The City Council of Norman convened on January 20, 2026, to discuss five critical agenda items aimed at funding and managing essential city services. The session featured detailed presentations from bond counsel, public works officials, legal staff, and representatives from City Care regarding the city's financial instruments for street maintenance, housing bond propositions, and homelessness strategies. Key discussions centered on the technical requirements for general obligation bonds, the specifics of a five-year street maintenance plan, a comprehensive overview of homelessness due diligence and the proposed shelter model, a transient guest tax increase, and proposed charter amendments.
Bond Counsel Legal Technicalities (Nate Ellis):
Street Maintenance Bond Program (Scott Sturz, Public Works):
Homelessness Shelter Strategy (Anthony, Shannon Stevenson, Rachel Freeman):
Transient Guest Tax Increase (Kathleen Walker, Mason Olson):
Charter Amendments (City Clerk):
The same thing that happened to the uh the Humphreys massive apartment complex noise got some group of material. Is that what happened today at OAC? I don't know. That's what I was doing. Internal, yeah, they got to it so quick. I think it takes to like have the buildings. Like they can go run and windows. I was hoping it's a question. All that's not for the 31st. Oh, yes, yes. Yep. Okay. Okay. All right, let's go ahead and get started so we can get through these five items. Um it is five o'clock. So we'll go ahead and get started with the city council study session for Tuesday, January 20th, 2026. We have five items on the agenda. And the first one is a discussion with bond council regarding technical aspects of general obligation bonds and applicable state law provisions as they relate to the city's planned voter propositions regarding the issuance of general obligation bonds to fund the street maintenance bond program and construction of a homeless shelter. And uh I think our bond council has to be in Chicache for a meeting uh at six. So if yeah, if you guys want to take it from here. Most of you, I think know Nate, but Nate Ellis has served as our bond counsel for many years, and he regularly advises us on all things bond related, but specifically uh general obligation bonds before we take something to forward to the voters and to counsel for a vote. We work very closely with Nate to draft language uh for the proposition, and so uh the language in the ordinance you see is is is bond language that will get those bonds sold on the market after uh approved by the voters. So we wanted to make Nate available to you all in case you have any questions about that and just to kind of chat about some of the language. Okay, well, good evening, Nate LS Public Finance Law Group. I don't have a formal presentation for you, but I mean, just generally speaking, when we'll go into the voters to issue general obligation bonds, there's a couple of parameters that we have to observe. We um there's there's a couple of different areas of bonds that we issue. What the city has historically done, I don't think exclusively. Come over here, so you can see all our spinning around looking out of the back of your head. Um what we've historically issued is um Article 10, Section 27 bonds, and so the requirements there are that it's a 50% majority vote, uh, which is different from what we see on school bonds, those are Article 10 Constitution Section 26 that requires a 60% vote. And uh the this uh section 27 provision allows cities to do the 50% vote for roads and bridge type projects, so that transportation, and then it can be done for public utilities. Now we think utilities, we think water and sewer lines, things like, but really a public utility is just about everything you can imagine that a city might engage in. So I mean cemeteries or public utilities, homeless shelter, community facilities, things like that. Those are all things that would qualify as as a public utility, but the requirement is the city has to exclusively own the property, has to exclusively own the building, the assets, whatever the case may be. And so that that sometimes presents some long-term challenges because there's not really good ways to you can't buy it and then turn or build it and then turn around and lease it to somebody else for them to operate the facility on your behalf. So uh exclusively owned, and so again, the city's used that numerous times over the years. Uh the I think the most recent one we did, the municipal um complex improvements that were actually voted in 2008, and we finally were able to issue in 2020. Uh, that's an example of community facilities uh that we did here as well. So um so we have to identify what um what we're specifically issuing. We've got language in there about it be to exclusively own or exclusively owned by the city, and you see we don't have that in streets because why streets aren't really owned by the city, they're in right of way, so it's actually owned by the property owners, so that's why there's that exception. And then we have to go in and we have to identify with respect to each uh proposition that we have. We have to identify how we're going to spend at least 70% of the funds. So if we have $35 million in streets, we need to identify where we're going to spend at least 75% of that or 70% of that number. Norman historically has taken the approach of let's identify where we're going to spend 100%. I mean, I think that's a good practice, but that's that's not that's more than what's actually required. And then the projects that you specifically list, you have to complete those projects, and you need to spend at least 85% of what you said you were going to spend on those projects. Now, if you get grant funds that come in from other locations that can offset that and maybe change that dynamic a little bit, but generally you've got to you've got to identify what you're gonna build, you're gonna identify generally how much it's gonna cost, and then you gotta spend the money on that. So you're pretty restricted, um, uh much more so than you would be with sales tax proceeds or utility revenues and and kind of picking what what you want to utilize those for as far as projects. Um just because people ask, sidewalks don't fall under that and require a 60% vote to do a sidewalk bond program. Yeah, to do exclusively a sidewalk uh program, yeah, really pro and the problem that we get into is that kind of exclusive. Yeah, it's that exclusive ownership.