City Council Study Session: OU Architecture Partnership and Fire Station Study - August 4, 2026
City Council Study Session: OU Architecture Partnership and Fire Station Study - August 4, 2026
The Norman City Council held a study session on August 4, 2026, to discuss two major items: a partnership with the University of Oklahoma School of Architecture to build a shelter at Reeves Park using student labor, and a comprehensive fire station study outlining future facilities, relocation, and staffing needs over the next decade.
Discussion Items
Partnership with OU School of Architecture
- Presenter: Brian Bloom, professor in the Construction Science Division, along with Parks Director Jason Olsen.
- Program: The American School of Design program (10th year) pairs fifth-year architecture and fourth-year construction science students to design and build real projects for community partners. Student labor is donated 100%; the client provides materials and heavy equipment.
- Project Scope: A shelter at Reeves Park, part of the TSEC KidSpace Playground rebuild (funded by a $600,000 T-SET grant). The shelter will match the new playground architecture. The city will provide a $75,000 material budget plus a 10% admin fee. Typical cost for a similar shelter is $250,000–$300,000; this partnership saves an estimated 50–75%.
- Timeline: Academic calendar: start in August 2026, design concept by September/October, foundation work by December, finish by April 2027, with an open house in May.
- Positions: Councilmembers expressed strong support. Councilmember Dixon noted that he participated in the program decades ago and praised the quality. Councilmember Gansbury highlighted that a previous OU-built structure (MSTAP building on Robinson) served the city well. Councilmember Grant suggested a brass plaque to recognize the students. The project fits within the Reeves Park Master Plan and Norman Forward surplus funds.
Fire Station Study
- Presenters: Fire Chief King, Deputy Chief Chesser, Assistant Chiefs Smith, Roaning, and Training Chief Mitchell, plus architect Justin Myers from Martinez Architecture.
- Context: The last fire station (Station 9) was built in 2013. Since then, call volume has increased 61% (from ~13,000 in 2013 to over 21,000 in 2025). The 2025 Matrix public safety study identified a high-priority need for 78 additional suppression personnel. Current stations are understaffed; for example, Ladder 2 runs with a single driver.
- Key Projects and Costs (escalated):
- Station 5 Relocation: From 168th & Hwy 9 (near city border) to Clear Bay & Hwy 9 (federal land under Dept. of Interior). Voter-approved under PSST2. Estimated cost ~$12M (excluding apparatus and land). Timeline: potential movement by summer 2027 (FY27-28).
- Station 10 (New): Preferred location at Saxon Park (city-owned) on Cedar Lane. Recommended in 2025 study as immediate need due to 60% projected growth east on Hwy 9. Estimated cost ~$13.5M. No staffing identified.
- Station 1 Relocation: Four options considered. Preferred by staff is Santa Fe & Main (requires land acquisition from AT&T and First Baptist Church). Integrated three-story design with admin on third floor. Cost ~$26M. Alternative: keep current location (415 E Main) and rebuild, or move admin to Station 7 campus (north base area) – that would reduce Station 1 cost but increase campus cost (~$12.8M for prevention/training at north base).
- Station 11 (New): Recommended at Tecumseh & 24th (preferred) or Franklin & 24th. Cost ~$13.5M. Serves northeast and would reduce gaps.
- Station 12 (Future): At 108th & Franklin area. Cost ~$11M. Not urgent.
- North Base Training Campus: Includes new burn tower, fleet storage, dirty classroom, and prevention/training facility. Cost ~$12.8M including a potential third story for admin.
- Positions and Debate:
- Councilmember Still questioned prioritizing Station 1 over Station 11, noting Station 1’s calls often head east (Ward 6) and that $26M for a relocation could instead fund Station 11 plus staffing.
- Councilmember Dixon advocated for Stations 11 and 12 over Station 1, emphasizing the 78-personnel shortage and the need for better coverage in northeast.
- Councilmember Kirby asked about satellite stations (smaller, cheaper) for rural areas; Chief King said full companies of four are needed for effective response.
- Councilmember Bruce and others discussed ISO rating (currently Class 1 citywide, Class 3 in rural areas due to water distribution) and the importance of maintaining it.
- Turnpike (OTA) Discussion: Chiefs explained that the proposed turnpike extension lacks adequate interchanges for emergency access. Council consensus (heads nodded) to invite OTA representatives to the August 11 pre-council conference.
- Staffing and Funding: City Manager Pyle noted that an eighth-cent sales tax (if transit tax sunsets) could fund about 45 firefighters per year. A go-bond could cover capital costs (buildings, apparatus, land). A combined bond of ~$150M over 20 years would cost the average homeowner about $14/month.
- Next Steps: Chief King will contact the Dept. of Interior about Station 5 land. Staff will bring a similar presentation on police facilities. Council will explore billing third parties for accident responses and possible bond packages.
Key Outcomes
- Consensus on OTTA Invitation: Council agreed to invite OTA to the August 11 pre-council conference to discuss turnpike interchanges and public safety.
- Consensus on Accident Billing: Council directed staff to explore a third-party billing program for fire/EMS responses to accidents, especially those involving out-of-state drivers.
- Priority for Fire Station 5: Council emphasized that Station 5 relocation (voter-approved, PSST2) should proceed as quickly as possible, with land discussions beginning immediately.
- Police Facilities Presentation: Staff will bring a similar study on police station needs to council in the coming months.
- No Formal Votes: As a study session, no resolutions or ordinances were adopted. All decisions are directional.
Meeting Transcript
Did you like write out the script? Brian has not seen the PowerPoint presentation during the presentation. Every slide is going to be a good thing. All right, everybody, we'll go ahead and get started with the uh since it is 5 30. We'll go ahead and get started with the city council study session for Tuesday, August 4th, 2026. Welcome everybody that's here in person and uh watching or listening at home. We have two items on the agenda. The first one is a discussion with the University of Oklahoma School of Architecture Construction Science. Um School of Architecture Construction Science regarding student projects in city parks. And we have Parks Director here to lead us in that discussion. Thank you, Mayor. Thank you, Council, for letting us present today. Jason Olsen, Director of Parks and Recreation, and I got Brian Bloom with the University of Oklahoma School of Architecture here with uh with me. We're gonna talk uh really quickly about a potential partnership between uh the School of Architecture and Norman Parks, uh very exciting thing that has a lot of possibilities, I think uh beyond just this year. But uh we're gonna um try to hop into this as a possible partnership with um them um helping us with things like shelters, stages or future uh build projects that we can do inside parks. So I um I'll let Brian talk a little bit about the the uh American School of Design that's at OU. Cool. Thanks, Jason. Thank you everybody for the time today and tonight, I guess whatever time it is. Um I teach in the construction science division and the school of architecture. Uh I'm a professor and uh I teach several classes there. One of which uh is a program that's called the American School Design Bill, which is sort of uh homage to Bruce Goff and some people that were doing some things in and around Norman several decades ago. But we we run a program, this will be our 10th year now, um, where we um task fifth year architecture students to um work with a community partner as well as a handful of uh fourth year or senior construction science students to build a real project for um uh for a partner. So we've worked for nonprofits, we've worked for uh tries, we've worked for schools, um, and so our our program is is parallel to uh the school calendar. So our clients uh sort of come to us in the summer, uh, we meet directly uh with them, and then by the time we show up in the fall, the students are sort of ready to launch into some problem that we've created or some facility for them. So this is uh a real uh project. A lot of them have never realized one of their designs before or even built something physically with their hands, so it's it's it's certainly an educational model. Uh not unique, like there's other schools that do this. Uh Auburn probably had the flagship program with Rural Studio. Um University of Colorado has a program, but we we've been doing this for nine years. We kind of resurrected an old program that used to exist in our college. Um but but we start in September. Uh we work uh pretty quickly to come up with a design concept for our clients. Uh, and then generally by September, beginning of October, we've settled in on what we're gonna do, and we're we're starting uh work. And so we start foundation work in the fall, and then um by the end of December, we sort of got foundations and slab done, and then the spring we come back and finish uh finish the build up the build out. Um we we exclude things that we like can't do from a licensing standpoint, like mechanical electrical plumbing. Our projects are typically uh uh we scroll through scroll through some of these um kind of like foundation shell uh structure, so things like um um pergolas, greenhouses, outdoor classrooms. Uh we've done fully enclosed projects as well. But um, you know, our squeak we we kind of bite stuff off that's in the 600 to 1200 square feet scale, something that we know we can deliver in a semester's time. Uh the model is that we uh donate the students labor uh 100%. Uh there's no no labor cost to our clients. Um the clients typically provide material and any heavy rental equipment that we would need to execute the work. Um and and and generally it's it's really been overall positive process. Our students are like super hyped and stoked to get to work on this. You'll probably not find more motivated like builders coming fresh out of school and wanting to see something get done. Um and then sometimes our clients will have things they want to add after, um, and we kind of accommodate things like that. But generally, um we we've done a range of project scopes and scales, anything from like 10 or 15,000 the first year to uh 80 or 90,000. That sort of that's kind of the range of projects that we've done. We we typically like people come to us with bigger projects, but we can't generally get them done in two semesters. So this definitely has to sort of start and finish during the school calendar year.
openpublica.com