Norman City Council Study Session on Transit, Mall Agreement, Budget, and Homelessness – May 19, 2026
Norman City Council Study Session – May 19, 2026
The Norman City Council held a study session on May 19, 2026, to discuss four major topics: an update on the One Transit commuter rail program, a proposed sales tax rebate agreement with Sooner Mall, the proposed FY 2027 enterprise funds budget (sanitation, water, water reclamation), and interim solutions for homelessness. Councilmembers heard presentations from One Transit representatives, city staff, and the mall manager, and engaged in extended deliberation on shelter capacity and fire safety improvements.
One Transit Commuter Rail Update
- Marion Hutchinson, Norman’s representative on the One Transit (formerly RTA) board, presented a high-level update on the regional commuter rail project connecting Edmond, Oklahoma City, and Norman. The project has been in planning since 2005; the RTA was formed in 2019 by the three member cities.
- Hutchinson noted that the Oklahoma City metro population is projected to grow from 1.5 million to 2 million by 2040, and Norman from about 130,000 to 175,000. Regional transit ridership (Embark, CityLink) is far below peer metros due to the lack of a regional system. He cited Salt Lake City’s success: over 40 million annual riders on its commuter rail, with $10 billion in private transit-oriented development (TOD) since 1999.
- The proposed first phase is a north-south commuter rail line using the BNSF corridor, with three stations in Norman (Tecumseh, downtown, and south Norman near Highway 9), plus a game-day station at OU. Initial service would be 12 round trips per day, with potential for 24 round trips. The system would connect major employers, universities, sports venues, and entertainment districts.
- Estimated infrastructure cost: $500–600 million, with half expected from federal FTA grants. Cities may choose to fund enhanced station features. BNSF would guarantee service and operate the trains; upgrades to double-track and sidings would also benefit freight.
- Economic benefits highlighted: every dollar invested in public transit yields a 5:1 return. Grapevine, Texas saw a 23% citywide sales tax increase and 95% property value increase near stations after commuter rail opened.
- Councilmembers asked about cost comparison to the proposed turnpike expansion, ridership projections, and station improvements. Several expressed support, noting the need to address congestion and attract young workers.
Sooner Mall Sales Tax Rebate Agreement
- City staff presented a draft agreement for a sales tax rebate to Sooner Mall, consistent with the term sheet previously approved by council. The mall manager, Derek Caldwell, arrived later to answer questions.
- The rebate is capped at $300,000 annually, based on incremental sales tax growth above a pre-pandemic baseline (three-year average has declined for three consecutive years). The rebate is only paid if the mall achieves sales growth; if no growth, no rebate. The term is 11 years: an initial period with a potential $60,000 first year, escalating to $300,000 at roughly $14 million in gross sales increase, followed by two three-year renewal options at council’s discretion.
- The agreement includes a provision for a city police substation or other city use in approximately 1,800–2,000 square feet, subject to mall management approval. Councilmembers discussed the need for security, potential for a hotel on the property, and the mall ownership’s financial strength (one of the largest mall ownership groups in the country).
- Council consensus was to place the agreement on the next regular meeting agenda for a vote. Councilmember Kirby raised concerns about the mall owner’s track record with other properties (e.g., the former Perfect Swing hotel), but staff noted the owner’s strong portfolio. The agreement uses only discretionary sales tax, not public safety or capital sales tax.
FY 2027 Enterprise Funds Budget Discussion
- Finance staff (Kim and Clint) presented the proposed FY 2027 budgets for the sanitation, water, and water reclamation (wastewater) enterprise funds. These funds are ratepayer-supported, not subsidized by general taxes.
- Sanitation Fund: Current rate of $17.20/month (including $3 for recycling) has not increased in 15 years. The city processes over 100,000 tons of trash and 60,000 tons of yard waste annually. A cost-of-service study by Rafelis is underway; staff anticipates recommending a $2/month increase. Fund balance projected at $5.57 million for FY 2027. Capital projects include a compost facility scale house. Discussion included recycling participation (~80% of single-family homes), challenges in Ward 5 (rural area without curbside recycling due to density), and potential for multifamily recycling pilot.
- Water Fund: Produces over 5 billion gallons annually. Current rates (inverted block structure) have not been raised since 2023; last successful increase was after two prior failed votes. Norman’s rate for 10,000 gallons is the second-lowest among 16 benchmark cities (only Ardmore lower). Major capital projects include a $16 million meter infrastructure program, groundwater disinfection, and water line replacements. Water loss is being reduced with new automatic meters; estimated reads dropped from 20,000 to 300. Fund balance projected at $10.3 million.
- Water Reclamation Fund: Current rates have not increased since 2013; Norman has the lowest sewer rates among 16 benchmark cities. A $5/month sewer maintenance fee (approved in 2001) funds capital projects; has never been increased. Fund balance projected at just over $4 million. Major projects include dewatering centrifuges and aeration basin blowers (partially funded by $5 million federal grant). No new capital projects requested for FY 2027 due to limited funds.
- Total utility comparison: For 10,000 gallons water/sewer/trash, Norman residents pay $102/month, the lowest among 16 cities; average is $167. Only Norman, Ardmore, and Newcastle lack a separate stormwater fee. Councilmember Grant suggested considering a stormwater fee to support infrastructure for densification.
- Public hearing on the budget is scheduled for the next regular council meeting on May 26, with adoption on June 9.
Interim Solutions for Homelessness
- City staff (Lance Harper) presented cost estimates for improving the current temporary shelter (on Gray Street) while a new shelter is under construction (expected completion ~18–24 months). Two options were discussed:
- Full sprinkler system for the three-building complex (109, 111, 113): estimated $125,000–200,000 (including underground riser work, engineering, and potential asbestos abatement when penetrating walls). Lead time of 6–7 months due to contractor backlog. This option would address fire safety and permit compliance.
- Expansion of men’s dorm space (in the 109 building): create ~1,800 sq. ft. for 30–35 additional beds at $35,000–45,000 (using in-house labor and salvaged HVAC). Does not include fire suppression; fire marshal would require a third-party occupancy determination. Could be completed in ~90 days.
- Councilmember Gainsbury proposed that private donations could fund the sprinkler system to reduce city expense. Councilmember Grant supported expansion to increase bed capacity, noting the current shelter houses 52, and that safety improvements are needed. Councilmember Kirby opposed expansion, citing firefighter safety, the shelter’s non-compliance with fire code, and the lack of immediate solutions for encampments. He suggested using temporary structures (e.g., bunkhouses) at other locations.
- City staff noted that the state Department of Mental Health has become less cooperative after recent negative news (an alleged death at an encampment, still under investigation by OSBI). The option to use state land near Food & Shelter appears off the table.
- Council discussed the 238 unsheltered individuals counted during a cold night (point-in-time) versus 400–500 unique individuals served per year. Service providers emphasized that 60–70% of long-term unsheltered individuals may not accept shelter due to rules or mistrust.
- An RFI for nonprofits to provide alternative shelter or services is being prepared. Staff is also drafting an ordinance to address encampments.
- No formal vote was taken; council directed staff to continue work on both options and the RFI. Some councilmembers expressed willingness to support expansion and sprinklers if privately funded, while others wanted more immediate temporary solutions like tents or use of church property.
Key Outcomes
- One Transit: None – informational update. Council expressed support and will consider future funding referendums (expected within 9–12 months). Councilmembers were invited to visit operating systems in Salt Lake City or Fort Worth.
- Sooner Mall Agreement: Council consensus to place the draft rebate agreement on the May 26 regular meeting agenda for a vote. Staff will circulate meeting minutes from earlier EDAB discussions.
- FY 2027 Budget: No vote; public hearing May 26, adoption June 9. Council noted the need to consider rate increases for sanitation and water reclamation based on cost-of-service studies due this summer.
- Homelessness: No formal decision. Council directed staff to:
- Proceed with developing the RFI for service providers.
- Continue exploring the 109 expansion and sprinkler options, with preference for privately funded sprinklers.
- Bring forward a proposed ordinance on encampments.
- Engage with state officials and potential private property owners for temporary solutions.
Meeting Transcript
All right. So Gary Bell. Okay, we'll go ahead and get started with the study session, City Council study session for Tuesday, May 19th, 2026. We have four items on the agenda. The first one is an update on the one transit commuter rail program. And we have one of our representatives for Norman, Marion Hutchinson here to uh lead us in that discussion. Thank you very much. And um, this will be a high level view. I was given a dance in 15 minutes uh directive. So I'll cover it. And if you have questions, we can talk again, or I'm happy to meet with anybody separately. So the first thing I want to say is we've been working on regional transit for 20 years since 2005, and I've been involved since 2010. And Norman has led the way on this. So many former mayors, all our former mayors, so many council members have worked on this. Uh, so it's something that isn't new, it's just been in the works and kind of finally gotten to the point where we're almost ready to get it done. So we'll just kind of go through this pretty quickly. Uh, one transit, which was formerly the regional transportation authority of central Oklahoma, was created by the member cities back in 2019. So that's Oklahoma City Edmund and Norman. So we're now an independent governmental agency. We represent you. I and Chuck Thompson are your representatives on our board. And you know, our mission is to uh develop a regional transit system for the Oklahoma City Metro, and we've got great partnerships with the federal and state governments and all of the local uh leaders as well as our current transit operators. So this is really all about growth. And Oklahoma City, we all know it's just it's it's been very successful. And when I say Oklahoma City, I mean the metro, Norman. Uh it continues to grow. We've had a lot of success on uh economic development and our populations booming. The metro is supposed to reach uh by 2040 about two million in population, and we're at 1.5 now, so that's a tremendous change. Uh and Norman's population is projected to be at 175, believe it or not. So, you know, we're not gonna stop growing. And the one of the fastest growing regions in the country, uh and you'll notice like I'm gonna talk about Salt Lake in a little bit, we're right behind Salt Lake. So the big problem with growth, and all the benefits are good, but all you inevitably you hit the point of congestion. And when congestion gets to the point it affects mobility, then you're affecting the quality of life, but you're also affecting economic development, and we need to be able to connect the region and move our citizens. Over on the left is Oklahoma Cities, that was last year's total transit ridership, and that includes uh the embark system in Norman, uh City Link, that's it. And the reason we're not with our peer cities is we do not have a regional transit system. It's as simple as that. Uh but we're at that point where all other cities kind of get to hit 1.5 million in the metro, you've got to start looking at transportation options. So this isn't about trying to make people not drive their cars, it's just an addition to your transportation system in almost all large metros. You've been to Salt Lake, Dallas. This is the this is your uh next transportation alternative is transit. And why now? So we've you know we've just got accelerating growth in the whole metro, and everybody's I'm sure driven up and down I-35. I just drove back this afternoon from Edmund at 3:30 and it was packed. And so you've got delay in uh per commuter in annual hours that's accelerating. So it's just something for our workforce for mobility of our residents that we've got to address. Uh and one critical thing is ODOT's a big supporter of ours now because I mean they've adamantly told us they're out of ride away on I-35. So it is not, it's not going to get widened. And if you think about it now, think about it, you know, in 10 more years. So transit improves mobility, which is is critical for those that need transit, but a big part of the regional transit system, if it's done right, is creating choice riders, and those are the people that have a car but decide they'll use transit because it saves them time, it gets them where they need to go, and it saves them the cost of fuel and all of that. Uh enhances quality of life.
openpublica.com