. We have a motion and second to deny. Any objections to moving the questions or further discussion? Seeing none. I just wanted a clarification point. Um this is a question for legal or for staff. Um if we if this is uh denied based on the motions, um would that in some fashions we have uh individuals who are denied and there's a waiting period. Does that apply for this? I'm not sure if this is specific to that or not before I would defer to legal, and I know there are sort of holdouts for denials with respect to zoning, but this is totally different thing. So I would defer to the city's attorney to answer that question. Not sure if there's a uh reading period. I will say that the only thing as you're evaluating each of the um exchanges is if there's any concern about the rotator calls or anything like that, you're just evaluating you know any kind of benefit to the city, but in terms of a weight of the application of it. I don't see that. Okay. But